This better not become a trend GS

I am not here to make bias claims at gamespot, after all they gave MGS4 a 10/10 and that is an exclusive so I got no beef with them about that but to they think that the PS3 is less important that the 360 or somthing.

They waited 5 days or so to give the PS3 version of DBZ: Burst Limit the EXACT same score as the 360 version and now one version of Battle field: Bad Company is reviewed and not the other. I could understand if it was like BlackSite: Area 51 where they the PS3 version and The 360 version came out at diffrent times and The PS3 version was never reviewed but to have both the games I mentioned earlier come out on the same day raises questions..

I sure their is a reason this is happeneing that doesn't involve a conspiracy theory against Sony and the PS3 but I just want it to stop.

It's just reviews. Who cares. If you like the game then buy it.LuckyLy

I've learned to cope with GS's pattern of releasing new news and reviews that are linked to their 360 section. most of their news on the ps3 involves sony losing money every year, its poor console sales, etc.

I've also learned that IGN seems less "bias" to the PS3 like GS is, and that their reviews are actually out on time, and not having us have to wait a week just to know a game sucked or not.

its harder for them to review because of teh Blu Ray lolpsn_Jaimzl

:|

its harder for them to review because of teh Blu Ray lolpsn_Jaimzl

This. And GS arent "biased" they gave MGS4 a 10 for christs sake.

It's just reviews. Who cares. If you like the game then buy it.LuckyLy

Yep.

[QUOTE="psn_Jaimzl"]its harder for them to review because of teh Blu Ray lolTheGTAvaccine

This. And GS arent "biased" they gave MGS4 a 10 for christs sake.

How could they not? They would look biased if they gave it anything other than thay since other websites gave it a perfect rating.

its harder for them to review because of teh Blu Ray lolpsn_Jaimzl

[QUOTE="psn_Jaimzl"]its harder for them to review because of teh Blu Ray lolTheGTAvaccine

This. And GS arent "biased" they gave MGS4 a 10 for christs sake.

Yes. As TC stated, that isn't their problem. Read the post for christs sake.

I am not here to make bias claims at gamespot, after all they gave MGS4 a 10/10 and that is an exclusive so I got no beef with them about that but to they think that the PS3 is less important that the 360 or somthing

Sony_Soldier78

If it's the exact same review then why not just read the 360's review.

Or you could hope they make a universal review and release it for both consoles. I honestly don't care about GS reviews unless they are a PS3 game that would make the forums go mad.;)

i don't know sometimes they seem bias like the heading for the news that kojima didn't get a million sales on the first day for mgs4, but they actually did also they only said japan not other countries.

Gamespot is weird. I had a topic like this once about MGS and GTA getting 10 in a short period. There was up to 80 replies in the topic only 10 minutes later. And as i was gonna respond to a reply, i mentioned X360 only once. Then the topic got closed. U should mentioned the 360 least possibly in this topic or their take it away with a lame excuse like "the topic belongs to the system wars forums".I agree 100% with u that Gamespot indeed is more interested in the 360. Look at the top games list. PS3 got so few in the top lists and many games get underrated. The 360 get's it's games reviewed days before release and if they wouldn't of came out with the MGS review the time they did, i would've snapped.

Sorry if u can't understand the whole message right,wrote it fast as hell.

Gamespot are biased, look at OBLIVION every website including gamespot themselves said the PS3 version had less loading issues, smoother framerate, better textures etc. Yet they still give the 360 OBLIVION a better scoresmeags11

I agree completely. great game by the way.

boo freaking hoo. hopefully they lock this topictgschmidt