**UNOFFICIAL PS2 on PS3 Graphic Problem**

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for KaptainKernal
KaptainKernal

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 KaptainKernal
Member since 2006 • 1787 Posts
**UNOFFICIAL PS2 ON PS3 GRAPHIC PROBLEM**

Many of you who have just purchased a PS3 and currently own a HDTV This is what happened:

All of you know that the PS3 is backward compatible and probly sold your PS2 when you got your PS3, then you pop in a PS2 game that does not support Progressive Scan (Now known from here on out as ProScan) and to your horror you learn it looks terrible. It is not your TV's fault or your games fault. This lies in a error that the PS3 causes. Here is what happens:

PS2 game running without ProScan at 480i

As you can see it is jagged and not smooth.

Now we take every other forth quadrent and cut it out.

Now lets flip the quadrent.

Put back into place.

It fits smoothly, AMAZING.

The problem is in two half:

1. The PS3 flips every forth quadrent and misplaces them. So any game running in 480i ON A HDTV will have these misplaced quadrents. Some PS2 games support ProScan. This enables the games to be in Progressive format. Such as 480p, 525p, 720p. It will say in the manual, back of the box, or in the options menu if a paticualr game supports this: Here is a list of all ProScan Enabled Games on PS2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Progressive_Scan_PS2_Games

If the game, such as Metal Gear Solid: Snake Eater does not support ProScan and only supports 480i then this firmware error will make the games look terrible.

Here is a larger example:
Running PS2 game on PS3 in 480i


Now the same game on the same system on the same HDTV only with ProScan in 480p


See the difference.

(Following Issue has not been proven and may be factually incorrect)
2. There is no scaler support for PS3 so basically this means the games can actually look better then they already do using ProScan. Most notably the 360 uses this so thats why some xbox games look better on the 360. Alos this scaller issue effects people with 480i/1080i HDTV's. Sony has stated it is working on resolving the issue.
(End of Speculational observations)

Big Thanks to Flumshid for bringging this issue to light. All the pictures origionate from the thread at this link:

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=808212&view=by_date_ascending&page=1

And thank you to all contributors to that thread for supporting it. Make the gamers voices heard.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a serious problem and needs to be adressed, and to Gamespot members keep this thread alive till it gains a sticky status. The gamers need to know and this would end hundreds of pointless threads on gamespot. Thankyou this has been KaptainKernal.


MOD: Sticky please this is important.

Avatar image for fallendamnation
fallendamnation

5981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 fallendamnation
Member since 2004 • 5981 Posts
Can this be fixed via firmware?
Avatar image for KaptainKernal
KaptainKernal

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 KaptainKernal
Member since 2006 • 1787 Posts
Yes. This isnt a hardware issue.
Avatar image for T-Zone
T-Zone

4525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 T-Zone
Member since 2003 • 4525 Posts
The Ps3 will be fixed ALL through updates...
Avatar image for fallendamnation
fallendamnation

5981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 fallendamnation
Member since 2004 • 5981 Posts
Yes. This isnt a hardware issue.KaptainKernal
ok thats good then
Avatar image for zenerik
zenerik

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 zenerik
Member since 2006 • 317 Posts
Interesting. Thanks for the information.
Avatar image for KaptainKernal
KaptainKernal

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 KaptainKernal
Member since 2006 • 1787 Posts
bump
Avatar image for choasgod
choasgod

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 choasgod
Member since 2005 • 5710 Posts
Nice post ...
   I wonder though if it affects PAL PS2 games as PAL games are slighlt different to NTSC games ...
Avatar image for blurrd
blurrd

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 blurrd
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
I was observing this today after I transferred my ps2 data onto my ps3. I tried Tomb Raider Legend, Justice League, and Kingdom Hearts 2. I have to say, i'm really disappointed in Sony for not fixing this issue. Both Tomb Raider and Justice League looked really smooth on my PS2, but on the ps3, even Tomb raider doesn't run on 525p. It used to on the ps2, but on the ps3 it looks like its running on 480p with all the jaggies and polygonal textures.
Avatar image for RahKayne
RahKayne

3436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 RahKayne
Member since 2003 • 3436 Posts
**UNOFFICIAL PS2 ON PS3 GRAPHIC PROBLEM**

Many of you who have just purchased a PS3 and currently own a HDTV This is what happened:

All of you know that the PS3 is backward compatible and probly sold your PS2 when you got your PS3, then you pop in a PS2 game that does not support Progressive Scan (Now known from here on out as ProScan) and to your horror you learn it looks terrible. It is not your TV's fault or your games fault. This lies in a error that the PS3 causes. Here is what happens:

PS2 game running without ProScan at 480i

As you can see it is jagged and not smooth.

Now we take every other forth quadrent and cut it out.

Now lets flip the quadrent.

Put back into place.

It fits smoothly, AMAZING.

The problem is in two half:

1. The PS3 flips every forth quadrent and misplaces them. So any game running in 480i ON A HDTV will have these misplaced quadrents. Some PS2 games support ProScan. This enables the games to be in Progressive format. Such as 480p, 525p, 720p. It will say in the manual, back of the box, or in the options menu if a paticualr game supports this: Here is a list of all ProScan Enabled Games on PS2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Progressive_Scan_PS2_Games

If the game, such as Metal Gear Solid: Snake Eater does not support ProScan and only supports 480i then this firmware error will make the games look terrible.

Here is a larger example:
Running PS2 game on PS3 in 480i


Now the same game on the same system on the same HDTV only with ProScan in 480p


See the difference.

(Following Issue has not been proven and may be factually incorrect)
2. There is no scaler support for PS3 so basically this means the games can actually look better then they already do using ProScan. Most notably the 360 uses this so thats why some xbox games look better on the 360. Alos this scaller issue effects people with 480i/1080i HDTV's. Sony has stated it is working on resolving the issue.
(End of Speculational observations)

Big Thanks to Flumshid for bringging this issue to light. All the pictures origionate from the thread at this link:

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=808212&view=by_date_ascending&page=1

And thank you to all contributors to that thread for supporting it. Make the gamers voices heard.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a serious problem and needs to be adressed, and to Gamespot members keep this thread alive till it gains a sticky status. The gamers need to know and this would end hundreds of pointless threads on gamespot. Thankyou this has been KaptainKernal.


MOD: Sticky please this is important.

KaptainKernal


there are threads like this already, not much of a problem, because

It's been proven that although people play PS2 games on PS3, but many people dont or dont care?
Serious problem, no.
BTW anything 480i looks bad on any hdtv.  For example TV.
PS3 is a hardware purest beast.  Instead of an emulator, like 360 (which turns out to be good for them), it has a PS2 chip right on the board (just an example , I'm not stating hte PS2 chip has anything to do with it),  so i can see why something like this happens.

The "scaler issue" (?) is not Sony's fault,  most latest models of hdtvs supports multiple resolutions.  However if the devs make the game support 720p  and not 1080i;     since when did you computer monitor when you turn up your resolution to something it can't handle upscale it to a higher resolution?  it doesn't, it goes to the next best one.

"There is no scaler support for PS3 so basically this means the games can actually look better then they already do using ProScan. Most notably the 360 uses this so thats why some xbox games look better on the 360"

What?  Progressive scan looks better than interlaced anywayz
What does that have to do with the 360 games looking better, it's not the resolutions its' the textures, and the way they ported the PS3 games from 360 etc.  PS3 does the same resolutions as 360.

Next I would like to ask you scaler issue?
Resolution  scaling ?
Or scanning?  Cause the resolution 1080i is the same res as 1080p,  it's just one is interlaced so it's every other, and one's progressive so it's pretty much close, if not full

Avatar image for regulator_23
regulator_23

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 regulator_23
Member since 2005 • 168 Posts
bump
Avatar image for d_agra
d_agra

1777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 d_agra
Member since 2003 • 1777 Posts

the fact that PS3 backward compatability was one of the system selling points,leads me to believe that sony should have done enough to fix this problem. I am not bashing or anything but they have done tests on backward compatability when building the console and they know that they had issues backward playability and they said nothing about it. They did state that 99% of the games are working but they didnt say anything about the quality of the 99% games working. Its been a month now and this firmware should be priority for sony specially with the lack of games for PS3 people will go back to their PS2 games, Sony should have predicted that.

There is 3 months for the UK launch, i am curious if they will fix this big bug or not!I am also suprise they havent answered concerns from consumers

Quite disappointed in sony

Avatar image for Ontario21
Ontario21

374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 Ontario21
Member since 2004 • 374 Posts
I am waiting for a Fix to this issue, I hope it will be addressed. Because Sony pushes backwards compatibility as a bonus to increase the number of game titles playable to this system. 
Avatar image for Sgt_Phan
Sgt_Phan

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Sgt_Phan
Member since 2006 • 819 Posts
dat kool if they update it....... mayne y they dont just fiurin out all this before they sellin the system?..... nowonder i play my socom3 the other day they dont look as gud as on PS2
Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
now that's a nice, non-fanboyish, write-up.
Avatar image for CaptainCrazy
CaptainCrazy

6856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#16 CaptainCrazy
Member since 2002 • 6856 Posts
and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.
Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.CaptainCrazy
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.
Avatar image for ogie_s
ogie_s

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 ogie_s
Member since 2003 • 218 Posts
[QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.eclipsed4utoo
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.



Too true that. It's amazing how much PS3 bashing has been going on considering that 1) out of the box the system works well with an easy to use interface (I had a 20 and now a 60 and both worked perfectly), 2) plays practically every PS1 and PS2 game (and actually lets you use your old saves BTW - my 360 wants me to replay Halo and Halo 2 from the beginning - thank god Microsoft didn't put out Front Mission 3rd or there goes 143 hours of gameplay up in smoke), 3) is actually a good deal when you total up all the hardware, 4) already has one GREAT game (RFOM) and a bunch of good ones with more on the horizon, 5) is amazingly quiet, and 6) is one insanely good-looking bit of kit.

If it weren't for all the hype, that's not too shabby for a new console. It IS just 1 month after the thing went on sale after all. Let's all have a little more patience.

And yes, if anyone asks, I do have an HDTV and have played FF 12 on it with my PS3 and have noticed this problem but no I'm not pissed off about it. Yes, I'd like it fixed but the picture doesn't suck so bad that I can't live with it. (Frankly, the fact I don't have to physically swap memory cards all the time or use an extension cord for my controller more than makes up for it). I can wait until the fix comes.


Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.ogie_s
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.



Too true that. It's amazing how much PS3 bashing has been going on considering that 1) out of the box the system works well with an easy to use interface (I had a 20 and now a 60 and both worked perfectly), 2) plays practically every PS1 and PS2 game (and actually lets you use your old saves BTW - my 360 wants me to replay Halo and Halo 2 from the beginning - thank god Microsoft didn't put out Front Mission 3rd or there goes 143 hours of gameplay up in smoke), 3) is actually a good deal when you total up all the hardware, 4) already has one GREAT game (RFOM) and a bunch of good ones with more on the horizon, 5) is amazingly quiet, and 6) is one insanely good-looking bit of kit.

If it weren't for all the hype, that's not too shabby for a new console. It IS just 1 month after the thing went on sale after all. Let's all have a little more patience.

And yes, if anyone asks, I do have an HDTV and have played FF 12 on it with my PS3 and have noticed this problem but no I'm not pissed off about it. Yes, I'd like it fixed but the picture doesn't suck so bad that I can't live with it. (Frankly, the fact I don't have to physically swap memory cards all the time or use an extension cord for my controller more than makes up for it). I can wait until the fix comes.


exactly...anybody who is complaining about this that has an HDTV, does it stop you from watching standard definition channels on your TV? I doubt it.
Avatar image for cofn42
cofn42

525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 cofn42
Member since 2003 • 525 Posts

I think a good bit of the anger from us PS3 users is that Sony totes the PS3 as being a TRUE HD system, really pushing the HDTV era, and allowing for resolutions higher than we have ever seen, and becasue we adopted this new tech, and got bought into the hype, grabbed ourselves a HDTV, we get punished for it. If I had a SDTV I wouldn't care at all.

I love my PS3, make no mistake, but becasue I have a HDTV should not mean my old PS2 games are of a lower quality than when played on the PS3. And NO, I cant go play them on my PS2 as I sold it to afford the PS3.

I have about 12 - 15 games left I still wish to play from PS2, and a few more down the road in 2007, being a videophile though, I think I will have to wait for the fix, as I have a difficult time accepting a lower quality product, on a higher quality system.

Avatar image for ultima-flare
ultima-flare

2259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 ultima-flare
Member since 2003 • 2259 Posts
its not just ps2 games on hdtvs. it also does it with ps1 and ps2 games on sdtvs
Avatar image for cofn42
cofn42

525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 cofn42
Member since 2003 • 525 Posts
and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.CaptainCrazy
At least Sony has the decentcy to allow it's supporters a lot more options then the compitor, who all but abandoned it's huge comsumer base the day they launched their system. No Transferable game saves. No built in HDD, next to NO Backwards compatibility at launch, and 1 year later it is still dismal, to name but a few, Fanboys should take a long hard look at their toys and the glaring inadequices of their company before they judge others.....
Avatar image for ScreamDream
ScreamDream

3953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ScreamDream
Member since 2006 • 3953 Posts

It's not a big deal and it will get better. Better to play my old games with barely noticible jags then not play them at all.

Avatar image for l88tsauce
l88tsauce

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 l88tsauce
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.eclipsed4utoo
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy
Avatar image for Terami
Terami

3992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 Terami
Member since 2004 • 3992 Posts

First off, is this an issue while using HDMI?  Or component cables?

Secondly, not all PS2 games support progressive scan.  I have been playing on an HDTV for two years and the visuals are always a result of the method of connection.  PSone was compatible with composite and s-video.  PS2 was compatible with those plus component cables.  PS3 adds HDMI support to the mix.

If you play a PSone game on your PS2 using component cables, the colour gets separated drastically.  The game becomes big time ugly.  I'll admit, I'm no professional but I wonder if the PS3's connection has anything to do with these issues?  Or are these issues happening while using composite, the lowest connection?

This is the very reason I still have my PSone connected, it's games don't support component cables.  My PS2 uses component cables and until I can get an HDMI display, my PS3 will use component cables.  Regardless, I figure I'll have to do the same as my PSone and leave my PS2 connected as well.

Thirdly, in my opinion, HDTV has always shown more flaws in games not designed for this type of display.

Avatar image for alexman234
alexman234

1350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 alexman234
Member since 2005 • 1350 Posts
i noticed that sticky this
Avatar image for danneswegman
danneswegman

12937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 danneswegman
Member since 2005 • 12937 Posts
HUGE problem. (imo/ not bashing/ i'm allowed to ventilate my opinion/)
Avatar image for KaptainKernal
KaptainKernal

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 KaptainKernal
Member since 2006 • 1787 Posts
Keep this thread alive plz. Thank you very much.
Avatar image for d_agra
d_agra

1777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 d_agra
Member since 2003 • 1777 Posts

I think that some people are missing the point here..its nothing to do what has the ps3 has the 360 doesnt have. We are not comparing systems and thats not the point of the argument. Sony promised a lot about the features of the PS3 specially about backward compatability to justify the high price of there system.It is a fact that the PS3 has clear issues with backward compatability and using HDTV 1080p and 1080i (correct me if am wrong), it something they promised they would deliver. When something goes wrong with the PS3 people just go state how "the 360 has crap backward compatability" or "how ps3 is better than the 360". When you pay a high price for something you expect the promises of the features to be met specially when you play a lot of money for the system. You seem to accept the companies like Microsoft and Sony produces because you have waited so long for it and its a great system. Just go beyond(no pun) that and look of how these companies short changed us or cut a few corners. I dont understand how 360 and ps3 fans give excuses for them, i dont understand!Well thats just me!

Avatar image for danneswegman
danneswegman

12937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 danneswegman
Member since 2005 • 12937 Posts

I think that some people are missing the point here..its nothing to do what has the ps3 has the 360 doesnt have. We are not comparing systems and thats not the point of the argument. Sony promised a lot about the features of the PS3 specially about backward compatability to justify the high price of there system.It is a fact that the PS3 has clear issues with backward compatability and using HDTV 1080p and 1080i (correct me if am wrong), it something they promised they would deliver. When something goes wrong with the PS3 people just go state how "the 360 has crap backward compatability" or "how ps3 is better than the 360". When you pay a high price for something you expect the promises of the features to be met specially when you play a lot of money for the system. You seem to accept the companies like Microsoft and Sony produces because you have waited so long for it and its a great system. Just go beyond(no pun) that and look of how these companies short changed us or cut a few corners. I dont understand how 360 and ps3 fans give excuses for them, i dont understand!Well thats just me!

d_agra
exactly, this is not system wars, this is a serious problem that we should adress as customers. If you have a PS3, you SHOULD complain about this.
Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts
[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.l88tsauce
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

It's obvious you have no idea how much a HDD helps. the funny thing is, the HDD doesn't help the 360's horrible loading times. oh, and the 20%, it's actually 23% BC games on the 360. I was a little off. It is alittle more now(probably around 30%) since M$ just released an update for more games. Here is how you get that number: 1.) you go to M$ site and count the number of games that are BC on the 360. 2.) you find out how many total games were released for the original Xbox. 3.) you take the amount from #1 and divide it by the amount from #2. 4.) you then multiply by 100, and you will have your percentage of BC games. Sony = 97%+ M$ = 30-35%
Avatar image for d_agra
d_agra

1777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 d_agra
Member since 2003 • 1777 Posts

[QUOTE="l88tsauce"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.eclipsed4utoo
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

It's obvious you have no idea how much a HDD helps. the funny thing is, the HDD doesn't help the 360's horrible loading times. oh, and the 20%, it's actually 23% BC games on the 360. I was a little off. It is alittle more now(probably around 30%) since M$ just released an update for more games. Here is how you get that number: 1.) you go to M$ site and count the number of games that are BC on the 360. 2.) you find out how many total games were released for the original Xbox. 3.) you take the amount from #1 and divide it by the amount from #2. 4.) you then multiply by 100, and you will have your percentage of BC games. Sony = 97%+ M$ = 30-35%

Like i said before not about who is better, its about BC promised us by Microsoft and sony..sheesh!!!:?

Avatar image for eclipsed4utoo
eclipsed4utoo

10578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 eclipsed4utoo
Member since 2006 • 10578 Posts

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="l88tsauce"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.d_agra

do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

It's obvious you have no idea how much a HDD helps. the funny thing is, the HDD doesn't help the 360's horrible loading times. oh, and the 20%, it's actually 23% BC games on the 360. I was a little off. It is alittle more now(probably around 30%) since M$ just released an update for more games. Here is how you get that number: 1.) you go to M$ site and count the number of games that are BC on the 360. 2.) you find out how many total games were released for the original Xbox. 3.) you take the amount from #1 and divide it by the amount from #2. 4.) you then multiply by 100, and you will have your percentage of BC games. Sony = 97%+ M$ = 30-35%

Like i said before not about who is better, its about BC promised us by Microsoft and sony..sheesh!!!:?

the fact is, everybody is complaining about Sony's BC problems, yet nobody cares about the piss poor job that M$ is doing. I guess it shows how its a double standard for the company that's on top.
Avatar image for danneswegman
danneswegman

12937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 danneswegman
Member since 2005 • 12937 Posts
[QUOTE="d_agra"]

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="l88tsauce"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.eclipsed4utoo

do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

It's obvious you have no idea how much a HDD helps. the funny thing is, the HDD doesn't help the 360's horrible loading times. oh, and the 20%, it's actually 23% BC games on the 360. I was a little off. It is alittle more now(probably around 30%) since M$ just released an update for more games. Here is how you get that number: 1.) you go to M$ site and count the number of games that are BC on the 360. 2.) you find out how many total games were released for the original Xbox. 3.) you take the amount from #1 and divide it by the amount from #2. 4.) you then multiply by 100, and you will have your percentage of BC games. Sony = 97%+ M$ = 30-35%

Like i said before not about who is better, its about BC promised us by Microsoft and sony..sheesh!!!:?

the fact is, everybody is complaining about Sony's BC problems, yet nobody cares about the piss poor job that M$ is doing. I guess it shows how its a double standard for the company that's on top.

360 backwards comp. is pretty decent..
Avatar image for RahKayne
RahKayne

3436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 RahKayne
Member since 2003 • 3436 Posts

First off, is this an issue while using HDMI? Or component cables?

Secondly, not all PS2 games support progressive scan. I have been playing on an HDTV for two years and the visuals are always a result of the method of connection. PSone was compatible with composite and s-video. PS2 was compatible with those plus component cables. PS3 adds HDMI support to the mix.

If you play a PSone game on your PS2 using component cables, the colour gets separated drastically. The game becomes big time ugly. I'll admit, I'm no professional but I wonder if the PS3's connection has anything to do with these issues? Or are these issues happening while using composite, the lowest connection?

This is the very reason I still have my PSone connected, it's games don't support component cables. My PS2 uses component cables and until I can get an HDMI display, my PS3 will use component cables. Regardless, I figure I'll have to do the same as my PSone and leave my PS2 connected as well.

Thirdly, in my opinion, HDTV has always shown more flaws in games not designed for this type of display.

Terami


use color correction   under the display options menu   (that's why it is there  :)   )
Avatar image for onemic
onemic

5616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 onemic
Member since 2003 • 5616 Posts
[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="d_agra"]

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="l88tsauce"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.danneswegman

do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

It's obvious you have no idea how much a HDD helps. the funny thing is, the HDD doesn't help the 360's horrible loading times. oh, and the 20%, it's actually 23% BC games on the 360. I was a little off. It is alittle more now(probably around 30%) since M$ just released an update for more games. Here is how you get that number: 1.) you go to M$ site and count the number of games that are BC on the 360. 2.) you find out how many total games were released for the original Xbox. 3.) you take the amount from #1 and divide it by the amount from #2. 4.) you then multiply by 100, and you will have your percentage of BC games. Sony = 97%+ M$ = 30-35%

Like i said before not about who is better, its about BC promised us by Microsoft and sony..sheesh!!!:?

the fact is, everybody is complaining about Sony's BC problems, yet nobody cares about the piss poor job that M$ is doing. I guess it shows how its a double standard for the company that's on top.

360 backwards comp. is pretty decent..

I wouldn't consider 23% BC decent.
Avatar image for d_agra
d_agra

1777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 d_agra
Member since 2003 • 1777 Posts
[QUOTE="d_agra"]

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="l88tsauce"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.eclipsed4utoo

do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

It's obvious you have no idea how much a HDD helps. the funny thing is, the HDD doesn't help the 360's horrible loading times. oh, and the 20%, it's actually 23% BC games on the 360. I was a little off. It is alittle more now(probably around 30%) since M$ just released an update for more games. Here is how you get that number: 1.) you go to M$ site and count the number of games that are BC on the 360. 2.) you find out how many total games were released for the original Xbox. 3.) you take the amount from #1 and divide it by the amount from #2. 4.) you then multiply by 100, and you will have your percentage of BC games. Sony = 97%+ M$ = 30-35%

Like i said before not about who is better, its about BC promised us by Microsoft and sony..sheesh!!!:?

the fact is, everybody is complaining about Sony's BC problems, yet nobody cares about the piss poor job that M$ is doing. I guess it shows how its a double standard for the company that's on top.

I wouldnt know because i dont go to the x360 forum, i am sure they have a few threads about that if not why not????

People should complain about this stuff !!Bth Microsolf and sony fans!!Its completely out of order from both complanies, yet people try to make excuses for them!i dont understand

Avatar image for rasstarman
rasstarman

852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 rasstarman
Member since 2004 • 852 Posts

[QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.cofn42
At least Sony has the decentcy to allow it's supporters a lot more options then the compitor, who all but abandoned it's huge comsumer base the day they launched their system. No Transferable game saves. No built in HDD, next to NO Backwards compatibility at launch, and 1 year later it is still dismal, to name but a few, Fanboys should take a long hard look at their toys and the glaring inadequices of their company before they judge others.....

They did not abandon it they just stopped making 1st party games.

Avatar image for rasstarman
rasstarman

852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 rasstarman
Member since 2004 • 852 Posts

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.l88tsauce
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

I also thought the PS3 would have fast loading times but they are horrible. Fight Night takes twice as long to load on the PS3 ocmpared to the Xbox 360.

Avatar image for rasstarman
rasstarman

852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 rasstarman
Member since 2004 • 852 Posts

[QUOTE="l88tsauce"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="CaptainCrazy"]and so the list of Sony's woes grows ever larger. I really don't think they could have screwed up this system any worse. It's like they did everything wrong. We can only hope the updates will correct all these glaring oversights in time.eclipsed4utoo
do the games play? yes. and for people without HDTVs, this isn't a problem. I can tell you how Sony could have screwed this system up more. By not including a next-gen media drive, by not including a HDD with EVERY console, and by only having 20% of their catalog of games being backward compatible. boy, that sounds like the characteristics of another console's launch. now move along.

lol buddy its not like the hdd does much help with anything either than make up for the horrible loading times of your "next gen media drive."where did you get this 20% number? anyways. your basically bragging about things that were essentially forced upon you. Owning both systems, you still sound like a easily offended fanyboy

It's obvious you have no idea how much a HDD helps. the funny thing is, the HDD doesn't help the 360's horrible loading times. oh, and the 20%, it's actually 23% BC games on the 360. I was a little off. It is alittle more now(probably around 30%) since M$ just released an update for more games. Here is how you get that number: 1.) you go to M$ site and count the number of games that are BC on the 360. 2.) you find out how many total games were released for the original Xbox. 3.) you take the amount from #1 and divide it by the amount from #2. 4.) you then multiply by 100, and you will have your percentage of BC games. Sony = 97%+ M$ = 30-35%

Are the PS3 load times better? They are worst...

Avatar image for onemic
onemic

5616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 onemic
Member since 2003 • 5616 Posts
and you know how?
Avatar image for KaptainKernal
KaptainKernal

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 KaptainKernal
Member since 2006 • 1787 Posts
Well I dont think the load times are bad they are just need to be inproved on... But the jaggies issue needs to be fixed.
Mods said no sticky so its up to you to keep the information availible to the public
Avatar image for abjot2003
abjot2003

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 abjot2003
Member since 2003 • 335 Posts
i hope they fix this problem, IMO its a big issue for ppl who have ps2 games and want to play them on there ps3 like me. I guess i have to keep my ps2 and hope it doesnt stop working.
Avatar image for nish2280
nish2280

489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 nish2280
Member since 2006 • 489 Posts
BUMp
Avatar image for wizeguy41
wizeguy41

296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 wizeguy41
Member since 2006 • 296 Posts
BUMP
Avatar image for Rhaxdric
Rhaxdric

2864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 Rhaxdric
Member since 2006 • 2864 Posts
I noticed graphic errors while watching MGS3S cutscenes. They look jagged. I'm just happy it'll be fixed in time with updates. 
Avatar image for jebarru
jebarru

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 jebarru
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
bump
Avatar image for Tony_Montana
Tony_Montana

3803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Tony_Montana
Member since 2005 • 3803 Posts
I have a 480i Standard Definition TV (a tube). Will this problem affect me or not ?
Avatar image for Terami
Terami

3992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#49 Terami
Member since 2004 • 3992 Posts
[QUOTE="Terami"]

First off, is this an issue while using HDMI? Or component cables?

Secondly, not all PS2 games support progressive scan. I have been playing on an HDTV for two years and the visuals are always a result of the method of connection. PSone was compatible with composite and s-video. PS2 was compatible with those plus component cables. PS3 adds HDMI support to the mix.

If you play a PSone game on your PS2 using component cables, the colour gets separated drastically. The game becomes big time ugly. I'll admit, I'm no professional but I wonder if the PS3's connection has anything to do with these issues? Or are these issues happening while using composite, the lowest connection?

This is the very reason I still have my PSone connected, it's games don't support component cables. My PS2 uses component cables and until I can get an HDMI display, my PS3 will use component cables. Regardless, I figure I'll have to do the same as my PSone and leave my PS2 connected as well.

Thirdly, in my opinion, HDTV has always shown more flaws in games not designed for this type of display.

RahKayne


use color correction   under the display options menu   (that's why it is there  :)   )

WTF are you talking about?  Display options?  Colour correction?  There's no such option on my PS2.  Did you even read my full post?