[QUOTE="SmokenAshes"][QUOTE="TerroRizing"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"][QUOTE="TerroRizing"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]i think this game is well worth it if only it had online or even offline splitscreen EmperorSupreme
Slitscreen sucks, especially for a game like this.
umm...UT3 is a multiplayer game, if uve played it you should know....meaning multiple people should be playing it together on the same tv and having a blast...online play can get a little boring espcially with bad mic support (can be fixed but..)..even with mic, its still not as fun as playing with friends and owning each other
No, split-screen doesnt even make sense now that we have online. The game is too fast paced and has too much going on for split-screen. One on one might be ok, anything beyond that is ridiculous.
Umm ever had a bunch of friends over and all of ya want to play something on the PS3. And you go "Well all I got that has 4 player split screen is .... ummm....crap just Resistance or Warhawk." And it sucks even more when your friends don't like Warhawk and are kinda tired of playing Resistance all the time. So yeah, see my point?
I agree, splitscreen is a nice feature. Just a fyi we play Rainbow 6: Vegas quite a bit and I've seen it as low as $30. It's worth it for the splitscreen action. Terrorist hunt is pretty fun with friends. My favorite group game though is Rockband.
Rockband actually makes sense local multiplayer, funny Jeff Gertsman actually mentions this in his blog.
Log in to comment