Video games - art

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hyksiu
hyksiu

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 hyksiu
Member since 2010 • 2201 Posts

I believe the overal experience you get when gameplay, graphics, sound and story combine in a game is like experiencing art. And its not like music or cinema but a completely new type of experience. This is also why i feel like video games are not a waste of time. Or maybe they are. But then so are movies and music.... It just that you do it for the feel and not to do something usefull.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
I don't know the correct definition of art because it's a vague word. But no video game compares to the Mona Lisa in terms of require skill to create.
Avatar image for hyksiu
hyksiu

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 hyksiu
Member since 2010 • 2201 Posts

That doesen't matter . You shouldn't compare very diffrent things.

Avatar image for newhighscore
newhighscore

2037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 newhighscore
Member since 2008 • 2037 Posts

im sorry, is this a question or a observation? seems like it should be a blog post or something.

Avatar image for lordfalsus
lordfalsus

527

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 lordfalsus
Member since 2010 • 527 Posts

That doesen't matter . You shouldn't compare very diffrent things.

hyksiu
how are you gonna tell him not to compare a video games to the mona lisa, when your thread is comapring video games to art? o_0
Avatar image for hyksiu
hyksiu

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 hyksiu
Member since 2010 • 2201 Posts

[QUOTE="hyksiu"]

That doesen't matter . You shouldn't compare very diffrent things.

lordfalsus

how are you gonna tell him not to compare a video games to the mona lisa, when your thread is comapring video games to art? o_0

I do not compare them to art. I say they are art. Art shouldn't be compared because it is abstract.You can't quite explain it.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

[QUOTE="lordfalsus"][QUOTE="hyksiu"]

That doesen't matter . You shouldn't compare very diffrent things.

hyksiu

how are you gonna tell him not to compare a video games to the mona lisa, when your thread is comapring video games to art? o_0

I do not compare them to art. I say they are art. Art shouldn't be compared because it is abstract.You can't quite explain it.

Totally lost me.
Avatar image for Rakuho
Rakuho

7008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Rakuho
Member since 2007 • 7008 Posts
A Video Game (or pretty much anything else you can envision) is art as long as you think it's art --as the meaning of art itself is subjective. It's nice of you to share your views, and I'm not going to redirect you to your blog (like some people might)... but ultimately, there's nothing really for us to discuss here... unless of course people are willing to argue about opinions.
Avatar image for hyksiu
hyksiu

2201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 hyksiu
Member since 2010 • 2201 Posts

Well i believe that things that are affecting you emtionally are art. Even if you can't explain why. Maybe it's the world of the game or the feeling when you're exploring it.The thing itself may not look abstract but the feelings are.And everyone may see it diffrently.

Avatar image for Starchild07
Starchild07

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Starchild07
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
I've given it a lot of thought since a certain other forum heatedly argued over it in response to Roger Ebert's articles and yes, I believe it qualifies.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="hyksiu"]

[QUOTE="lordfalsus"] how are you gonna tell him not to compare a video games to the mona lisa, when your thread is comapring video games to art? o_0Fightingfan

I do not compare them to art. I say they are art. Art shouldn't be compared because it is abstract.You can't quite explain it.

Totally lost me.

It is completely pointless to compare two different forms of art. There is no comparison between the two. Can you imagine someone saying "yeah, Exile On Main Street is good, but Bosch's 'the Garden of Earthly Delights' is better"? No, it'd be a rediculous statement.

Avatar image for Ninja_Zombie83
Ninja_Zombie83

1893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#12 Ninja_Zombie83
Member since 2009 • 1893 Posts
Well if the product or process is deliberately arranging symbolic elements in a way that influences and affects the senses, emotions, and/or intellect then yeah its art. Not everything is art, but I would say SOME video games are. Key concept is the use of symbolic elements. Flower is art. Grand Theft Auto isn't. Linger in the Shadows is art. Warhawk isn't. I'd say both the Mona Lisa and some video games are art. Which one is "better" is up to the individual imo.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

How is Grand Theft Auto not art?

Avatar image for J-WOW
J-WOW

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 J-WOW
Member since 2010 • 3105 Posts
It can be, but thats not its purpose. I think the only reason people are now calling video games art is becuz of the visuals, before when the graphics sucked, no one dared to call video games art
Avatar image for MethodManFTW
MethodManFTW

26516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 MethodManFTW
Member since 2009 • 26516 Posts
Art is totally subjective.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

It can be, but thats not its purpose. I think the only reason people are now calling video games art is becuz of the visuals, before when the graphics sucked, no one dared to call video games artJ-WOW

They've almost always been an artform as far as I'm concerned.

Avatar image for untouchables111
untouchables111

1650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 untouchables111
Member since 2005 • 1650 Posts
art is almost whatever we say it is. also just because a critic says something does not mean it is absolute... film, comics, color, painting, theater. these all at one time were not considered to be art. but as always over many years this has changed. Film was never looked at as art until a big shot actress stared in a picture and it kinda took off from there. even now some say Nay. Games i do believe are art. when you learn how art has evolved from early times you can also agree. the artist principles of design are very evident in video games. examples are use of scale,color lighting, line.... all of these are used in just about every game you have played and has it not evolved as the Tech has gotten better?
Avatar image for LightR
LightR

17739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 LightR
Member since 2009 • 17739 Posts
I don't know the correct definition of art because it's a vague word. But no video game compares to the Mona Lisa in terms of require skill to create.Fightingfan
Maybe not yet but a great deal of time goes into creating a video game from various people, each adding their own influence into the mix. Their joint efforts can create something just as or more beautiful, just depends what you difine as beauty or what you look for in art. Video games are definitely art, as are many things.
Avatar image for LightR
LightR

17739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 LightR
Member since 2009 • 17739 Posts
It can be, but thats not its purpose. I think the only reason people are now calling video games art is becuz of the visuals, before when the graphics sucked, no one dared to call video games artJ-WOW
Games have always influenced our senses and have been an expression of anothers ideas. Graphics don't make it art, I can point to alot of paintings that don't look realistic or all that refined.
Avatar image for Ilikemyname420
Ilikemyname420

5147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Ilikemyname420
Member since 2007 • 5147 Posts

Any game with a plot is art in my eyes.

Avatar image for J-Man725
J-Man725

6786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 J-Man725
Member since 2006 • 6786 Posts

I'd say video games are art, without a doubt. Think of the combination of music scores, concept art/sketches, visuals, sound effects, story, characters.

I'd call video games art moreso than I'd call that abstract crap art.

I think if more people saw what goes into the creation of video games behind the scenes, they'd be more apt to classify it as art.

Avatar image for hazelnutman
hazelnutman

9688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 hazelnutman
Member since 2007 • 9688 Posts
Oh God, not this again. As MethodManFTW said, art is totally subjective. Therefore, I can say with personal confidence that video games do NOT count as art, and never will be. If I'm playing a video game, I'm expecting grand gameplay design, excellent audio-visual presentation, and an overall "fun" factor -- not a provocative experience which will trigger the emotions in my subconscious. The game could be Mona Lisa: The Game for all I care, but if it doesn't deliver a coherent, interactive experience, then it fails as a video game, and therefore never qualifies as anything in both categories. Okami - not art. Echochrome - not art. Flower - not art. Uncharted 2 - not art. Assassin's Creed 2 - not art. Ico - not art. The above are video games. Video games I love. Not art. They were interactive experiences I had fun with. Art has the sole purpose of provoking emotions, while video games takes fun into a tangible and interactable form.
Avatar image for Ilikemyname420
Ilikemyname420

5147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Ilikemyname420
Member since 2007 • 5147 Posts
[QUOTE="hazelnutman"]Oh God, not this again. As MethodManFTW said, art is totally subjective. Therefore, I can say with personal confidence that video games do NOT count as art, and never will be. If I'm playing a video game, I'm expecting grand gameplay design, excellent audio-visual presentation, and an overall "fun" factor -- not a provocative experience which will trigger the emotions in my subconscious. The game could be Mona Lisa: The Game for all I care, but if it doesn't deliver a coherent, interactive experience, then it fails as a video game, and therefore never qualifies as anything in both categories. Okami - not art. Echochrome - not art. Flower - not art. Uncharted 2 - not art. Assassin's Creed 2 - not art. Ico - not art. The above are video games. Video games I love. Not art. They were interactive experiences I had fun with. Art has the sole purpose of provoking emotions, while video games takes fun into a tangible and interactable form.

Those games would seem to fit the definition of art though: "the use of skill and imagination in the creation of aesthetic objects, environments, or experiences that can be shared with others."
Avatar image for LightR
LightR

17739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 LightR
Member since 2009 • 17739 Posts
I'd say having fun is provoking my senses (which includes emotions) because if it didn't, how could it be fun? It is art. Also there are video games that have the sole purpose of provoking emotions...
Avatar image for Second_Rook
Second_Rook

3680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 Second_Rook
Member since 2007 • 3680 Posts
I feel like the very best games are more of a canvas which allows those of us playing to become the artist. My example would be Vice City, between the environment, the vehicles, and the cheat codes, the creators gave us everything we needed to have thousands of adventures and create our own little games, I played that game for hundreds of hours and didn't tire of it. It definitely speaks to what a great game it is, but it also speaks to how imaginative it inspired me to become. I guess in regards to the term "art" the main question is where does the designer end and the player begin?
Avatar image for UnrealLegend
UnrealLegend

5888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#26 UnrealLegend
Member since 2009 • 5888 Posts

All games are art, some are just crap art.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Oh God, not this again. As MethodManFTW said, art is totally subjective. Therefore, I can say with personal confidence that video games do NOT count as art, and never will be. If I'm playing a video game, I'm expecting grand gameplay design, excellent audio-visual presentation, and an overall "fun" factor -- not a provocative experience which will trigger the emotions in my subconscious. The game could be Mona Lisa: The Game for all I care, but if it doesn't deliver a coherent, interactive experience, then it fails as a video game, and therefore never qualifies as anything in both categories. Okami - not art. Echochrome - not art. Flower - not art. Uncharted 2 - not art. Assassin's Creed 2 - not art. Ico - not art. The above are video games. Video games I love. Not art. They were interactive experiences I had fun with. Art has the sole purpose of provoking emotions, while video games takes fun into a tangible and interactable form.hazelnutman

Is having fun not provoking an emotion? And whoever said the only purpose of art was to provoke emotions? Strictly apeaking the word "art" means "craft" or "skill", so in that regard video games are very much an art.

Avatar image for KamuiFei
KamuiFei

4334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#28 KamuiFei
Member since 2003 • 4334 Posts

Art is totally subjective.MethodManFTW

Agreed. This thread feels more like a blog for some reason.

Avatar image for hazelnutman
hazelnutman

9688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 hazelnutman
Member since 2007 • 9688 Posts

@Ilikemyname420 and worlock77:

I guess you missed the part where I re-stated the fact that art is totally subjective. Let me quote it for you guys so you don't miss it this time around:

As MethodManFTW said, art is totally subjective. Therefore, I can say with personal confidence that video games do NOT count as art, and never will be. hazelnutman

I feel so good today that I even decided to bold parts in my text which were really important. You're welcome.

If you people are going to base what art is off of dictionary definitions, then you're missing the point. I think video games are video games, and art is art. Art to me is something I observe and make interpretations of. Video games are pieces of interactive media I use for sheer entertainment value. You don't have to stick with my reasoning -- you can have your own interpretations of what art is (or in your cases, use the dictionary definition).

Again, I've bolded the important parts above to ensure that we don't have a misunderstanding here like we did last time.

Here's some further reading you guys should do: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

Avatar image for Ninja_Zombie83
Ninja_Zombie83

1893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#30 Ninja_Zombie83
Member since 2009 • 1893 Posts

I think I'm going to go with the definition of art that is definitive and has an origin instead of the word of MethodManFTW on Gamespot Forums like the rest of the world.

I know you like to boost your ego by making bold letters and quoting yourself as reference, but the rest of us are going by the intention of stimulating thoughts and emotions, not aesthetics like you Hazel. Big difference there.

Just because you have the ability to label something doesn't make it subjective and there is always the exception. We arn't dealing with that so quit patting yourself on the back, stop puffing out your chest and actually answer the question without diversing to the philosophy of what art means. Try and get back to the middle of the normal curve with the rest of us.

I'll even get you started by linking your favorite website to the word ART instead of OPINION.