Want to know why Sony's phasing out the 60Gb? - Here's the REAL logical reason.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jas315
jas315

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jas315
Member since 2006 • 34 Posts
To clear things up in a more understanding view, after putting together many thoughts being thrown around.

80GB is easier to find, and hence cheaper than the 60GB to produce at this point in time. The PS1/PS2 Emulation software is a hell of a lot cheaper to intergrate as well, apart from the EE Chip (found in current 60Gb models) which is basically costing the company by each individual console.

Sony would then like to phase out the 60GB and roll out 80GB PS3s, by having a clearance sale (see: price cut) on the existing 60GBs. The 80GB, which in its current form is only available in the "MotorStorm bundle" (it's status is labeled as "LIMITED EDITION") gets slapped with the $599 label, since two Core models cannot co-exist. When the 60GB is out of the picture, the 80GB bundle is "discontinued" and a standalone Core 80GB PS3 is offered. (Sony would obviously keep this under wraps, otherwise if consumers knew, they'd all be ditching the idea of buying up the 60GB in the first place... eliminating Sony's primary goal in all of this)

The Single 80GB SKU then starts to arise at $499 again. Featuring the release of their new touch sense SIXAXIS controller.

Therefore, quite possibly... and I mean possibly, paving the way for a 120Gb "Premium" bundle sometime soon thereafter. (Only if Sony decide to keep choices leveled.)

Of course, this move is only what is logical and Sony doesn't always follow logic, although, this is the way it should go along. Even now, after all this, I still feel Sony realize what's common sense towards their sales right now.

Sony = King of illusions.
Avatar image for Gamer443
Gamer443

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#2 Gamer443
Member since 2005 • 931 Posts
you could be right i beleive so
Avatar image for Absynthetic
Absynthetic

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Absynthetic
Member since 2004 • 1897 Posts

that would be the only logical explanation and i think SCEE and Kaz announced the no 60gb prematurely

Avatar image for cyow
cyow

1387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 cyow
Member since 2004 • 1387 Posts
if the 80gig/emulation PS3's were cheaper to produce, they would have just sold those in the first place.
Avatar image for jas315
jas315

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jas315
Member since 2006 • 34 Posts

if the 80gig/emulation PS3's were cheaper to produce, they would have just sold those in the first place. cyow

The current 60GB consoles you see in stores were not fitted with the Emulation software now found in the 80GB, this being one of the reasons why Sony want to stop producing 60GB models (which they have) and sell the current ones by the price cut. In order to move the Core standalone 80GB into it's place once it's out of the picture altogether.

Make sense now?

Avatar image for AlMar12345
AlMar12345

749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 AlMar12345
Member since 2005 • 749 Posts
That sounds pretty logical to me, now to decide if I want an 80 gig haha.
Avatar image for pete_merlin
pete_merlin

6098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 pete_merlin
Member since 2007 • 6098 Posts
i assumed it was because they origionally assumed they would have the advantage memory wise over the 360 but then when the 360 was set to be released in an elite version with 120g memory sony had to step up
Avatar image for DanC1989
DanC1989

50952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 DanC1989
Member since 2004 • 50952 Posts
Very logical, and I hope that you're right.
Avatar image for Deepcut9
Deepcut9

761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Deepcut9
Member since 2007 • 761 Posts
The emulation software--which, according you, is making it cheaper to produce PS3--is for PS2 emulation?
Avatar image for FireFalkon
FireFalkon

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 FireFalkon
Member since 2004 • 866 Posts
To clear things up in a more understanding view, after putting together many thoughts being thrown around.

80GB is easier to find, and hence cheaper than the 60GB to produce at this point in time. The PS1/PS2 Emulation software is a hell of a lot cheaper to intergrate as well, apart from the EE chip (found in current 60Gb models) which is basically costing the company without a doubt. Sony would then like to phase out the 60GB and roll out 80GB PS3s, by having a clearance sale (see: price cut) on the existing 60GBs. The 80GB, which in its current form is only available in a "MotorStorm bundle" (Which it's status is labeled as "LIMITED EDITION") gets slapped with the $599 label. When the 60GB is out of the picture, the 80GB bundle is "discontinued" and a standalone 80GB PS3 is offered. (Sony would obviously keep this under wraps, otherwise if consumers knew, they'd all be ditching the idea of buying up the 60G in the first place... eliminating Sony's primary goal in all of this)

The Single SKU then starts to arise at $499 again. Featuring the release of their new touch sense SIXAXIS controller.

Therefore, quite possibly... and I mean possibly, paving the way for a 120Gb "premium" bundle sometime soon thereafter.

Of course, this move is only what is logical and Sony doesn't always follow logic, although, this is the way it should go along. Even now, after all this, I still feel Sony realize what's common sense towards their sales right now.jas315
This seems to be the most logical and wise plan. I realy can't see a $600 SKU on sale for the holydays...
Avatar image for supreuph
supreuph

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 supreuph
Member since 2007 • 654 Posts
I've got a wii, and wish I had a PS3 too, but this is ridiculous. I can only imagine that the surge on the 60GB model will be amplified with this news. Maybe that's one reason. But all this speculation about possible marketing strategies is pointless. We were just praising these guys for listening to consumers and dropping the price, and they turn around and prove that they didn't hear anything we said. This thing may be jam packed full of high-tech wizardry, but if the consumers says it's too expensive, IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE. Listen to what the market is telling you. Don't rearrange the pieces and give me a rehash of specs for a couple of months...drop the price! Even if the 80GB PS3 does drop down, who's gonna trust that? Sony is messing this up in the worst way.
Avatar image for jas315
jas315

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 jas315
Member since 2006 • 34 Posts

The emulation software--which, according you, is making it cheaper to produce PS3--is for PS2 emulation?Deepcut9

Yes. Including PS1.

Avatar image for EMERlCa6969
EMERlCa6969

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 EMERlCa6969
Member since 2004 • 2142 Posts
There are always some positives to this. Emulation could mean native 720p and 1080p PS2 displayed games. Kind of like the upgrade the 360 gets for its Xbox titles. Hopefully because the 80 is cheaper to produce they will just drop the motorstorm bundle and make the 80 gig 499. Those are the only positives I see could come from this. Maybe even a secret no emotion engine 60 gig for 399.
Avatar image for jacintos09
jacintos09

1466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 jacintos09
Member since 2007 • 1466 Posts
The reason you stated is what I've been thinking since I heard about this last night. I mean, it's the only thing that makes any kind of sense.
Avatar image for mantisybza
mantisybza

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 mantisybza
Member since 2006 • 362 Posts

To clear things up in a more understanding view, after putting together many thoughts being thrown around.

80GB is easier to find, and hence cheaper than the 60GB to produce at this point in time. The PS1/PS2 Emulation software is a hell of a lot cheaper to intergrate as well, apart from the EE Chip (found in current 60Gb models) which is basically costing the company by each individual console.

Sony would then like to phase out the 60GB and roll out 80GB PS3s, by having a clearance sale (see: price cut) on the existing 60GBs. The 80GB, which in its current form is only available in the "MotorStorm bundle" (it's status is labeled as "LIMITED EDITION") gets slapped with the $599 label. When the 60GB is out of the picture, the 80GB bundle is "discontinued" and a standalone 80GB PS3 is offered. (Sony would obviously keep this under wraps, otherwise if consumers knew, they'd all be ditching the idea of buying up the 60G in the first place... eliminating Sony's primary goal in all of this)

The Single SKU then starts to arise at $499 again. Featuring the release of their new touch sense SIXAXIS controller.

Therefore, quite possibly... and I mean possibly, paving the way for a 120Gb "premium" bundle sometime soon thereafter.

Of course, this move is only what is logical and Sony doesn't always follow logic, although, this is the way it should go along. Even now, after all this, I still feel Sony realize what's common sense towards their sales right now.

jas315

I think you should become sonys marketing supervisor or whatever cause the guys whoa re working at sony right now are complete morons.

Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts

It is true about HDDs, these small drives can have so little price between them. I mean look at the 360 20gig HDD, that's the smallest laptop drive you can buy, and actually hard to find anywhere, so litereally $1-$5 more you can get a 40gig, $10 more a 60 to 80 gig, the reason why, the 20gig is freaking expensive for what you get.

A price difference between a 60-80gig is like 10% probably. I mean I bought a 120gb drive for the PS3 for $70, yet Microsoft wants to charge $180 for their 120gb drive, that 360 case can't be an extra $110 and they shouldn't be making $90 profit. And then they left the 20gb drive still at $99, for freaking sake, a 40gig drive is only $40, a 60gig drive is only $50, so why the hell do they still charge $99 for a 20gb drive 2 years later, atleast put a 40gig one in there so it last some amount of time and they'd make the same profit.

Avatar image for B1gB0y5555
B1gB0y5555

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 B1gB0y5555
Member since 2007 • 26 Posts
ew
Avatar image for Red_26
Red_26

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Red_26
Member since 2006 • 256 Posts
guys you gotta calm down. those guys at SCEI are professionals man and they went to college and are probably smarter in handling business then we are. as long as i see a critic of sony with a mba degree i will listen butiwill have to admit that some guys in the business are a littlebut odd
Avatar image for jshigashi
jshigashi

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 jshigashi
Member since 2007 • 528 Posts

I would bet the house that the 80GB will be available for $499 for the Holiday season.. I believe the TC is totally right. As far as production costs go, don't forget about the huge drop in the blu-ray diode.

You guys can sit there and say how this is some sort of PR nightmare, but they are just trying to clear out the 60GB as fast as possible and start selling a more profitable production line. I don't know why people are in such a tizzy over this whole thing... right now they can get a $500 PS3, and 5 free blu-ray movies. And I am willing to guarantee they will be able to get a PS3 for $500 come the Holidays.

Avatar image for bigbadbeerman
bigbadbeerman

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 bigbadbeerman
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts
But you can put a 120 gig ( or ?) in yourself if you have a 40 or 60 gig already
Avatar image for me2002
me2002

3106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 me2002
Member since 2002 • 3106 Posts

exactly what I've been saying.

Just want to add they are making it sound like the $599 bundle will be the only sku left once the 60s are sold out is so people will rush out and buy the 60gigs. I presume they have too much stock and will have a hard time getting rid of.

They want to get rid of it because once the 80gig + rumble standard comes in the 60gig without rumble will be completely useless.

This is the same reason they didn't announce rumble publicly at the press conference but instead have an employee confirm the next day. If they made it too public people will want to hold off for the rumble.

Avatar image for LaserGunzPewPew
LaserGunzPewPew

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 LaserGunzPewPew
Member since 2007 • 140 Posts

To clear things up in a more understanding view, after putting together many thoughts being thrown around.

80GB is easier to find, and hence cheaper than the 60GB to produce at this point in time. The PS1/PS2 Emulation software is a hell of a lot cheaper to intergrate as well, apart from the EE Chip (found in current 60Gb models) which is basically costing the company by each individual console.

Sony would then like to phase out the 60GB and roll out 80GB PS3s, by having a clearance sale (see: price cut) on the existing 60GBs. The 80GB, which in its current form is only available in the "MotorStorm bundle" (it's status is labeled as "LIMITED EDITION") gets slapped with the $599 label. When the 60GB is out of the picture, the 80GB bundle is "discontinued" and a standalone 80GB PS3 is offered. (Sony would obviously keep this under wraps, otherwise if consumers knew, they'd all be ditching the idea of buying up the 60G in the first place... eliminating Sony's primary goal in all of this)

The Single SKU then starts to arise at $499 again. Featuring the release of their new touch sense SIXAXIS controller.

Therefore, quite possibly... and I mean possibly, paving the way for a 120Gb "premium" bundle sometime soon thereafter.

Of course, this move is only what is logical and Sony doesn't always follow logic, although, this is the way it should go along. Even now, after all this, I still feel Sony realize what's common sense towards their sales right now.

jas315

This is what I think is going to happen too.

Avatar image for henry4th
henry4th

1180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 henry4th
Member since 2003 • 1180 Posts

To clear things up in a more understanding view, after putting together many thoughts being thrown around.

80GB is easier to find, and hence cheaper than the 60GB to produce at this point in time. The PS1/PS2 Emulation software is a hell of a lot cheaper to intergrate as well, apart from the EE Chip (found in current 60Gb models) which is basically costing the company by each individual console.

Sony would then like to phase out the 60GB and roll out 80GB PS3s, by having a clearance sale (see: price cut) on the existing 60GBs. The 80GB, which in its current form is only available in the "MotorStorm bundle" (it's status is labeled as "LIMITED EDITION") gets slapped with the $599 label. When the 60GB is out of the picture, the 80GB bundle is "discontinued" and a standalone 80GB PS3 is offered. (Sony would obviously keep this under wraps, otherwise if consumers knew, they'd all be ditching the idea of buying up the 60G in the first place... eliminating Sony's primary goal in all of this)

The Single SKU then starts to arise at $499 again. Featuring the release of their new touch sense SIXAXIS controller.

Therefore, quite possibly... and I mean possibly, paving the way for a 120Gb "premium" bundle sometime soon thereafter.

Of course, this move is only what is logical and Sony doesn't always follow logic, although, this is the way it should go along. Even now, after all this, I still feel Sony realize what's common sense towards their sales right now.

jas315

I agree with you 95%. The only difference is that I believe 80GB system will be first sold at 549 instead of 499 when 60G is sold out. Then we will see another price drop on the 80G system and see a 120G (or bigger) version of PS3.

Avatar image for kilik
kilik

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 kilik
Member since 2002 • 145 Posts

I agree with everything except the 120 GB SKU. Hirai said in that interview they will have a single SKU strategy from now on.

80 GB w/o MotorStorm @ 499,- this holiday season is pretty certain though.

Avatar image for 218409372945592235589581321688
218409372945592235589581321688

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 218409372945592235589581321688
Member since 2007 • 618 Posts

To clear things up in a more understanding view, after putting together many thoughts being thrown around.

80GB is easier to find, and hence cheaper than the 60GB to produce at this point in time. The PS1/PS2 Emulation software is a hell of a lot cheaper to intergrate as well, apart from the EE Chip (found in current 60Gb models) which is basically costing the company by each individual console.

Sony would then like to phase out the 60GB and roll out 80GB PS3s, by having a clearance sale (see: price cut) on the existing 60GBs. The 80GB, which in its current form is only available in the "MotorStorm bundle" (it's status is labeled as "LIMITED EDITION") gets slapped with the $599 label. When the 60GB is out of the picture, the 80GB bundle is "discontinued" and a standalone 80GB PS3 is offered. (Sony would obviously keep this under wraps, otherwise if consumers knew, they'd all be ditching the idea of buying up the 60G in the first place... eliminating Sony's primary goal in all of this)

The Single SKU then starts to arise at $499 again. Featuring the release of their new touch sense SIXAXIS controller.

Therefore, quite possibly... and I mean possibly, paving the way for a 120Gb "premium" bundle sometime soon thereafter.

Of course, this move is only what is logical and Sony doesn't always follow logic, although, this is the way it should go along. Even now, after all this, I still feel Sony realize what's common sense towards their sales right now.

jas315

Ya, as far as pricing goes that is what I thought to. The mistake sony made in my opinion is saying they were phasing out the 60gb. I know they cannot say the 80gb will take its place during the holiday season or people will not buy it. They should have kept quite about, I mean it is tough becasue either way they will piss people off...tough pr decision, hopefully the will not alienate people.

Avatar image for 218409372945592235589581321688
218409372945592235589581321688

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 218409372945592235589581321688
Member since 2007 • 618 Posts

I agree with everything except the 120 GB SKU. Hirai said in that interview they will have a single SKU strategy from now on.

80 GB w/o MotorStorm @ 499,- this holiday season is pretty certain though.

kilik

I would have to agree... but there is something I have been thinking about for a while. The motorstorm bundle is limited edition with 1,000,000 copies correct? clearly they believe it will take sometime to move the rest of the 60gb before they could introduce the 80 alone for 499. I don't think they will be able to sell the 80gb alone for 599 because of the bundle. But if they dont sell out the 60 gb by the holidays and are running low on the bundle do they drop the price of the 60gb to 399 and 80 499? Thouhgts/opinions on any of this?

Avatar image for EMERlCa6969
EMERlCa6969

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 EMERlCa6969
Member since 2004 • 2142 Posts
There is only one problem they need to address. If a 20 gig or a 60 gig break, will they fix it for free or are we going to have to pay some 100+ dollarsto have it repaired. Another would be will retailers replace 20 and 60 gig PS3's with the 80 when customers who bought an extended warrenty have a dead console. Of course it seems very unlikely given I have never heard of one breaking yet. Still something to ponder though.
Avatar image for 218409372945592235589581321688
218409372945592235589581321688

618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 218409372945592235589581321688
Member since 2007 • 618 Posts

There is only one problem they need to address. If a 20 gig or a 60 gig break, will they fix it for free or are we going to have to pay some 100+ dollarsto have it repaired. Another would be will retailers replace 20 and 60 gig PS3's with the 80 when customers who bought an extended warrenty have a dead console. Of course it seems very unlikely given I have never heard of one breaking yet. Still something to ponder though.EMERlCa6969

If it is under the one year warranty still I think they would replace it with the 80gb...I don't think production costs are any higher on the 80 gig cuz they are loosing teh EE chip...so it is not like sony loses any money from 60gb to 80 gb

Avatar image for jas315
jas315

34

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 jas315
Member since 2006 • 34 Posts

There is only one problem they need to address. If a 20 gig or a 60 gig break, will they fix it for free or are we going to have to pay some 100+ dollarsto have it repaired. Another would be will retailers replace 20 and 60 gig PS3's with the 80 when customers who bought an extended warrenty have a dead console. Of course it seems very unlikely given I have never heard of one breaking yet. Still something to ponder though.EMERlCa6969

It would be common sense for Sony to treat all customers with the same costumer service no matter which model you own. As they always have.

Although I highly doubt they'd upgrade your HDD to 80GB, since what you buy, on your own choice, is what you get.

Avatar image for kilik
kilik

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 kilik
Member since 2002 • 145 Posts
they will probably replace a faulty 20 and 60 GB hard drive with 80 GB yes. probably not now, but in a few months when they only have 80 gig disks left they will do that.
Avatar image for dukerav
dukerav

2029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 dukerav
Member since 2003 • 2029 Posts
That is very logical, let us all hope it turns out that way, if not similarly. Although I hope people that own a PS3 realize you can add in any 2.5inch HDD to the PS3 and probably cheaper than buying the coming 80gb PS3. The ability to do this really makes me question why Sony would even add a 80 gig version let alone something larger.
Avatar image for Red_26
Red_26

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Red_26
Member since 2006 • 256 Posts
[QUOTE="jas315"]

To clear things up in a more understanding view, after putting together many thoughts being thrown around.

80GB is easier to find, and hence cheaper than the 60GB to produce at this point in time. The PS1/PS2 Emulation software is a hell of a lot cheaper to intergrate as well, apart from the EE Chip (found in current 60Gb models) which is basically costing the company by each individual console.

Sony would then like to phase out the 60GB and roll out 80GB PS3s, by having a clearance sale (see: price cut) on the existing 60GBs. The 80GB, which in its current form is only available in the "MotorStorm bundle" (it's status is labeled as "LIMITED EDITION") gets slapped with the $599 label. When the 60GB is out of the picture, the 80GB bundle is "discontinued" and a standalone 80GB PS3 is offered. (Sony would obviously keep this under wraps, otherwise if consumers knew, they'd all be ditching the idea of buying up the 60G in the first place... eliminating Sony's primary goal in all of this)

The Single SKU then starts to arise at $499 again. Featuring the release of their new touch sense SIXAXIS controller.

Therefore, quite possibly... and I mean possibly, paving the way for a 120Gb "premium" bundle sometime soon thereafter.

Of course, this move is only what is logical and Sony doesn't always follow logic, although, this is the way it should go along. Even now, after all this, I still feel Sony realize what's common sense towards their sales right now.

henry4th

I agree with you 95%. The only difference is that I believe 80GB system will be first sold at 549 instead of 499 when 60G is sold out. Then we will see another price drop on the 80G system and see a 120G (or bigger) version of PS3.

actually it will be 499 cuz the 80 gig is more commonaly used and the ee is out

Avatar image for KadeYuy_
KadeYuy_

243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 KadeYuy_
Member since 2007 • 243 Posts
well that sucks so the people that were faithful to them by buying the ps3 when it came out get screwed because we would now have to buy a new controler and get we got less for more money
Avatar image for Elviathan
Elviathan

5052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Elviathan
Member since 2006 • 5052 Posts
Yeah that seems quite logical. Let's hope they discontinue the bundle in a month or two and when the holiday season comes around, they should just release the 80GB SKU for $499 with their new Sixaxis controller.
Avatar image for sainraja
sainraja

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 sainraja
Member since 2006 • 1956 Posts

[QUOTE="Deepcut9"]The emulation software--which, according you, is making it cheaper to produce PS3--is for PS2 emulation?jas315

Yes. Including PS1.

There is enough supply of the 60GB unit in retail for this holiday season......at least I think they do. =/

Avatar image for Lights-Shadow
Lights-Shadow

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Lights-Shadow
Member since 2007 • 160 Posts

http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/13/sony-says-499-60gb-ps3-is-staying-alive-alive-in-us/

no one came to my thread I have this on so this one seemed apropriate.

Avatar image for choasgod
choasgod

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 choasgod
Member since 2005 • 5710 Posts
[QUOTE="jas315"]

[QUOTE="Deepcut9"]The emulation software--which, according you, is making it cheaper to produce PS3--is for PS2 emulation?sainraja

Yes. Including PS1.

There is enough supply of the 60GB unit in retail for this holiday season......at least I think they do. =/



Remember sales have doubled in physical sotres --> or atleast thats the case arrocding to SONY about the top 5 retailers selling PS3 ...
On Amazon PS3 is selling in huge quantities ...

60gb PS3 should be gone by late september / early october imo ...
Avatar image for TOTAL_DEFENSE_0
TOTAL_DEFENSE_0

1192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#40 TOTAL_DEFENSE_0
Member since 2007 • 1192 Posts
I hope your right for Sony and PS3's sake.
Avatar image for 5FingersOfDeath
5FingersOfDeath

1114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 5FingersOfDeath
Member since 2007 • 1114 Posts

This might be a stupid Q, but I'm wondering if the PS3s internal hard drive can be swapped?

Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts

This might be a stupid Q, but I'm wondering if the PS3s internal hard drive can be swapped?

5FingersOfDeath

Yes, there's instructions in the manual. Just remember to get tiny screwdrivers for circuit coards from Radio Shack. Not to use on circuitboards, it's just the scews holding the HDD in are very small, you don't want to strip them

This is the drive I have in my PS3 right now: http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16822149057

Avatar image for 5FingersOfDeath
5FingersOfDeath

1114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 5FingersOfDeath
Member since 2007 • 1114 Posts
[QUOTE="5FingersOfDeath"]

This might be a stupid Q, but I'm wondering if the PS3s internal hard drive can be swapped?

TimothyB

Yes, there's instructions in the manual. Just remember to get tiny screwdrivers for circuit coards from Radio Shack. Not to use on circuitboards, it's just the scews holding the HDD in are very small, you don't want to strip them

This is the drive I have in my PS3 right now:

Sounds good, I'll get one when I'm down to 10G. Ummm how would I transfer data? Do I need to hook em up to a comp.?

Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts
[QUOTE="TimothyB"][QUOTE="5FingersOfDeath"]

This might be a stupid Q, but I'm wondering if the PS3s internal hard drive can be swapped?

5FingersOfDeath

Yes, there's instructions in the manual. Just remember to get tiny screwdrivers for circuit coards from Radio Shack. Not to use on circuitboards, it's just the scews holding the HDD in are very small, you don't want to strip them

This is the drive I have in my PS3 right now:

Sounds good, I'll get one when I'm down to 10G. Ummm how would I transfer data? Do I need to hook em up to a comp.?

If you have a 60gb model you can probably transfer all your saved game data to memory cards with the copy function. Or a thumbdrive with the usb ports. Then just redownload all the demos, movies and patches on the new drive. It's good to back up your saves now and then just incase the drive dies, which happened with my 20gig drive, which is the reason I bought the 120gig drive.

Avatar image for Cutekitten6_18
Cutekitten6_18

22640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Cutekitten6_18
Member since 2005 • 22640 Posts
Makes sense.