Warhawk or Unreal Tournament 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Booty998
Booty998

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Booty998
Member since 2005 • 701 Posts
I want a online game and I have Call of Duty for the 360. So which one is better?
Avatar image for Booty998
Booty998

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Booty998
Member since 2005 • 701 Posts
bomp
Avatar image for ocdog45
ocdog45

9072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#3 ocdog45
Member since 2005 • 9072 Posts
at this point its gotta be UT III
Avatar image for Booty998
Booty998

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Booty998
Member since 2005 • 701 Posts
BBBUUUMMMPPP !
Avatar image for Krigon
Krigon

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Krigon
Member since 2005 • 5591 Posts
I don't have UT3 (not out in Sweden), but i would go for it. It has mods!
Avatar image for the4got10one
the4got10one

781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 the4got10one
Member since 2007 • 781 Posts
Both are great games. I'd say go with Warhawk. Some people seem to have trouble with the twitch based gameplay of UT3.
Avatar image for 1nverted
1nverted

1654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 1nverted
Member since 2006 • 1654 Posts

I was sorely dissapointed with Warhawk.

To start off with there is no in game tutorial to give you the basics, you basically just have to join a server and learn as you go, so for the first few hours it was just a confusing mess. Then as I got the hang of the game I found that getting into a Warhawk meant certain death as there are already players who domninate the sky and wont let you live longer than a few seconds, so dogfights rarely happen.

If your not getting your ass handed to you in the sky, your on the ground which is just as bland. Unless your in a tank or jeep your basically mince meat for the Warhawks that hover around and pick off soldiers fighting other soldiers and the fact that you respawn with nothing but a pistol means that before your worth anything in a shootout you have to run around aimlessly looking for a weapon. Plus you can't aim them properly as there is no over the shoulder aiming system which makes infantry combat really bland.

It's a mess of a game really.

Avatar image for yonnex
yonnex

1265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 yonnex
Member since 2006 • 1265 Posts
Get Warhawk there is so many diffrent things you can do!!! fly, drive, on foot, dropship, set up booby traps on the roads it is so sweet
Avatar image for CellAnimation
CellAnimation

6116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 CellAnimation
Member since 2007 • 6116 Posts
I own both and they are both nice arcade like shooters. Warhawk is obviously 3rd person. UTIII 1st person, or 3rd person with mods. If you like arcade like shooters either are a great choice but I'd pick UTIII over Warhawk just for the crazy mods, plus I like how fast it plays.
Avatar image for mosespippy
mosespippy

7501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 mosespippy
Member since 2005 • 7501 Posts

I was sorely dissapointed with Warhawk.

To start off with there is no in game tutorial to give you the basics, you basically just have to join a server and learn as you go, so for the first few hours it was just a confusing mess. Then as I got the hang of the game I found that getting into a Warhawk meant certain death as there are already players who domninate the sky and wont let you live longer than a few seconds, so dogfights rarely happen.

If your not getting your ass handed to you in the sky, your on the ground which is just as bland. Unless your in a tank or jeep your basically mince meat for the Warhawks that hover around and pick off soldiers fighting other soldiers and the fact that you respawn with nothing but a pistol means that before your worth anything in a shootout you have to run around aimlessly looking for a weapon. Plus you can't aim them properly as there is no over the shoulder aiming system which makes infantry combat really bland.

It's a mess of a game really.

1nverted
This is why there are lvl 1 servers. They are for people with less than 5000 points. 5000 points is 1 days worth for the good pilots, and they can't get into these games. You also spawn with 2 grenades and a knife, which is all you need to survive, if you know what your doing. You always spawn by better weapons anyway. Any warhawk that is hovering trying to take out ground troops is most likely going to get shot down by other pilots, or ground troops in tanks, turrets or with rocket launchers. If they hover low enough, proxy mines and flamethrower will take them down too. Sounds to me like you just suck at the game and you think it's the games fault.
Avatar image for yonnex
yonnex

1265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 yonnex
Member since 2006 • 1265 Posts
you are a noob without doubt who can stand practice. To anwser some questions yes you will probably die in the Warhawk alot at first it does require something called skill. As for on foot combat you wont get picked off aslong as you equip correctly before hitting the battle field make sure you get rocket launcher if a hawk comes over head 2 rockets he is down. Normally after they realise your not a noob and fire the rocket launcher at them once they will fly away in fear!!! also keep a jeep handy as when your in and out of one you will have double the life because you will have the jeeps health and your own. Its a skillful combination of being able to stay alive on foot and jump in and out of diffrent machines etc. Dont listen to non skillful noobs.
Avatar image for 1nverted
1nverted

1654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 1nverted
Member since 2006 • 1654 Posts
[QUOTE="1nverted"]

I was sorely dissapointed with Warhawk.

To start off with there is no in game tutorial to give you the basics, you basically just have to join a server and learn as you go, so for the first few hours it was just a confusing mess. Then as I got the hang of the game I found that getting into a Warhawk meant certain death as there are already players who domninate the sky and wont let you live longer than a few seconds, so dogfights rarely happen.

If your not getting your ass handed to you in the sky, your on the ground which is just as bland. Unless your in a tank or jeep your basically mince meat for the Warhawks that hover around and pick off soldiers fighting other soldiers and the fact that you respawn with nothing but a pistol means that before your worth anything in a shootout you have to run around aimlessly looking for a weapon. Plus you can't aim them properly as there is no over the shoulder aiming system which makes infantry combat really bland.

It's a mess of a game really.

mosespippy

This is why there are lvl 1 servers. They are for people with less than 5000 points. 5000 points is 1 days worth for the good pilots, and they can't get into these games. You also spawn with 2 grenades and a knife, which is all you need to survive, if you know what your doing. You always spawn by better weapons anyway. Any warhawk that is hovering trying to take out ground troops is most likely going to get shot down by other pilots, or ground troops in tanks, turrets or with rocket launchers. If they hover low enough, proxy mines and flamethrower will take them down too. Sounds to me like you just suck at the game and you think it's the games fault.

Well being Australian means if I want to play on a server with a decent latency I have the choice of 2 servers, 1 being empty 90% of the time and the other being full with most of the Aussie Warhawk owners. It may the case in America or Europe where there is a plethora of servers to choose from, however in Aus we don't get that luxury.

Avatar image for the4got10one
the4got10one

781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 the4got10one
Member since 2007 • 781 Posts

I was sorely dissapointed with Warhawk.

To start off with there is no in game tutorial to give you the basics, you basically just have to join a server and learn as you go, so for the first few hours it was just a confusing mess. Then as I got the hang of the game I found that getting into a Warhawk meant certain death as there are already players who domninate the sky and wont let you live longer than a few seconds, so dogfights rarely happen.

If your not getting your ass handed to you in the sky, your on the ground which is just as bland. Unless your in a tank or jeep your basically mince meat for the Warhawks that hover around and pick off soldiers fighting other soldiers and the fact that you respawn with nothing but a pistol means that before your worth anything in a shootout you have to run around aimlessly looking for a weapon. Plus you can't aim them properly as there is no over the shoulder aiming system which makes infantry combat really bland.

It's a mess of a game really.

1nverted

I think you need to play the game more. If you want to get into a dogfight, try going into deathmatch or team deathmatch and going into a dogfight specific match. When you're on the ground, you can get the homing missle which can easily take down a warhawk. And that pistol is more than enough to keep you alive. I've killed plenty of people with that pistol. Just keep at it and you'll get better.

Avatar image for bazookajoe19
bazookajoe19

827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 bazookajoe19
Member since 2006 • 827 Posts
get warhawk
Avatar image for CellAnimation
CellAnimation

6116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 CellAnimation
Member since 2007 • 6116 Posts
[QUOTE="mosespippy"][QUOTE="1nverted"]

I was sorely dissapointed with Warhawk.

To start off with there is no in game tutorial to give you the basics, you basically just have to join a server and learn as you go, so for the first few hours it was just a confusing mess. Then as I got the hang of the game I found that getting into a Warhawk meant certain death as there are already players who domninate the sky and wont let you live longer than a few seconds, so dogfights rarely happen.

If your not getting your ass handed to you in the sky, your on the ground which is just as bland. Unless your in a tank or jeep your basically mince meat for the Warhawks that hover around and pick off soldiers fighting other soldiers and the fact that you respawn with nothing but a pistol means that before your worth anything in a shootout you have to run around aimlessly looking for a weapon. Plus you can't aim them properly as there is no over the shoulder aiming system which makes infantry combat really bland.

It's a mess of a game really.

1nverted

This is why there are lvl 1 servers. They are for people with less than 5000 points. 5000 points is 1 days worth for the good pilots, and they can't get into these games. You also spawn with 2 grenades and a knife, which is all you need to survive, if you know what your doing. You always spawn by better weapons anyway. Any warhawk that is hovering trying to take out ground troops is most likely going to get shot down by other pilots, or ground troops in tanks, turrets or with rocket launchers. If they hover low enough, proxy mines and flamethrower will take them down too. Sounds to me like you just suck at the game and you think it's the games fault.

Well being Australian means if I want to play on a server with a decent latency I have the choice of 2 servers, 1 being empty 90% of the time and the other being full with most of the Aussie Warhawk owners. It may the case in America or Europe where there is a plethora of servers to choose from, however in Aus we don't get that luxury.

I'm in Australia (Melbourne to be exact) and I have no issue playing on US or European servers. I'm not sure what kind of connection you're on but I'm on 24 mbit down and haven't had any issues with lag at all. Warhawk takes practice not much else to say.
Avatar image for d14m23
d14m23

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 d14m23
Member since 2005 • 491 Posts
Both are awesome. Don't listen to these people that don't like Warhawk. All aspects of the game is great whether you want to fly, tank, or on foot the game is great. You just have to learn which weapons work better. Like the flame thrower, it is great against tanks if you are on foot. UT3 is also great. Hands down the best Multiplayer game franchise on the computer come to the PS3. Get both and have fun!!
Avatar image for 1nverted
1nverted

1654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 1nverted
Member since 2006 • 1654 Posts
I knew there was something wrong with the game when I realised I am probably more useful running around the battleifled with a knife than driving a Tank or piloting a Warhawk. Being in a Tank should give you the feeling that your actually in something with tonnes of armour and firepower, yet your really just as weak as an infantry unit.
Avatar image for brad5553
brad5553

188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 brad5553
Member since 2006 • 188 Posts

unreal tournament 3 hands down i own both and i hardly play warhawk

PSN:jamsk8er

add me

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
UT3 is better, plus it has a ton of mods.
Avatar image for -Rinder-
-Rinder-

1307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 -Rinder-
Member since 2008 • 1307 Posts
get ut3
Avatar image for deactivated-5cc24faac533d
deactivated-5cc24faac533d

691

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5cc24faac533d
Member since 2007 • 691 Posts

Both are awesome. Don't listen to these people that don't like Warhawk. All aspects of the game is great whether you want to fly, tank, or on foot the game is great. You just have to learn which weapons work better. Like the flame thrower, it is great against tanks if you are on foot. UT3 is also great. Hands down the best Multiplayer game franchise on the computer come to the PS3. Get both and have fun!!d14m23

I, personally, think Warhawk is the better of the two. UT3, while well made, just has a hollow feel to it. pros for it include a nonexistant learning curve, you can pick up a gun and seriously kick some rear with little to no Fps experience. Cons are lack of skill, the online (depending on your area) could be crappy, uncoordinated, and such ans such.

I, personally, prefer warhawk because it does have a learning curve. It makes it all the more satisfying when you hop into a warhawk and shoot a more competant pilot out of the sky. The flight controls are easy to understand and learn. All you need to do is spend some time with it and you will be good.

Overall it will really come down to a personal preference, some people like the mindless death and carnage of UT3, others like the feel you get from warhawk.

Avatar image for d14m23
d14m23

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 d14m23
Member since 2005 • 491 Posts

[QUOTE="d14m23"]Both are awesome. Don't listen to these people that don't like Warhawk. All aspects of the game is great whether you want to fly, tank, or on foot the game is great. You just have to learn which weapons work better. Like the flame thrower, it is great against tanks if you are on foot. UT3 is also great. Hands down the best Multiplayer game franchise on the computer come to the PS3. Get both and have fun!!LatusItani

I, personally, think Warhawk is the better of the two. UT3, while well made, just has a hollow feel to it. pros for it include a nonexistant learning curve, you can pick up a gun and seriously kick some rear with little to no Fps experience. Cons are lack of skill, the online (depending on your area) could be crappy, uncoordinated, and such ans such.

I, personally, prefer warhawk because it does have a learning curve. It makes it all the more satisfying when you hop into a warhawk and shoot a more competant pilot out of the sky. The flight controls are easy to understand and learn. All you need to do is spend some time with it and you will be good.

Overall it will really come down to a personal preference, some people like the mindless death and carnage of UT3, others like the feel you get from warhawk.

Oh, I wasn't saying UT3 is better. It really depends on the person.

Flying the Warhawk is so freakin' addicting. There is nothing more satisfying than winning a dogfight.

I love both. All depends on what I am in the mood for.

Avatar image for bigLLL
bigLLL

3688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 bigLLL
Member since 2005 • 3688 Posts
I just got ut3 today and I must say I luv it, they did a great job getting it to run on the ps3, it looks stunning and plays great!!! and the fact that is has mods just makes it a winner, I have warhawk as well and It's great so either one ud have to be happy.
Avatar image for Booty998
Booty998

701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Booty998
Member since 2005 • 701 Posts
I picked Warhawk
Avatar image for shimamaster
shimamaster

408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 shimamaster
Member since 2004 • 408 Posts
good choice mate
Avatar image for patriotsr1
patriotsr1

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 patriotsr1
Member since 2008 • 76 Posts
Both are good games. Warhawk supports 4p split-screen online and UT3 is 1p online or offline.
Avatar image for jquest123
jquest123

765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 jquest123
Member since 2007 • 765 Posts

UT3
Pros:
Mods (can add to a whole new type of gameplay), easy to learn, bots, easy to get a quick game going both on/offline excellent graphics, you dont get mad that easily

Cons:
horrible graphics if you play on an SDTV (trust me i know), no alot of people online (will change when it comes out in Europe), gets repetetive real quick, campaign is a joke

Warhawk:
Pros: 32 player online, huge battles, ground,air,etc sits your fighting technique decent graphics both on SD and HDTV (not as good as UT3 on HDTV though) Really fun and ADDICTING once you get the hang of it. Kills are more satisfying

Cons: steep learning curve, can get really frustrating, your gonna die alot, flying in warhawk on pro for the first time will make you want to kill yourself,no campaign

I'd go with warhawk, stronger online community and more to do in game. UT3 is still by far one of the best games Ive ever played even without bots, its a great game to get if your internet sucks since it has bots. Plus mods can change the game drastically. Theres like about 50+ mods for the PS3 out now.

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
I got both and I must say I enjoy Warhawk more.
Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts

UT3
Pros:
Mods (can add to a whole new type of gameplay), easy to learn, bots, easy to get a quick game going both on/offline excellent graphics, you dont get mad that easily

Cons:
horrible graphics if you play on an SDTV (trust me i know), no alot of people online (will change when it comes out in Europe), gets repetetive real quick, campaign is a joke

Warhawk:
Pros: 32 player online, huge battles, ground,air,etc sits your fighting technique decent graphics both on SD and HDTV (not as good as UT3 on HDTV though) Really fun and ADDICTING once you get the hang of it. Kills are more satisfying, no campaign

Cons: steep learning curve, can get really frustrating, your gonna die alot, flying in warhawk on pro for the first time will make you want to kill yourself

I'd go with warhawk, stronger online community and more to do in game. UT3 is still by far one of the best games Ive ever played even without bots, its a great game to get if your internet sucks since it has bots. Plus mods can change the game drastically. Theres like about 50+ mods for the PS3 out now.

jquest123

I totally disagree. I play all my games on an SDTV and this looks good.

Avatar image for jquest123
jquest123

765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 jquest123
Member since 2007 • 765 Posts
[QUOTE="jquest123"]

UT3
Pros:
Mods (can add to a whole new type of gameplay), easy to learn, bots, easy to get a quick game going both on/offline excellent graphics, you dont get mad that easily

Cons:
horrible graphics if you play on an SDTV (trust me i know), no alot of people online (will change when it comes out in Europe), gets repetetive real quick, campaign is a joke

Warhawk:
Pros: 32 player online, huge battles, ground,air,etc sits your fighting technique decent graphics both on SD and HDTV (not as good as UT3 on HDTV though) Really fun and ADDICTING once you get the hang of it. Kills are more satisfying, no campaign

Cons: steep learning curve, can get really frustrating, your gonna die alot, flying in warhawk on pro for the first time will make you want to kill yourself

I'd go with warhawk, stronger online community and more to do in game. UT3 is still by far one of the best games Ive ever played even without bots, its a great game to get if your internet sucks since it has bots. Plus mods can change the game drastically. Theres like about 50+ mods for the PS3 out now.

Duckman5

I totally disagree. I play all my games on an SDTV and this looks good.

well then its probably my SDTV it flat out sucks, but no worries i got an HDTV now:D

Avatar image for d14m23
d14m23

491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 d14m23
Member since 2005 • 491 Posts

I picked WarhawkBooty998

Good choice. You couldn't have gone wrong with either one, but Warhawk is a little more fun in my opinion just because if you get tired of doing one thing you can switch.

Look forward to blowing you outta of the sky. Hehe :P

Avatar image for OfficialBed
OfficialBed

17668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 OfficialBed
Member since 2005 • 17668 Posts

back when i had my ps3....i had warhawk and loved it

Avatar image for Singpow
Singpow

360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 Singpow
Member since 2007 • 360 Posts
Well i've like UT for a long time now, and i havent tried UT3 yet, but i have warhawk, and it is it a depature from your average game. You will die A LOT. You will get frustarated, A LOT. and until you have a decent handle on everything, you might not like it. I have and i've played for a couple hours and i still die a lot even though i have the hang of it. Personally, i'm not that into it, but who knows, you might be. And if i were you i would STRONGLY reccomend getting Resistance Fall of Man if you havent already. I love that game, one of the most fun FPS's i've ever played.
Avatar image for legofan712
legofan712

664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 legofan712
Member since 2005 • 664 Posts
Vehicles = Warhawk
Psycho = UT3 :)
Avatar image for GEMINIVice
GEMINIVice

1139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 GEMINIVice
Member since 2007 • 1139 Posts

get warhawkbazookajoe19

I say get both. Warhawk is a unique third person shooter in which you have all kinds of capabilites with the aircraft (from movement to weaponry). UT3 is another first person without multiplayer splitscreen, but it's beginning to show it's gonna 'stay fresh' for a minute. You have the option of freely downloading mods for the game and a splitscreen patch may become available in the future.

Just my thoughts. I own both myself and enjoy them equally whenever I play them.