was killzone 1 realy that bad?

i actually realy enjoyed killzone 1 and i think alot of the Wii and MS fanboys are useing that numba one suked as their exuse to ignore kilzone 2s greatness. im realy looking  forward to it.

I just rented it last week and thought it was great. It had great animations and the AI was good. The audio really needed some help though.emitsu97

the AI was horrible. and the collision detection was horrid, and many glitches.

but overall it was a good game, i like the intro, the story and the weapon animation, but hated the fact that you play as 4 diff character.WTF  give me someone tht can keep up with the chief at least.

killzone liberation is also great, and if you have a psp don't miss it. 

I know Killzone was not the greatest game ever made but it was still a very good game. The story mode was good and playing online was great.

[QUOTE="emitsu97"]I just rented it last week and thought it was great. It had great animations and the AI was good. The audio really needed some help though.PowerCharged

the AI was horrible. and the collision detection was horrid, and many glitches.

but overall it was a good game, i like the intro, the story and the weapon animation, but hated the fact that you play as 4 diff character.WTF  give me someone tht can keep up with the chief at least.

killzone liberation is also great, and if you have a psp don't miss it. 

No way. People are overreacting. Killzone 1 was good.ludacriss

Absolutely Killzone 1 was good.

Conceptually solid, but technically it was over-ambitious.  They tried to do things beyond what the PS2 was capable of.  It's clear whenever you approach an ally and their face texture takes 2 seconds to load.  Kinda scary.

The enemies (helghast) were good and scary though, and I like the cutscenes.  I just didn't think the playable class variety ended up playing a significant role in differentiating the gameplay.  Overall, a fairly generic experience with some big technical problems. 

personly i think im the best killzone player in the world lol...seriously i beat every person in the EU server and i got my ps2 bios flashed and ntsc copy so i could play on the US server and i destroyed evryone i played

i had 1 GOA profile

1 General

1 lt general

2 profiles i had zero fodders and cowards

insane kill death ratio(i only used shotgun sniper helg and isa pistol grenades and assault rifles)

anyone wanna play again just send me a PM on here

KZ1 was a fantastic experience for me. Most people who dog it are solely going on the mediocre reviews it got from sites like GS (which were fairly groteque to put it lightly) and have never played it or were very influenced by the reviews that when they did play ten minutes of it they just insisted on disliking it. Any which way, each to his/her own. I'm glad I'm one that can think for myself; it's a good virtue that not many people have. To me it was a great art piece with a great stroy line made for growth. I loved it.

Also, if over 2 million copies sold world wide it couldn't have been half as bad as a lot of people would make you believe.

I can't figure out why people consider Chief to be this bad mamojama.emitsu97

people like to play with cool leading character. templar was ok but since you were forced to play with 3 other character the excitement went away and you don't get to know him. luger was a girl and i don't like girls as lead character, rico was just barbaric and his eavy weapons are just for noobs who can't aim so they spray bullets hoping that they will get a head shot. hakka was useless. 

I can't figure out why people consider Chief to be this bad mamojama.emitsu97

If halo was a PlayStation, title it would have just been one of the great games to play in it's vast libary but not really an out right stand out.

killzone 1 had plenty of hype ....they even had it on the cover of "The Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine" i still have that issue.360player_eq12

It was just okay.  Socom owns itjshigashi

It was just okay. Socom owns itjshigashi

 definitely. but story wise killzone owns

[QUOTE="emitsu97"]I can't figure out why people consider Chief to be this bad mamojama.PowerCharged

people like to play with cool leading character. templar was ok but since you were forced to play with 3 other character the excitement went away and you don't get to know him. luger was a girl and i don't like girls as lead character, rico was just barbaric and his eavy weapons are just for noobs who can't aim so they spray bullets hoping that they will get a head shot. hakka was useless.

But what makes Chief cool?  Kratos is easily a bad mamojama.  Snake is easily a bad mamojama.  Chief has zero character/personality. 

[QUOTE="360player_eq12"]killzone 1 had plenty of hype ....they even had it on the cover of "The Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine" i still have that issue.chubear700

KZ1 was a fantastic experience for me. Most people who dog it are solely going on the mediocre reviews it got from sites like GS (which were fairly groteque to put it lightly) and have never played it or were very influenced by the reviews that when they did play ten minutes of it they just insisted on disliking it. Any which way, each to his/her own. I'm glad I'm one that can think for myself; it's a good virtue that not many people have. To me it was a great art piece with a great stroy line made for growth. I loved it.

Also, if over 2 million copies sold world wide it couldn't have been half as bad as a lot of people would make you believe.

chubear700

Insult others on their opinions, nice.

[QUOTE="emitsu97"]I can't figure out why people consider Chief to be this bad mamojama.PowerCharged

people like to play with cool leading character. templar was ok but since you were forced to play with 3 other character the excitement went away and you don't get to know him. luger was a girl and i don't like girls as lead character, rico was just barbaric and his eavy weapons are just for noobs who can't aim so they spray bullets hoping that they will get a head shot. hakka was useless. 

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="chubear700"]

KZ1 was a fantastic experience for me. Most people who dog it are solely going on the mediocre reviews it got from sites like GS (which were fairly groteque to put it lightly) and have never played it or were very influenced by the reviews that when they did play ten minutes of it they just insisted on disliking it. Any which way, each to his/her own. I'm glad I'm one that can think for myself; it's a good virtue that not many people have. To me it was a great art piece with a great stroy line made for growth. I loved it.

Also, if over 2 million copies sold world wide it couldn't have been half as bad as a lot of people would make you believe.

chubear700

Insult others on their opinions, nice.

 Everyone knows I am not a troll, but whatever makes you sleep at night. You used to bash the PS3.

Think that's what u call hyping your game before its out i could be wrong tho.[QUOTE="chubear700"][QUOTE="360player_eq12"]killzone 1 had plenty of hype ....they even had it on the cover of "The Official U.S. PlayStation Magazine" i still have that issue.360player_eq12

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="chubear700"]

KZ1 was a fantastic experience for me. Most people who dog it are solely going on the mediocre reviews it got from sites like GS (which were fairly groteque to put it lightly) and have never played it or were very influenced by the reviews that when they did play ten minutes of it they just insisted on disliking it. Any which way, each to his/her own. I'm glad I'm one that can think for myself; it's a good virtue that not many people have. To me it was a great art piece with a great stroy line made for growth. I loved it.

Also, if over 2 million copies sold world wide it couldn't have been half as bad as a lot of people would make you believe.

chubear700

Insult others on their opinions, nice.

 I guess the proof is in the pudding:

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/show_msgs.php?board_id=314159282&topic_id=25588541

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/show_msgs.php?board_id=314159282&topic_id=25588536

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25586760

You got me. You are quite the detective. I guess people aren't allowed to like and dislike things about all 3 consoles in your world.

Btw, Killzone is definitely worth buying for $10 if you've never played it.

[QUOTE="PowerCharged"]

[QUOTE="emitsu97"]I can't figure out why people consider Chief to be this bad mamojama.emitsu97

people like to play with cool leading character. templar was ok but since you were forced to play with 3 other character the excitement went away and you don't get to know him. luger was a girl and i don't like girls as lead character, rico was just barbaric and his eavy weapons are just for noobs who can't aim so they spray bullets hoping that they will get a head shot. hakka was useless.

But what makes Chief cool? Kratos is easily a bad mamojama. Snake is easily a bad mamojama. Chief has zero character/personality.

dude you got it all wrong. to the lemmings masterchief is cool. but for me he a POS. when someone that can stand againts him i meant story wise. example solid snake have a strong background of doing awsome things, and so does kratos, i guess what im asking for is an iconic character. and i have the same problem with RFOM, the main guy is just a nobody, well i guess since he is half chimera now, and was arested by the black ops in the sequel he might be better. 

[QUOTE="chubear700"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="chubear700"]

KZ1 was a fantastic experience for me. Most people who dog it are solely going on the mediocre reviews it got from sites like GS (which were fairly groteque to put it lightly) and have never played it or were very influenced by the reviews that when they did play ten minutes of it they just insisted on disliking it. Any which way, each to his/her own. I'm glad I'm one that can think for myself; it's a good virtue that not many people have. To me it was a great art piece with a great stroy line made for growth. I loved it.

Also, if over 2 million copies sold world wide it couldn't have been half as bad as a lot of people would make you believe.

BioShockOwnz

Insult others on their opinions, nice.

 Everyone knows I am not a troll, but whatever makes you sleep at night. You used to bash the PS3.

dude you got it all wrong. to the lemmings masterchief is cool. but for me he a POS. when someone that can stand againts him i meant story wise. example solid snake have a strong background of doing awsome things, and so does kratos, i guess what im asking for is an iconic character. and i have the same problem with RFOM, the main guy is just a nobody, well i guess since he is half chimera now, and was arested by the black ops in the sequel he might be better. PowerCharged

I agree with you about Hale.  At minimum, main characters need to have an audible voice. 

[QUOTE="emitsu97"][QUOTE="PowerCharged"]

[QUOTE="emitsu97"]I can't figure out why people consider Chief to be this bad mamojama.PowerCharged

people like to play with cool leading character. templar was ok but since you were forced to play with 3 other character the excitement went away and you don't get to know him. luger was a girl and i don't like girls as lead character, rico was just barbaric and his eavy weapons are just for noobs who can't aim so they spray bullets hoping that they will get a head shot. hakka was useless.

But what makes Chief cool? Kratos is easily a bad mamojama. Snake is easily a bad mamojama. Chief has zero character/personality.

dude you got it all wrong. to the lemmings masterchief is cool. but for me he a POS. when someone that can stand againts him i meant story wise. example solid snake have a strong background of doing awsome things, and so does kratos, i guess what im asking for is an iconic character. and i have the same problem with RFOM, the main guy is just a nobody, well i guess since he is half chimera now, and was arested by the black ops in the sequel he might be better. 

I agree, but what if that nobody (Nathan Hale) turns into somebody (an iconic character)? He is obviously transforming throughout the game, and I think Resistance 2 will be very epic, and change how we all feel toward Resistance.

 Everyone knows I am not a troll, but whatever makes you sleep at night. You used to bash the PS3.

 So, I am a troll because I want Heavenly Sword more then any game? That remains true. Talk intelligently instead of trying to insult me and others for our opinions on games. Just because you don't enjoy some games doesn't mean you're a troll. I have said more positive then negative, so whatever man.

[QUOTE="PowerCharged"][QUOTE="emitsu97"][QUOTE="PowerCharged"]

[QUOTE="emitsu97"]I can't figure out why people consider Chief to be this bad mamojama.BioShockOwnz

people like to play with cool leading character. templar was ok but since you were forced to play with 3 other character the excitement went away and you don't get to know him. luger was a girl and i don't like girls as lead character, rico was just barbaric and his eavy weapons are just for noobs who can't aim so they spray bullets hoping that they will get a head shot. hakka was useless.

But what makes Chief cool? Kratos is easily a bad mamojama. Snake is easily a bad mamojama. Chief has zero character/personality.

dude you got it all wrong. to the lemmings masterchief is cool. but for me he a POS. when someone that can stand againts him i meant story wise. example solid snake have a strong background of doing awsome things, and so does kratos, i guess what im asking for is an iconic character. and i have the same problem with RFOM, the main guy is just a nobody, well i guess since he is half chimera now, and was arested by the black ops in the sequel he might be better.

I agree, but what if that nobody (Nathan Hale) turns into somebody (an iconic character)? He is obviously transforming throughout the game, and I think Resistance 2 will be very epic, and change how we all feel toward Resistance.

that's exactly what i want.

"SuperCharged" is the name add me to your friends list if you have a ps3. maybe we can duke it out later. 

[QUOTE="PowerCharged"]dude you got it all wrong. to the lemmings masterchief is cool. but for me he a POS. when someone that can stand againts him i meant story wise. example solid snake have a strong background of doing awsome things, and so does kratos, i guess what im asking for is an iconic character. and i have the same problem with RFOM, the main guy is just a nobody, well i guess since he is half chimera now, and was arested by the black ops in the sequel he might be better. emitsu97

I agree with you about Hale. At minimum, main characters need to have an audible voice.

my opinion about templar has changed BTW, i was refering to him based on KZ 1. but after playing liberation i started liking him and i hope that in KZ Ps3 playing with him will be epic.

BTW. do you want a cover sytem in KZ ps3. i mean with those long @$$ reloading animation sequences, a cover system is a must have. 95% of my demise in resisance is done while im reloading. 

I agree, but what if that nobody (Nathan Hale) turns into somebody (an iconic character)? He is obviously transforming throughout the game, and I think Resistance 2 will be very epic, and change how we all feel toward Resistance.

that's exactly what i want.

"SuperCharged" is the name add me to your friends list if you have a ps3. maybe we can duke it out later. 

I'll add you if you wanna play online sometime.

BioShockOwnz

I agree, but what if that nobody (Nathan Hale) turns into somebody (an iconic character)? He is obviously transforming throughout the game, and I think Resistance 2 will be very epic, and change how we all feel toward Resistance.

that's exactly what i want.

"SuperCharged" is the name add me to your friends list if you have a ps3. maybe we can duke it out later.

I'll add you if you wanna play online sometime.

 no problem. (BTW im with you on heavenly swords. i think the will rock)

I liked the game as well, Online was pretty insane which was awsome!Stryder_18

there are so many cheater now itsnot even funny 

CAN YOU STILL PLAY KZ1 ONLINE OR ARE THERE SERVERS DOWN?