I vote Godfather 2
This topic is locked from further discussion.
wow that is pretty bad, ive not played a lot of ps3 games so my addition is really limited. I would say that fallout 3 wasnt that good and neither was wanted: weapons of fate nor MAG
damann22
Seconded. The game wasn't very good on the whole...
:|
Put a ton of hours into it to give it a fair shake, but Bethesda games just are not my cuppa.
Out of my collection it'd probably be Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom. Not to say it looked bad at all (I was enticed by the cloaks when I played it), just haven't seen worse yet.
[QUOTE="damann22"]
wow that is pretty bad, ive not played a lot of ps3 games so my addition is really limited. I would say that fallout 3 wasnt that good and neither was wanted: weapons of fate nor MAG
MonkeySpot
Seconded. The game wasn't very good on the whole...
:|
Put a ton of hours into it to give it a fair shake, but Bethesda games just are not my cuppa.
Wow, well that's the first time I've seen such an opinion. But yeah, Last Rebellion had horrible graphics, but the visuals were honestly great, even the character designs were attractive to see.Out of my collection it'd probably be Untold Legends: Dark Kingdom. Not to say it looked bad at all (I was enticed by the cloaks when I played it), just haven't seen worse yet.
finalserenade75
I second this statement. This was one of the first ps3 games I bought because it was cheap. It was purged from my collection very quickly.
[QUOTE="damann22"]
wow that is pretty bad, ive not played a lot of ps3 games so my addition is really limited. I would say that fallout 3 wasnt that good and neither was wanted: weapons of fate nor MAG
MonkeySpot
Seconded. The game wasn't very good on the whole...
:|
Put a ton of hours into it to give it a fair shake, but Bethesda games just are not my cuppa.
I had New Vegas shrinkwrapped for the longest time (got it when it went $9.99 for the very first time). Never could bring myself to start it. Ended up selling it on ebay sealed for basically the same . I just had the sense that more than any other franchises, the Bethesda games probably should be played on a PC at max settings and with mods to really be enjoyed. All the problems their games had in the past turned me off as well (even if they were mostly fixed, I know the "vampirism" glitch in Oblivion was never fixed, and Fallout 3 GOTY edition was a mess, and of course skyrim with it's massive save file issue was also an issue but I believe that one was fixed...
black site area 51 turok haze cod WAW army of two 2 the whellman dante infermo kane and luncy and kane and lunch 2 dog days CTR360
Dante Inferno looked OK to me, albeit a very poor mans' God of War, nothing was particularly TERRIBLE about it either that I can remember. It was average both as a game and graphically.
My worst would be:
Terminator Salvation: game was just utter trash all aroud, ugly, choppy animations, a technical mess.
The Watchmen (see above)
Duke Nukem Forever (again)
MAG: decent game, 256 players with smooth servers, BUT bad graphics (even worse looking than the dated Call of Duty engine, and worse looking by a decent margin).
The Saboteur = GREAT fun game, but extremely dated looking graphics and character/car models (graphics probably on par with the Godfather 2 example)
Brink = ok game, kinda trashy but fun in a weird way. TERRIBLE graphics and animations though, and laughable story and character design. Actually now that I think about it I don't know how I enjoyed this game. It was like a bad movie that you just keep watching anyway LOL.
Borderlands = kinda like Brink, game was fun and addictive in a weird way. RPG elements definitely helped keep me going. But the pseudo cel shaded look and character design was very ugly to look at, didn't help that it was texture pop-in galore on consoles.
recently checked out this game called *bodycount* on utube.. far as graphics go, those are the worst i've seen yet, like seriously the ps1 could've handled it.
recently checked out this game called *bodycount* on utube.. far as graphics go, those are the worst i've seen yet, like seriously the ps1 could've handled it.
ShangTsung17
It's a $20.00 now - I picked it up, it's not that bad. Good luck find people online though.
[QUOTE="ShangTsung17"]
recently checked out this game called *bodycount* on utube.. far as graphics go, those are the worst i've seen yet, like seriously the ps1 could've handled it.
d_parker
It's a $20.00 now - I picked it up, it's not that bad. Good luck find people online though.
i never do online mp bro, never have never will, i only play games for the story, i'm an old school gamer.. but that game was just aweful in every aspect, only reason i checked it out was cause i heard the same game designer that made that one also made black, which is one of my favorite fps's of all time.[QUOTE="CTR360"]black site area 51 turok haze cod WAW army of two 2 the whellman dante infermo kane and luncy and kane and lunch 2 dog days 2Chalupas
Dante Inferno looked OK to me, albeit a very poor mans' God of War, nothing was particularly TERRIBLE about it either that I can remember. It was average both as a game and graphically.
My worst would be:
Terminator Salvation: game was just utter trash all aroud, ugly, choppy animations, a technical mess.
The Watchmen (see above)
Duke Nukem Forever (again)
MAG: decent game, 256 players with smooth servers, BUT bad graphics (even worse looking than the dated Call of Duty engine, and worse looking by a decent margin).
The Saboteur = GREAT fun game, but extremely dated looking graphics and character/car models (graphics probably on par with the Godfather 2 example)
Brink = ok game, kinda trashy but fun in a weird way. TERRIBLE graphics and animations though, and laughable story and character design. Actually now that I think about it I don't know how I enjoyed this game. It was like a bad movie that you just keep watching anyway LOL.
Borderlands = kinda like Brink, game was fun and addictive in a weird way. RPG elements definitely helped keep me going. But the pseudo cel shaded look and character design was very ugly to look at, didn't help that it was texture pop-in galore on consoles.
Wrong, the Sabotuer's graphics are not on par with the Godfather 2, just look:
No Detail and I can count the polygon's with my fingers.
The Saboteur's car model is far more detailed.
[QUOTE="ShangTsung17"]
recently checked out this game called *bodycount* on utube.. far as graphics go, those are the worst i've seen yet, like seriously the ps1 could've handled it.
d_parker
It's a $20.00 now - I picked it up, it's not that bad. Good luck find people online though.
Bodycount is probably the worst DEMO i've ever played, and based on the demo it actually might be the ultimate winner in this thread for worst graphics. It never entered my mind because I never actually played the real game, I honestly forgot all about it.
I knew from it's initial reveal that game would suck, all the footage i've seen both pre-and post release sucked, and trying the demo when it came out did nothing but further reinforce all of that. I wouldn't pay $2.00, let alone $20. Too many better games can be had for much less than $20.
[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]
[QUOTE="CTR360"]black site area 51 turok haze cod WAW army of two 2 the whellman dante infermo kane and luncy and kane and lunch 2 dog days RageQuitter69
Dante Inferno looked OK to me, albeit a very poor mans' God of War, nothing was particularly TERRIBLE about it either that I can remember. It was average both as a game and graphically.
My worst would be:
Terminator Salvation: game was just utter trash all aroud, ugly, choppy animations, a technical mess.
The Watchmen (see above)
Duke Nukem Forever (again)
MAG: decent game, 256 players with smooth servers, BUT bad graphics (even worse looking than the dated Call of Duty engine, and worse looking by a decent margin).
The Saboteur = GREAT fun game, but extremely dated looking graphics and character/car models (graphics probably on par with the Godfather 2 example)
Brink = ok game, kinda trashy but fun in a weird way. TERRIBLE graphics and animations though, and laughable story and character design. Actually now that I think about it I don't know how I enjoyed this game. It was like a bad movie that you just keep watching anyway LOL.
Borderlands = kinda like Brink, game was fun and addictive in a weird way. RPG elements definitely helped keep me going. But the pseudo cel shaded look and character design was very ugly to look at, didn't help that it was texture pop-in galore on consoles.
Wrong, the Sabotuer's graphics are not on par with the Godfather 2, just look:
No Detail and I can count the polygon's with my fingers.
The Saboteur's car model is far more detailed.
Can't tell from those tiny pics. But I would say my recollection is that Godfather 2 and Saboteur are closer to each other in terms of "graphics" than they are to the best open world graphics of GTA IV and Red Dead Redemption or Just Cause 2. Both sort of have a "last gen" look to them, but obviously with the higher 720P or whatever native resolution and draw distances of this generation.
I kind of enjoyed both GF2 and Saboteur despite their lousy graphics, but clearly Saboteur was the much better game of the two overall. Actually Saboteur was a truly excellent game.
Duke Nukem Forever without a doubt has last-gen graphics. The gameplay sucked just as bad as it looked too.
Why is everybody saying Fallout 3? I think that game looks really good, even today. The art design was superb and made up for most of its technical problems. New Vegas on the other hand looked pugly, poor art design and an aged engine.
Oblivion... dem faces. Other than that, the game actually looks decent, but whoever did the facial models... just, ugh.
Those NISA games aren't exactly top of the line. My vote goes to Disgaea 3, the sprites aren't even in HD...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment