What do you seriously think about the game? Cause sincerely I don't see what so nice about the game. Doesn't differ from Timesplitters for me. It's just another 7.5 average game IMO.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What do you seriously think about the game? Cause sincerely I don't see what so nice about the game. Doesn't differ from Timesplitters for me. It's just another 7.5 average game IMO.
All of the delays have hurt Haze and you have Ubisoft (publisher) not FreeRadicals(developers) to blame. And the fact that it will be going up against GTA4 and MGS4 will make matters worse. If HAZE would have came out in December like it was suppose to, we wouldn't even be having this conversation, we would be seeing COD4 VS HAZE threads.lol....I for one am still getting HAZE, because FreeRadicals have yet to let me down.
it looks okay. it seems like they are trying to get a "halo" feel and trying to be original with the weird yellow helmets.
also, 4 people online??? i think they could do bettersummer_star17x
It's 4-person co-op, meaning you play through the game with four people. That's very good and not something seen in every game.
When it was first announced I was only a 360 owned and I couldn't wait. But then it was canned on that so i was like maybe a game I'd not get to play. But I still tracked it and the more I seen of it the less impressed I was. The last footage I seen on it was a game show on tv and it looked under-par for next gen visually but it was early development at this time. The screen shots look more impressive now though.
But I have now purchased a PS3 so I have the chance to get this but I'm still unsure. I think I'd like to play a demo of it before I get it as I dont think it's an essential buy really.
i dont think i can answer that poll cuz i havent tried it
but i think it will be a great shooter nonetheless
the only feature worth mentioning about Haze is that its exclusive. -GhostMLD-
As long as this game is only on the PS3 is going to be badass........
I don't think it will happen with the pedigree of the developers and the features offered. I have only really heard two constant negatives: the game looks average artistically and graphically, and that the vehicle sections are iffy. Other than that most sites have praised the gameplay and concept. But...Then again Lair had a developer with a good track record but failed mainly bc the response to the games controls and mission structure as nothing more than paint job on Factor 5's older games. I don't expect the game to get slaughtered, I think it will recieve reviews ranging from 7.5-8.5. I know that Haze certainly is above crap shooters like Turok, and Blacksite but nowhere on level with CoD4 or BioshockI think that it's gonna get slaughtered by critics. I expect another Lair incident, except worse. Some sites recieved hands-on sessions, and are already pointing out flaws that hurt the gameplay badly.
I expect it to crash and burn. Viciously.
Red_Nine
i was thinkin of gettin it but cbf now its been delayed 4 to long so i dun realli care bouts it....
though im waiting 4 mgs 4
[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]the only feature worth mentioning about Haze is that its exclusive. DJCUEBALL
Typical response from a 360 fanboy
I happen to agree with GhostMLD.
Just another average FPS. it makes me think of Halo 3 which is very average to me.TykainWhat do you consider "above average" Not saying Halo is, It's not in my top five shooters either, but when people say it's mediocre, I become interested in knowing what they think is better. Of course I'm speaking of console shooters. We already know that there are countless PC shooters that may be better, and if that's your argument it's a pretty lame one.
[QUOTE="Tykain"]Just another average FPS. it makes me think of Halo 3 which is very average to me.Kuruption84What do you consider "above average" Not saying Halo is, It's not in my top five shooters either, but when people say it's mediocre, I become interested in knowing what they think is better. Of course I'm speaking of console shooters. We already know that there are countless PC shooters that may be better, and if that's your argument it's a pretty lame one.
What's better on consoles ? Bioshock for the solo and COD4 for both solo and multi-player. On PC, too many to list.
I'm not saying Halo 3 sucks, just average, not a bad game but it has nothing more than most other FPS to me, it doesn't stand out of the crowd.
As i see it, Halo 3 is worth getting for the fan of the genre. But for me that's not a huge fan of the genre, but still enjoy playing a FPS every now and then, i'll have higher standards and will prefer picking Bioshock and CoD4 and ignore Halo 3.
Well considering it is a PS3 exclusive it should be pretty decent. All focus is just on the PS3 for the game so I can see it being pretty good, especially since Free Radical has a good record.
I'm keeping an eye on it, it should be worth a pick up from the looks of it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment