[QUOTE="MonkeySpot"]
[QUOTE="hxczuner"]
I consider all games art. I can't think of a single game that I WOULDN't consider art.
frostybanana
Oh c'mon... there are PLENTY. There was that game that you chased down terrorists, and you had a fist fight with Osama BenLauden a few years ago, with a bunch of flag-waving BS draped over it...
:lol:
... but I know what you meant.
For me, it's definitely "Beyond Good & Evil", the perfect game. I also think that "Etermal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem" is unsurpassed in artistic expression, the finest survival horror game ever programmed.
Though I didn't care for the game all that much, "BioShock" was a graphicly wonderful game too. I just didn't care for what they did with that beauty, is all.
it's pretty much subjective as to whether something is a piece of art. one thing might be a piece of crap to one person and godly to another. art is ambiguous.True, but I think we can all agree that punching Osama in the face... it's expression, sure... but art? I'll support Robert Maplethorp puting a bullwhip handle-first up someone's backside and taking a picture of it... but punching Osama?
:?
I'm just not ready to elevate that sort of irrational, blind, ethnocentrichatred to consideration as art... glad you like it, but I just can't. Especially because in the US, video games are getting put on trial again and value judgements from outside will be directly effected by representation from within. We need to show the governing body that games indeed ARE artistic and that they deserve to be protected under the Constitution.
So let's not bring up "Postal", shall we?
:lol:
I'm with you, everything should be protected to say what they wanna say, and art IS about interpretation by the individual... but you see my point, do you not?
:)
Log in to comment