There have been some awesome PS3 games and there have been some busts too. What bad game do you want to be remade so it can fix upon the problems of the game? Also explain what was wrong with the game and what could be improved on. Please no FF7 remake responses as this is not that type of question. This pertains to bad PS3 games that you want to be remade. Mine would have to be Soldier of Fortune: Payback. The game was just plain out horrible. The story was horrible and not entertaining at all. They would need to remake the story for a better experience. Also multiplayer was sub par. They needed something new and exciting in which they didn't do at all. There was also a lot of lag and frame rate problems in which would had helped make the experience better.
They could improve on voice acting, the actual script, gameplay, story, character models, graphics. Now I actually enjoyed haze mainly because it was one of thoughs "it's so bad it's good" type of games. Also your pick is a good one as well, I use to love SoF on the ps2 and the PS3 one was pretty bad.
I would have to say without a doubt Ninja Gaiden 2. How Tecmo went from the brilliance of the first game to the utter trash that became Ninja Gaiden 2, I really have no idea. Oh, and if we can include games that aren't PS3-specific, I really wish Bungie had done a better job with the Halo 3 campaign.
I'm going With Dark Sector. I really enjoyed the mechanics of the game, especially the glaive and it's ability to take on different elements, but the story was just pure rubbish. Gameplay could have been improved with a few tweaks to movement and aiming, but overall it was pretty sound in that department. Also could use some work on the voice acting and character development. Overall though I think it's still an underrated title.
The Lord of the Rings: Conquest. I saw the demo on PSN and I'm like "Hey! This looks like a Battlefront-style games with a Lord of the Rings setting! Gee-willickers!" and I then proceeded to download it. Dear god, what a horrible game. It made me want to violently vomit. Nothing like Battlefront at all, didn't even try to be like Battlefront, and it really should have.
The Lord of the Rings: Conquest. I saw the demo on PSN and I'm like "Hey! This looks like a Battlefront-style games with a Lord of the Rings setting! Gee-willickers!" and I then proceeded to download it. Dear god, what a horrible game. It made me want to violently vomit. Nothing like Battlefront at all, didn't even try to be like Battlefront, and it really should have.
While WET wasn't a terrible game, I would like to see some improvements over the basic formula. Felt clunky a lot of times and shallow on many accounts. I wanted to like it more than I did, but it became tedious and mediocre throughout. And I second Dark Sector as well, great game but needed some more work.
While WET wasn't a terrible game, I would like to see some improvements over the basic formula. Felt clunky a lot of times and shallow on many accounts. I wanted to like it more than I did, but it became tedious and mediocre throughout. And I second Dark Sector as well, great game but needed some more work.
I'm going With Dark Sector. I really enjoyed the mechanics of the game, especially the glaive and it's ability to take on different elements, but the story was just pure rubbish. Gameplay could have been improved with a few tweaks to movement and aiming, but overall it was pretty sound in that department. Also could use some work on the voice acting and character development. Overall though I think it's still an underrated title. raven_squad
So...you are 1 of the 5 people who bought Dark Sector!!! lol...just kidding...I loved the game too and agree it was very underrated.
They could improve on voice acting, the actual script, gameplay, story, character models, graphics. Now I actually enjoyed haze mainly because it was one of thoughs "it's so bad it's good" type of games. Also your pick is a good one as well, I use to love SoF on the ps2 and the PS3 one was pretty bad.
Melpoe
I actually enjoyed Haze with my brothers. If it wasn't for the co-op, I would probably never have bought the game for $2.95.
i gotta go with Haze too...so much hype for it to be a halo killer and such and it just flat out feel on it's face and didn't get back up.
HaDoKeN_NaTe
It wasn't just the Halo killer hype that put alot of pressure on Haze, it was the fact that it was produced by Free Radicals....who are well known by older shooter fans.
The Lord of the Rings: Conquest. I saw the demo on PSN and I'm like "Hey! This looks like a Battlefront-style games with a Lord of the Rings setting! Gee-willickers!" and I then proceeded to download it. Dear god, what a horrible game. It made me want to violently vomit. Nothing like Battlefront at all, didn't even try to be like Battlefront, and it really should have.
Khadaj32
I think I might one of the few who actually enjoyed the game. I'm a huge LotR fan and saw this game really cheap and turned out to be an enjoyable experience for me. The story could have been longer but I enjoyed it for the most part.
They could improve on voice acting, the actual script, gameplay, story, character models, graphics. Now I actually enjoyed haze mainly because it was one of thoughs "it's so bad it's good" type of games. Also your pick is a good one as well, I use to love SoF on the ps2 and the PS3 one was pretty bad.
ExoticAnimal
I actually enjoyed Haze with my brothers. If it wasn't for the co-op, I would probably never have bought the game for $2.95. Wow...Haze for 3bks?? I might have to jump on that!!!
The Lord of the Rings: Conquest. I saw the demo on PSN and I'm like "Hey! This looks like a Battlefront-style games with a Lord of the Rings setting! Gee-willickers!" and I then proceeded to download it. Dear god, what a horrible game. It made me want to violently vomit. Nothing like Battlefront at all, didn't even try to be like Battlefront, and it really should have.
ExoticAnimal
I think I might one of the few who actually enjoyed the game. I'm a huge LotR fan and saw this game really cheap and turned out to be an enjoyable experience for me. The story could have been longer but I enjoyed it for the most part.
You are a more patient man than I. Maybe it's because I was expecting Battlefront-caliber gameplay, I dunno. I'm also a huge LotR fanboy, but I didn't even enjoy the game as a fan service.
They could improve on voice acting, the actual script, gameplay, story, character models, graphics. Now I actually enjoyed haze mainly because it was one of thoughs "it's so bad it's good" type of games. Also your pick is a good one as well, I use to love SoF on the ps2 and the PS3 one was pretty bad.
S0LDIER_X
I actually enjoyed Haze with my brothers. If it wasn't for the co-op, I would probably never have bought the game for $2.95. Wow...Haze for 3bks?? I might have to jump on that!!! Yea, I saw a new copy on buy.com for $2.95 with free shipping so I had to jump on that deal. I doubt you can find it for that low anymore.
[QUOTE="ExoticAnimal"][QUOTE="S0LDIER_X"][QUOTE="ExoticAnimal"] I actually enjoyed Haze with my brothers. If it wasn't for the co-op, I would probably never have bought the game for $2.95. Wow...Haze for 3bks?? I might have to jump on that!!! Yea, I saw a new copy on buy.com for $2.95 with free shipping so I had to jump on that deal. I doubt you can find it for that low anymore. Either way I'm gonna get it....are the servers still up???
I'm going With Dark Sector. I really enjoyed the mechanics of the game, especially the glaive and it's ability to take on different elements, but the story was just pure rubbish. Gameplay could have been improved with a few tweaks to movement and aiming, but overall it was pretty sound in that department. Also could use some work on the voice acting and character development. Overall though I think it's still an underrated title. raven_squad
Good call. That game is good...but coulda been great.
Even though its a greatest hit, im gonna go with Star Wars: TFU. The graphics, glitches, targeting issues, screen tearing, bad voice acting, and plot holes all made this a letdown for me. It was still a fun game but it definitly felt last gen. They should add some sixaxis to the force powers on the new one. Itd be fun to toss stormtroopers by waving the controller.
[QUOTE="S0LDIER_X"][QUOTE="ExoticAnimal"][QUOTE="S0LDIER_X"] Wow...Haze for 3bks?? I might have to jump on that!!! Yea, I saw a new copy on buy.com for $2.95 with free shipping so I had to jump on that deal. I doubt you can find it for that low anymore. Either way I'm gonna get it....are the servers still up??? I would think so because they had a sale on their DLC a few weeks back but I cant say with certainty since I haven't played the game in a good while.
WKC. It's wasn't bad, but it could have been so much more with a little more challenge and spice added to the battle system.
yokofox33
same for me, Im at the last dungeon and have been there for months and Im like I'll finish it whenever. I hate how they tell the story its so damn awkward when the characters spell things out exactly like it is for you. It makes me feel insulted like they think im simple or sumthin :(
Dante's Inferno - Poorly presented. Waste of idea. If it actually has a good story, well done levels and different/unique gameplay designs compare to GOW, it would have been great, could it be because the manager from Visceral left and went to Activision? That's the only case I'm worrying about Dead Space 2. Fear 2 - Fail multiplayer. Fear 3 is coming out, but the whole new WB letting a movie director direct video game is already a poor and naive decision.
Damnation? I want Borderlands to be redone. Brilliant gameplay (except for slow bullet speed) but terribly unbalanced, no competitive multiplayer (worth playing), loot was pointless because of hex editing, and there was nothing really there to grind for.
Know it nt going to happen but it be good to remake tomb raider 6 angel of darkness with better controls tomb raider 6 a decent game but the controls are bad
HAZE. That game had potential, but it had a messy story, annoying characters, and awful enemy AI. Graphics weren't very good either. Best part was using Nectar, but that only lasted for the first couple of hours unfortunately :|
They could improve on voice acting, the actual script, gameplay, story, character models, graphics. Now I actually enjoyed haze mainly because it was one of thoughs "it's so bad it's good" type of games. Also your pick is a good one as well, I use to love SoF on the ps2 and the PS3 one was pretty bad.
Melpoe
Mmm if it had a big budget and was developed under Crytek it could do well I agree.
They could improve on voice acting, the actual script, gameplay, story, character models, graphics. Now I actually enjoyed haze mainly because it was one of thoughs "it's so bad it's good" type of games. Also your pick is a good one as well, I use to love SoF on the ps2 and the PS3 one was pretty bad.
Lair, fantastic idea poorly done
ArchoNils2
These two games. Haze would have needed an extra year of re-doing/revamping to produce a solid game. Lair needed more polish controls wise and graphics wise. Hell, both looked terrible in terms of graphics. Lair had good looking cutscenes.. but in-game.. it was trash.. even for a 2007 game. Two games poorly done, to the extreme.
All Pro Football 2K8 - I loved ESPN NFL 2K5, but this lacked any depth and felt recycled.
MW2 (multiplayer) - I loved COD4's so much, but MW2's is full of too many annoyances that could have been taken out and it would have made a great mutiplayer.
Far Cry 2 - Travel here, travel there, ZZZ... They should have made the enemies feel less generic and focused less on the traveling.
Assassin's Creed - The game was so repetitive. They should have been making you do different things every now and then.
Destroy all humans: Path of the Furon - I thought the Destroy all Humans games that Pandemic developed on the PS2 were really good fun games but Path of the Furon wasn't that great the PS3 version did seem a bit broken with the controls Sandblast Games couldn't do a better job then Pandemic Studios. I'm still wondering why THQ released the PS3 version to us in Europe but not in the US.
WET - While the character was interesting and so was the storyline the gameplay felt too much like Stranglehold but worse and every level felt the same but it has a great soundtrack.
Eat Lead The Return of Matt Hazard - I know most people hate the game but I have to admit it was a funny game how it was making fun of the older video games and the jokes were pretty good. The game was annoying at times the shooting wasn't exactly fun and nearly every shot you pretty much had to go for a head shot every time. It had great music and I finished it and If I didn't like the game that much I would have finished it. Will Arnett and Neil Patrick Harris were great with the voice acting though it was one of the best parts about the game.
I know this game is really good but i think they could have done more...Infamous...
The only problem i have with this game is that after you finish the game...i want like one of those "alert the police" in prototype or GTA4 in that game...
Far Cry 2. While I thought it was good, it had horrible design choices and terrible voice acting. It also got me very frustrated. Devil May Cry 4 could have been WAY better. So disappointing... It could have had better combat and more level. I hate contrived backtracking! I haven't bought a "bad" game on my PS3, even though I have been disappointed a few times. I do my research.
I'm going With Dark Sector. I really enjoyed the mechanics of the game, especially the glaive and it's ability to take on different elements, but the story was just pure rubbish. Gameplay could have been improved with a few tweaks to movement and aiming, but overall it was pretty sound in that department. Also could use some work on the voice acting and character development. Overall though I think it's still an underrated title. raven_squad
Pretty much this excep replace it with Just Cause 2
Log in to comment