Great answers, I like Resistance and Heavenly Sword. But they didn't make me buy a PS3. I love the Final Fantasy and Metal Gear games and I gotta admit i'm a bit of Playstation fanboy. But all of these games that come out on PS3 and 360 at the same time, or even later on the PS3 are all the same, from what I hear anyways. Warhawk has interested me, but obviously not enough to get it. Eventually the PS3 will surpass the 360 in quality (hopefully). What i'm trying to say is, when is that breathtaking game gonna come along? I'm pretty sure a lot of you are waiting for it, Resistance, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, Ratchet, those are all games to hold over until that GREAT game comes. Call me picky, but i'm tired of waiting. As for being childish, I can argue that anyone who pays 600 bucks for a system has a little bit of a childish mentality in them :Ppetes1316
No offense, but it sounds like you are always gonna be waiting for something and never be satisfied. When I bought my PS3, I expected a machine that surpassed it's predecessor. And it has in so many ways. Aside from the amazing graphical difference between ps2 and ps3 (and that was just using an sdtv, it became even better once I got an HD set), games are just so much... MORE.
Resistance: ok, maybe they could've made this game on a last-gen system (with much worse graphics), but 40 player online multiplayer with no lag?
Heavenly Sword: the way they captured the actors expressions and rendered them with such detail was amazing. Oh, and did you actually pay attention to the number of independent, active enemies were on screen at one time? Play the cannon levels again, or the last level, leading up to the Bohan fight. There are thousands of enemies. On previous systems, the framerate drops to nothing, or enemies pop in and out after a few dozen on screen.
Warhawk: You haven't gotten it, I'm sorry. It's probably the best online multiplayer game I've played.
Ratchet: Don't have it, but from what I've seen, the in-game rendering looks as good as a pre-rendered cgi pixar movie.
Now I, for one, think the ps3 is much better than the 360, but not because the games are necesarily going to be mind-blowingly better. I expect multi-plats to look and play about the same on both systems, maybe one is better on one, and another is better on the other. And exclusives will always be about preference. I thought Resistance was much cooler than Halo, just like back in the day, I liked Mario more than Sonic. The end result is the ps3 and the 360 do things differently, but ultimately can achieve similar results. If you are waiting for some game to come out that's gonna make 360 games look like GameCube games... I hate to break it to you, it isn't going to happen. And you're missing out on a lot of truely GREAT games in the meantime.
What makes the ps3, in my oppinion, better, and made it worth the 600 dollars I paid for it, is the fact that I consider the 360's fail rate to be inexscusable I refuse to buy a system, having seen so many friends of mine have to send them in to get fixed. And also, in order to get a 360 with all the features my ps3 has, it would have cost more than 600. I would have had to get a 360 elite for about 400 (because 20gb is not enough, and at the time, only th elite had hdmi) then buy the hd-dvd add-on for 170 (and I still would have lost out, because blu-ray is doing better), then buy a wi-fi adaptor for another 100 or so. And then pay annually to play online. Assuming I keep the system for 5-10 years, that's 250-500 more. By comparison, for what you get, the ps3 was a deal at 600.
Log in to comment