Thats really no reason for Sony to not have a beta testing.Blitz_Nemesis
Okay, so its your biggest game, people been talking bout it for 2 years, you want it to go perfectly, and a 13 year old jerk gets the beta off a mate and starts posting crap bout it. Want that to happen?
People got into the warhawk beta but didnt leak any information about the game, unless i missed it, so really just because a couple of people who werent supposed to be there are in really isnt any reason to not hold a beta and wiether or not people are getting in legit there is still the possiblity that they will leak out information. So really why even have betas at all if there is this risk? Sometimes they gotta just make risk to improve the game and if information leaks it really shouldnt be that big of a deal if the game is gonna be released like a month afterwards. Unless im to blind to see how a beta would really hurt them there is no reason they shouldnt have one.
People got into the warhawk beta but didnt leak any information about the game, unless i missed it, so really just because a couple of people who werent supposed to be there are in really isnt any reason to not hold a beta and wiether or not people are getting in legit there is still the possiblity that they will leak out information. So really why even have betas at all if there is this risk? Sometimes they gotta just make risk to improve the game and if information leaks it really shouldnt be that big of a deal if the game is gonna be released like a month afterwards. Unless im to blind to see how a beta would really hurt them there is no reason they shouldnt have one.Blitz_Nemesis
hehe way more than a few people got the warhawk beta. Comes down to this, one guy starts saying crap bout it, media gets a hold of it as the idiot gaming media does, blows it out of order and then people dont buy it and Sony losses out. This is why its rare to have open betas.
[QUOTE="Blitz_Nemesis"]People got into the warhawk beta but didnt leak any information about the game, unless i missed it, so really just because a couple of people who werent supposed to be there are in really isnt any reason to not hold a beta and wiether or not people are getting in legit there is still the possiblity that they will leak out information. So really why even have betas at all if there is this risk? Sometimes they gotta just make risk to improve the game and if information leaks it really shouldnt be that big of a deal if the game is gonna be released like a month afterwards. Unless im to blind to see how a beta would really hurt them there is no reason they shouldnt have one.teebeenz
hehe way more than a few people got the warhawk beta. Comes down to this, one guy starts saying crap bout it, media gets a hold of it as the idiot gaming media does, blows it out of order and then people dont buy it and Sony losses out. This is why its rare to have open betas.
i really didnt see that affect in the Halo 3 beta (other than the graphics looking pretty average... buts its better to break that news ahead of time than to let the hype build up and kill it)... and if anything, i'm way more excited for Warhawk (most of the guys at the 1up podcast have been raving about it) .
Warhawk is going to kick so much @ss, that game is such a bargain with the headset. Most if not all people that own a ps3 will own warhawk. I am much looking foward to Killzone 2 and hopefully it will stay that way after E3. Really though they should make the beta easy to get into and allow a lot of people to play it. I don't really feel like the warhawk beta is all that fair in my opinion with the way that its set up.
[QUOTE="Blitz_Nemesis"] Thats really no reason for Sony to not have a beta testing.teebeenz
Okay, so its your biggest game, people been talking bout it for 2 years, you want it to go perfectly, and a 13 year old jerk gets the beta off a mate and starts posting crap bout it. Want that to happen?
Seriously you are a fool if you think that Sony expected people not to talk about the Warhawk beta. I mean what is going to happen? It's a game, why can't people discuss how it is?
I got in the beta and I talked about so what, no big deal.
Warhawk is going to kick so much @ss, that game is such a bargain with the headset. Most if not all people that own a ps3 will own warhawk. I am much looking foward to Killzone 2 and hopefully it will stay that way after E3. Really though they should make the beta easy to get into and allow a lot of people to play it. I don't really feel like the warhawk beta is all that fair in my opinion with the way that its set up.odin2019
Warhawk needs a lot of work, I'm definently not buying it if it plays exactly like the beta. But if it's a decent bluetooth I might just get it for that.
[QUOTE="odin2019"]Warhawk is going to kick so much @ss, that game is such a bargain with the headset. Most if not all people that own a ps3 will own warhawk. I am much looking foward to Killzone 2 and hopefully it will stay that way after E3. Really though they should make the beta easy to get into and allow a lot of people to play it. I don't really feel like the warhawk beta is all that fair in my opinion with the way that its set up.GoldenGlove
Warhawk needs a lot of work, I'm definently not buying it if it plays exactly like the beta. But if it's a decent bluetooth I might just get it for that.
Once again I have yet to play that beta and I can only go by what I hear/read. Like I said, I feel like the Warhawk beta is unfair to lots of ps3 owners because no one is getting to play it.
Log in to comment