Which is the Better Medal of Honor?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for OMG_iTz_Evo
OMG_iTz_Evo

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 OMG_iTz_Evo
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts
Based on: Game play Graphics Story line Length of game Online play Population on Servers Controls ..... you all know the list
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

MoH Heroes 2 is much better

Avatar image for ston3henge
ston3henge

2732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 ston3henge
Member since 2007 • 2732 Posts

MoH Heroes 2 is much better

sikanderahmed

I disagree... respectfully. "MoH:H1" has Skirmish Mode so you can play multiplayer vs. 'bots and I like the online maps better. With any of the MoH games I find that it is really important to turn off the enemy indicator (a floating red cross above the nazi's heads) to feel like you're getting ANYTHING out of it. Otherwise it's too easy generally. I also liked the graphics, limited story, and over-all presentation of the first game over the second (they even got the VO actor to do the intros to the missions like in the PSOne titles!!!). Noner of the maps/ missions are very long at all, but they are generally fun and if you play it on "Hard" it'sll challenge you... getting golds in each level is TOUGH on the first game because of accuracy being a factor in your score - learn to love the rifle, SMGs will never get you that accuracy score you need.

Both games are hacker playgrounds, so don't look at online as a diciding factor. I would get the first one and play it through then get the second (as you will inevitably do). Skirmish mode is the biggest difference of the two titles, I enjoyed them both for what they were.

PS - USE "ELITE" CONTROLS. That's where you use the buttons for movement and the stick for aiming... it makes a big difference! Hope this helps! I'm "realBADaim" on MoH 1 (I rarely play MoH2 online anymore), see you online. I don't cheat so add me as a friend.

Avatar image for jasontdoto
jasontdoto

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 jasontdoto
Member since 2005 • 510 Posts

i played both games single player only and can safely say they both suck (imo). the worst part is the AI of the enemies. they are either too stupid and run past you, or start shooting when you are no where near them. i like games where u can sneak up and kill a few baddies here and there. this game almost never gives you that option. its like the enemies can smell you a mile away and once they do they fire at you even if you are hiding. the endless waves of enemies coming at you get boring as well. lastly they could have had destroyable environmental objects in this game. could have placed a few exploding barrels in the single player campaign. none of that exists. you cant even shoot at a lamp and destroy it. so sad. i am sure most of you who like this 2 games like it for the multiplayer. this game could have been much better if game devs spent a little more time polishing it. KEEP IN MIND BEFORE U FLAME ME: i am saying only the single player sucks. multiplayer never tried it, and really don't care to either.

Avatar image for OMG_iTz_Evo
OMG_iTz_Evo

218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 OMG_iTz_Evo
Member since 2009 • 218 Posts
well thanks for everyone's input... but seeing as not many people play online still I would guess, that Bot feature must be very nice on MOH:1... that is my choice!
Avatar image for squaredude44
squaredude44

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 squaredude44
Member since 2009 • 289 Posts

Out of both Medal of Honors, Medal of Honor 2 is better because of the Story mode being a lot longer, the controls and the graphics are pretty nice, and the online mode is really good, because there is a great multiplayer mode for Medal of Honor 2.

Avatar image for lostcali8
lostcali8

2548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 lostcali8
Member since 2005 • 2548 Posts

MOH 1 for me. Played them both and the graphics are literally the same.

Shorter campaign in the second MOH with no jump to speak of and different weapons. Seems like theres more hackers online as well..

Avatar image for flowersjf
flowersjf

2856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 flowersjf
Member since 2008 • 2856 Posts

MOH 2 since the missions don't involve standing next to a flag most of the time. But they are both great games

Avatar image for JasonDarksavior
JasonDarksavior

9323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#9 JasonDarksavior
Member since 2008 • 9323 Posts

I like the original Heroes beause it hard Skirmish mode, which is heaps fun....But Heroes 2 had excellent sound and heaps long missions.....

Avatar image for ston3henge
ston3henge

2732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 ston3henge
Member since 2007 • 2732 Posts

I thought the AI in the first game was better than the second, with neither one being astounding (to agree with an earlier post)... that's whay i said "I enjoy them for what they are".