Which Playstation 3 message was argued about by the US Supreme Court today?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for appleater
appleater

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 appleater
Member since 2002 • 1574 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26467378

California cited it in its brief too.

In case you didn't know, the fate of violent video games, perhaps for minors, perhaps for everyone, was argued in the US Supreme Court today.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
I don't understand how this is a debate for discussion for the supreme court. You have to be 17+ to purchase a M rated game, problem solved. Also, I don't understand the point of posting that thread link.
Avatar image for appleater
appleater

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 appleater
Member since 2002 • 1574 Posts

The state of California cited the message in its written argument ("brief") to the US Supreme Court which argued about that particular Playstation 3 forum message today.

California's brief (see page 21):

http://www.mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/Schwarzenegger_State%20Reply%20Brief_10.15.10.pdf

California is showing that parental controls don't work.

Avatar image for Flame_Blade88
Flame_Blade88

39348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#4 Flame_Blade88
Member since 2005 • 39348 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I don't understand how this is a debate for discussion for the supreme court. You have to be 17+ to purchase a M rated game, problem solved.

I know, this crap makes me wonder why the ESRB even exists in the first place then.
Avatar image for jcopp72
jcopp72

5375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 jcopp72
Member since 2007 • 5375 Posts
[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I don't understand how this is a debate for discussion for the supreme court. You have to be 17+ to purchase a M rated game, problem solved. Flame_Blade88
I know, this crap makes me wonder why the ESRB even exists in the first place then.

i agree with both of you. thats why ESRB is there.
Avatar image for 360hammer
360hammer

2596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 360hammer
Member since 2009 • 2596 Posts

The state of California cited the message in its written argument ("brief") to the US Supreme Court which argued about that particular Playstation 3 forum message today.

California's brief (see page 21):

http://www.mediacoalition.org/mediaimages/Schwarzenegger_State%20Reply%20Brief_10.15.10.pdf

California is showing that parental controls don't work.

appleater

California is showing how they know what's best for everyone. Seriously, people were murdering and violent way before video games, movies, or any other form of media. Way more important issues are out there and this type of schoolyard games is exactly why America is going down hill fast. Here we are with job shortage, trying to add millions of new citizens who broke laws to get here, cause we all know we have jobs here just Americans are too lazy to do the work so we need to import workers and send them to school. Kids playing violent video games may someday save their lives.

Avatar image for FIREKNIGHT19
FIREKNIGHT19

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 FIREKNIGHT19
Member since 2010 • 467 Posts

[QUOTE="Flame_Blade88"][QUOTE="Fightingfan"]I don't understand how this is a debate for discussion for the supreme court. You have to be 17+ to purchase a M rated game, problem solved. jcopp72
I know, this crap makes me wonder why the ESRB even exists in the first place then.

i agree with both of you. thats why ESRB is there.

The ESRB is a great system but its a "voluntary" system put together by the gaming community. Most stores that I have been in (Best Buy, Target, Gamestop) have always asked for my id or TOLD me (since I'm 35) that this was a mature game. You know so I didn't buy the game and give God Of War to my four year old neighbor or six year old nephew.This rediculous court case is about making these games with big "must be 17 or older to purchase" stickers on the front of the box art and also fining stores that sell these games to minors. It's a big waste of taxpayers dollars and pretty much telling people you are too stupid to control what your children are playing or watching so let the government do it for you.

Avatar image for appleater
appleater

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 appleater
Member since 2002 • 1574 Posts

http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/08-1448.pdf

Official transcript of the argument yesterday.