why do exclusive Playstation 3 games have superior graphics than...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts
a mulitplatform game?
Avatar image for rrric
rrric

2408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 rrric
Member since 2003 • 2408 Posts
because theyre lazy
Avatar image for Correyov31
Correyov31

358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Correyov31
Member since 2005 • 358 Posts
I think it is mainly because the fact that the game is built specifically for that system. The game is meant to run specifically on the hardwares arcitecture.
Avatar image for c0mplex
c0mplex

15382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 c0mplex
Member since 2002 • 15382 Posts
multiplatform games use the 360 as its lead SKU (most of them anyways). PS3 exclusives use the PS3's unique hardware.
Avatar image for The_Gamer81
The_Gamer81

357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 The_Gamer81
Member since 2007 • 357 Posts
for a very simple reason. Multiplatform games are usually developed first on the 360 then these games get a crappy port to the PS3. for example NCAA football runs in 1080i on the 360 and only 720p on the ps3. We all know that the PS3 is more than capable of handling 1080i, but developers are lazy and want to make money asap, so they get the game to look ok on the PS3 while the 360 version gets more attention. When company actually take their time creating a PS3 game, it comes great and example of that is Oblivion which looks better on the PS3 than it does on the 360. the reason is that developers actually took their time developing the game rather than creating a crappy port like most other developers do. I don't necessarly blame the developers because it's more cost effective to produce a game on the 360 than the PS3, so that's why that develop for the 360 first, I think. BUT, this all is soon to change I think because Sony is offering more support for development on the PS3 to companies.
Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts

Most developers that do multi platform games have to port it from 360 to PS3. Square Enix addressed this and said that a more efficient way to do this and get high quality in both consoles was to build first for the PS3 and then port. Most of the ports we see today are from already released games, thus developers just want to "quick cash" them. The only dev I can think of pulling the best ever port is Bethesda, that got the updated Oblivion to the PS3. All the others were just speeding through porting process. Ubisoft appears to have taken Bethesdas way and decidedtake their time before releasing the game to solve many of th problems that come from cheap porting.

1st and 2nd party games dont have this problems as they are build with only PS3 on mind, and know what they can use and what they cant.

A good example of crappy porting from last gen is Metal Gear Solid 2: Substance on the Xbox. Im still wondering how it got to score so high (GS used to be so light hearted lol since if they had to review it with todays standards they would have massacred it).

Avatar image for killzones
killzones

1738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 killzones
Member since 2004 • 1738 Posts

Right now most of the multiplatform games on PS3 are ports of 360 games therefore the developers are not taking full advantage of PS3. When PS3 install base reaches the #of 360's out there then developers might start developing the game around PS3 technology. MGS4 is being developed around the PS3 architecture and it shows.

And also Sony's first party games take full advantage of PS3 without having to worry about porting to another console. Games like motorstorm, Killzone2, GT5, Uncharted and Heavenly sword look far superior than 3rd party multiplatform games.

Avatar image for callumohare
callumohare

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 callumohare
Member since 2007 • 141 Posts

cause... well, The 360 cant do the same stuff as the PS3. - PS3 has better... everything really.

Therefor, when you take a multi-platform game, if they design it for the PS3, they would have to decrease things for the 360. Thus resulting in more work for the developers, and also 360 fanboys wining and complaining about how the only reason the PS3 had better graphics is because *Insert lame, fake, made-up excuse here*

so yeah . if they design it made for the 360, then they can port it over to the PS3 no problem... they arent gonna RAISE the

graphics for the game for the PS3... they're too lazy. :D

Avatar image for sharrak
sharrak

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 sharrak
Member since 2005 • 226 Posts
Assassin's Creed should look good then since they built it on the Ps3 and ported it to the 360.
Avatar image for c0mplex
c0mplex

15382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 c0mplex
Member since 2002 • 15382 Posts

Assassin's Creed should look good then since they built it on the Ps3 and ported it to the 360.sharrak

im pretty sure its the other way around. why would they show the 360 version in all of their conferences if the PS3 was lead SKU.

Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#11 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts

[QUOTE="sharrak"]Assassin's Creed should look good then since they built it on the Ps3 and ported it to the 360.c0mplex

im pretty sure its the other way around. why would they show the 360 version in all of their conferences if the PS3 was lead SKU.

A long time ago Ubi said they started the PS3 one first, but noone ever cared about so I trashed the link.

Avatar image for interpolate
interpolate

257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 interpolate
Member since 2007 • 257 Posts

Right now most of the multiplatform games on PS3 are ports of 360 games therefore the developers are not taking full advantage of PS3. When PS3 install base reaches the #of 360's out there then developers might start developing the game around PS3 technology. MGS4 is being developed around the PS3 architecture and it shows.

And also Sony's first party games take full advantage of PS3 without having to worry about porting to another console. Games like motorstorm, Killzone2, GT5, Uncharted and Heavenly sword look far superior than 3rd party multiplatform games.

killzones

I don't think i could say it better

Avatar image for sharrak
sharrak

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 sharrak
Member since 2005 • 226 Posts

[QUOTE="sharrak"]Assassin's Creed should look good then since they built it on the Ps3 and ported it to the 360.c0mplex

im pretty sure its the other way around. why would they show the 360 version in all of their conferences if the PS3 was lead SKU.

Oh, I didn't know that. I thought when they released the statement that it wasn't going to be exclusive to the Ps3 that they were going to continue to work on the PS3 and then port it to the 360. I didn't know they ported what they had done and finished on the 360. I haven't followed the game so much since they announced that it went multiplatform.

Avatar image for ps3ruler
ps3ruler

428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 ps3ruler
Member since 2004 • 428 Posts

I agree with everyone!

Peace bretherein!