Why do GS always review ps3 games like a few weeks after release..sigh

halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingGamerboi27

[QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingWhyuStillAlive

ya man...honestly i think its soooo brutal. uncharted was an AWESOME, i repeat AWESOME game...maybe not everyone likes it but i think it deserves a 9.0 in my book

because gamespot is run by a bunch a facist corporate nazis who only wanna make money at the expense of others. welcome to america.JaySin8706

Perfectly said.

[QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingGamerboi27

ya man...honestly i think its soooo brutal. uncharted was an AWESOME, i repeat AWESOME game...maybe not everyone likes it but i think it deserves a 9.0 in my book

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

[QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]

[QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingLarge_Soda

ya man...honestly i think its soooo brutal. uncharted was an AWESOME, i repeat AWESOME game...maybe not everyone likes it but i think it deserves a 9.0 in my book

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]

[QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingWhyuStillAlive

ya man...honestly i think its soooo brutal. uncharted was an AWESOME, i repeat AWESOME game...maybe not everyone likes it but i think it deserves a 9.0 in my book

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

Yes if a game is highly anticipated it should be reviewed on time, or before release.

PS3 games are not treated unfair on GS, they are unfair to you, so now you side with IGN because they are more inline with your thoughts. So great, take both reviews into consideration, that's what a smart person does. I think IGN was too giving in their reviews of those games, but I think GS nailed Uncharted, but was off with R&C, but that is just an opinion.

You claiming bias is just stupid and childish. You even say in your first post that Uncharted is an awesome....I repeat awesome game, maybe not everyone will like it. So you are willing to admit that it may not be as special to some people as it is to you, but you claim bias when a site reviews it below your standards? Grow up.

hey man, don´t call people stupid. that was completely uncalled for.

GS overrates a lot of games, and underrates as well. but every site does that. there is no single perfect site for reviews and completely unbiased opinions. so you should grow up and try to be a little more mature when talking to other people.

[QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]

[QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingLarge_Soda

ya man...honestly i think its soooo brutal. uncharted was an AWESOME, i repeat AWESOME game...maybe not everyone likes it but i think it deserves a 9.0 in my book

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

Yes if a game is highly anticipated it should be reviewed on time, or before release.

PS3 games are not treated unfair on GS, they are unfair to you, so now you side with IGN because they are more inline with your thoughts. So great, take both reviews into consideration, that's what a smart person does. I think IGN was too giving in their reviews of those games, but I think GS nailed Uncharted, but was off with R&C, but that is just an opinion.

You claiming bias is just stupid and childish. You even say in your first post that Uncharted is an awesome....I repeat awesome game, maybe not everyone will like it. So you are willing to admit that it may not be as special to some people as it is to you, but you claim bias when a site reviews it below your standards? Grow up.

how was uncharted nowhere near..wat about UT3...been a day already

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]

[QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingGamerboi27

ya man...honestly i think its soooo brutal. uncharted was an AWESOME, i repeat AWESOME game...maybe not everyone likes it but i think it deserves a 9.0 in my book

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

Yes if a game is highly anticipated it should be reviewed on time, or before release.

PS3 games are not treated unfair on GS, they are unfair to you, so now you side with IGN because they are more inline with your thoughts. So great, take both reviews into consideration, that's what a smart person does. I think IGN was too giving in their reviews of those games, but I think GS nailed Uncharted, but was off with R&C, but that is just an opinion.

You claiming bias is just stupid and childish. You even say in your first post that Uncharted is an awesome....I repeat awesome game, maybe not everyone will like it. So you are willing to admit that it may not be as special to some people as it is to you, but you claim bias when a site reviews it below your standards? Grow up.

how was uncharted nowhere near..wat about UT3...been a day already

I'm not saying Uncharted is a bad game but it did not have the hype surrounding like Halo 3 did.

because most of the staff are biased 360 fanboys...IMO...but whatever....this site has lost most of it's credability anyways...only Alex N and Brad S reviews count...IMO...tryfe_lyn

how was uncharted nowhere near..wat about UT3...been a day already

Gamerboi27

UT3 is primarily an online game. how do you review an online game without other people have the game yet? the PS3 doesn't have something PartnerNet like the 360 for those with preview builds to play the game online.

[QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]

how was uncharted nowhere near..wat about UT3...been a day already

c0mplex

UT3 is primarily an online game. how do you review an online game without other people have the game yet? the PS3 doesn't have something PartnerNet like the 360 for those with preview builds to play the game online.

[QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]

[QUOTE="WhyuStillAlive"][QUOTE="Gamerboi27"]halo 3 and gears was reviewed like the hour it was release or somethingLarge_Soda

ya man...honestly i think its soooo brutal. uncharted was an AWESOME, i repeat AWESOME game...maybe not everyone likes it but i think it deserves a 9.0 in my book

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

[QUOTE="Large_Soda"]

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

jpridgen0

i think there is more to it than just the amount of hype that gets it a quick review.

Halo 3 had a beta. this meant that once the review copy came out, the review really only had to hop online for a small amount of time (just to see what was adjusted) and to play the single player (10 hours at the most).

Gears of War also had a short campaign, and Epic demoed the multiplayer at every gaming event. people who saw the Chainsaw Massacre at the premier even got to play the game's multiplayer.

when was the last time Square gave early looks into their FF games?? hell, even when the Japanese versions come out, Square doesn't give American reviewers a preview build of the game for them to look at. American reviewers frequently have to import the game themselves in order to see some sort of preview of the game. and if they don't know Japanese... then they pretty much have to wait for the review copy in order to experience the game for the first time.

because gamespot is run by a bunch a facist corporate nazis who only wanna make money at the expense of others. welcome to america.JaySin8706

We will soon be the Corporate States of America. Instead of in god we trust; "In Gates We Trust." One Nation, Under the Dollar.

[QUOTE="jpridgen0"][QUOTE="Large_Soda"]

Then get a job at GS or another site and change things.

Using Halo 3 and Gears of War as examples doesn't make sense. Those were 2 of the most anticipated games of this year and last year, so having a prompt review makes sense. Uncharted was nowhere near as anticipated as those 2 games, so I don't see your point at all.

c0mplex

i think there is more to it than just the amount of hype that gets it a quick review.

Halo 3 had a beta. this meant that once the review copy came out, the review really only had to hop online for a small amount of time (just to see what was adjusted) and to play the single player (10 hours at the most).

Gears of War also had a short campaign, and Epic demoed the multiplayer at every gaming event. people who saw the Chainsaw Massacre at the premier even got to play the game's multiplayer.

when was the last time Square gave early looks into their FF games?? hell, even when the Japanese versions come out, Square doesn't give American reviewers a preview build of the game for them to look at. American reviewers frequently have to import the game themselves in order to see some sort of preview of the game. and if they don't know Japanese... then they pretty much have to wait for the review copy in order to experience the game for the first time.

According to a "staff" member, GS won't release the score of a big hyped AAA title if its flopped here. The marketing department for GS supposedly has a deal with all the writers to not release the scores of highly anticipated games that flopp. This is to give the developers of said game a heads up as well as give the game a little of time to sale before negative press.

In other words, it's a way to protect their marketing dollars with developers. Ever wonder why Uncharted took so long to review....it was only a 8 hour game yet for some reason it took a long to to release......oh that's right, PS3's last hope for a AAA (majority of people gave it AAA) and it got an 8 here. There is your reason.

Because they aren't paying CNET any money.