Why is Sony developing games for a Microsoft platform?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for espoac
espoac

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 espoac
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
With The Agency's recent announce for PC, I got to wondering. Why is SOE, a Sony subsidiary making games for what is in essence a Microsoft platform? Especially at a time when their new system on which they've plunked down billions of dollars really needs good exclusive games? Seems a bit counter-intuitive...
Avatar image for -DirtySanchez-
-DirtySanchez-

32760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 -DirtySanchez-
Member since 2003 • 32760 Posts
theyve made pc games before and will keep makein them, hopefully they bring some over to the ps3 while there at it tho
Avatar image for junk56
junk56

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 junk56
Member since 2003 • 1748 Posts
PC is not owned by microsoft. SOE has released many games on PC like everquest and drakengard. If Microsoft gets no recognition for the title on PC and get no profit, i can't see how it is a problem.
Avatar image for -Ven-
-Ven-

318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 -Ven-
Member since 2007 • 318 Posts
The answer is simple: $
Avatar image for espoac
espoac

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 espoac
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
I get that MS get's no profit from it, however why are they not as first party developers giving the PS3 an exclusive. That should be their priority, Sony knows what a big role exclusives play in what platform gamers choose to buy. And maybe somewhere this game will be the deciding factor in somebody not buying a PS3 as in:"this is on the PC, so why do I need a PS3?". It just seems like a shortsighted business decision, in the short term we'll make some more profit off the game which we invested maybe 15 million in, but in the long run we may be hurting sales of a sytem which we spent billions on.
Avatar image for junk56
junk56

1748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 junk56
Member since 2003 • 1748 Posts
maybe its not a game that will sell ps3 units but a game for ps3 units. Not every game made by sony has to be ps3 exclusive so i guess they want to have PC and PS3 gamers to play together
Avatar image for Killer_Cyborg
Killer_Cyborg

2814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Killer_Cyborg
Member since 2003 • 2814 Posts
I get that MS get's no profit from it, however why are they not as first party developers giving the PS3 an exclusive. That should be their priority, Sony knows what a big role exclusives play in what platform gamers choose to buy. And maybe somewhere this game will be the deciding factor in somebody not buying a PS3 as in:"this is on the PC, so why do I need a PS3?". It just seems like a shortsighted business decision, in the short term we'll make some more profit off the game which we invested maybe 15 million in, but in the long run we may be hurting sales of a sytem which we spent billions on.espoac


To keep it short, PC = MMO land. They're really not that successful on consoles while the MMO market on PC is already big.
Avatar image for Mochyc
Mochyc

4421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Mochyc
Member since 2007 • 4421 Posts

It's prett simple:

For one, PCs are not a microsoft platform, they only run on MS XP or VISTA. In addition, by making a game for pc, they arn't exactly losing a potential PS3 buyer since almost everyone owns a PC, whereas if it was on the 360 people would have the choice of buying either console. 

Avatar image for ocelotcougar
ocelotcougar

2099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 ocelotcougar
Member since 2005 • 2099 Posts
Spiderman 3 came out for 360. Could have easily been an exclusive.
Avatar image for espoac
espoac

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 espoac
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
Spiderman 3 came out for 360. Could have easily been an exclusive.ocelotcougar
yeah that's a bit of a puzzler. Why in the hell would Sony ever give the movie game rights for 1,2 or 3 to Activison instead of their own game studio? I say blame it on Kutaragi, the crazy old kook! J/K
Avatar image for Rakuho
Rakuho

7008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 Rakuho
Member since 2007 • 7008 Posts
so what. a pc is one thing a 360 is another. SCE games can do some real damage on the PC to all other competitors, so why not. Plus sony makes actual PC's, it's just that windows are embeded so deeply with PCs, we don't even think that it's MS anymore, just some stuff we take for granted everytime we look at our desktops. 
Avatar image for deadkingdg
deadkingdg

4252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deadkingdg
Member since 2005 • 4252 Posts

The answer is simple : If you make a PC game that cannot be run on a MS OS, then your profit will never be higher than the development cost.

SCEA has made games for PC for years, why should they stop? 

Avatar image for deadkingdg
deadkingdg

4252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 deadkingdg
Member since 2005 • 4252 Posts

I get that MS get's no profit from itespoac

 

PC softwares are different than consoles. The devs of a software that can only run on PC do not have anything to pay to the owners of the OS. Anyone can make software for windows without having to ask MS. There's like 1000 more softwares for windows than games on the PS2, so it would be way too much of a problem for MS to give permission to each of those, and sue those who didn't.

Avatar image for albyx
albyx

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 albyx
Member since 2004 • 50 Posts
Sony doesn't have the total rights to the spiderman franchise. Marvel still owns that and they dictate who can make the game. Sony only owns the rights to the movie.
Avatar image for Super_M_cool
Super_M_cool

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Super_M_cool
Member since 2006 • 134 Posts
The Agency is coming out for the PS3 as well you know.
Avatar image for MagMower
MagMower

992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 MagMower
Member since 2005 • 992 Posts
[QUOTE="espoac"]I get that MS get's no profit from it, however why are they not as first party developers giving the PS3 an exclusive. That should be their priority, Sony knows what a big role exclusives play in what platform gamers choose to buy. And maybe somewhere this game will be the deciding factor in somebody not buying a PS3 as in:"this is on the PC, so why do I need a PS3?". It just seems like a shortsighted business decision, in the short term we'll make some more profit off the game which we invested maybe 15 million in, but in the long run we may be hurting sales of a sytem which we spent billions on.Killer_Cyborg


To keep it short, PC = MMO land. They're really not that successful on consoles while the MMO market on PC is already big.

Yea, thats pretty much it.
Avatar image for gamer082009
gamer082009

6679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 gamer082009
Member since 2007 • 6679 Posts
With The Agency's recent announce for PC, I got to wondering. Why is SOE, a Sony subsidiary making games for what is in essence a Microsoft platform? Especially at a time when their new system on which they've plunked down billions of dollars really needs good exclusive games? Seems a bit counter-intuitive...espoac
Microsoft just happens to have a Operating System that alot of people use for their computers, so it's not a big deal. Microsoft doesn't own or make comuters (Dell, HP make computers etc.) Microsoft is more of a software based company, so your title is very misleading, I would go as far to say purposefully done!
Avatar image for ultima-flare
ultima-flare

2259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 ultima-flare
Member since 2003 • 2259 Posts

 SOE =/= SCE. Also, it is not like they are helping MS by releasing a game for Windows. It's not like someone will buy a computer/Windows just to play a SOE game.

Avatar image for Jamh83
Jamh83

689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Jamh83
Member since 2006 • 689 Posts

[QUOTE="ocelotcougar"]Spiderman 3 came out for 360. Could have easily been an exclusive.espoac
yeah that's a bit of a puzzler. Why in the hell would Sony ever give the movie game rights for 1,2 or 3 to Activison instead of their own game studio? I say blame it on Kutaragi, the crazy old kook! J/K

Activision own the video game rights to anything Spider-Man related which includes the movies and as such determines what platforms they'll make it for. 

Avatar image for blitzinger123
blitzinger123

2370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 blitzinger123
Member since 2005 • 2370 Posts
PC is a universal tool. Microsoft is one of a couple operating systems. To maximize sales, SOE makes their software compatible with numerous operating systems, including Microsoft because its the most popular.
Avatar image for xxgunslingerxx
xxgunslingerxx

4275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 xxgunslingerxx
Member since 2005 • 4275 Posts

Spiderman 3 came out for 360. Could have easily been an exclusive.ocelotcougar

same as surfs up lol ... but i can see why money is more important then exclusive game in thsi case

Avatar image for xxgunslingerxx
xxgunslingerxx

4275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 xxgunslingerxx
Member since 2005 • 4275 Posts

Sony doesn't have the total rights to the spiderman franchise. Marvel still owns that and they dictate who can make the game. Sony only owns the rights to the movie. albyx

yes and when the game is about the movie sony owns the right to that game

Avatar image for blitzinger123
blitzinger123

2370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 blitzinger123
Member since 2005 • 2370 Posts

[QUOTE="albyx"]Sony doesn't have the total rights to the spiderman franchise. Marvel still owns that and they dictate who can make the game. Sony only owns the rights to the movie. xxgunslingerxx

yes and when the game is about the movie sony owns the right to that game

true story

Avatar image for Absynthetic
Absynthetic

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Absynthetic
Member since 2004 • 1897 Posts

[QUOTE="ocelotcougar"]Spiderman 3 came out for 360. Could have easily been an exclusive.espoac
yeah that's a bit of a puzzler. Why in the hell would Sony ever give the movie game rights for 1,2 or 3 to Activison instead of their own game studio? I say blame it on Kutaragi, the crazy old kook! J/K

because thats exactly why

Sony owns the movie rights and nothing else about Spiderman

Marvel owns Spiderman

Marvel gave the gaming rights to activision