wich one do u think its more important single player or multiplayer

IMO i think that SP is more important cause if a game has a good SP u wont get bored easyli and actualy most of the games dont have replayability sopeople cant finish them i get bored before i finish them one perfect example is gta4.and look uncharted it doesnt have neither MP or SS but IMO its the best ps3 game so far and it has a very high replayability... i think that developers should pay more atention to SP what do u think about it?

Wow...longest sentence ever.

Wow...longest sentence ever.

Thetaguru

I like a good single campaign but once I finish it, I never come back so not only is online multiplayer essential for me, it's also the most important aspect of a game.

I prefer single player but I play both...

depends on the genre...if its shooter,fighter, brawler...then its multi player

if its action or rpg...then off course single player...

I prefer single player but I play both...

rodney130

It depends on the genre. That is a very vague question since all genres have completely different gameplay. Shooters most of the time are average in single-player and multiplayer is where it's at. I just got into multiplayer and FPSes so I've been getting my ass handed to me... Depends if I'm good for that day lol. RPGs never have multiplayer and single-player has hours upon hours of customization and fun. Fighting games get old fast and when strategic games are over they're over. A lot of games are doneafter single-player and offer no replay value. Depends on the game really.

No doubt SP

SP. I don't care much for multiplayer.chathuranga

Single player for me.

Only SP for me... but i know MP is being enjoyed by a lot of people as well, its a great feature!

Wow...longest sentence ever.

Thetaguru

Guess you missed the misplaced period in there, lol.

Anyways, SP is definitely more important. I haven't even touched the online in Killzone 2 yet. Also, offline multiplayer is a lot better than online multi-player. Its way more fun and is useful when having big get togethers. Rock Band wouldn't have made a dent in the industry if it didn't have offline Multi-player.

Single player for me. I don't know why but online multiplayer has never appealed to me.

I love local multiplayer though. I just wish more ps3 games supported it. Local co-op can sometimes make below average games seem more fun, even the new spyro game!

Both of them makes a truely great game. Neither should be neglected to make one better. COD needs to improve on single player for sure.

There is the argument that an FPS nowadays will need a good online multiplayer mode in order to compete with the likes of COD, KZ2 and Resistance.

However, I think the majority of games require a solid SP feature. It's the only side to a game which everyone can use. Some people don't have additional controllers (or no r/l friends into gaming, or just no r/l friend :/) and some don't have an Internet connection, so their gaming experience will be exclusively SP.

Also, a solid SP is the basis for good a MP mode. I think MP can be much more fun than SP a lot of the time, but every game needs a good SP mode - so therefore SP is much more important imo.

Story over (I couldnt think of any word that rhymes with story that means muliplayer)

There is the argument that an FPS nowadays will need a good online multiplayer mode in order to compete with the likes of COD, KZ2 and Resistance.

However, I think the majority of games require a solid SP feature. It's the only side to a game which everyone can use. Some people don't have additional controllers (or no r/l friends into gaming, or just no r/l friend :/) and some don't have an Internet connection, so their gaming experience will be exclusively SP.

Also, a solid SP is the basis for good a MP mode. I think MP can be much more fun than SP a lot of the time, but every game needs a good SP mode - so therefore SP is much more important imo.

i haven't even played a single game online on my ps3. Single player all the way.

If life was fair and right in the world then MP would be fun but at least in SP you you don't have a bunch of crazy men running around spraying the walls with gunfire if any of that was real everyone of them would have been shot you don't see the AI acting like that,,,

Singleplayer is more important to me than multiplayer. I think Co-op is more important than full multiplayer. I hope they bring Co-op to killzone 2!

IMO i think that SP is more important cause if a game has a good SP u wont get bored easyli and actualy most of the games dont have replayability sopeople cant finish them i get bored before i finish them one perfect example is gta4.and look uncharted it doesnt have neither MP or SS but IMO its the best ps3 game so far and it has a very high replayability... i think that developers should pay more atention to SP what do u think about it?

membership1

Lol I know people who buy games then just play the online stuff, it's pretty sad to buy a game and not play the single player content. I myself always complete single player first and if I liked it, I'd play it again and if I had nothing left or found somethingtoo hard to do then I would play multi-player.

I definitely think multiplayer is important, single player can be misleading but multiplayer makes up for it. e.g Resistance 2

If it doesn't have multiplayer and then the single player is a bit poor then it's not worth a purchase.

Multiplayer definitely makes it for me.

Depends on what kind of game it is

SP. I don't care much for multiplayer.chathuranga

I definitely think multiplayer is important, single player can be misleading but multiplayer makes up for it. e.g Resistance 2

If it doesn't have multiplayer and then the single player is a bit poor then it's not worth a purchase.

Multiplayer definitely makes it for me.

[QUOTE="smithster118"]

I definitely think multiplayer is important, single player can be misleading but multiplayer makes up for it. e.g Resistance 2

If it doesn't have multiplayer and then the single player is a bit poor then it's not worth a purchase.

Multiplayer definitely makes it for me.

membership1

Well for me, it was good but not great.

SP. I don't care much for multiplayer.chathuranga

This.

Wow...longest sentence ever.

Thetaguru

Try reading the last section of The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner, it has page long sentences.

On topic, the SP is definitely the most important for me. The only MP I really care about is local, especially Co-op.

[QUOTE="membership1"][QUOTE="smithster118"]

I definitely think multiplayer is important, single player can be misleading but multiplayer makes up for it. e.g Resistance 2

If it doesn't have multiplayer and then the single player is a bit poor then it's not worth a purchase.

Multiplayer definitely makes it for me.

Well for me, it was good but not great.

SP. I don't care much for multiplayer.chathuranga

SP for me. I go with the SP first then try out the MP.