Your opinions of COD going back in time.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DEWMAN08
DEWMAN08

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 DEWMAN08
Member since 2006 • 2145 Posts
Personally I love that its going back to WW2 era, and its set in the Pacific which should give some new opportunities for gameplay and storytelling. What do you think?
Avatar image for realistic44
realistic44

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 realistic44
Member since 2008 • 8458 Posts
Its not that its a bad thing goes back in time, my question though is why now, especially when brothers in arms comes earlier aug 26th btw. and so many ww2's games are alike,. only thing im looking forward to cod5 is the co-op.
Avatar image for sinistergoggles
sinistergoggles

9919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 sinistergoggles
Member since 2005 • 9919 Posts
For some reason I'm not excited. I mean.. it's another WW2 game; don't we have enough of those?
Avatar image for OWNAGE20
OWNAGE20

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 OWNAGE20
Member since 2006 • 304 Posts
I am happy about this. COD had not yet done a Pacific theater game. Eurpoe has been done in three titles. We finally get a quality WWII Pacific theater game with COD5.
Avatar image for danome01
danome01

211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 danome01
Member since 2008 • 211 Posts

NO! frankly i have enough of WW2 even if its in the pacific mainly cause i have a new thirst for modern guns of sci-fi like resistance or ratchet and clank.

unless their weapons you see in the soul calibur games....

But i'm still gonna give this a try

Avatar image for That_WC3_Guy
That_WC3_Guy

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 That_WC3_Guy
Member since 2008 • 31 Posts

I'm fine with it as long as they don't go to the future...I don't wanna play some game with people shooting semi-automatic laser beams out of their eyes:D

Avatar image for SPD_WeBmAsTaH
SPD_WeBmAsTaH

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 SPD_WeBmAsTaH
Member since 2004 • 2668 Posts
I'm ok with it as long as this is the last time that they do it. For COD5 they should stick with the present. Going to the future would certainly ruin the whole aspect of the COD franchise. So what I'm saying is, as long as they stick to the current day and age with the technology, weapons and warfare then they should be just fine. I really hope it's the last time I see them do this because WW2 has had enough games to tell it's story.
Avatar image for Atheos-Arkhaios
Atheos-Arkhaios

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 Atheos-Arkhaios
Member since 2008 • 880 Posts
I'm a bit upset, as the modern look and feel was done so perfectly. Why not try a different war? What about World War I? How many FPS games are there based on that?
Avatar image for 360player_eq12
360player_eq12

2214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 360player_eq12
Member since 2006 • 2214 Posts
pass on Call of Duty 09 .... im gonna wait for Call of Duty 2010 since Infinity Ward will be making it.
Avatar image for Promised_Trini
Promised_Trini

3651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Promised_Trini
Member since 2008 • 3651 Posts
I Hate This World War 2 Getting Tired Of It.
Avatar image for TrevCubsOr21
TrevCubsOr21

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#11 TrevCubsOr21
Member since 2006 • 934 Posts
I think its silly! Call of Duty was never that popular until Modern Combat, which was the first game that was NOT in the WWII era! Now they have the popularity and fan support, and there taking it back to WWII??? I know I wont be buying this one, but for those of you that are have fun with it.
Avatar image for Sk8ter_213
Sk8ter_213

4573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Sk8ter_213
Member since 2003 • 4573 Posts
i thought going back to WWII was lame, Call of Duty series has plenty of WWII based games. They should have just stuck with modern warfare and go on from there. Now i'll still play the upcoming call of duty. i just thought it was stupid to go back.
Avatar image for Beast_2300
Beast_2300

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Beast_2300
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
i think it might suck
Avatar image for sa10kun
sa10kun

4290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 sa10kun
Member since 2007 • 4290 Posts
They should do a game based in the wild west of america. Then you could use bows and arrows and see the arrow's flight path using the kill cam. Haha.
Avatar image for Rhen_Var
Rhen_Var

12422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#15 Rhen_Var
Member since 2006 • 12422 Posts
I just love the modern era better, in world war 2, the guns were...meh but possibly a more slightly more futuristic theme, something like Future Weapons :lol:
Avatar image for G-Legend
G-Legend

7387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16 G-Legend
Member since 2005 • 7387 Posts
LAME! I'm tired of the WW2 scene. Even though this one is the pacific, WW2 weapons and the whole story line seems so played out...I doubt I will pick this title up.
Avatar image for hilltops
hilltops

1833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 hilltops
Member since 2005 • 1833 Posts

I'm fine with it as long as they don't go to the future...I don't wanna play some game with people shooting semi-automatic laser beams out of their eyes:D

That_WC3_Guy


Yeah..Same Here :roll:
Avatar image for deactivated-62b9a76fce1c1
deactivated-62b9a76fce1c1

710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-62b9a76fce1c1
Member since 2006 • 710 Posts

lame, but I want Infinity Ward to make Modern Warfare 2.

Avatar image for LURCH87
LURCH87

1375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#19 LURCH87
Member since 2008 • 1375 Posts
no im sick of wwII fps:roll:
Avatar image for Blaiyze1
Blaiyze1

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 Blaiyze1
Member since 2007 • 975 Posts
Yea i'm not happy with it goin bak 2 WWII but in comparison for me its like GTA4 being delayed.... okay we're gonna b pissed but in the end i'll still b buyin the game!
Avatar image for melodeathx
melodeathx

97

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 melodeathx
Member since 2008 • 97 Posts
I don't really mind the fact that they're going back in time, but i really dislike that Treyarch is developing the game, I hope it doesn't suck just like CoD3 did.
Avatar image for alien100000
alien100000

825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 alien100000
Member since 2005 • 825 Posts
I don't like it, I'm sick of World War 2 shooters.
Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts
I think it was a bad idea. Modern Warfare is far more fun.
Avatar image for T-Machine99
T-Machine99

1848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 T-Machine99
Member since 2007 • 1848 Posts

I just hope the multiplayer is as good as COD4's.

They should have like went in the future and had new weapons and futuristic technology.