Department of Justice sues Georgia over voting law

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#201 Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts

@mattbbpl: Sounds to me like Texas was in the right if they won all 12 lawsuits.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23357 Posts

@eoten: They were rulings based on inertia, stating that voting methods couldn't be expanded to accommodate the epidemic.

Their tactic is to strategically limit votes.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#203 Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

@eoten: They were rulings based on inertia, stating that voting methods couldn't be expanded to accommodate the epidemic.

Their tactic is to strategically limit votes.

That's your opinion, but it wasn't the opinion of the courts. For every drop box there has to be security to ensure they're not tampered with. Without limits, one political party can put more in communities that favor them politically, and less in another. And the cries that this was to limit votes or was racially motivated are without merit. Just like the accusations against Georgia's voting laws, the lawsuit against which will ultimately fail as well because none of the accusations have merit.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

Referenced by TX:

They need voter suppression to win some areas. That's known.

They have literally admitted it.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts

@eoten said:
@mattbbpl said:

@eoten: They were rulings based on inertia, stating that voting methods couldn't be expanded to accommodate the epidemic.

Their tactic is to strategically limit votes.

That's your opinion,

No. That's literally the reason according to the GOP itself from interview gaffs and leaked documents. Why lie so much? Even you know this is all about having higher chances at winning elections. Not sure what this election security ruse is all about, even TX GOP fraud admit there is zero evidence of widespread fraud.

GOP Pols Forced to Admit the ‘Big Lie’ Is BS During Farcical Texas Showdown

Keith Ingram, director of the Elections Division at the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, echoed Hughes’ admission that drive-through and 24-hour polling places had not been an issue.

“I don’t think we have any evidence of actual fraud,” he said. “There are discrepancies that resulted because of the failure to check the machines...on a continual basis throughout the voting process. So, there were problems involved with it, but nothing that we’ve seen rises to [the level of] fraud.”

Read the above quote please, and understand how you are objectively in the wrong. Going by pure facts.

What's wrong with drive through voting?

What's wrong with 24 hour voting?

Many of the provisions make 0 sense and have 0 data to back them up. All it will do is reduce turnout. This isn't about election security, the 2020 election was the most secure in history and fraud was at it's typical infentismal rate. This is all due to Trump's lie. Hundreds of phony bills due to a lie, what a shithole party with it's shithole policy.

Fortunately the clowns were forced to make some changes,

The pieces of legislation were ultimately adjusted to omit two of the most controversial measures: banning early voting before 1 p.m. on Sundays, and making it easier for judges to overturn an election, the Post reported.