House Oversight Subcommittee Hearing on the Clinton Foundation

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

https://www.c-span.org/video/?455872-1/house-oversight-subcommittee-hearing-clinton-foundation

The House Oversight Government Operations Subcommittee holds a hearing on oversight of nonprofit organizations and restrictions to their political activities, with a focus on the New York-based Clinton Foundation.

Starts at 2PM EST.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

yawn

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

8126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 judaspete
Member since 2005 • 8126 Posts

If they find anything illegal, then by all means throw the book at them. If they don't, will republicans finally shut up about the Clintons?

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

@judaspete said:

If they find anything illegal, then by all means throw the book at them. If they don't, will republicans finally shut up about the Clintons?

2020 isn't that far away.

Avatar image for tryit
TryIt

13157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 TryIt
Member since 2017 • 13157 Posts

@judaspete said:

If they find anything illegal, then by all means throw the book at them. If they don't, will republicans finally shut up about the Clintons?

nope.

Hillary specifically they have been complaining about for more than 20 years

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts
Loading Video...

Avatar image for Damedius
Damedius

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Damedius
Member since 2010 • 737 Posts

https://www.ibtimes.com/clinton-foundation-donors-got-weapons-deals-hillary-clintons-state-department-1934187

But now, in late 2011, Hillary Clinton’s State Department was formally clearing the sale, asserting that it was in the national interest. At press conferences in Washington to announce the department’s approval, an assistant secretary of state, Andrew Shapiro, declared that the deal had been “a top priority” for Clinton personally. Shapiro, a longtime aide to Clinton since her Senate days, added that the “U.S. Air Force and U.S. Army have excellent relationships in Saudi Arabia.”

These were not the only relationships bridging leaders of the two nations. In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.

The Saudi deal was one of dozens of arms sales approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that placed weapons in the hands of governments that had also donated money to the Clinton family philanthropic empire, an International Business Times investigation has found.

Under Clinton's leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure -- derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) -- represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. These extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that accompanied Obama’s arrival in the White House. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.

American defense contractors also donated to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state and in some cases made personal payments to Bill Clinton for speaking engagements. Such firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of Pentagon-negotiated deals that were authorized by the Clinton State Department between 2009 and 2012.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

The thing is, Republicans straight up admitted that the Benghazi hearings and inquiries were about hurting Hillary Clinton politically. Why should I trust them that this is anything, but a political stunt?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23356 Posts

@Serraph105: Is anyone taking this seriously?

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#12 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

...did we go back in time?

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60828 Posts

@Damedius: do you think maybe Judicial Watch has a bit of a bias?

...Judicial Watch is an American conservative activist group and self-styled watchdog group that files Freedom of Information Act lawsuits...

Nice attempt at a distraction, though. I think our focus should be on the real crook with real powet, Trump.