@ad1x2: Thanks for providing the link. I think it's ironic that libs are concerned about violence from the right after the election
The FBI doesn't find it ironic.
The FBI also looks at ANTIFA as a domestic terrorist org. So there is that.
@ad1x2: Thanks for providing the link. I think it's ironic that libs are concerned about violence from the right after the election
The FBI doesn't find it ironic.
The FBI also looks at ANTIFA as a domestic terrorist org. So there is that.
@ad1x2: Protests aren't riots. And yeah there are always some criminal elements taking advantage of that but the core wasn't rioting. Per your link.
So your rebuttal is to try and say it "technically" wasn't a riot despite the violence? I guess plausible deniability isn't limited to politicians.
The vast majority of people were protesters. Not rioters.
@ad1x2: Thanks for providing the link. I think it's ironic that libs are concerned about violence from the right after the election
The FBI doesn't find it ironic.
The FBI also looks at ANTIFA as a domestic terrorist org. So there is that.
Indeed. Just not the bigger threat, by far. Both are bad, but one is worse.
I can guarantee less meltdowns if Trump loses to if Trump wins. If Trump does pull this out the left will go bat shit crazy. I really don't want either side to win, but watching the meltdown by the left may just be worth it.
Are you talking about throwing milkshakes and angry tweets? Probably true.
If you're talking about political terrorism, and you know people being killed, the right will take the cake going by stats.
No starting fires and destroying private property as they did when Trump won the election in 2016.
I think the more important question would be "Will liberals riot again if Trump gets re-elected?"
I think the more important question would be "Will conservatives continue to be the top source of domestic terrorism and kill the most people for political violence if Trump is not re-elected?"
I even remember you down playing throwing milkshakes at people.
Calling out false equivalencies and/or degrees of violence is not the same as saying it's okay.
I think people who throw milk shakes are stupid.
I think people who shoot up synagogues are worse.
The person who shot up the synagogue in Pittsburgh was a Trump hater.
@JimB: "The person who shot up the synagogue in Pittsburgh was a Trump hater."
Yeah but that doesn't fit the liberal narrative so they will discount it as being one isolated incident. Trump haters can't be bad people and cause violence and start riots when their candidate loses.. Oh wait.
@JimB: "The person who shot up the synagogue in Pittsburgh was a Trump hater."
Yeah but that doesn't fit the liberal narrative so they will discount it as being one isolated incident. Trump haters can't be bad people and cause violence and start riots when their candidate loses.. Oh wait.
Technically he wasn't happy that trump wasn't harder on the Jewish people.
@JimB: "The person who shot up the synagogue in Pittsburgh was a Trump hater."
Yeah but that doesn't fit the liberal narrative so they will discount it as being one isolated incident. Trump haters can't be bad people and cause violence and start riots when their candidate loses.. Oh wait.
Technically he wasn't happy that trump wasn't harder on the Jewish people.
Which you base on what?
Also what source do you use to determine if someone is not a Trump support or is?
@JimB: "The person who shot up the synagogue in Pittsburgh was a Trump hater."
Yeah but that doesn't fit the liberal narrative so they will discount it as being one isolated incident. Trump haters can't be bad people and cause violence and start riots when their candidate loses.. Oh wait.
Technically he wasn't happy that trump wasn't harder on the Jewish people.
Which you base on what?
Also what source do you use to determine if someone is not a Trump support or is?
It was reported way back when dude. Pay attention sometime.
@JimB: "The person who shot up the synagogue in Pittsburgh was a Trump hater."
Yeah but that doesn't fit the liberal narrative so they will discount it as being one isolated incident. Trump haters can't be bad people and cause violence and start riots when their candidate loses.. Oh wait.
Technically he wasn't happy that trump wasn't harder on the Jewish people.
Which you base on what?
Also what source do you use to determine if someone is not a Trump support or is?
It was reported way back when dude. Pay attention sometime.
That was not what i asked.
I asked what you base what political affiliation he has on?
It was reported way back when dude. Pay attention sometime.
That was not what i asked.
I asked what you base what political affiliation he has on?
Since I didn't mention his political affiliation once again comprehension,
It was reported way back when dude. Pay attention sometime.
That was not what i asked.
I asked what you base what political affiliation he has on?
Since I didn't mention his political affiliation once again comprehension,
You clearly attempt to disproof the statement, but ok you agree then that he is not a trump voter.
It was reported way back when dude. Pay attention sometime.
That was not what i asked.
I asked what you base what political affiliation he has on?
Since I didn't mention his political affiliation once again comprehension,
You clearly attempt to disproof the statement, but ok you agree then that he is not a trump voter.
I clearly didn't mention his politics at all. Stop being dishonest.
You clearly attempt to disproof the statement, but ok you agree then that he is not a trump voter.
I clearly didn't mention his politics at all. Stop being dishonest.
Of course you were, you specifically said "Technically he wasn't happy that trump wasn't harder on the Jewish people."
And no the little mention of Technically does not negate the sentiment and conclusion you wish to come from that comment.
I clearly didn't mention his politics at all. Stop being dishonest.
Of course you were, you specifically said "Technically he wasn't happy that trump wasn't harder on the Jewish people."
And no the little mention of Technically does not negate the sentiment and conclusion you wish to come from that comment.
That was TECHNICALLY his complaint. Duh.,
I clearly didn't mention his politics at all. Stop being dishonest.
Of course you were, you specifically said "Technically he wasn't happy that trump wasn't harder on the Jewish people."
And no the little mention of Technically does not negate the sentiment and conclusion you wish to come from that comment.
That was TECHNICALLY his complaint. Duh.,
And again using "technically" does not remove your intentions.
That was TECHNICALLY his complaint. Duh.,
And again using "technically" does not remove your intentions.
You shouldn't assume. Which is all you're doing.
That was TECHNICALLY his complaint. Duh.,
And again using "technically" does not remove your intentions.
You shouldn't assume. Which is all you're doing.
Assuming ? not assuming anything I know what your intentions were.
That was TECHNICALLY his complaint. Duh.,
And again using "technically" does not remove your intentions.
You shouldn't assume. Which is all you're doing.
Assuming ? not assuming anything I know what your intentions were.
No, no you don't. You're being arrogant.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment