Incredibly, GOP senators are demanding billions more in tax cuts for the rich

  • 52 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for drunk_pi
Drunk_PI

3358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Drunk_PI
Member since 2014 • 3358 Posts

Billionaires are pointless. Giving more tax cuts to the ultra wealthy is self-defeating. Conservatives don't care about economic theory and reality, just giving their donors more and more while proclaiming they are "patriots."

What a load of hogwash.

@xdude85 said:

Always amazes how some people who probably make less than $40,000 a year always defend the obscenely wealthy and that it's a fair trade for them to get more tax breaks while the rest of us struggle.

Because they too think they'll be rich, nevermind social mobility has been hampered. It's sad but the reality in this country of fools.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

The GOP complains that the capital gains tax isn’t indexed to inflation. As a result, the argument goes, taxpayers including “everyday Americans” are charged taxes on gains that are due purely to inflation, not to the real appreciation of their stocks or bonds.

Lastly, even more than the 2017 tax cut, this one would be almost exclusively a rich person’s gimme. The top 1% would collect more than 86% of the benefits, according to a 2018 analysis by the Wharton School; the bottom 90% would get 2.5% of the benefits. The change would cost the Treasury $100 billion to $200 billion over 10 years, according to expert estimates.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-07-30/gop-demands-another-tax-cut

This tax cut wouldn't go through Congress at all if they used the proposed mechanism for passage. I look forward to passage by the administration followed by bellows about too high deficits and taxes.

Read https://taxfoundation.org/capital-cost-recovery-across-oecd-2018/

  • The United States offers the 16th best treatment of capital investment out of the 35 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Conclusion

Prior to the enactment of the TCJA, the U.S. had not only the highest corporate tax rate among industrialized nations, but also one of the worst capital allowance systems. Post-TCJA, the U.S. has a much more competitive corporate tax rate but still has a capital allowance system that is less competitive than it was in the 1980s.

"Nordic nanny states" are beating US on capital allowance. LOL.