MSNBC should be shut down.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

https://www.infowars.com/msnbc-guest-republicans-are-domestic-terrorists/

During a segment on Saturday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “AM Joy,” the liberal network allowed a Democratic pollster to call for his political enemies to be arrested and put in prison for failing to adhere to a variety of left-wing viewpoints.

The pollster, Fernand Amandi, made the comments during a discussion about what liberals see as Republican members refusing to push for a Children’s Health Insurance Program. (CHIP) Amandi also conflated the issue with actual left-wing causes like a psychotic fear of Russia and the 100% belief that Senate Candidate Roy Moore is guilty of numerous accusations.

Rather than actually discuss the issue, Amandi instead opted for a straw man attack, using multiple flat out lies to declare the entire Republican Party as a group of literal terrorists.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#2 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

more infowars spam

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

@drlostrib said:

more infowars spam

Valid news source with video feed from msnbc themselves. If you don't like it, don't post it in it. Troll somewhere else.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#4 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@n64dd said:
@drlostrib said:

more infowars spam

Valid news source with video feed from msnbc themselves. If you don't like it, don't post it in it. Troll somewhere else.

infowars is not a valid news source

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

Remember those "lock her up!" chants from the election? What's your stance on that, OP?

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#6 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42236 Posts

@perfect_blue said:

Remember those "lock her up!" chants from the election? What's your stance on that, OP?

And... /thread

Avatar image for resevl4rlz
resevl4rlz

3848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 resevl4rlz
Member since 2005 • 3848 Posts

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

Is this "news" story also happening the basement of pizza shop?

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#10 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts
@drlostrib said:
@n64dd said:
@drlostrib said:

more infowars spam

Valid news source with video feed from msnbc themselves. If you don't like it, don't post it in it. Troll somewhere else.

infowars is not a valid news source

There's a war on for your mind.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

Except it was AN ACTUAL MSNBC VIDEO. Proof you didn't even look at it.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#12  Edited By nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42236 Posts

@n64dd said:
@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

Except it was AN ACTUAL MSNBC VIDEO. Proof you didn't even look at it.

Again, justify when Trump and co called "lock her up". Otherwise, you look just as hypocritical as he does.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d

6278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
Member since 2009 • 6278 Posts

@n64dd: By your "logic" you support Info Wars to be shut down too, right?

Avatar image for speedfreak48t5p
speedfreak48t5p

14491

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 62

User Lists: 0

#14 speedfreak48t5p
Member since 2009 • 14491 Posts

@drlostrib said:
@n64dd said:
@drlostrib said:

more infowars spam

Valid news source with video feed from msnbc themselves. If you don't like it, don't post it in it. Troll somewhere else.

infowars is not a valid news source

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

@nintendoboy16 said:
@n64dd said:
@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

Except it was AN ACTUAL MSNBC VIDEO. Proof you didn't even look at it.

Again, justify when Trump and co called "lock her up". Otherwise, you look just as hypocritical as he does.

I never supported that? What does Trump have to do with this?

Avatar image for Mercenary848
Mercenary848

12143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Mercenary848
Member since 2007 • 12143 Posts

@xdude85 said:

Thank you, at this point I just ignore his threads or come in to see who still takes him serious.

Avatar image for SOedipus
SOedipus

15075

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 SOedipus
Member since 2006 • 15075 Posts

They should shut down infowars too.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

@tjandmia said:

Entertaining troll64dd with this shit only makes it worse.

Real story.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127738 Posts

@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

No we can not.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

@horgen said:
@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

No we can not.

The source was directly from MSNBC?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts

N64DD.........nothing to see here.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#23 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@horgen said:
@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

No we can not.

Why? Infowars as a source serves no real purpose. If TC has a problem with the MSNBC video, then why not link that instead of linking infowars just to troll?

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127738 Posts

@drlostrib said:
@horgen said:
@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

No we can not.

Why? Infowars as a source serves no real purpose. If TC has a problem with the MSNBC video, then why not link that instead of linking infowars just to troll?

We moderators will rather not pick a side when it comes to which sources we allow and not.

WCCFtech isn't a great place for hardware news. If you're into computer hardware, you don't give anything that comes from that site a second thought.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#25  Edited By DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@horgen said:
@drlostrib said:
@horgen said:
@resevl4rlz said:

can we just lock threads with infowars they don't provide eligible sources

No we can not.

Why? Infowars as a source serves no real purpose. If TC has a problem with the MSNBC video, then why not link that instead of linking infowars just to troll?

We moderators will rather not pick a side when it comes to which sources we allow and not.

WCCFtech isn't a great place for hardware news. If you're into computer hardware, you don't give anything that comes from that site a second thought.

WCCFtech doesn't push dangerous conspiracies and bigotted view points. And still if TC is taking issue with MSNBC, then why not link to MSNBC?

VGChartz was not allowed on SW because it was inaccurate, but a fake news site that pushes things like Pizzagate and Sandy Hook Hoax conspiracies, saying parents grieving over their murdered children were actors, that's A-okay? Would the National Policy Institute also be an allowed source?

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127738 Posts

@drlostrib said:

WCCFtech doesn't push dangerous conspiracies and bigotted view points. And still if TC is taking issue with MSNBC, then why not link to MSNBC?

VGChartz was not allowed on SW because it was inaccurate, but a fake news site that pushes things like Pizzagate and Sandy Hook Hoax conspiracies, saying parents grieving over their murdered children were actors, that's A-okay? Would the National Policy Institute also be an allowed source?

I remember when VGCharts were banned as a source... Different rules back then.

Don't like the topics, don't post in them.

Also I think the topics are good for one thing. See how certain things are twisted when viewed through the glasses of somebody supporting far right, alternative right or whatever it is called these days.

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27 DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts

@horgen said:
@drlostrib said:

WCCFtech doesn't push dangerous conspiracies and bigotted view points. And still if TC is taking issue with MSNBC, then why not link to MSNBC?

VGChartz was not allowed on SW because it was inaccurate, but a fake news site that pushes things like Pizzagate and Sandy Hook Hoax conspiracies, saying parents grieving over their murdered children were actors, that's A-okay? Would the National Policy Institute also be an allowed source?

I remember when VGCharts were banned as a source... Different rules back then.

Don't like the topics, don't post in them.

Also I think the topics are good for one thing. See how certain things are twisted when viewed through the glasses of somebody supporting far right, alternative right or whatever it is called these days.

So now we're allowed to link to (and thus support) sites that support dangerous conspiracies that have resulted in violence and harrassment as long as they provide a difference in perspective? So National Policy Institute? Or American Renaissance?

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127738 Posts

@drlostrib said:

So now we're allowed to link to (and thus support) sites that support dangerous conspiracies that have resulted in violence and harrassment as long as they provide a difference in perspective? So National Policy Institute? Or American Renaissance?

If you want to I can always bring it up with the other mods and hopefully get admins to add their 2 cents on it as well. Last time we decided not to outright ban sources. But back then infowars was perhaps the most biased one.

Avatar image for Jacanuk
Jacanuk

20281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#29 Jacanuk
Member since 2011 • 20281 Posts

@drlostrib: One could also ask why this profile is allowed to be around when you are a proven alt to a older account.

But ahh, Ce la vie i guess

Avatar image for drlostrib
DrLostRib

5931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#30  Edited By DrLostRib
Member since 2017 • 5931 Posts
@Jacanuk said:

@drlostrib: One could also ask why this profile is allowed to be around when you are a proven alt to a older account.

But ahh, Ce la vie i guess

Yes, and when I hid it so well. Well good bye, I'm sure @zaryia will be very disappointed that his alt is going to be banned

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts

@drlostrib said:
@Jacanuk said:

@drlostrib: One could also ask why this profile is allowed to be around when you are a proven alt to a older account.

But ahh, Ce la vie i guess

Yes, and when I hid it so well. Well good bye, I'm sure @zaryia will be very disappointed that his alt is going to be banned

What happened to your old account?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180226 Posts

@Jacanuk said:

@drlostrib: One could also ask why this profile is allowed to be around when you are a proven alt to a older account.

But ahh, Ce la vie i guess

If you can get away with trolling then he can have another account. At least he doesn't troll with them.