Old tapes unearthed of racist comments by Ronald Reagan

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/07/ronald-reagans-racist-conversation-richard-nixon/595102/

So it looks like the republicans savior was racist after all!

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@joebones5000 said:

The entire Republican party is racist. They'll tell you that a statement like that is stereotyping, while feigning outage, of course, but they are and they know it.

How do you know all of them, personally?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

Paul Krugman:

Over the years there have been many, many angry declarations from conservatives that Reagan wasn't a racist. They were all beside the point; what mattered was that he exploited racism, ruthlessly.

As it turns out, however, he *was* a racist

This party is who we thought they were.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

@heirren said:
@joebones5000 said:

The entire Republican party is racist. They'll tell you that a statement like that is stereotyping, while feigning outage, of course, but they are and they know it.

How do you know all of them, personally?

He did say 'party', and yeah the party is. Are there individual Republicans who aren't racist? Absolutely. But the party itself has proven time and again its primary concern is white anglo saxon protestants.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#6 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@br0kenrabbit:

Its asinine to generalize like that. Entire would equate to everyone involved in the party.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

@heirren said:

@br0kenrabbit:

Its asinine to generalize like that. Entire would equate to everyone involved in the party.

The party itself can have intrinsic values that not every member shares.

Just look at Christianity. X-D

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@br0kenrabbit:

The party is the people within it. Its still calling them all racists.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

@heirren said:

@br0kenrabbit:

The party is the people within it. Its still calling them all racists.

The party is a conglomerate, true. But the fact remains the party is racist because enough of that conglomerate are, it doesn't take every one.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@br0kenrabbit:

Still doesnt matter.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

@heirren said:

@br0kenrabbit:

Still doesnt matter.

Then why argue about it? Seems counterproductive to argue a point of something that you think doesn't matter.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#12  Edited By deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@br0kenrabbit:

Because i find it unlikely that they are all racist. Like i said its an asinine thing to say.

Avatar image for br0kenrabbit
br0kenrabbit

18091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 br0kenrabbit
Member since 2004 • 18091 Posts

@heirren said:

@br0kenrabbit:

Because i find it unlikely that they are all racist. Like i said its an asinine thing to say.

You really don't retain what you read, do you?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

@heirren said:

@br0kenrabbit:

Because i find it unlikely that they are all racist. Like i said its an asinine thing to say.

That was not what was said...………...

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#15 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@LJS9502_basic:

Yes. The republican party. Thats everyone involved, my friend.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127731 Posts

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@heirren: If you want to claim that everyone involved in a party shares their intrinsic values, so be it. But a party that actively works to undermine minority voting rights is racist.

Avatar image for npiet1
npiet1

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#18 npiet1
Member since 2018 • 3576 Posts

A racist old president in the early 80's? Who would of guessed.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#19  Edited By deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@mattbbpl:

You dont know the inner-politics that occur. These are still citizens. So calling the party racist, you are also calling them racist, as US citizens. Now lets say you think they are racist, but a week later something happens or a chouce is made which makes you think otherwise. So now you no longer think they are racist but it was people within that "racist" party thst were there all along that made you think this? So these racists are no longer racists? (I could probably word this better.)

Saying such means change is not possible.

Had to rush for the democratic debate.

Republicans, democrats...theyre all clowns.

Avatar image for deactivated-6068afec1b77d
deactivated-6068afec1b77d

2539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#20  Edited By deactivated-6068afec1b77d
Member since 2017 • 2539 Posts

most people already knew about consciously, but many people didn't really thought about it. Like for me, for example, I learned about Ronald Regan in class and I compared his policies with Trump and got a matching order. So, this not a surprise for me.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

I'm not familiar with the rules that kept this under wraps for decades, but why? Too damaging to know he said some racist stuff?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@heirren: I know the party is racist. They intentionally lower the voting power of minorities, and thus they're a racist party.

You're the one saying that all members of a racist party are racist themselves. Not me.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

'“Last night, I tell you, to watch that thing on television as I did,” Reagan said. “Yeah,” Nixon interjected. Reagan forged ahead with his complaint: “To see those, those monkeys from those African countries—damn them, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes!” Nixon gave a huge laugh.'

Oh shit, Reagan might drop in presidential historical ratings after this.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@mattbbpl:

The party is the people within it.

Or are you saying the ideals the party was born from are racist? In essense if you join the republican party you somehow magically become racists? Something isnt adding up.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#25  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62651 Posts

I mean, he was a rich old white guy born in 1911.

It's like discovering water is wet.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@heirren said:

@mattbbpl:

The party is the people within it.

Then you're right, those people are racist.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#27 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@mattbbpl:

I never said that they were.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@heirren said:

@mattbbpl:

I never said that they were.

You're arguing that calling the party racist is the same as calling everyone in the party racist because the party is the people.

A party that systematically works to lower the voting power of minorities is racist. Full stop. If we accept your proposition that:

@heirren said:

@mattbbpl:

The party is the people within it.

Then those people are racist because intentionally and systematically lowering the voting power of minorities to boost the power of the majority voting block is sure as **** racist.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#29 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@mattbbpl:

Still doesnt matter. The KKK is racist. That is what they stand for. You mean to tell me that the republican party is a racist cult? Arent there people of various ethnic groups within this party?

...

Minorities cant vote?

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

Who would've guessed that a race-baiting president was actually racist?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@heirren said:

@mattbbpl:

Still doesnt matter. The KKK is racist. That is what they stand for. You mean to tell me that the republican party is a racist cult? Arent there people of various ethnic groups within this party?

...

Minorities cant vote?

Republicans have been intentionally working to strip away minority voting power via multiple mechanisms as part of a coordinated effort at both the state and national levels for years. The Hofeller files took the last remaining bit of ambiguity out of the situation.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#32 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15246 Posts

AOC is right again............she took heat for calling Reagan racist a few months back and now, what do you know? LOL

Reagan seemed more racist than even Nixon here.

Avatar image for vfighter
VFighter

11031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 VFighter
Member since 2016 • 11031 Posts

@mattbbpl: Imagine that, somebody on the left calling everybody on the right racist, very original and creative...yawn...

Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Sevenizz
Member since 2010 • 6462 Posts

Big deal - as if no one ever talks or thinks inappropriately about *insert topic here*. Acting on or legislating said beliefs is another matter.

Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Sevenizz
Member since 2010 • 6462 Posts

@texasgoldrush: She’s also an idiot who doesn’t know anything about WW2 and cries for photos in parking lots.

Avatar image for Sevenizz
Sevenizz

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Sevenizz
Member since 2010 • 6462 Posts

@mattbbpl: Requiring basic ID to vote isn’t racist. It’s common sense.

Avatar image for MirkoS77
MirkoS77

17968

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37  Edited By MirkoS77
Member since 2011 • 17968 Posts

So now it’s acceptable to be racist and shrug it off because it isn’t being acted upon or legislated. It’s a good thing that legislation from racists will be labeled racist so we can all know not to pass it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#38 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@mattbbpl:

Sounds a bit like paranoia.

Avatar image for Solaryellow
Solaryellow

7340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Solaryellow
Member since 2013 • 7340 Posts

@MirkoS77 said:

So now it’s acceptable to be racist and shrug it off because it isn’t being acted upon or legislated. It’s a good thing that legislation from racists will be labeled racist so we can all know not to pass it.

Hey Mirko, how about a cup of coffee?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@heirren: @MirkoS77: But it is being acted upon.

Here's a living list of known voter suppression efforts in the US. For the purposes of this discussion, you'd want to focus on 2006 and beyond as that's when the planning for Project REDMAP began in earnest. Hofeller was a key architect of that effort, and those efforts continued up until his death, at which point tens of thousands of documents detailing his work were inherited by his daughter.

These documents are an ongoing story, as details about their contents get revealed through the discovery phase of various related lawsuits. The census question was the first one on the docket, so information that the GOP was using it to limit representation of minority districts came out early. More recent revelations from the files center around racial gerrymandering. For example, the maps he used contain his raw data and the algorithms he used to create the districts:

Chen said he found Hofeller manually entered “%18_ap_blk” into the mapping software’s formula box of nearly every draft that Chen said he analyzed. This formula, the political scientist explained on Tuesday, was used to calculate and track how many African American citizens were of voting age in each district.

Though racial gerrymandering was the focus of many previous lawsuits against the state, it is the focus on partisan gerrymandering that sets this specific case apart for the rest.

The files are so spot on that the defense has resorted to ridiculous defenses like the following:

Chen testified that Hofeller’s files contained racial data, although under cross-examination from GOP lawyer Thomas Farr, Chen conceded it’s technically possible Hofeller could have used one hand to cover up part of the screen while drawing the maps so he couldn’t actually see the racial data.

Republican legislative leaders, who are the main defendants in the lawsuit, have also previously said Hofeller’s personal files only reflect his hobbies, and not any official work he was doing for the state.

The entire thing is a farce.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@vfighter said:

@mattbbpl: Imagine that, somebody on the left calling everybody on the right racist, very original and creative...yawn...

This entire thing started because someone claimed that the party being racist was the same as every member of the party being racist. The party is definitely racist. When the party stops being racist, I'll stop calling it racist.

As for every member being racist, I concede that a racist party doesn't mean every member is racist. Some members may be racist, some members may merely be OK with supporting racist policies to get their tax tax cuts, and other members may be too oblivious to even know racist policies are part of the party.

@Sevenizz said:

@mattbbpl: Requiring basic ID to vote isn’t racist. It’s common sense.

Even if we concede that (and I don't), what about the other actions?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

@heirren said:

@mattbbpl:

The party is the people within it.

Or are you saying the ideals the party was born from are racist? In essense if you join the republican party you somehow magically become racists? Something isnt adding up.

If you go along with racism it doesn't say well about you.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

@heirren said:

@LJS9502_basic:

Yes. The republican party. Thats everyone involved, my friend.

Simplistic reading and understanding of a complex idea...……..

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#44 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@mattbbpl: @LJS9502_basic:

I agree. That holds true for many things.

I stand by what i said, though. We do not know all the inner politics. Regardless of the outcome, and for sake of discussion lets say there are racist doings within that party, as long as there are those working against it or opposed to the outcome, you simply cannot call the party, as a whole, racist. America is still a democracy(lol i think).

Very simple.

Is the fundamental nature of what the republican party stands for racist? Or, are there a selection of individuals within the party--with power--racist? Theres a big difference between the two.

Say there is corruption within the a law enforcement agency. If you know a few police officers or detectives that actually do honest work based on what the department is meant to do, does that make these police officers corrupt?

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23341 Posts

@heirren: All I wanted was an admission that the party is racist and that it can be called racist without calling every member racist.

We are now in agreement.

Avatar image for n64dd
N64DD

13167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 N64DD
Member since 2015 • 13167 Posts
@uninspiredcup said:

I mean, he was a rich old white guy born in 1911.

It's like discovering water is wet.

LOL

Avatar image for JimB
JimB

3925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 JimB
Member since 2002 • 3925 Posts

@mattbbpl said:
@heirren said:

@mattbbpl:

The party is the people within it.

Then you're right, those people are racist.

All this coming from the party of slavery.

Avatar image for zaryia
Zaryia

21607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48  Edited By Zaryia
Member since 2016 • 21607 Posts
@JimB said:
@mattbbpl said:
@heirren said:

@mattbbpl:

The party is the people within it.

Then you're right, those people are racist.

All this coming from the party of slavery.

Southern Conservative Democrat Party that became the Southern Conservative Republican Party?

The people who would still be in the "party of slavery" would be Republicans. Same goes for the KKK, which is they the KKK are currently right wing and not Democrats.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
deactivated-5ea0704839e9e

2335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#49 deactivated-5ea0704839e9e
Member since 2017 • 2335 Posts

@mattbbpl:

Nope. I think you agree with me, though.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

@heirren said:

@mattbbpl: @LJS9502_basic:

I agree. That holds true for many things.

I stand by what i said, though. We do not know all the inner politics. Regardless of the outcome, and for sake of discussion lets say there are racist doings within that party, as long as there are those working against it or opposed to the outcome, you simply cannot call the party, as a whole, racist. America is still a democracy(lol i think).

Very simple.

Is the fundamental nature of what the republican party stands for racist? Or, are there a selection of individuals within the party--with power--racist? Theres a big difference between the two.

Say there is corruption within the a law enforcement agency. If you know a few police officers or detectives that actually do honest work based on what the department is meant to do, does that make these police officers corrupt?

The problem with the party as a whole is that even if they are not racist themselves they are doing nothing to say it's wrong. And for that they are accountable. It's not a positive trait to keep your mouth shut while these ideologies are becoming the norm.