Should America have gun rights in this day and age? Why? Why not?

  • 130 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#51 Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts
@xdude85 said:

There's a mass shooting every day in America, and America's excess of guns are smuggled to other countries, resulting in violent crime going up in those places.

Really psychotic mindset that you claim to live in the world's greatest country, yet you feel the need to have an arsenal of weapons because a random stranger may kill you at the supermarket.

There's a reason why other countries don't have mass shootings all the time, and it's because they have pragmatic gun laws. When there is a mass shooting, all these country's immediate reaction is to look over and modify their gun laws to prevent another mass shooting. Sure beats America's reaction, which is doing nothing. Oh, and these countries (Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, etc.) are not dictatorships.

Also really batshit insane that the same people who are pro-gun are also pro-military and cop, despite the fact that the reason they why they bought a shitload of guns to begin with is the fear that the military or police may become too powerful and take over.

Again you people use emotionally driven disinformation. "There's a mass shooting every day in America." No, there isn't. If there was, it'd be all over the rabidly anti gun media. Every single one of them. Most those "shootings" are gang related violence, not some crazy person going out to murder innocents as you would like people to believe, as those who told you that nonsense would like you to believe. That gang violence also occurs in, and is going up in cities ran by people refusing to enforce existing laws.

Also, the US is larger than any other country in the world, except two. There's a reason you hear about the US more than France or Germany. Because there's over 320 million of us. And New Zealand? You could fit the entire population of New Zealand into New York City 5-6 times over.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#52 Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts
@mrbojangles25 said:
@eoten said:
@sargentd said:
@eoten said:

It's such a stupid argument. So the government has nukes and drones. Big fucking deal. Does that mean going forward every citizen in every country should bend a knee to tyrants and dictators? That nobody should ever desire a form of government in which the balance of power ultimately lies with the citizens? It's the talking points of authoritarian apologists.

I truly don't get the argument.. government is more powerful anyway so give up your 2A rights?? lol

Government has always lead a military that in most cases has more strength, weapons, and funding than its people. That's never changed. Nor has the need for the balance of power to remain in the hands of the people, and not in the hands of an oligarchy, or aristocracy. I'm not sure why the idea of people who do not wish to be ruled by tyrants having any means to defend themselves from such is so unpalatable to them. They pretend to be against the elites, and big corporations, and the 1%, yet at every turn tell us we shouldn't even resist their claims to power in any fashion.

They are hypocrites through and through.

As long as the government is staffed by people, for the people, and not the oligarchs and aristocracy, I think things are for the most part fine. The military is staffed by regular folks, they won't turn their guns on their own people simple because some rich asshole says they should. Generals and military leaders voiced dissent during Trump's tenure; these people are not mindless drones. They're intelligent, free-thinking patriots who defend the people, arguably before they would defend the government in many cases.

You look at history, a lot of these folks you are afraid of are groomed to be psychopaths. Hitler's SS had to be hand-picked and even then there were serious problems because a lot of those guys would suffer PTSD and many even killed themselves after committing acts of genocide.

Killing other people is not a normal thing, it's not the default nature of humans; the daily struggle of humanity is not "Man I want to kill some people, but I can't. AHHH this is so tough". We are social, communal creatures and it's more natural to want to get along with other people than to want to kill them.

People that are under the impression that it's simply a matter of time and/or a simple order until their military (at least in the Western world) turns around and starts shooting their own people don't really have a solid understanding of human nature IMO.

Obviously it's easier to do this in shitty parts of the world; you take some people that have nothing, give them everything, and say "all you gotta do is kill who I want you to kill", then that's a little easier. But in the Western world where standards of living are relatively high, not such a big concern.

Government isn't staffed by people for the people, it's made up of bureaucracies created by congress to circumvent their own duties and delegate more authority to the executive branch where leaders are appointed to make laws on behalf of those elected in large part by the media. You don't get the option to pick someone who is actually "for the people." You get a choice between two people who are for the system which keeps them in power.

Also, it doesn't matter what your impression of the military is, or how long you think it'd take for this or that to happen. None of that is even remotely relevant to the right in question. You show how naive you are talking down about "shitty" parts of the world, and arrogantly believe that shittiness cannot and will not happen in the US. That arrogance is exactly why it's only a matter of time before it does.

Standards are not much higher than what you would like to think. You think you're so much better than those people from those "shitty" places but you're not. They're no different than you are. They fell for the same bullshit you're spreading right now, that more power in the hands of politicians was some how going to work out to their benefit. It didn't. And I hate to break it to you, but it never will.

Avatar image for vfighter
VFighter

11031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 VFighter
Member since 2016 • 11031 Posts

@xdude85: That's a lot of BS for one post, try to spread it out more next time

Avatar image for palasta
palasta

1517

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#54 palasta
Member since 2017 • 1517 Posts

In this day and age? The apocalypse is upon us, what better time to start packing heat.

Loading Video...

https://youtu.be/O_3_-UrhZH0

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

@eoten: @vfighter:

Gun Violence Archive

Gun Violence in America 2021 (So Far)

Murders: 13,253

Mass Shootings: 452

Murder Suicides: 385

Avatar image for sargentd
SargentD

10114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#56 SargentD
Member since 2020 • 10114 Posts

@xdude85: you forgot the biggest one

Suicide 15,576

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#57  Edited By Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts
@LJS9502_basic said:

The 2nd was a product of it's time. Rifles were necessary for food and for defense. The founding fathers didn't trust armies so they didn't want to rely on one. The men in town all were part of the militia for their territory and did drill. That's why the well-regulated militia is part of the 2nd. With the US military today there is no need for regular citizens to worry about the need to defend the country. And TBH if they ever had to confront our military, one such excuse I see for those wanting the weapons, they wouldn't stand a chance anyway.

I'm not anti gun per se but the US has a major problem and it needs resolved. The NRA is the main point. Any legislation to make guns safer and they scream about it. Take money out of politics and we'd get some sensible legislation.

We would still absolutely stand a chance against the military because by the time that happens, the military will have already been divided in a coup.

Blow up pipelines, take up military bases, cut food supply. You don't just need a rifle to accomplish these things but it does help in a battle against the other side. Maybe you just want a way out and don't want to participate which means that rifle can save you and your family.

America doesn't know what it's like to truly struggle and have their shit taken away from them.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180212 Posts

@Gaming-Planet said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

The 2nd was a product of it's time. Rifles were necessary for food and for defense. The founding fathers didn't trust armies so they didn't want to rely on one. The men in town all were part of the militia for their territory and did drill. That's why the well-regulated militia is part of the 2nd. With the US military today there is no need for regular citizens to worry about the need to defend the country. And TBH if they ever had to confront our military, one such excuse I see for those wanting the weapons, they wouldn't stand a chance anyway.

I'm not anti gun per se but the US has a major problem and it needs resolved. The NRA is the main point. Any legislation to make guns safer and they scream about it. Take money out of politics and we'd get some sensible legislation.

We would still absolutely stand a chance against the military because by the time that happens, the military will have already been divided in a coup.

Blow up pipelines, take up military bases, cut food supply. You don't just need a rifle to accomplish these things but it does help in a battle against the other side.

Yeah no. The US military is highly trained and highly equipped. A bunch of good ole boys playing soldier isn't going to do it.

Avatar image for kadin_kai
Kadin_Kai

2247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#59 Kadin_Kai
Member since 2015 • 2247 Posts

There’s a vicious circle in the US. Even when you don’t particularly want to have a gun, the fact that your neighbours have guns then you maybe inclined to have one yourself.

That plus the gun culture, constitutional rights, general high violent crime rate and … do people inherit guns too… I guess they do.

America would certainly be in a better place without guns but I honestly don’t know how this issue could be resolved.

Avatar image for sargentd
SargentD

10114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#60 SargentD
Member since 2020 • 10114 Posts

@kadin_kai: I got my first gun .22 at 6yo for Christmas, grew up around them my whole life.

Nobody I know is going to give up their guns. They don't care what the government says. Its their right to own it.

Nobody wants the job of trying confiscate either lol.

Gun violence sucks, but it's not as wide spread here in the states as people act when you take into account how large the population. Take into account over 50% are suicide.

Then take into account the other half is 75% pistols.

Its starts painting a clearer picture. We have pockets where it is really high. Lots of gun homicide is gang/drug related in pockets of the inner city. Alot of these people are felons and are already breaking the law by having one.

Rural communities have way more guns and looser laws and don't experience that type of violence very often.

People who are not for more gun laws just don't see increasing gun control laws as a solution. Where the anti gun crowd feels it will.

Some people just don't believe more laws will stop it, they would be giving up their guns for nothing essentially.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#61  Edited By Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts
@sargentd said:

@xdude85: you forgot the biggest one

Suicide 15,576

If he cared he wouldn't be using falsified statistics anyway. And he actually thinks if made illegal, gangsters and drug dealers, already committed to a life of crime, would stop using them and sit down to a chess match to solve their differences.

Avatar image for pyro1245
pyro1245

9525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#62 pyro1245
Member since 2003 • 9525 Posts

I don't think most people need them. There should be a whole lot less of them being made, and they should be extremely difficult to fabricate and own. If you're caught with guns that aren't registered you should go straight to jail, for the rest of your life. I want to be able to go on google maps and see a list of your arms, so I can avoid you like a sex offender.

It's not really an argument it's just my perspective. Whatever benefit our country may have from allowing people to own and operate guns doesn't really seem worth it after all the negative things that have come from it. I don't trust people who rely on guns for protection.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#63  Edited By Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts
@pyro1245 said:

I don't think most people need them. There should be a whole lot less of them being made, and they should be extremely difficult to fabricate and own. If you're caught with guns that aren't registered you should go straight to jail, for the rest of your life. I want to be able to go on google maps and see a list of your arms, so I can avoid you like a sex offender.

It's not really an argument it's just my perspective. Whatever benefit our country may have from allowing people to own and operate guns doesn't really seem worth it after all the negative things that have come from it. I don't trust people who rely on guns for protection.

Aaw, and you people claim to be the ones fighting the authoritarians. Do you know why the 2A exists? To fight authoritarians :-D.

Also, I'll tell you what I've told others. Stop listening to bullshit propaganda and maybe, just maybe you'd have an understanding as to why the 2A exists, and how many people guns actually help every year. You only see all those negative things, because you've only ever been told negative things. That's how disinformation works.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180212 Posts

@eoten said:
@pyro1245 said:

I don't think most people need them. There should be a whole lot less of them being made, and they should be extremely difficult to fabricate and own. If you're caught with guns that aren't registered you should go straight to jail, for the rest of your life. I want to be able to go on google maps and see a list of your arms, so I can avoid you like a sex offender.

It's not really an argument it's just my perspective. Whatever benefit our country may have from allowing people to own and operate guns doesn't really seem worth it after all the negative things that have come from it. I don't trust people who rely on guns for protection.

Aaw, and you people claim to be the ones fighting the authoritarians. Do you know why the 2A exists? To fight authoritarians :-D.

Also, I'll tell you what I've told others. Stop listening to bullshit propaganda and maybe, just maybe you'd have an understanding as to why the 2A exists, and how many people guns actually help every year. You only see all those negative things, because you've only ever been told negative things. That's how disinformation works.

LOL the irony............and no self awareness.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

I think Australia over the last year has been a great example of why Americans need to keep their guns. Australia disarmed their citizens in what... the 90's? Now they have a fascist government arresting people for visiting family and friends, mandating "potentially"... not even actually infected but potentially infected people have a notification on their home. Oh, then they're basically making concentration camps that should be up and running by 2022 for those not wanting to comply. They already gunned down a bunch of rescue dogs so citizens wouldn't travel to adopt them.

Wonder why that's not happening in America (yet)...? Because the citizens are armed.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#66 Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts

@Telekill said:

I think Australia over the last year has been a great example of why Americans need to keep their guns. Australia disarmed their citizens in what... the 90's? Now they have a fascist government arresting people for visiting family and friends, mandating "potentially"... not even actually infected but potentially infected people have a notification on their home. Oh, then they're basically making concentration camps that should be up and running by 2022 for those not wanting to comply. They already gunned down a bunch of rescue dogs so citizens wouldn't travel to adopt them.

Wonder why that's not happening in America (yet)...? Because the citizens are armed.

Aah, but the left wants a society where government rules everyone and everything by force. Because they actually think that government is on their side.

Avatar image for xdude85
xdude85

6559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 xdude85
Member since 2006 • 6559 Posts

@eoten said:
@sargentd said:

@xdude85: you forgot the biggest one

Suicide 15,576

If he cared he wouldn't be using falsified statistics anyway. And he actually thinks if made illegal, gangsters and drug dealers, already committed to a life of crime, would stop using them and sit down to a chess match to solve their differences.

Considering my source literally links you to every mass shooting, the details of each incident, and where it occurred. Then again, you're a liar who doesn't back up anything he says.

Care to offer a real rebuttal?

Gun Violence in America (2021 So Far)

Total Gun Deaths: 29,026

Murders: 13,318

Mass Shootings: 452

Oh, and we do have an agency that was founded to stop illegal firearms trafficking. It's called the ATF, too bad it's been butchered and underfunded that it can't actually do its purpose because of gun-nut politicians.

Really blows my mind that thousands of people needlessly dying every year from guns is acceptable in America, when literally no other civilized country in the world thinks so and passed laws and regulations so they wouldn't be like America.

Avatar image for THUMPTABLE
THUMPTABLE

2425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#68 THUMPTABLE
Member since 2003 • 2425 Posts

@eoten said:
@Telekill said:

I think Australia over the last year has been a great example of why Americans need to keep their guns. Australia disarmed their citizens in what... the 90's? Now they have a fascist government arresting people for visiting family and friends, mandating "potentially"... not even actually infected but potentially infected people have a notification on their home. Oh, then they're basically making concentration camps that should be up and running by 2022 for those not wanting to comply. They already gunned down a bunch of rescue dogs so citizens wouldn't travel to adopt them.

Wonder why that's not happening in America (yet)...? Because the citizens are armed.

Aah, but the left wants a society where government rules everyone and everything by force. Because they actually think that government is on their side.

Lol, now there's a conspiracy theory...

Avatar image for THUMPTABLE
THUMPTABLE

2425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 THUMPTABLE
Member since 2003 • 2425 Posts
@eoten said:
@sargentd said:

@xdude85: you forgot the biggest one

Suicide 15,576

If he cared he wouldn't be using falsified statistics anyway. And he actually thinks if made illegal, gangsters and drug dealers, already committed to a life of crime, would stop using them and sit down to a chess match to solve their differences.

Why then does the US have such a piss poor record for a supposedly developed country?

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

I absolutely believe we should have the ability to own and carry firearms. However, I do believe we should have stricter controls on how they are purchased, to whom they are sold to, and how they are maintained and tracked. All guns should be registered, require gun safety lessons which should be renewed periodically, and gun deaths/injuries legally tracked by the CDC for impact analysis.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#71 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@HoolaHoopMan: Background checks are already mandatory for legal sales. A problem around the world is the black market. Criminals will not comply with any new rules and the cities and states with the strictest gun control laws in America have proven their laws don't work as gun violence runs rampant in those areas.

Also... CDC? No thanks. Don't need China telling us what we should do.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

@Telekill said:

@HoolaHoopMan: Background checks are already mandatory for legal sales. A problem around the world is the black market. Criminals will not comply with any new rules and the cities and states with the strictest gun control laws in America have proven their laws don't work as gun violence runs rampant in those areas.

Also... CDC? No thanks. Don't need China telling us what we should do.

Are you saying that the CDC is run by China?

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#73  Edited By Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@HoolaHoopMan: Heavily influenced if not corrupted by... yes. WHO is as well. Hell, the entire Biden administration.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

@Telekill said:

@HoolaHoopMan: Heavily influenced if not corrupted by... yes. WHO is as well. Hell, the entire Biden administration.

Oh, so just conspiracy nonsense then. Par for the course.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@HoolaHoopMan: Lately it takes about a month to go from conspiracy to reality.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

@Telekill said:

@HoolaHoopMan: Lately it takes about a month to go from conspiracy to reality.

Give us examples.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180212 Posts

@Telekill said:

@HoolaHoopMan: Heavily influenced if not corrupted by... yes. WHO is as well. Hell, the entire Biden administration.

Far right and conspiracy theories.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#78 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@HoolaHoopMan: Sure. How about people getting banned on social media for the conspiracy that booster shots are going to be coming. Now a month or so later and it's looking like fact.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

@Telekill said:

@HoolaHoopMan: Sure. How about people getting banned on social media for the conspiracy that booster shots are going to be coming. Now a month or so later and it's looking like fact.

Who were these people, and what exact social media posts caused them to be banned? I want full context.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180212 Posts

@Telekill said:

@HoolaHoopMan: Sure. How about people getting banned on social media for the conspiracy that booster shots are going to be coming. Now a month or so later and it's looking like fact.

Source

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#81 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

@eoten said:
@sargentd said:
@eoten said:

It's such a stupid argument. So the government has nukes and drones. Big fucking deal. Does that mean going forward every citizen in every country should bend a knee to tyrants and dictators? That nobody should ever desire a form of government in which the balance of power ultimately lies with the citizens? It's the talking points of authoritarian apologists.

I truly don't get the argument.. government is more powerful anyway so give up your 2A rights?? lol

Government has always lead a military that in most cases has more strength, weapons, and funding than its people. That's never changed. Nor has the need for the balance of power to remain in the hands of the people, and not in the hands of an oligarchy, or aristocracy. I'm not sure why the idea of people who do not wish to be ruled by tyrants having any means to defend themselves from such is so unpalatable to them. They pretend to be against the elites, and big corporations, and the 1%, yet at every turn tell us we shouldn't even resist their claims to power in any fashion.

They are hypocrites through and through.

Your premise is wrong.

1. You don't live under a "tyrannical" government. There has never been one in the history of the USA from Columbus to now. The English were hardly tyrannical. It's not a matter of the government's guns are bigger than yours (though they are, and the 2A stockpilers wouldn't stand a chance).

2. 2A is a product of it's time where Americans were more inclined to be armed considering it was still a growing country and many countries were vying for land within the modern US border. 2A was written for muskets, not semi-automatic weapons.

3. The gun advocates will bitch about their "rights." It's a complete misunderstanding of how the law actually works. Law evolves and the constitution has been interpreted as time has progressed. For example, free speech has limitations, freedom of mobility has limitations, freedom of expression has limitations. The "freedoms" have NEVER been absolutely "free." The fact that there are not more limitations to 2A is because of insane party interests.

4. Power has always been in the hands of the people. It's called voting.

5. There are checks and balances in Congress that prevent the threat of turning an army against it's citizens. Also, each state has it's own police force not under the direction of the feds.

6. NRA may be the most dumb human beings in the US. As or worse than the "woke." Also whom I despise.

BUT HERE'S THE PROBLEM, there are too many guns in the wild. So, unfortunately, I would want one to protect myself (against other gun owners) just in case even though the thought sickens me.

And, listen, I went to a shooting range, I found it a lot of fun. I'm not into hunting. And I feel for the responsible gun owners, but the danger outweighs the responsible owners. My opinion of course.

As a side note, the two-party system might be the most stupid system in modern democracy. US prides itself on it's democratic process, yet no other party has a chance to get in. Ross Perot being the closest. It's a false plurality.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#82 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@sonic_spark: Curious what your thoughts on what Australia is currently doing are.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#83 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

@Telekill said:

@sonic_spark: Curious what your thoughts on what Australia is currently doing are.

With the lockdowns? Wholly unnecessary.

I think the way this was handled across the board was terrible. I understand that the CDC has flip flopped. If they just said, listen, we know masks/social distancing/clean surfaces work, let's do that period - better safe than sorry, would have been better than flip flopping.

I was not against a very temporary lockdown for out of control numbers. But recurring lockdowns and prolonged ones are ridiculous.

I was not thrilled about receiving the vaccine, though I'm double vaxxed. And I'm not thrilled with the government mandating it. Problem is, there are so many conspiracy/anti-vaxxers, who are actually making it worse and forcing the issue.

And that is essentially what happened in Australia. They didn't get their vaccine numbers up, and instead are going into lockdown. Seems silly to me with such low numbers.

Avatar image for THUMPTABLE
THUMPTABLE

2425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#84 THUMPTABLE
Member since 2003 • 2425 Posts

@Telekill said:

@HoolaHoopMan: Heavily influenced if not corrupted by... yes. WHO is as well. Hell, the entire Biden administration.

ROFL, completely lost touch with reality eh?
Dangerous rabbit hole you've gone down...

Avatar image for THUMPTABLE
THUMPTABLE

2425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#85 THUMPTABLE
Member since 2003 • 2425 Posts
@sonic_spark said:
@Telekill said:

@sonic_spark: Curious what your thoughts on what Australia is currently doing are.

With the lockdowns? Wholly unnecessary.

I think the way this was handled across the board was terrible. I understand that the CDC has flip flopped. If they just said, listen, we know masks/social distancing/clean surfaces work, let's do that period - better safe than sorry, would have been better than flip flopping.

I was not against a very temporary lockdown for out of control numbers. But recurring lockdowns and prolonged ones are ridiculous.

I was not thrilled about receiving the vaccine, though I'm double vaxxed. And I'm not thrilled with the government mandating it. Problem is, there are so many conspiracy/anti-vaxxers, who are actually making it worse and forcing the issue.

And that is essentially what happened in Australia. They didn't get their vaccine numbers up, and instead are going into lockdown. Seems silly to me with such low numbers.

Big numbers for here mate.

Avatar image for tjandmia
tjandmia

3827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#86  Edited By tjandmia
Member since 2017 • 3827 Posts

They're really isn't a valid excuse for guns as a right in any country. Gun ownership should be a privilege and privilege should be required to be continually demonstrated.

All of the pro gun arguments are specious, at best. The worst is that "if we banned things, it would increase crime and criminals would create a massive black market!!!". Not true at all. We know this for a fact because guns are banned in certain countries and this mysterious black market has never appeared.

Avatar image for YearoftheSnake5
YearoftheSnake5

9731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#87 YearoftheSnake5
Member since 2005 • 9731 Posts

I don't believe the ownership of guns is the issue. The gun violence is just the tragic result of other unaddressed issues that continue to be unaddressed by leaders in the USA. I remember when these things were rarely in the news. Back when they used to shock people. It wasn't that long ago.

If all the guns were to somehow disappear, of course the shootings would go away. What replaces them is anyone's guess. Unless the problems that make people want to go out and commit such violence are addressed, restrictions are like putting a band aid on a tumor.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#88 Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts

@YearoftheSnake5 said:

I don't believe the ownership of guns is the issue. The gun violence is just the tragic result of other unaddressed issues that continue to be unaddressed by leaders in the USA. I remember when these things were rarely in the news. Back when they used to shock people. It wasn't that long ago.

If all the guns were to somehow disappear, of course the shootings would go away. What replaces them is anyone's guess. Unless the problems that make people want to go out and commit such violence are addressed, restrictions are like putting a band aid on a tumor.

Why should those so-called leaders address the actual problems when they can allow those problems to persist, blame convenient scapegoats, and collect votes from those who believe it? Those "leaders" have no interest in solving the underlying issues, so they blame tools, and by extension, voters of the other political party.

The reality is, most shootings are gang/drug related. And the gang/drug problems are absolutely a failure of leadership.

Avatar image for firedrakes
firedrakes

4468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#89 firedrakes
Member since 2004 • 4468 Posts

@eoten said:
@YearoftheSnake5 said:

I don't believe the ownership of guns is the issue. The gun violence is just the tragic result of other unaddressed issues that continue to be unaddressed by leaders in the USA. I remember when these things were rarely in the news. Back when they used to shock people. It wasn't that long ago.

If all the guns were to somehow disappear, of course the shootings would go away. What replaces them is anyone's guess. Unless the problems that make people want to go out and commit such violence are addressed, restrictions are like putting a band aid on a tumor.

Why should those so-called leaders address the actual problems when they can allow those problems to persist, blame convenient scapegoats, and collect votes from those who believe it? Those "leaders" have no interest in solving the underlying issues, so they blame tools, and by extension, voters of the other political party.

The reality is, most shootings are gang/drug related. And the gang/drug problems are absolutely a failure of leadership.

but also mental health to.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#90  Edited By Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts
@firedrakes said:
@eoten said:
@YearoftheSnake5 said:

I don't believe the ownership of guns is the issue. The gun violence is just the tragic result of other unaddressed issues that continue to be unaddressed by leaders in the USA. I remember when these things were rarely in the news. Back when they used to shock people. It wasn't that long ago.

If all the guns were to somehow disappear, of course the shootings would go away. What replaces them is anyone's guess. Unless the problems that make people want to go out and commit such violence are addressed, restrictions are like putting a band aid on a tumor.

Why should those so-called leaders address the actual problems when they can allow those problems to persist, blame convenient scapegoats, and collect votes from those who believe it? Those "leaders" have no interest in solving the underlying issues, so they blame tools, and by extension, voters of the other political party.

The reality is, most shootings are gang/drug related. And the gang/drug problems are absolutely a failure of leadership.

but also mental health to.

A tiny, tiny, tiny percent may be related to that. The media sensationalizes that to deflect from the reality. Of the homicides that occur, more than half the victims are black. Of those, more than half of them are male. Most victims in the US fall within the age group of the late teens, to mid 20s. This isn't a mental health problem, it's not a gun problem, it's not even a race problem. It's a leadership problem so overwhelming so that anyone who blames the police, mental health, or the tools is just blowing smoke up your ass to shift blame.

Avatar image for tjandmia
tjandmia

3827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#91 tjandmia
Member since 2017 • 3827 Posts

@eoten: it's clearly a gun problem, and why do you claim it's also not a race problem, but constantly mention blacks? You're like that guy who starts sentences with "I'm not racist, but...".

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#92 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:
@Gaming-Planet said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

The 2nd was a product of it's time. Rifles were necessary for food and for defense. The founding fathers didn't trust armies so they didn't want to rely on one. The men in town all were part of the militia for their territory and did drill. That's why the well-regulated militia is part of the 2nd. With the US military today there is no need for regular citizens to worry about the need to defend the country. And TBH if they ever had to confront our military, one such excuse I see for those wanting the weapons, they wouldn't stand a chance anyway.

I'm not anti gun per se but the US has a major problem and it needs resolved. The NRA is the main point. Any legislation to make guns safer and they scream about it. Take money out of politics and we'd get some sensible legislation.

We would still absolutely stand a chance against the military because by the time that happens, the military will have already been divided in a coup.

Blow up pipelines, take up military bases, cut food supply. You don't just need a rifle to accomplish these things but it does help in a battle against the other side.

Yeah no. The US military is highly trained and highly equipped. A bunch of good ole boys playing soldier isn't going to do it.

Which is why they got all their equipment stolen and lost to the Taliban lol

US couldn't survive a coup with all this woke crap happening.

Avatar image for eoten
Eoten

8671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

#93 Eoten
Member since 2020 • 8671 Posts

@tjandmia said:

@eoten: it's clearly a gun problem, and why do you claim it's also not a race problem, but constantly mention blacks? You're like that guy who starts sentences with "I'm not racist, but...".

Aah, and there it is. Cannot talk about the actual cause without your programming to call everyone who disagrees with your delusion that the tools at fault by calling them a racist. No independent thinking required, no effort to actually solve the issue. Accuse the other person of being racist, and whine about the tool.

You do not actually want to help the communities where crime is a problem. You don't want to address the leadership that have turned those communities to shit because it would implicate your "team" you fanboy over and after all, politics and your ego are certainly more important than solving real problems.

People like you are why these problems never get solved. People like you are why those communities never get better. People like you are more responsible for the homicide rate, than the average gun owner you're trying to point fingers at.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180212 Posts

@Gaming-Planet said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

Yeah no. The US military is highly trained and highly equipped. A bunch of good ole boys playing soldier isn't going to do it.

Which is why they got all their equipment stolen and lost to the Taliban lol

US couldn't survive a coup with all this woke crap happening.

The equipment the Taliban has was from the Afghan military when they ran away. They didn't take it from US soldiers. Stop pushing a false agenda.

Avatar image for JimB
JimB

3925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#95 JimB
Member since 2002 • 3925 Posts

Gun rights are more important than ever. The first responsibility of a nation is to protect it's citizens unfortunately the United States can no longer do that. For political reasons law enforcement has been destroyed and criminals are free to do what they will. They are making sure our military personnel must think the way the government wants. In a few tears the greatest military in the world will be a shame. This coming from a veteran.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180212 Posts

@JimB said:

Gun rights are more important than ever. The first responsibility of a nation is to protect it's citizens unfortunately the United States can no longer do that. For political reasons law enforcement has been destroyed and criminals are free to do what they will. They are making sure our military personnel must think the way the government wants. In a few tears the greatest military in the world will be a shame. This coming from a veteran.

Wow. Such a rant, yet not based on reality.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#97  Edited By Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts
@LJS9502_basic said:
@Gaming-Planet said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

Yeah no. The US military is highly trained and highly equipped. A bunch of good ole boys playing soldier isn't going to do it.

Which is why they got all their equipment stolen and lost to the Taliban lol

US couldn't survive a coup with all this woke crap happening.

The equipment the Taliban has was from the Afghan military when they ran away. They didn't take it from US soldiers. Stop pushing a false agenda.

The afghan army that simply gave up and turned sides. And I never said it was stolen from US soldiers, just the US military as a whole because that is their equipment.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180212 Posts

@Gaming-Planet said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

The equipment the Taliban has was from the Afghan military when they ran away. They didn't take it from US soldiers. Stop pushing a false agenda.

The afghan army that simply gave up and turned sides. And I never said it was stolen from US soldiers, just the US military as a whole because that is their equipment.

No, it was no longer the US equipment.

Avatar image for tjandmia
tjandmia

3827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#99 tjandmia
Member since 2017 • 3827 Posts

@eoten said:
@tjandmia said:

@eoten: it's clearly a gun problem, and why do you claim it's also not a race problem, but constantly mention blacks? You're like that guy who starts sentences with "I'm not racist, but...".

Aah, and there it is. Cannot talk about the actual cause without your programming to call everyone who disagrees with your delusion that the tools at fault by calling them a racist. No independent thinking required, no effort to actually solve the issue. Accuse the other person of being racist, and whine about the tool.

You do not actually want to help the communities where crime is a problem. You don't want to address the leadership that have turned those communities to shit because it would implicate your "team" you fanboy over and after all, politics and your ego are certainly more important than solving real problems.

People like you are why these problems never get solved. People like you are why those communities never get better. People like you are more responsible for the homicide rate, than the average gun owner you're trying to point fingers at.

Man, that was such a strange, pointless tirade. People with guns are 100% responsible for all shootings. I guess good luck with blaming shootings on the people without the guns. 🤣

Avatar image for deactivated-622fe92f3678e
deactivated-622fe92f3678e

1836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 5

#100  Edited By deactivated-622fe92f3678e
Member since 2021 • 1836 Posts

@JimB: Yet the US has the highest incarcration rate in the world.