@ad1x2 said:
An impeccable moral character is preferred, but not required when it comes to results. I tell you that as a guy that has been to combat and had more than one asshole leader do a better job keeping his guys safe than a timid leader that wanted to be his soldiers' friend.
And chill with the Hitler comparisons when you are trying to convince people like me why Trump is so bad. While it is your right as an American to claim that POTUS would be like Hitler if he could, it is a great way to shut down any conversation you are having with an undecided voter you are trying to convince to vote for Biden.
Being an asshole isn't synonymous with holding no moral center or values as an individual. You can come off as a prick in getting the job done while not compromising what is morally right or sacrificing your values. It is evident that your leader in combat was a morally decent human being, I can say that with confidence given your assessment that he cared about your lives due to his efficacy in saving them. That tends me to believe he was a decent man despite his manner of achieving this end. Can you honestly claim the same about Trump? He has no moral center whatsoever or values past what serve himself and his interests, this is blatantly apparent. He is morally bankrupt.
It is very telling, but not entirely unsurprising nor unpredictable, that you are unable to discern and grasp such an important distinction.
Further, I'm getting sick and tired of an argument being dismissed simply because six letters appear on the screen. Read my paragraph again. I am not comparing Hitler to Trump and I don't know how you got that from what I wrote. I am using Hitler as an example that simply because he had policies that many Germans found profitable to their own situation, that their placing their confidence into him in overlooking his character due to those policies (which is exactly the rationale you are putting forth) was probably not the best course of action given its ultimate outcome, was it? Are you incapable of understanding that downplaying character in favor of policy is incredibly naive and dangerous? I don't even understand why this needs to be spelled out.
@Sevenizz: ‘This should not even be spoken of until a designated period of mourning has concluded.’
It’s not like the Democrats gave anytime to mourn when Scalia passed.
As I said, I don't disagree. I hate politics.
@eoten: of course they'll do everything in their power to ram one through. And you can be damn sure the DNC would have done the same in 2016 if they held the senate at the time. It seems ethics, working across the isle, and compromise are only things touted by the left when they do not have any power. Once they do then it's getting shut out of committees, being told they're going to the back of the bus, and "we have to pass this bill to see what's in it" nonsense.
As I said, I don't disagree. I hate politics.
Log in to comment