How would you say Sonic has done in 2007?

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#1 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

After a poor showing in 2006 I actually believe that the Sonic franchise in 2007 is going in the right direction. The series seems to have plenty left and with a huge following for the franchise. Sonic had a much better 2007 actually I thought it was one of his best years for a few years. Sonic Secret of the Rings was good but not amazing Sonic Rush Adventure kept up the great following of 2D Sonic games. Sonic Rivals 2 also seemed to be a decent game even though I never played it.

As a Sonic fan it has been a good year for Sonic I would say nothing fantastic but nothing terrible either what are your opinions.

Avatar image for sbfullmer
sbfullmer

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 sbfullmer
Member since 2004 • 2673 Posts
I think Sonic did good during this year, and keeping the right track. Hopefully it's better on 2008. 2006 was horrible.
Avatar image for Da_Yoshi_Man89
Da_Yoshi_Man89

1696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 Da_Yoshi_Man89
Member since 2007 • 1696 Posts
Let's not forget the biggest thing here. Sonic was announced forSuper Smash BrothersBrawl.
Avatar image for legendary_noob
legendary_noob

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 legendary_noob
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

2006, the only thing i can recall comming out was sonic riders, and next gen sonic.

Sonic riders i thought was a great game infact, however next gen sonic was bad due to being rushed.

In 2007, they have had a few releases, sonic & the secret rings, great game. Sonic rush adventure, another great game (so i've been told) and also mario and sonic at the olympic games. So, i believe this year has been alot better than the previous.

Avatar image for deactivated-59be76f5a5388
deactivated-59be76f5a5388

11372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-59be76f5a5388
Member since 2006 • 11372 Posts

Sonic has done quite well this year. I can't think of a bad Sonic game this year. But then again, my memory's really bad.

What they need to do is create an amazing game. 2007's games were just... adequate.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#6 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
2007 was not a bad year at all from Sonic it was fairly good actually nothing spectulary but decent overall. It seems the franchise is heading back in the right direction hopefully SEGA can keep it up and get Sonic back to his old SEGA glory days when his games rivaled Marios.
Avatar image for Nintendus21
Nintendus21

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Nintendus21
Member since 2007 • 85 Posts
Well, I haven't bought anything from Sonic in a while, the reviews he gets are getting higher, but they still need to improve. Much better than 2006.
Avatar image for kbaily
kbaily

13042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 138

User Lists: 0

#8 kbaily
Member since 2007 • 13042 Posts

Agreed 2007 was definitely a better year for Sonic than 2006.

2006:

Sonic Riders: While not well received, I liked the game for the mere fact it was not a Mario Kart Knockoff though it does have a steep learning curve.

Sonic Next Gen: This game has already gotten more attention than it ever deserved. Let's not speak of it anymore.

Sonic Genesis: Just a bad port of a good game and the fact that you can play Sonic on the Xbox Live Arcade, VC, one of the many Gensis collections out there and Gametap, did we really need this crummy port?

Sonic Rivals: Ok but got really repetitive after a while.

2007:

Sonic and the Secret Rings: Thank god for this. Secret Rings finally got a few things right. No more friends, no more adventuring, no sappy love story, no guns, no cars, just Sonic running fast through levels like he should've been all along. Secret Rings was one of the reasons I wanted a Wii and it was like the 2nd or 3rd game I had for it. While the controls weren't perfect and the game felt short, it was still worlds better than any Sonic game I played in a while. Hopefully the Sonic Team learns from this one and makes Sonic's Next Wii Adventure, even better.

Sonic Rush Adventure: The DS seems to be the place where Sonic shines best and SRA took all the great things about Sonic Rush and improved on them adding more depth. Too bad Marine was annoying.

Mario and Sonic at the Olympics: Ok so it wasn't the coming together we had hoped for but I still thought this game was fun and from the numbers, it's selling well. It might actually hit that 4 million unit goal Sega had.

Sonic Rivals 2: Meh, a lot of the same as before.

Things are looking brighter for Sonic. Riders 2 seems to be improving on flaws of the first and looks really nice. There's Brawl of course which some joke will be Sonic's best game in years. Let's just hope his next 3D adventure can be Sonic's "Galaxy."

Avatar image for 209745241664696408198013673166
209745241664696408198013673166

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#9 209745241664696408198013673166
Member since 2006 • 10273 Posts

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

But to be on topic, Sonic has fared much better than last year. Sonic RUsh Adventure was the peak of his games, IMO. It featured refined sidescrolling Sonic action over WiFi. Now THAT is something I've waited a while to see. I want that for the Wii as well. Let's hope for another good year for Sonic.

Avatar image for Nintendus21
Nintendus21

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Nintendus21
Member since 2007 • 85 Posts

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

DoctorEggman

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#11 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
[QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

Nintendus21

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.
Avatar image for Nintendus21
Nintendus21

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Nintendus21
Member since 2007 • 85 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

chocolate1325

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.

Agreed. It was a bit lackluster, especially the awful PS2 port version, but Heroes is better than that Shadow game. Lets not talk about that.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#13 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
[QUOTE="chocolate1325"][QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

Nintendus21

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.

Agreed. It was a bit lackluster, especially the awful PS2 port version, but Heroes is better than that Shadow game. Lets not talk about that.

Okay we won't talk about it.
Avatar image for -SpikyBlueHero-
-SpikyBlueHero-

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#14 -SpikyBlueHero-
Member since 2007 • 2176 Posts

Agreed 2007 was definitely a better year for Sonic than 2006.

2006:

Sonic Riders: While not well received, I liked the game for the mere fact it was not a Mario Kart Knockoff though it does have a steep learning curve.

Sonic Next Gen: This game has already gotten more attention than it ever deserved. Let's not speak of it anymore.

Sonic Genesis: Just a bad port of a good game and the fact that you can play Sonic on the Xbox Live Arcade, VC, one of the many Gensis collections out there and Gametap, did we really need this crummy port?

Sonic Rivals: Ok but got really repetitive after a while.

2007:

Sonic and the Secret Rings: Thank god for this. Secret Rings finally got a few things right. No more friends, no more adventuring, no sappy love story, no guns, no cars, just Sonic running fast through levels like he should've been all along. Secret Rings was one of the reasons I wanted a Wii and it was like the 2nd or 3rd game I had for it. While the controls weren't perfect and the game felt short, it was still worlds better than any Sonic game I played in a while. Hopefully the Sonic Team learns from this one and makes Sonic's Next Wii Adventure, even better.

Sonic Rush Adventure: The DS seems to be the place where Sonic shines best and SRA took all the great things about Sonic Rush and improved on them adding more depth. Too bad Marine was annoying.

Mario and Sonic at the Olympics: Ok so it wasn't the coming together we had hoped for but I still thought this game was fun and from the numbers, it's selling well. It might actually hit that 4 million unit goal Sega had.

Sonic Rivals 2: Meh, a lot of the same as before.

Things are looking brighter for Sonic. Riders 2 seems to be improving on flaws of the first and looks really nice. There's Brawl of course which some joke will be Sonic's best game in years. Let's just hope his next 3D adventure can be Sonic's "Galaxy."

kbaily

Don't forget about the ports. With those, Sonic had a stand on the Wii, 360, PS3, and even the iPod last year, but especially the Wii. And though it's not an official release, the Sonic X-treme beta was released online for the first time. Beyond the games, 2007 was a superb year for Sonic's television outings. Finally, after several years of focus on Sonic X, SatAM and AoStH received proper DVD box sets. And the comics! They seemed so much more epic! I haven't read them myself, however. XP Nevertheless, great list ya got there. You beat me to it. LOL

2008 is looking packed. So far, we've got Sonic Riders: Zero Gravity, Mario & Sonic DS, SSBB, the multi-platform Sega Superstars Tennis, Sonic RPG, and Samba de Amigo, with many of those titles being released in or near Q1. Get ready for the speed dash!

-

Avatar image for sbfullmer
sbfullmer

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#15 sbfullmer
Member since 2004 • 2673 Posts
[QUOTE="chocolate1325"][QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

Nintendus21

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.

Agreed. It was a bit lackluster, especially the awful PS2 port version, but Heroes is better than that Shadow game. Lets not talk about that.

I respect you guys, but also, I started become a fan of Sonic when I played Sonic Heroes for PS2, so it was a great game to me, and Shadow the Hedgehog was alright, but that's my opinion.
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#16 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="chocolate1325"][QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

sbfullmer

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.

Agreed. It was a bit lackluster, especially the awful PS2 port version, but Heroes is better than that Shadow game. Lets not talk about that.

I respect you guys, but also, I started become a fan of Sonic when I played Sonic Heroes for PS2, so it was a great game to me, and Shadow the Hedgehog was alright, but that's my opinion.

I respect your opinion but I have been a Sonic fan since it first began on the SEGA Genesis and games like Sonic Heroes and Shadow the Hedgehog can not compete with the likes of Sonic 2 and Sonic Adventure in my opinion. If you have played them they are awesome experiences because of the speed and a Sonic game that has guns in it is a joke in my opinion.
Avatar image for Nintendus21
Nintendus21

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Nintendus21
Member since 2007 • 85 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="chocolate1325"][QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

chocolate1325

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.

Agreed. It was a bit lackluster, especially the awful PS2 port version, but Heroes is better than that Shadow game. Lets not talk about that.

Okay we won't talk about it.

Nah, I was joking with ya lol! :P
Avatar image for Nintendus21
Nintendus21

85

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Nintendus21
Member since 2007 • 85 Posts
[QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="chocolate1325"][QUOTE="Nintendus21"][QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

sbfullmer

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.

Agreed. It was a bit lackluster, especially the awful PS2 port version, but Heroes is better than that Shadow game. Lets not talk about that.

I respect you guys, but also, I started become a fan of Sonic when I played Sonic Heroes for PS2, so it was a great game to me, and Shadow the Hedgehog was alright, but that's my opinion.

That's okay, not everyone played the first game. You seem like someone who really understands the series, and never gives up on the serieseven if there are bad games. I like that. :D
Avatar image for legendary_noob
legendary_noob

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 legendary_noob
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Actually, i donno how many of you may of played this game, but to me it seems like sonic heroes was another attempt at a knuckles chaotix style game, similar to the style of sonic crackers (the demo/rom which susposedly was sonic 4).

And i think it's the sega of america's fault for shadow, they let an american company make the shadow game, now that was a massive mistake, i mean i wanted a knuckles game, not a shadow one =[, i voted knuckles day in day out, stupid fangirls, thats who i blame XD

Avatar image for kbaily
kbaily

13042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 138

User Lists: 0

#20 kbaily
Member since 2007 • 13042 Posts

For a while I had gotten out of playing Sonic games but while having my Gamecube, Sonic Heroes was the first to interest me and I had heard decent reviews for it though.

Heroes felt more like an old school Sonic game with straightforward running, two act levels with special stages and boss battles made it feel like an old school Sonic game in 3D. Like the old games, there wasn't much of a plot and sometimes I like when games aren't making me watch cutscenes every five minutes. Even the level design was more reminscent of the old Genesis games with the checkered cliffs and all. My biggest complaint was playing through the same game four times as different characters where they should've simply made a longer game where you played as the Sonic, Tails, Knuckles trio.

I eventually played the two Adventure games during one of the summer gaming droughts. I see the potential in the first Adventure game but once again, too many characters. Sonic and Tails's stories were fun, Knuckles and Gamma's were ok, but Amy's had horrible camera angles and she walked around so slowly trying to get away from a robot that couldn't be destroyed and Big's fishing levels were just downright dull. Sonic Adventure 2 cut back on the characters and I think had a better story and moved along at a better pace. Plus it had a lot to do outside of the regular game. The Chao garden had more options, there was the racing game and additional missions for each level. The Sonic/Shadow levels were the best but the Knuckles/Rouge and Eggman/Tails levels just got on my nerves. I'd get through a great high speed platforming stage then have to slog around in a clunky mech or hunt through a stage for emeralds or keys. I play Sonic games because I want to go fast.

My biggest complaint with Shadow's game was the hero/dark missions. You didn't need the guns to fight and the chaos powers were great but the hero/dark missions were so tedious I found myself circling the stage a dozen times trying to find the last soldier, alien or whatever to move on.

I liked Riders for the fact that it wasn't just a Mario Kart knockoff but the learning curve was steep and I thought the story was rather blah.

Sonic Rush and the Sonic Advance series were great old school 2D games.

Finally Secret Rings was the first Sonic game I had payed full price for in a while and while some part the controls were tough or the mission was riduculously hard, I still liked it. I was running fast, no being forced to play as some sidekick I wasn't interested in and even the party mode made for a nice distraction.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#21 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

For a while I had gotten out of playing Sonic games but while having my Gamecube, Sonic Heroes was the first to interest me and I had heard decent reviews for it though.

Heroes felt more like an old school Sonic game with straightforward running, two act levels with special stages and boss battles made it feel like an old school Sonic game in 3D. Like the old games, there wasn't much of a plot and sometimes I like when games aren't making me watch cutscenes every five minutes. Even the level design was more reminscent of the old Genesis games with the checkered cliffs and all. My biggest complaint was playing through the same game four times as different characters where they should've simply made a longer game where you played as the Sonic, Tails, Knuckles trio.

I eventually played the two Adventure games during one of the summer gaming droughts. I see the potential in the first Adventure game but once again, too many characters. Sonic and Tails's stories were fun, Knuckles and Gamma's were ok, but Amy's had horrible camera angles and she walked around so slowly trying to get away from a robot that couldn't be destroyed and Big's fishing levels were just downright dull. Sonic Adventure 2 cut back on the characters and I think had a better story and moved along at a better pace. Plus it had a lot to do outside of the regular game. The Chao garden had more options, there was the racing game and additional missions for each level. The Sonic/Shadow levels were the best but the Knuckles/Rouge and Eggman/Tails levels just got on my nerves. I'd get through a great high speed platforming stage then have to slog around in a clunky mech or hunt through a stage for emeralds or keys. I play Sonic games because I want to go fast.

My biggest complaint with Shadow's game was the hero/dark missions. You didn't need the guns to fight and the chaos powers were great but the hero/dark missions were so tedious I found myself circling the stage a dozen times trying to find the last soldier, alien or whatever to move on.

I liked Riders for the fact that it wasn't just a Mario Kart knockoff but the learning curve was steep and I thought the story was rather blah.

Sonic Rush and the Sonic Advance series were great old school 2D games.

Finally Secret Rings was the first Sonic game I had payed full price for in a while and while some part the controls were tough or the mission was riduculously hard, I still liked it. I was running fast, no being forced to play as some sidekick I wasn't interested in and even the party mode made for a nice distraction.

kbaily
Can I just say Sonic Heores in my opinion was a terrible mistake. It felt nothing like a Sonic game it was like trying to do something different it felt like a Zelda game but with3 playable characters but Zelda is miles better and so are the bosses and you get items. The version I played it always told you what technique you had to use to progress in the level. Sonic Adventure was the closest thing to Mario 64 in my opnion you didn't get to roam around an adventure field in Sonic Heroes. Team play in a Sonic game is just pathetic. The reason Sonic Adventure rocked because it offered the same kind of free roaming like Mario 64 or Sunshine. Am I the only one who hates Sonic Heroes because it seems as though it is I never really liked it. I only completed to finish the game.
Avatar image for demoman_chaos
demoman_chaos

13896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 demoman_chaos
Member since 2006 • 13896 Posts

I liked Sonic Heroes and Adventure, but SA2 is the best. Big's fishing and Amy's invincible pursuer ruined it. Sonic's and Tails stages were good, Knux and Gamma's were ok.

SA2 had more Sonic-type levels. The shooting was again ok. My main complaint is the hunting missions were too large and hard to do, especially the space ones.
Take SA2's sonic-type gamplay, remake the genesis-era levels, add Tails and Knux how the were in 2D, rebuild the old stroyline (Eggman captures animals, Sonic saves them), and remake the old bosses and add new ones. Without glitches, it would be better than even S3&K.

Avatar image for sbfullmer
sbfullmer

2673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 sbfullmer
Member since 2004 • 2673 Posts
To chocolate1325: I have played Sonic Adventure 2: Battle few times, and see other games on youtube.com, and I can understand how those games can be fun. And that's why I respect all Sonic fans. ^_^ To Nintendus21: I appreciate your comment about that. ^_^ Actually, my first time I played was long time ago when I little, I played my friend's Sega portable thing, I remember that Sonic was in it. Also, I use to watch the Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, then I just forget about them afterwards. So I never been experience as a Sonic fan for a long time. Hey, maybe I should join Sega or Sonic Team, so I can talk to them, because sometimes I can do a really great job with hardworking, but my problem is my speech language sometimes, but oh well. :?
Avatar image for legendary_noob
legendary_noob

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 legendary_noob
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

For a while I had gotten out of playing Sonic games but while having my Gamecube, Sonic Heroes was the first to interest me and I had heard decent reviews for it though.

Heroes felt more like an old school Sonic game with straightforward running, two act levels with special stages and boss battles made it feel like an old school Sonic game in 3D. Like the old games, there wasn't much of a plot and sometimes I like when games aren't making me watch cutscenes every five minutes. Even the level design was more reminscent of the old Genesis games with the checkered cliffs and all. My biggest complaint was playing through the same game four times as different characters where they should've simply made a longer game where you played as the Sonic, Tails, Knuckles trio.

I eventually played the two Adventure games during one of the summer gaming droughts. I see the potential in the first Adventure game but once again, too many characters. Sonic and Tails's stories were fun, Knuckles and Gamma's were ok, but Amy's had horrible camera angles and she walked around so slowly trying to get away from a robot that couldn't be destroyed and Big's fishing levels were just downright dull. Sonic Adventure 2 cut back on the characters and I think had a better story and moved along at a better pace. Plus it had a lot to do outside of the regular game. The Chao garden had more options, there was the racing game and additional missions for each level. The Sonic/Shadow levels were the best but the Knuckles/Rouge and Eggman/Tails levels just got on my nerves. I'd get through a great high speed platforming stage then have to slog around in a clunky mech or hunt through a stage for emeralds or keys. I play Sonic games because I want to go fast.

My biggest complaint with Shadow's game was the hero/dark missions. You didn't need the guns to fight and the chaos powers were great but the hero/dark missions were so tedious I found myself circling the stage a dozen times trying to find the last soldier, alien or whatever to move on.

I liked Riders for the fact that it wasn't just a Mario Kart knockoff but the learning curve was steep and I thought the story was rather blah.

Sonic Rush and the Sonic Advance series were great old school 2D games.

Finally Secret Rings was the first Sonic game I had payed full price for in a while and while some part the controls were tough or the mission was riduculously hard, I still liked it. I was running fast, no being forced to play as some sidekick I wasn't interested in and even the party mode made for a nice distraction.

kbaily

In a sense you are right it was more old school as it did follow a certain amount of the old traditions, but because in this time we have got bored of that and reviews have become stricter it can decide whether or not the game is good or bad.

Because we have now got bigger and better more advanced hardware they expect new things and not the traditional methods, sure i enjoy the old school sonic as much as any sonic fan, but i still feel the same as others, heroes was a let down, sure i've completed it, but i found it rather boring, the story admitally, there wasn't exactly a deep story so it probably was good for some people because of that, and although it had good intentions i found the game boring. I played it with sonic's team first it was good, then i played through it all over again 3 more times with each other team, on the same maps, same bosses, it was identical other than the cutscenes, this bored me so much and ruined the game for me.

I'll agree with you on the fact that i thought sonic adventure 2 had a better story, but in no way was it a better game than adventure, for starters you played as a cast of identical characters basically, sonic & shadow, similar levels, same sorta style, sure i enjoyed it who doesn't enjoy fast maps full of speed and enjoyment, and of course shadow was made to be the same, playing as dr.eggman was pretty cool aswell i was like cool we get to play as eggman in one of his toys for once thats pretty cool, but then thats where they f**k'd up in my opinion.

They put tails in the x tornado? what the hell for? it ruined tails for me i enjoyed playing as tails more in adventure because he could be more free and it was more fun.

Now, sure knuckles is fun, so i was happy to see him in it, but whats worse is his missions from the first adventure game got worse, the original adventure he didn't have to glide round the whole time searching, it was a bit more of an involvement for him. To make it worse you do it for the whole game, and to make it ever worser, they put another character in which is identical in terms of gameplay to knuckles. Sure it was a good game, but the original was better anyday, even if he did have add-ons the original game didn't.

Sonic adventure, i enjoyed alot, sonic missions rocked, tails missions weren't as fun but were still pretty cool. And it was awesome playing as amy for the first time, she had a good gameplay, admitally her story was a little well i think under-thought, since a robot chasing her for a bird is kinda stupid but gameplay wise it was a good start for amy, and i enjoyed it alot, even if she wasn't exactly speedy. Big the cat, sure it was interesting at first, but boring as hell later on, since you get bored with him quickly, however for casual gamers it would'a been a good character. And as for E-102 Gamma, i loved him i thought it was awesome the way they made him be involved in the story and how you played as him, as he was the style they used eggman and tails for Sonic adventure 2. E-102 Gamma, was the second best character in my opinion, he had great gameplay and is underated terribly alot, just because most fans are like, "it's not sonic, so it sucks!".

Shadow the hedgehog was an okay game and could'a been something good, if they didn't involve guns and vechicals most likely.

Sonic riders, great game with great intentions, was under-rated alot considering it's playability and gameplay was awesome.

Sonic and the secret rings, i've played it, i enjoyed it but haven't played it since because i get bored of it quickly, and the controls are a bit hard to get use to, i prefer sonic on the controllers and such, but it still don't mean i don't think it's a good game.

[QUOTE="kbaily"]

For a while I had gotten out of playing Sonic games but while having my Gamecube, Sonic Heroes was the first to interest me and I had heard decent reviews for it though.

Heroes felt more like an old school Sonic game with straightforward running, two act levels with special stages and boss battles made it feel like an old school Sonic game in 3D. Like the old games, there wasn't much of a plot and sometimes I like when games aren't making me watch cutscenes every five minutes. Even the level design was more reminscent of the old Genesis games with the checkered cliffs and all. My biggest complaint was playing through the same game four times as different characters where they should've simply made a longer game where you played as the Sonic, Tails, Knuckles trio.

I eventually played the two Adventure games during one of the summer gaming droughts. I see the potential in the first Adventure game but once again, too many characters. Sonic and Tails's stories were fun, Knuckles and Gamma's were ok, but Amy's had horrible camera angles and she walked around so slowly trying to get away from a robot that couldn't be destroyed and Big's fishing levels were just downright dull. Sonic Adventure 2 cut back on the characters and I think had a better story and moved along at a better pace. Plus it had a lot to do outside of the regular game. The Chao garden had more options, there was the racing game and additional missions for each level. The Sonic/Shadow levels were the best but the Knuckles/Rouge and Eggman/Tails levels just got on my nerves. I'd get through a great high speed platforming stage then have to slog around in a clunky mech or hunt through a stage for emeralds or keys. I play Sonic games because I want to go fast.

My biggest complaint with Shadow's game was the hero/dark missions. You didn't need the guns to fight and the chaos powers were great but the hero/dark missions were so tedious I found myself circling the stage a dozen times trying to find the last soldier, alien or whatever to move on.

I liked Riders for the fact that it wasn't just a Mario Kart knockoff but the learning curve was steep and I thought the story was rather blah.

Sonic Rush and the Sonic Advance series were great old school 2D games.

Finally Secret Rings was the first Sonic game I had payed full price for in a while and while some part the controls were tough or the mission was riduculously hard, I still liked it. I was running fast, no being forced to play as some sidekick I wasn't interested in and even the party mode made for a nice distraction.

chocolate1325

Can I just say Sonic Heores in my opinion was a terrible mistake. It felt nothing like a Sonic game it was like trying to do something different it felt like a Zelda game but with3 playable characters but Zelda is miles better and so are the bosses and you get items. The version I played it always told you what technique you had to use to progress in the level. Sonic Adventure was the closest thing to Mario 64 in my opnion you didn't get to roam around an adventure field in Sonic Heroes. Team play in a Sonic game is just pathetic. The reason Sonic Adventure rocked because it offered the same kind of free roaming like Mario 64 or Sunshine. Am I the only one who hates Sonic Heroes because it seems as though it is I never really liked it. I only completed to finish the game.

Right first off, stop comparing sonic games to zelda and mario! Sure you can say if it's a better game or not, but what is the point in comparing a game, complaining it isn't good enough it wasn't mario like enough when it's another character and based on it's own series, i get tired day in day out hearing people compare various other games to famous names, it's stupid you are basically saying to people, "this game sucks because it's stolen idea's from that game, or it sucks because it's not similar to mario" that is bulls**t, stop comparing and enjoy the game for what it is already! sonic is sonic, mario is mario you can compare how good the games are, but never compare them in terms of saying it's not good enough because it's not similar to mario or whatever.

Team play is not pathetic, it is a good idea which sega have used before, it's in a sense is saying that a fighting game sucks because you are doing a tag battle, yet it's more fun, maybe they may of gone about this in the wrong way but it was a good idea from the retro days. And i don't hate heroe's but i don't enjoy it.

I liked Sonic Heroes and Adventure, but SA2 is the best. Big's fishing and Amy's invincible pursuer ruined it. Sonic's and Tails stages were good, Knux and Gamma's were ok.

SA2 had more Sonic-type levels. The shooting was again ok. My main complaint is the hunting missions were too large and hard to do, especially the space ones.
Take SA2's sonic-type gamplay, remake the genesis-era levels, add Tails and Knux how the were in 2D, rebuild the old stroyline (Eggman captures animals, Sonic saves them), and remake the old bosses and add new ones. Without glitches, it would be better than even S3&K.

demoman_chaos

SA2 isn't the best,it limited the gameplay alot, going through as 2 identical characters in terms of gameplay, which can become rather boring. Heroes was okay, but wasn't as good as others. Sonic adventure was the best purely it was stylistic and awesome, it had free roaming ability so you could enjoy the enviroment alot more. Big did ruin it, amy was a great addition if you didn't like her because she wasn't speedy then your a bit silly, i repest your opinion, but to be honest amy was a great addition, your forgetting it was her debut as a playable character, (discluding sonic the fighters) and it was a good choice, she providing new gameplay, and it was done well, the story for her was a little silly, but it's better than her randomly chasing after sonic now.

Sonic stages were awesome, and tails were quite good too, knuckle's were a little repetitive but better than the stages in SA2, and gamma, i thought he was the best character overall, his gameplay was unique, and fun, he provided alot.

These are just my opinions, so sorry if i've offended anyone =)

Avatar image for demoman_chaos
demoman_chaos

13896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#25 demoman_chaos
Member since 2006 • 13896 Posts

I didn't like SA's freeroam, it wasn't very good at telling oyu where to go (the orb thing helped, but was useless on several occasions).

SA2 just needed morerunning and less hunting and shooting.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#26 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
Sonic Adventure 2 was better and more action paked and I feel had more replay value than Sonic Adventure but Sonic Adventure the levels where huge well Sonics were and I can understand a few of Tails levels were easy and Amys levels and Bigs were just boring.
Avatar image for 209745241664696408198013673166
209745241664696408198013673166

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#27 209745241664696408198013673166
Member since 2006 • 10273 Posts
[QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]

As far as I know, Sonic Heroes was Sonic's "Galaxy", combining old and new in one of the most beautiful ways possible.

Nintendus21

While I respect your opinon, I have to disagree with that. Why should I be forced to play with Knuckles and Talis when I only want Sonic? Why is the camera so clunky? The closest Sonic game to your "Galaxy" would be the original Sonic Adventure on DreamCast.

Well, we all have our own views on this. But seriously, Tails and Knuckles were forced upon you in other Sonic games like SA and SA2. The difference here is that in Sonic Heroes you stick to Sonic-style gameplay throughout. Whereas in SA and SA2 (mainly in SA2 for Tails) playing as the other characters forced entire stages on you that featured non-sonic gameplay (like shooting and treasure collecting) Now, those gameplay styles are okay, but to put them in a Sonic game and force them upon you isn't right. In Sonic Heroes, you didn't have to spend entire stages as Tails and Knuckles, shooting things, and looking for stuff while moving slowly. Instead, you move swiftly, taking advantage of various gimmicks for a short while. But switching back to Sonic, who is fastest, is quite easy to do once you've overcome an obstacle that requirs a power or flight character.
And about the camera, I think it depends on your gameplay style. Let's face the facts: Sonic games' cameras have never been the most exploration-friendly. But I find Sonic Adventure's camera to be the worst because it freaks out on me every now and then, even when I'm going through stages normally. (moving forward, rarely turning back to explore or sight-see) In SA2 and Sonic Heroes, I have way less camera trouble while proceeding normally through a stage.
Avatar image for 209745241664696408198013673166
209745241664696408198013673166

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#28 209745241664696408198013673166
Member since 2006 • 10273 Posts
I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.chocolate1325
Sonic Heroes was faster, and had longer stages. And Sonic games have never been known for an impressive story. The gameplay is what makes most Sonic games so good. Remember, these are games, not movies. If you like good stories, you should play RPGs, read books, or watch movies.
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#29 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
[QUOTE="chocolate1325"] I have to agree with you there Sonic Adventure was a top game miles better than Sonic Heroes. I play Sonic games to go as Sonic and get a thrill with the speed of Sonic not to play as other characters. I hated the Sonic Heroes game the story was awful. It didn't feel like a Sonic game not at all to me.DoctorEggman
Sonic Heroes was faster, and had longer stages. And Sonic games have never been known for an impressive story. The gameplay is what makes most Sonic games so good. Remember, these are games, not movies. If you like good stories, you should play RPGs, read books, or watch movies.

I don't like Sonic Heroes the story was completeley pathetic in my opnion. The team play was awful all four different groups had the same abilites. The bosses never changed. I hated it. Sonic Adventure had a much better story to it and so did Sonic Adventure 2. Story doesn't mean anything in a game just a simple plot like Super Mario Galaxy or Super Mario 64. Yeh it's the same story all the time but the gameplay is fantatsic. If I wanted to play a Sonic game that focuses more on speed I would play the Sega Genesis titles.
Avatar image for 209745241664696408198013673166
209745241664696408198013673166

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#30 209745241664696408198013673166
Member since 2006 • 10273 Posts
Much like Mario games, the story is pathetic, but the gameplay is awesome for me in Sonic Heroes. The bosses weren't a big deal, but weren't too impressive for the most part. Still, they weren't terrible, I'd say. And no, the story isn't really much of one.
Avatar image for demoman_chaos
demoman_chaos

13896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#31 demoman_chaos
Member since 2006 • 13896 Posts

Much like Mario games, the story is pathetic, but the gameplay is awesome for me in Sonic Heroes. The bosses weren't a big deal, but weren't too impressive for the most part. Still, they weren't terrible, I'd say. And no, the story isn't really much of one.DoctorEggman

There were actually only 3 actual levelbosses (one you fight a second time with a hot air ballon on it). The others were masses of goons or other teams. Fighting other teams was just a button-mash fest, the goon hordes were quite dull, but at least the actual bosses were good.
The final bosses were nothing special either (but the final one had some good music).

If you want a Sonic experience,get a Genesis and play Sonic 3 or Sonic and Knux (or, if you have both, S3&K).

ONTOPIC: Sonic did much better in 07 than 06, and 08 looks even more promising.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#32 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts

[QUOTE="DoctorEggman"]Much like Mario games, the story is pathetic, but the gameplay is awesome for me in Sonic Heroes. The bosses weren't a big deal, but weren't too impressive for the most part. Still, they weren't terrible, I'd say. And no, the story isn't really much of one.demoman_chaos

There were actually only 3 actual levelbosses (one you fight a second time with a hot air ballon on it). The others were masses of goons or other teams. Fighting other teams was just a button-mash fest, the goon hordes were quite dull, but at least the actual bosses were good.
The final bosses were nothing special either (but the final one had some good music).

If you want a Sonic experience,get a Genesis and play Sonic 3 or Sonic and Knux (or, if you have both, S3&K).

ONTOPIC: Sonic did much better in 07 than 06, and 08 looks even more promising.

I agree with you facing other teams was all about luck I thought and the eneimies boss battle was annoying as well. Sonic 3 and Knuckles is a fantastic experience espically with Knuckles.
Avatar image for demoman_chaos
demoman_chaos

13896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#33 demoman_chaos
Member since 2006 • 13896 Posts

'92 (I beleive) was Sonic's best year. The realease of Sonic 3, Sonic & Knux, the lock-on thing, and (if I remember right) Sonic CD.

Correct me where I am wrong.

Avatar image for legendary_noob
legendary_noob

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 legendary_noob
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

'92 (I beleive) was Sonic's best year. The realease of Sonic 3, Sonic & Knux, the lock-on thing, and (if I remember right) Sonic CD.

Correct me where I am wrong.

demoman_chaos

They were both released in 1994. I donno how you got that date since the first sonic game released was in 91, and releasing 3 more games in 1992 would be a major rush.

Much like Mario games, the story is pathetic, but the gameplay is awesome for me in Sonic Heroes. The bosses weren't a big deal, but weren't too impressive for the most part. Still, they weren't terrible, I'd say. And no, the story isn't really much of one.DoctorEggman

Yes, sonic heroe had no real story, which is fine, but the gameplay i thought got boring and repetitive as it was all identical, i wouldn't of minded so much if every level you played was the same for every other team, which is why it turned out bad i reackon, the best thing about it is probably the ending story, but getting those chaos emeralds, although in a sense similar to old school sonic in the style you get them it was a pain in the arse.

Avatar image for demoman_chaos
demoman_chaos

13896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 demoman_chaos
Member since 2006 • 13896 Posts
I don't know how I got that date either, it just sounded right.
Avatar image for 209745241664696408198013673166
209745241664696408198013673166

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#36 209745241664696408198013673166
Member since 2006 • 10273 Posts

Yes, sonic heroe had no real story, which is fine, but the gameplay i thought got boring and repetitive as it was all identical, i wouldn't of minded so much if every level you played was the same for every other team, which is why it turned out bad i reackon, the best thing about it is probably the ending story, but getting those chaos emeralds, although in a sense similar to old school sonic in the style you get them it was a pain in the arse.

legendary_noob
I guess it depends on gameplay preference. SA2 got repetetive and boring for me REALLY fast for some reason. :?
But to this day, Sonic Heroes is always an extreme pleasure for me to play.
I guess because there were too few speed stages and they were too slow/short for my best experience in a Sonic game.
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#37 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
1994 was Sonics best year with the ability to play Sonic 2 and Sonic 3 with Knuckles and the special stages as well with Sonic the Hedgehog and Knuckles was good.
Avatar image for deactivated-59be76f5a5388
deactivated-59be76f5a5388

11372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-59be76f5a5388
Member since 2006 • 11372 Posts
I'd say '92 was best. It was the year of Sonic 2, which is, in my opinion, the greatest Sonic game ever. It had the same gameplay as the original, but built upon it in so many ways. For me, Sonic 3 and Sonic & Knuckles weren't great. But together, they were a giant orgy of awesomeness, if you excuse my wordplay.
Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#39 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
I'd say '92 was best. It was the year of Sonic 2, which is, in my opinion, the greatest Sonic game ever. It had the same gameplay as the original, but built upon it in so many ways. For me, Sonic 3 and Sonic & Knuckles weren't great. But together, they were a giant orgy of awesomeness, if you excuse my wordplay.Hyper_Hedgehog
I agree Sonic 2 was the best Sonic game.
Avatar image for SonicBoom344
SonicBoom344

685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 SonicBoom344
Member since 2007 • 685 Posts

Either Sonic 2 or Sonic 3 & Knuckles is my favorite.

Avatar image for chocolate1325
chocolate1325

33007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 306

User Lists: 0

#41 chocolate1325
Member since 2006 • 33007 Posts
I like Sonic CD as well.
Avatar image for 209745241664696408198013673166
209745241664696408198013673166

10273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#42 209745241664696408198013673166
Member since 2006 • 10273 Posts
I liked Sonic 3 & Knuckles the best out of the 2D Sonic games. More stages, enough characters, awesome music, and a file save feature.
Avatar image for legendary_noob
legendary_noob

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 legendary_noob
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="legendary_noob"]

Yes, sonic heroe had no real story, which is fine, but the gameplay i thought got boring and repetitive as it was all identical, i wouldn't of minded so much if every level you played was the same for every other team, which is why it turned out bad i reackon, the best thing about it is probably the ending story, but getting those chaos emeralds, although in a sense similar to old school sonic in the style you get them it was a pain in the arse.

DoctorEggman

I guess it depends on gameplay preference. SA2 got repetetive and boring for me REALLY fast for some reason. :?
But to this day, Sonic Heroes is always an extreme pleasure for me to play.
I guess because there were too few speed stages and they were too slow/short for my best experience in a Sonic game.

Well the problem is, no one sonic game can be defined as the best and such as it always comes down to an opinion, because for me sonic 3 is the best sonic game, and was the one i enjoyed most.

Much like i feel heroes was boring you enjoy it, just like i think sonic adventure 1 was the best of the 3D series, i don't think secret rings was better either.