[QUOTE="wildcat2000"]
[QUOTE="Madmangamer364"]
As others have said, Mike Brown has been outcoached the past couple of years in the playoffs, and it's clear that the Cavs organization didn't feel like Brown maxed out the talent of the team that he was given. Is it fair? Probably not, but he's not the first coach to go through such a fate, and he probably won't be the last.
Fact is that coaches are the easiest to get rid of in the sports world, so when things go wrong, they're often the first to go.
Madmangamer364
Yeah like I said its the entire team's fault. Like mentioned before about Byron Scott, as soon as things go wrong with a team they automaticly blame the coaches...ya like the players not trying enough and missing shots have nothing to do with it :roll:
In that article it says there was tension in the locker-room and players were getting upset because of all the different rotations Brown kept making. Saying because Shaq was back after being out for so long it messed up the tempo.
So he was just supposed to not play Shaq anymore, one of the biggest trades they made specificly for the Playoffs? Ya that makes alot of sense. You didnt hear about any complaints in the first round vs Bulls when the entire team was playing great with each other, including Shaq. Who knows why the Cavs broke-down against the Celtics....but if your gonna blame someone, blame the whole team.
Yes I know having the best record doesnt matter in the Playoffs but just because you happen to get eliminated does not mean your coach should be fired. If that was the case teams would be changing coaches every year. look at Jerry Sloan? Made it to Finals twice and lost to the Lakers 3 years in a row....you think he deserves to be fired? No.
I never said that Mike Brown deserved to be fired, nor did I say that the rest of the team isn't at fault for not meeting expectations. I was just speaking of the nature of the sports world in general. Someone had to be the scapegoat for all of this, and unfortunately for Mike Brown, he was the easiest one to blame and get rid of from an organization perspective. No, Brown wasn't the one that was missing shots or the one allowing Rajon Rondo to do whatever he wants, but I don't think you'll run into anyone that would say his coaching was perfect or that his game-to-game adjustments were as great as they should have been. The team made moves like getting Shaq and Jamison in the hopes that Brown would be able to get the most out of them at the best times, and that didn't happen.
Different teams do different things, depending on personel and circumstances, so it's not the best comparison pairing up Mike Brown's stay in Cleveland to Jerry Sloan's tenure in Utah. The Jazz has seen what Sloan is capable of over the 20 years he's been there, and they probably know their team isn't going to be any better than they are at this given point. The Cavs, on the other hand, has arguably the best player in the game and only had Championship hopes in mind, and the fact that they didn't get a ring this year means that some changes were going to have to be made from somewhere, especially throwing considering the free-agency factor to the mix. There's a saying that goes "coaches are hired to get fired," and unless it's a hall of fame type coach or someone that manages to win a Championship with the given talent, ala Doc Rivers a couple of years ago, coaches are almost always on the hot seat.
Once again, is it fair? I don't think so, but it is what it is.
Yeah I was agreeing with you when you said "Fact is that coaches are the easiest to get rid of in the sports world, so when things go wrong, they're often the first to go." I know you didnt say he deserved to be fired...I was speaking generally to everyone. Sorry for the confusion :)
Log in to comment