Cavs get Big Ben

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for UssjTrunks
UssjTrunks

11299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 UssjTrunks
Member since 2005 • 11299 Posts
http://blogs.chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/fullcourtpress/2008/02/times-up-on-big.html

I can't say I'm fan of this deal. Cleveland gave away half their team for an expensive and washed up Wallace. They weren't going anywhere with their current group of guys, but they won't be going anywhere with Big Ben either. However, being only 32 he still has time to return to form.
Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts

They didn't just get ben, they also got Delonte West and Wally from the Sonics. Both will be contributors, but giving up 6 players to get 3 seems a bit much.

Let's see what the team looks like now.

PG: West (more passing PG so that's good)

SG: Gibson

SF: James

PF: Ilgauskaus

C: Wallace

Wally and Varejo coming off the bench. They need more bench players. Wallace has to at least show some of his previous dominance to be worth this trade.

Avatar image for Ragashahs
Ragashahs

8785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Ragashahs
Member since 2005 • 8785 Posts
holly *** was that a bad deal for the cav bull get the lucky end while supersoics really did't do anything
Avatar image for Jazz_Fan
Jazz_Fan

29516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Jazz_Fan
Member since 2008 • 29516 Posts
I think its good they got: Ben, Joe Smith, Delonte West, and Wally.
Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts
Dumb trade. Seems like they did this just to make a move. Not a fan of it.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

LeBron forced the Cavs to do a knee jerk reaction and have screwed themselves for the 2009 season.

They were going to be able to clear out contracts to trade for quality players and then get a free agent or two with the extra cap space they'd have.

This is all on LeBron's head

Avatar image for g-unit248
g-unit248

7197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 g-unit248
Member since 2005 • 7197 Posts
god ben wallace sucks, what a slug, he just stands around and does nothing, now hopefully the bulls can get good once again
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
Good trade for the bulls. ok trade for the cavs. Joe smith is a pretty good player still. Ben wallace doesnt even look like he plays basketball.
Avatar image for EnergyAbsorber
EnergyAbsorber

5116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 EnergyAbsorber
Member since 2005 • 5116 Posts

They didn't just get ben, they also got Delonte West and Wally from the Sonics. Both will be contributors, but giving up 6 players to get 3 seems a bit much.

Let's see what the team looks like now.

PG: West (more passing PG so that's good)

SG: Gibson

SF: James

PF: Ilgauskaus

C: Wallace

Wally and Varejo coming off the bench. They need more bench players. Wallace has to at least show some of his previous dominance to be worth this trade.

manningbowl135

Big Z is a Center, not Power Forward. He's 7"3. And Wallace will play PF. And Gibson will probably be a back-up PG to West.

Anyways, I could see some Bulls fans getting angry at how much better Ben Wallace will look because he will be a much better fit in Cleveland than he was in Chicago. He now actually has a really tall Center to play with in Big Z who takes up a lot of space. His lack of offensive game wont be as noticable in Cleveland with Lebron getting most of the touches. The Cavs addressed the problems that everyone said they needed for now, PG - West, Shooter - Wally, Banger - Wallace. And this is just a "short-term" trade for the Cavs as all the players they got have contracts that end in 1-2 years. And they also get the Bulls 2009 2nd Round pick.

I would say it was a good trade for Cleveland. Now if they can just start getting healthy. Their high energy/rebounding/charge drawing/ pick setting/wild hair/ flopping Anderson Varejao will return soon after missing the last 11 games with an ankle sprain. And their SG Sahsa may return in the next couple of weeks from his mid-foot sprain. But Gibson might be out for awhile with his high ankle sprain he suffered last night against the Pacers. If the Cavaliers can become injury free they could be a very dangerous team come play-off time. They are a very good rebounding team and play great defense (when they have all there guys healthy). They're not a very exciting team to watch because they're a defensive minded team with a "random offense".

Cavs fans are probably happy to get rid of Hughes and Bulls fans are probably happy to get rid of Wallace.

Avatar image for sullivan352
sullivan352

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 sullivan352
Member since 2008 • 501 Posts
i think this was a good trade for the cavs too. hopefully Wallace can jumpstart his career again.
Avatar image for Killfox
Killfox

6666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Killfox
Member since 2004 • 6666 Posts
Big Ben is teh Big suck. If you habe ever watched him. It looks like hes holding a basketball for the first time. Im surprised he doesnt stick it in his mouth to see what it is like babies do.
Avatar image for comstrikeiscool
comstrikeiscool

3616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 comstrikeiscool
Member since 2004 • 3616 Posts
All I can say is "WOHOO" that Wallace is gone. Sorry Cavs' fans, but Wallace literally is a 50 million dollar flop.
Avatar image for Witchking111111
Witchking111111

7094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 Witchking111111
Member since 2004 • 7094 Posts
Well at least Wallace will uphold the accomplishment of the Cavs being the worst free-throw shooting team in the league.
Avatar image for fudger2
fudger2

2315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#14 fudger2
Member since 2004 • 2315 Posts
Ok, let me analyze. The Bulls sucked, the Pistons were a powerhouse. Maybe Big has Ben is only good and a contributor on winning teams. Im sure he hated the Bulls, they wouldnt let him wear his headband and they suck. The Cavs may have lost a lot of players but its not like they did damage to teams anyways. Its a lose-maybe not lose situation for them. Theyre just trying to improve because the team they had was a junior college team at best. It was pure fluke last year. Now they have a powerful Offensive player and if he returns to be it, a great defensive player. Just this morning on Mike and MIke they said the team with a great player on both sides of the ball wins. Just like my Spurs!!!! Anyways this doesnt help them much, theyll advance in the plaoffs but wont get past the Magic, Pistons, Celtics.
Avatar image for silky_smooth8
silky_smooth8

3659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 silky_smooth8
Member since 2003 • 3659 Posts
i dunno about this one...lebron needed help on offense and they already had one of the best rebounding/defensive teams in the east. don't know why they went out and got ben wallace...and its not like delonte west is a huge upgrade over gibson in terms of being a starting pg. Then again, they got some decent players and hughes and marshall were sucking in cleveland so...we'll see
Avatar image for Delta055
Delta055

1024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Delta055
Member since 2003 • 1024 Posts
Pretty good trade for the cavs i must say, sad to see gooden go though.
Avatar image for Witchking111111
Witchking111111

7094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 Witchking111111
Member since 2004 • 7094 Posts
Rockets and Hornets also traded. Hornets got Bonzi Wells and Mike James. Rockets got Adam Haluska and Bobby Jackson.
Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts

LeBron forced the Cavs to do a knee jerk reaction and have screwed themselves for the 2009 season.

They were going to be able to clear out contracts to trade for quality players and then get a free agent or two with the extra cap space they'd have.

This is all on LeBron's head

Jaysonguy

Maybe the Cavs should've traded for the gazillion of stars that were available recently.

LeBron was right to force the Cavs to do something. He single handedly took this team to the finals last year and this year the team does absolutely nothing to help him. Since they've drafted him, the Cavs have done nothing to build the team around him. He should be mad. It's the management's fault for never building around him and not making a better deal this year.

Avatar image for gtap00ner
gtap00ner

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 gtap00ner
Member since 2006 • 189 Posts

i dont see them being a threat to the pistons or celtics. but everyone knows they are a lock 3 seed. i dont even know the 4-8...prob sub 500 teams?but the west is really hard it seems like the east is pre school leaguge and the west a varsity team.

imagine which good team is going to be left out? it could be anyone just one serious injury and u could not make the playoffs...

Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts

Ben Wallace is absolutely terrible. I saw this and laughed. Silly Cleveland. I'm more disappointed that the Bulls had to give up Joe Smith.

Plus, sometimes you don't even know if Wallace will show up for a game because of "teh traffic :cry:".

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

LeBron forced the Cavs to do a knee jerk reaction and have screwed themselves for the 2009 season.

They were going to be able to clear out contracts to trade for quality players and then get a free agent or two with the extra cap space they'd have.

This is all on LeBron's head

manningbowl135

Maybe the Cavs should've traded for the gazillion of stars that were available recently.

LeBron was right to force the Cavs to do something. He single handedly took this team to the finals last year and this year the team does absolutely nothing to help him. Since they've drafted him, the Cavs have done nothing to build the team around him. He should be mad. It's the management's fault for never building around him and not making a better deal this year.

No he wasn't right, he forced the Cavs to make a move this offseason where there wasn't quality moves to be made.

The Cavs had expiring contracts next season and that meant that they could have traded for big name talent with them. They were also going to get salary cap relief that would allow them to pursue one top tier free agent and one or two for the bench.

If they didn't do anything this season they were going to be able to get much better for the long haul. LeBron doesn't have a chance to do anything until 2010, in 2009 they were going to be in a position to stock their team with talent so he wouldn't leave.

Instead they traded for pieces that still don't make them as good as the Celtics or the Pistons. They no longer have attractive contracts for next season to trade, and their salary cap is back up so they can't pursue top tier free agents.

They're screwed.

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
[QUOTE="manningbowl135"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

LeBron forced the Cavs to do a knee jerk reaction and have screwed themselves for the 2009 season.

They were going to be able to clear out contracts to trade for quality players and then get a free agent or two with the extra cap space they'd have.

This is all on LeBron's head

Jaysonguy

Maybe the Cavs should've traded for the gazillion of stars that were available recently.

LeBron was right to force the Cavs to do something. He single handedly took this team to the finals last year and this year the team does absolutely nothing to help him. Since they've drafted him, the Cavs have done nothing to build the team around him. He should be mad. It's the management's fault for never building around him and not making a better deal this year.

No he wasn't right, he forced the Cavs to make a move this offseason where there wasn't quality moves to be made.

The Cavs had expiring contracts next season and that meant that they could have traded for big name talent with them. They were also going to get salary cap relief that would allow them to pursue one top tier free agent and one or two for the bench.

If they didn't do anything this season they were going to be able to get much better for the long haul. LeBron doesn't have a chance to do anything until 2010, in 2009 they were going to be in a position to stock their team with talent so he wouldn't leave.

Instead they traded for pieces that still don't make them as good as the Celtics or the Pistons. They no longer have attractive contracts for next season to trade, and their salary cap is back up so they can't pursue top tier free agents.

They're screwed.

So basically the front office would tell him screw this year, we'll build next year and LeBron is supposed to accept? How about trading for something other than this? There was Pau Gasol and so many other stars available this season that they could've pursued. It's the front office's fault for making a trade that's idiotic. The front office is paid handsomely to make sure they get somebody without screwing future cap numbers. They made an idiotic trade when good ones were available. It's all on the front office guys that they made a bad trade.

Avatar image for TheDarkDisciple
TheDarkDisciple

3564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 TheDarkDisciple
Member since 2004 • 3564 Posts

Wallace may be on the decline, but he's not as overrated as people say he is. He was playing decent recently with the Bulls and i think the biggest problem was that they were having him do more than he should (...like take shots.) It should be easier for him now that he's playing along Big Z. Same goes for Smith; i think he's been playing the best basketball of his career.

But as a Bulls fan, yeah i'm just glad we got rid of Wallace and got some pretty good players in return.

Avatar image for UssjTrunks
UssjTrunks

11299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 UssjTrunks
Member since 2005 • 11299 Posts

i dont see them being a threat to the pistons or celtics. but everyone knows they are a lock 3 seed. i dont even know the 4-8...prob sub 500 teams?

gtap00ner
Toronto and Orlando can both finish ahead of Cleveland in the standings.
Avatar image for EnergyAbsorber
EnergyAbsorber

5116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 EnergyAbsorber
Member since 2005 • 5116 Posts
[QUOTE="gtap00ner"]

i dont see them being a threat to the pistons or celtics. but everyone knows they are a lock 3 seed. i dont even know the 4-8...prob sub 500 teams?

UssjTrunks

Toronto and Orlando can both finish ahead of Cleveland in the standings.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Cavs slipped to the 6th or 7th seed. They're already a 5th seed (a few percentage points below the Raptors for the 4th seed). And they have a few key injuries. Their best 3-point shooter Gibson will be out 4-6 weeks with a high ankle sprain. And plus It will take some time to gain chemistry with all their new players.

The Cavs only have 6 players that can play in todays game against the Wizards, lol. Lebron, Big Z, Damon Jones, Eric Snow, Devin Brown, and Dwyane Jones. Because all their new players wont be ready to play in time and Varejao, Gibson, and Sahsa injured. I think the league rule is that you have to have atleast 8 players to suit up so I expect the Cavs to sign a couple NBDL players to 10-Day contracts.

Avatar image for Innovazero2000
Innovazero2000

3159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 Innovazero2000
Member since 2006 • 3159 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

LeBron forced the Cavs to do a knee jerk reaction and have screwed themselves for the 2009 season.

They were going to be able to clear out contracts to trade for quality players and then get a free agent or two with the extra cap space they'd have.

This is all on LeBron's head

manningbowl135

Maybe the Cavs should've traded for the gazillion of stars that were available recently.

LeBron was right to force the Cavs to do something. He single handedly took this team to the finals last year and this year the team does absolutely nothing to help him. Since they've drafted him, the Cavs have done nothing to build the team around him. He should be mad. It's the management's fault for never building around him and not making a better deal this year.

Agreed, and I was REALLY hoping the cavs were gonna jump and grab Jason Kidd...but nope.
Avatar image for strongbow540
strongbow540

173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 strongbow540
Member since 2007 • 173 Posts

Refering to the cavs cap situation they were never going to sign an all-star type free agent over the next 2 off-seasons anyway. Wally and Snow combine to be about 20mil and will be expiring next year. Package them with some picks for a disgruntled all-star is still a possiblity.

Wallace and Z compliment eachother nicely and Joe Smith will be more reliable than Gooden. Hughes just wouldn't work with LeBron. He needs shooters around him and Szczerbiak is that. West is a good young prospect who played well in Boston and still has size for defending the point.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Don't know any of the players :P Let's see what happens.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#29 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

No he wasn't right, he forced the Cavs to make a move this offseason where there wasn't quality moves to be made.

The Cavs had expiring contracts next season and that meant that they could have traded for big name talent with them. They were also going to get salary cap relief that would allow them to pursue one top tier free agent and one or two for the bench.

If they didn't do anything this season they were going to be able to get much better for the long haul. LeBron doesn't have a chance to do anything until 2010, in 2009 they were going to be in a position to stock their team with talent so he wouldn't leave.

Instead they traded for pieces that still don't make them as good as the Celtics or the Pistons. They no longer have attractive contracts for next season to trade, and their salary cap is back up so they can't pursue top tier free agents.

They're screwed.

manningbowl135

So basically the front office would tell him screw this year, we'll build next year and LeBron is supposed to accept? How about trading for something other than this? There was Pau Gasol and so many other stars available this season that they could've pursued. It's the front office's fault for making a trade that's idiotic. The front office is paid handsomely to make sure they get somebody without screwing future cap numbers. They made an idiotic trade when good ones were available. It's all on the front office guys that they made a bad trade.

You just shot your arguement in the foot.

The reason the Lakers got Pau is because the Grizz got an expiring contract back worth almost 10 million dollars.

Expiring contracts are the most valuable thing in the NBA right now. The Cavs next season were going to have those next season. They would have been able to pull off a superstar trade next season just the Lakers did this season.

LeBron forced their hand, he wanted something to do NOW even though there weren't moves to be made. Next season the Cavs were going to be in the driver's seat when it comes to trades. Now they've been cornered into bad trades that need to work because they no longer have anything to trade next season.

A superstar needs to wait until the time is right, LeBron refused and the Cavs pay the price.

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
[QUOTE="manningbowl135"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

No he wasn't right, he forced the Cavs to make a move this offseason where there wasn't quality moves to be made.

The Cavs had expiring contracts next season and that meant that they could have traded for big name talent with them. They were also going to get salary cap relief that would allow them to pursue one top tier free agent and one or two for the bench.

If they didn't do anything this season they were going to be able to get much better for the long haul. LeBron doesn't have a chance to do anything until 2010, in 2009 they were going to be in a position to stock their team with talent so he wouldn't leave.

Instead they traded for pieces that still don't make them as good as the Celtics or the Pistons. They no longer have attractive contracts for next season to trade, and their salary cap is back up so they can't pursue top tier free agents.

They're screwed.

Jaysonguy

So basically the front office would tell him screw this year, we'll build next year and LeBron is supposed to accept? How about trading for something other than this? There was Pau Gasol and so many other stars available this season that they could've pursued. It's the front office's fault for making a trade that's idiotic. The front office is paid handsomely to make sure they get somebody without screwing future cap numbers. They made an idiotic trade when good ones were available. It's all on the front office guys that they made a bad trade.

You just shot your arguement in the foot.

The reason the Lakers got Pau is because the Grizz got an expiring contract back worth almost 10 million dollars.

Expiring contracts are the most valuable thing in the NBA right now. The Cavs next season were going to have those next season. They would have been able to pull off a superstar trade next season just the Lakers did this season.

LeBron forced their hand, he wanted something to do NOW even though there weren't moves to be made. Next season the Cavs were going to be in the driver's seat when it comes to trades. Now they've been cornered into bad trades that need to work because they no longer have anything to trade next season.

A superstar needs to wait until the time is right, LeBron refused and the Cavs pay the price.

What expiring contracts? You have been talking about this for the whole thread, but let's see:

Hughes: 2 years 26 mil. Basically the same as Wallace, 2 years 28 mil.

Gooden 6 mil over 2 years, very reasonable

Brown and Simmons are prospects.

Newble doesn't have a big contract.

Marshall may be the only one and Wally's expiring contract after next season replaces him and is even better b/c Wally's contract is bigger.

I just assumed you were right b/c I didn't know about the cap situation, but the Cavs are actually in a better situation cap wise than before. They can still pull off a superstar trade b/c they'll still have two expiring contracts in Wally and Eric Snow.

So cap wise, this was not a bad trade.

Avatar image for RenegadePatriot
RenegadePatriot

20815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 RenegadePatriot
Member since 2007 • 20815 Posts
This trade could go either way really, I mean if Ben could be his old self this trade would be great for the Cavs but most likely this trade will be a bust.
Avatar image for tharg617
tharg617

1157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 tharg617
Member since 2004 • 1157 Posts

For this year, I believe it's a good trade. Next year, I think they will have to change something in order to win a championship. Ben Wallace will now be able to focus on strictly defense because James is going to take care of the offense. So I believe this year they are better off than where they started this season. I don't think Wallace cared for Chicago over these past two seasons and that's why he never really gave it his all. He went from being an amazing defensive player to a bench warmer. So if he developes some chemristy with his new team the way he did with us (Detroit) then I believe the Cavs can be in the top three of the East behind the Pistons.

Avatar image for LinkG1
LinkG1

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 LinkG1
Member since 2003 • 185 Posts

Never thought I would see Ben Wallace in a cavs uniform but it's happened.

Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts
Boy Wally looks like the least athletic guy in the NBA.
Avatar image for king23_
king23_

18169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#35 king23_
Member since 2007 • 18169 Posts
I really like this trade. Larry Hughes has been very inconsistent. Drew Gooden was pretty good, but not supe good. Ira Newble, Shannon Brown, and Donyell Marshall weren't that great. Ben Wallace will help us on defense and will be a good rebounder, and even give us a little help on offense. Delonte West will be a solid Point Guard. Wally Szczerbiak will be a very great shooter. And Joe Smith is just kind of "meh".

Good trade

Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts
Ben Wallace will help us on defense and will be a good rebounder, and even give us a little help on offense. And Joe Smith is just kind of "meh".

Good trade

king23_

Ben Wallace is the worst offensive player in the history of basketball. He will not give the Cavs "a little help on offense". With Wallace in the game, it'll basically be 4 on 5 when the Cavs have the ball. You should be more excited about the "meh" Joe Smith than Ben Wallace. Joe Smith was very consistent for the Bulls, and I'd be willing to be ya that he will contribute more to the Cavs than Wallace will.

Avatar image for king23_
king23_

18169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#37 king23_
Member since 2007 • 18169 Posts
[QUOTE="king23_"]Ben Wallace will help us on defense and will be a good rebounder, and even give us a little help on offense. And Joe Smith is just kind of "meh".

Good trade

JML897

Ben Wallace is the worst offensive player in the history of basketball. He will not give the Cavs "a little help on offense". With Wallace in the game, it'll basically be 4 on 5 when the Cavs have the ball. You should be more excited about the "meh" Joe Smith than Ben Wallace. Joe Smith was very consistent for the Bulls, and I'd be willing to be ya that he will contribute more to the Cavs than Wallace will.

Ben Wallace can get the Cavs maybe 6 PPG, which isn't great but he's not the worst offensive player ever.
Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts

Boy Wally looks like the least athletic guy in the NBA.manningbowl135

Word:lol: He looks like a 3rd garde teacher:lol:

Avatar image for Greenman_34
Greenman_34

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Greenman_34
Member since 2008 • 29 Posts
[QUOTE="king23_"]Ben Wallace will help us on defense and will be a good rebounder, and even give us a little help on offense. And Joe Smith is just kind of "meh".

Good trade

JML897

Ben Wallace is the worst offensive player in the history of basketball. He will not give the Cavs "a little help on offense". With Wallace in the game, it'll basically be 4 on 5 when the Cavs have the ball. You should be more excited about the "meh" Joe Smith than Ben Wallace. Joe Smith was very consistent for the Bulls, and I'd be willing to be ya that he will contribute more to the Cavs than Wallace will.

Offensive rebounds= more chances for the offence

Avatar image for comstrikeiscool
comstrikeiscool

3616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 comstrikeiscool
Member since 2004 • 3616 Posts
I really like this trade. Larry Hughes has been very inconsistent. Drew Gooden was pretty good, but not supe good. Ira Newble, Shannon Brown, and Donyell Marshall weren't that great. Ben Wallace will help us on defense and will be a good rebounder, and even give us a little help on offense. Delonte West will be a solid Point Guard. Wally Szczerbiak will be a very great shooter. And Joe Smith is just kind of "meh".

Good trade

king23_

What? Do you even watch the NBA??? Joe Smith was the ONLY consistent player on the Bulls' this entire season and you call him "mehh?" Please do explain...

Avatar image for Witchking111111
Witchking111111

7094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 Witchking111111
Member since 2004 • 7094 Posts
I had to laugh when the Cavs had only 6 players yesterday and had to call up 2 players for the D League.