This topic is locked from further discussion.
 All of you guys act like you looked in your crystal ball and saw Dirk flopping in the playoffs. If the playoffs were taken into consideration then ya Dirk probably shouldn't win, but it's not. There is a Finals MVP I'm sure every player would rather have. Dirk has come in the top 3 in voting the last 2 years, and is one of the best players in the NBA, and plays for the team that had the best record. He didnt have to play as much due to the Mavs winning and deep roster, but if averaged out over 48 min his stats would compare well with any other MVP favorite. While I am tempted to join in and write him off, it is a regular season award and you can't forget about all he accomplished this season. d12maluI was voting for Nash ever since he went down and the Suns went 1-6.
MVP is a joke in the NBA, Nash, Labron, Baron, Bosh, Arenas, Kidd, Dwight Howard and Kobe all deserved it more than Dirk did.pundog
Completely agreed.
Wow........I cant believe they actually gave him that award.Big_O2006
Â
they havent given it to him yet
Â
who knowsÂ
The MVP doesn't even go to the person who is best defined by the freaking phrase "most valuable player." The award is a joke. Nash's best year in the last three is the ONE year he doesn't get the prize. Screw Dirk.ScoopyMcScoop
Â
although i agree that Dirk's unheard of season of 24 and 9 isnt en ough to overtake nash - nash had a stronger case the last 2 years.
Â
first year, took the suns from a 29 win team to a 62 win team
second year, no amare, no richardson, no joe johnson
Â
this year, they were at full strength BUT he did average career highs in stats
Â
people just wanna see it go to someone else, the award is tainted this yearÂ
[QUOTE="ScoopyMcScoop"]The MVP doesn't even go to the person who is best defined by the freaking phrase "most valuable player." The award is a joke. Nash's best year in the last three is the ONE year he doesn't get the prize. Screw Dirk.BobSacamento
Â
although i agree that Dirk's unheard of season of 24 and 9 isnt en ough to overtake nash - nash had a stronger case the last 2 years.
Â
first year, took the suns from a 29 win team to a 62 win team
second year, no amare, no richardson, no joe johnson
Â
this year, they were at full strength BUT he did average career highs in stats
Â
people just wanna see it go to someone else, the award is tainted this year
last year Nash had Marion Bell and Barbosa who avg more points then 3 of the lakers starters. , Kobe had......Ugh, even AFTER the disappointing series loss to the 8th seeded GT Warriors? I'm a Lakers fan so naturally I don't like Steve Nash but he definitely deserved the award.proteKYFMread the posts above MVP is for REGULAR SEASON
Unbelievable. While I know the votes were cast before the playoffs, if they saw the way Nowitzki played (or didn't play's more like it) they would never have given him this award. They may have earned one of the best records in NBA history, but Nash kills this guy!! The amount of assists and the way he makes them are stunning. Watching him play is amazing. Nowitzki, however, shoots from inside the arc and gets boards. That first game against the Spurs in round 2, while they were beaten and Duncan and Parker each scored big, Nash had 31 points. Also, in the first round against the Lakers, he came one shy of the record for assists in a playoff game with 23!! This is a travesty. Nash is still the MVP in my eyes. When he hoists the championship trophy, we'll all know who the real MVP is here. mkearney_913KIDD avg a triple double in a playoff series yet he doesnt give MVP consideration and thats why it makes sense that MVP should be awarded to th eperson who had a good Regular season. Dirks team won 67 games lead the nba was the number 1 seed in the western conference and obviouslyt Dirk was the MVP of his team. If all you guys are complaining that Nash should have won it this year then obviously Kobe should have had the trophy last year
[QUOTE="mkearney_913"]Unbelievable. While I know the votes were cast before the playoffs, if they saw the way Nowitzki played (or didn't play's more like it) they would never have given him this award. They may have earned one of the best records in NBA history, but Nash kills this guy!! The amount of assists and the way he makes them are stunning. Watching him play is amazing. Nowitzki, however, shoots from inside the arc and gets boards. That first game against the Spurs in round 2, while they were beaten and Duncan and Parker each scored big, Nash had 31 points. Also, in the first round against the Lakers, he came one shy of the record for assists in a playoff game with 23!! This is a travesty. Nash is still the MVP in my eyes. When he hoists the championship trophy, we'll all know who the real MVP is here. NetYankEagleKIDD avg a triple double in a playoff series yet he doesnt give MVP consideration and thats why it makes sense that MVP should be awarded to th eperson who had a good Regular season. Dirks team won 67 games lead the nba was the number 1 seed in the western conference and obviouslyt Dirk was the MVP of his team. If all you guys are complaining that Nash should have won it this year then obviously Kobe should have had the trophy last year
Kidd had an outstanding regular and post season. I would definitely rank him higher than Dirk in MVP voting, he puts up better numbers and is just as valuable to his team.
KIDD avg a triple double in a playoff series yet he doesnt give MVP consideration and thats why it makes sense that MVP should be awarded to th eperson who had a good Regular season. Dirks team won 67 games lead the nba was the number 1 seed in the western conference and obviouslyt Dirk was the MVP of his team. If all you guys are complaining that Nash should have won it this year then obviously Kobe should have had the trophy last year[QUOTE="NetYankEagle"][QUOTE="mkearney_913"]Unbelievable. While I know the votes were cast before the playoffs, if they saw the way Nowitzki played (or didn't play's more like it) they would never have given him this award. They may have earned one of the best records in NBA history, but Nash kills this guy!! The amount of assists and the way he makes them are stunning. Watching him play is amazing. Nowitzki, however, shoots from inside the arc and gets boards. That first game against the Spurs in round 2, while they were beaten and Duncan and Parker each scored big, Nash had 31 points. Also, in the first round against the Lakers, he came one shy of the record for assists in a playoff game with 23!! This is a travesty. Nash is still the MVP in my eyes. When he hoists the championship trophy, we'll all know who the real MVP is here. UssjTrunks
Kidd had an outstanding regular and post season. I would definitely rank him higher than Dirk in MVP voting, he puts up better numbers and is just as valuable to his team.
Â
no way, team has to win at least 50 games to be considered
Â
only one player in the last like 50 years has won it without having his team win 50 gamesÂ
[QUOTE="mkearney_913"]Unbelievable. While I know the votes were cast before the playoffs, if they saw the way Nowitzki played (or didn't play's more like it) they would never have given him this award. They may have earned one of the best records in NBA history, but Nash kills this guy!! The amount of assists and the way he makes them are stunning. Watching him play is amazing. Nowitzki, however, shoots from inside the arc and gets boards. That first game against the Spurs in round 2, while they were beaten and Duncan and Parker each scored big, Nash had 31 points. Also, in the first round against the Lakers, he came one shy of the record for assists in a playoff game with 23!! This is a travesty. Nash is still the MVP in my eyes. When he hoists the championship trophy, we'll all know who the real MVP is here. NetYankEagleKIDD avg a triple double in a playoff series yet he doesnt give MVP consideration and thats why it makes sense that MVP should be awarded to th eperson who had a good Regular season. Dirks team won 67 games lead the nba was the number 1 seed in the western conference and obviouslyt Dirk was the MVP of his team. If all you guys are complaining that Nash should have won it this year then obviously Kobe should have had the trophy last year
dirk has now officially won the mvp trophy, and is to receive it next week
Â
didnt the mavs have a better record than the suns last year? i just dont get itÂ
nash goes down and the suns lose a few. nash comes back, they go on another winning streak. don't you think that thats valuable????bubblesbarry182that equation would go for the Wolves w/o Garnett Nets w/o Kidd Cavs w/o Lebron, Hornets w/o Paul LAKERS w/o Kobe Sixers w/o Iverson so that excuse shouldnt be used
Suns w/o Nash would be a 50 Game winning team. if you were to put someone like jameer Nelson on the team they would be a 55 game winning team. Having Amare Marion and Barbosa can make any Point guard look like cristof course it should be
Â
only difference is: suns w/ nash = 62 wins
BobSacamento
other way around
Â
those guys look like christ because of nash
Â
moreso in the past, now they are better - but look at the team record before he got there, 29 winsÂ
[QUOTE="BobSacamento"]Suns w/o Nash would be a 50 Game winning team. if you were to put someone like jameer Nelson on the team they would be a 55 game winning team. Having Amare Marion and Barbosa can make any Point guard look like cristof course it should be
Â
only difference is: suns w/ nash = 62 wins
NetYankEagle
How many wins did they have before Nash came? 29?
[QUOTE="NetYankEagle"][QUOTE="BobSacamento"]Suns w/o Nash would be a 50 Game winning team. if you were to put someone like jameer Nelson on the team they would be a 55 game winning team. Having Amare Marion and Barbosa can make any Point guard look like cristof course it should be
Â
only difference is: suns w/ nash = 62 wins
UssjTrunks
How many wins did they have before Nash came? 29?
how many wins did the 2000-2001 Nets have before Kidd came? 26. How many wins did the Nets 2001-2002 team have when Kidd arrived .....52 and a trip to the Finls but he didnt win the MVP award.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment