Kobe's six game stretch vs Lebron's six game stretch

Kobe

48.3 ppg
6.5 rpg
3.4 apg
52.1% FG
42.9% 3PT
90% FT

Lebron

30.8 ppg
6.7 rpg
6.5 apg
71.7% FG
55.5% 3PT
78.1% FT

Which is more impressive?

I would like to know the dates for Kobe's 6 game stretch. No_Hablo_Ingles

3/16/07 through 3/27/07

He only scored 23 on the sixth game, his PPG for the five game stretch was 53.6

I would like to know the W-L record. Master_Live

Lakers won all but the sixth game where Kobe only scored 23.

What's crazy about Lebron, is that this is closer to the norm that an abnormality. He's up to 27 points on 56.5% shooting on the season. That is ridiculous. With that said, Kobe's stretch was unbelievable. Absolutely insane the way he was scoring, so as much as I love LBJ's game I'll give the edge to Kobe's run.bobcheeseball

Yeah, 65, 50, 60, 50, and 43 in five straight games is pretty nutty. Not to mention he averaged 43 ppg in January of 06. I feel like people forget how ridiculous Kobe was in his prime.

So yeah, in 1989 Michael Jordan had a triple-double in 7 straight games and in 10 of 11 games. The Bulls went 5-2 in that stretch.

So yeah, in 1989 Michael Jordan had a triple-double in 7 straight games and in 10 of 11 games. The Bulls went 5-2 in that stretch.

Master_Live

Kobe had a nice strecth of games here too.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/514596-remembering-the-2002-2003-season-kobes-streak-of-nine-straight-40-point-games.

The Lakers were 7 and 2 during that run.

Kobe's is more impressive, you just expect this stuff from Lebron so it's not so surprising.

Pure FG% doesn't take into account 3 point shots are worth more than 2 point shots (shooting 40% from behind the arc = 60% from within the arc. Going 4/10 from behind the arc gives you 12 points, same as going 6/10 on easier shots.No_Hablo_Ingles

They'd be the same for your team's score, but wouldn't going 4/10 from behind the arc be worse for overall scoring differential?  You'd be giving the opponents two additional opportunities to score.

[QUOTE="No_Hablo_Ingles"]Pure FG% doesn't take into account 3 point shots are worth more than 2 point shots (shooting 40% from behind the arc = 60% from within the arc. Going 4/10 from behind the arc gives you 12 points, same as going 6/10 on easier shots.Oleg_Huzwog

They'd be the same for your team's score, but wouldn't going 4/10 from behind the arc be worse for overall scoring differential?  You'd be giving the opponents two additional opportunities to score.

I would like to know the W-L record. Master_Live

[QUOTEThey'd be the same for your team's score, but wouldn't going 4/10 from behind the arc be worse for overall scoring differential?  You'd be giving the opponents two additional opportunities to score.

Assuming they got the rebounds, but yeah.