Firing Shanahan, and it's not even close. The Broncos had the pieces for one of the best offenses in football -- if they got a little help on defense they could have been a really dangerous team. Then McDaniels comes in and alienates his two best offensive players (causing one of them to be traded) and now they'll probably win something like 5 games this year. Even though firing Gruden might have been a mistake, the Bucs weren't going to be a dangerous team no matter who the coach was. JML897
I agree with this. Taking McDaniels and Morris out of the equation, Shanahan won two Super Bowls, took his team to the playoffs consistently, and frankly is a pretty damn good coach. His offense was not a problem last season, his defense, which was being run into the ground by an incompetent cordinator, was the problem. Maybe that's his fault for not firing the guy after his defense sagged two seasons in a row, but I don't see how hiring a young hothead who insists on focusing all his energy on dismantling a perfectly competent offense while the defense remains shaky is any better. While I don't think Gruden's firing is justified, Shanahan at least kept his team at a respectable level, just out of the playoffs. Gruden's Bucs haven't even been close for a while.
I think the better question, though, is which team has less of an excuse for going after one of them, the Browns, Lions, or Raiders? The fact that Mangini, Cable, and Schwartz have jobs while Gruden and Shanahan don't is more of a tragedy to me than the actual firings.
Log in to comment