Worse move, firing Shanahan or firing Gruden?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Second_Rook
Second_Rook

3680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 Second_Rook
Member since 2007 • 3680 Posts

Looking back the answer looks black and white. Shanahan took the fall for Cutler crumbling against SD now Cutler is gone and Marshall will be following, Denver has a very bad looking QB and the defense hasn't really improved.

Not that things are looking much better in Tampa. The QB situation is a joke, the running back commitee looks decidelysecond tier and a once vaunted defense is a fading memory. I think that Gruden could have turned this around, where as now who knows? Public perception always gave Tony Dungy too much credit for the Bucaneers only Super Bowl win, in the end I think misconception may be what ended Gruden's tenure.

Which of these firings was the worse decision?

Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

Firing Gruden was the worse move. Raheem Morris looks more and more in over his head each week. Shanahan needed to get canned, but to replace him with McDaniels? Really? Last I checked the Belichick coaching tree wasn't producing a whole lot.

Avatar image for JML897
JML897

33134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 JML897
Member since 2004 • 33134 Posts
Firing Shanahan, and it's not even close. The Broncos had the pieces for one of the best offenses in football -- if they got a little help on defense they could have been a really dangerous team. Then McDaniels comes in and alienates his two best offensive players (causing one of them to be traded) and now they'll probably win something like 5 games this year. Even though firing Gruden might have been a mistake, the Bucs weren't going to be a dangerous team no matter who the coach was.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
Shanahan for sure. I've yet to be convinced Gruden is a good coach.
Avatar image for LTomlinson21
LTomlinson21

24423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#5 LTomlinson21
Member since 2004 • 24423 Posts
Firing Shanahan was a much worse move.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Shanahan failed to bring a defense to Denver, I mean over the last 3 seasons the Broncos have given up 24 points a game. Last season they gave up on average 28 points a game

Think about that, you need to score 4 touchdowns per game just to keep the game close

I think it justified that he was let go

Gruden on the other hand took Tony Dungy's team and won a Superbowl. The proof of this has been shown as he's torn down that team piece by piece. They had a stellar defense that needed an offense but Gruden was too busy having 5 different QB's and never once trying to find the outlet player who could help out the running game. What was the first thing the Bucs did when Gruden left? They grabbed a TE that knows how to catch the ball in the middle and take pressure off the line

It's really hard to go against either firing but if I had to I'd go with Shanny. I think the owner could have forced him to do something on defense. That might have caused probolems with their relationship though.

Avatar image for heysharpshooter
heysharpshooter

6348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 heysharpshooter
Member since 2009 • 6348 Posts

Firing Shanahan.

I like Morris for the Bucs: has has made some tough decisions that Gruden was reluctant or incapable of making, like reducing the amount of QB's and cutting the increasingly ineffective Derrick Brooks. I think Morris will be fine: the Bucs are going to be bad because they have to rebuild an old and tired football team, and if anything Morris is ahead of schedule IMO.

Avatar image for InterpolWilco
InterpolWilco

2487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 InterpolWilco
Member since 2005 • 2487 Posts
Both coaches had to go, but man, Morris and McDaniels look like they have no idea what they're doing.
Avatar image for Shhadow_Viper
Shhadow_Viper

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Shhadow_Viper
Member since 2009 • 2300 Posts

Shanahan is one of my favorite coaches, ever, so I would have to say firing him is the worse decision.

Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

They both needed to go. Shanahan has nothing to show for so many years, and Gruden was wearing thin on his players and that situation was going to get worse with him there.

Avatar image for CajunCeltic
CajunCeltic

353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 CajunCeltic
Member since 2009 • 353 Posts
Firing Shanahan, I never seen Gruden that good of a coach, he won that Super Bowl off of Dungy's team.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

Firing Shanahan, and it's not even close. The Broncos had the pieces for one of the best offenses in football -- if they got a little help on defense they could have been a really dangerous team. Then McDaniels comes in and alienates his two best offensive players (causing one of them to be traded) and now they'll probably win something like 5 games this year. Even though firing Gruden might have been a mistake, the Bucs weren't going to be a dangerous team no matter who the coach was. JML897

I agree with this. Taking McDaniels and Morris out of the equation, Shanahan won two Super Bowls, took his team to the playoffs consistently, and frankly is a pretty damn good coach. His offense was not a problem last season, his defense, which was being run into the ground by an incompetent cordinator, was the problem. Maybe that's his fault for not firing the guy after his defense sagged two seasons in a row, but I don't see how hiring a young hothead who insists on focusing all his energy on dismantling a perfectly competent offense while the defense remains shaky is any better. While I don't think Gruden's firing is justified, Shanahan at least kept his team at a respectable level, just out of the playoffs. Gruden's Bucs haven't even been close for a while.

I think the better question, though, is which team has less of an excuse for going after one of them, the Browns, Lions, or Raiders? The fact that Mangini, Cable, and Schwartz have jobs while Gruden and Shanahan don't is more of a tragedy to me than the actual firings.

Avatar image for bunchofpixels
bunchofpixels

7049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 bunchofpixels
Member since 2003 • 7049 Posts

Both were good moves, IMO. If Shanny could handle just being the coach he would be all right but he wasn't getting done as GM. It was time for both teams to rebuild.

Avatar image for Second_Rook
Second_Rook

3680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 Second_Rook
Member since 2007 • 3680 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

Gruden on the other hand took Tony Dungy's team and won a Superbowl.

Firing Shanahan, I never seen Gruden that good of a coach, he won that Super Bowl off of Dungy's team.CajunCeltic
This is a common perception, but the fact remains that Dungy does not get it done in the playoffs (one year out of how many top seeds?) and Gruden did. Too much credit is given to Dungy.
I think the better question, though, is which team has less of an excuse for going after one of them, the Browns, Lions, or Raiders? The fact that Mangini, Cable, and Schwartz have jobs while Gruden and Shanahan don't is more of a tragedy to me than the actual firings.

theone86
That is the better question, wouldn't it be something to see Chucky or Shanahan back in Oakland? Though there is a lot of buzz (and I realize that's all it is) about him ending up taking Weis' seat if the Irish have another bad year. How cool would that be? I'm gonna step out on a limb and say that with the 10 season being uncapped we're gonna see the return of a few classics, (Shanahan, Gruden, Cowher, Schottenheimer) maybe one in Dallas? The next couple years are shaping up to be as awesome as ever.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"] [QUOTE="CajunCeltic"]Firing Shanahan, I never seen Gruden that good of a coach, he won that Super Bowl off of Dungy's team.Second_Rook
This is a common perception, but the fact remains that Dungy does not get it done in the playoffs (one year out of how many top seeds?) and Gruden did. Too much credit is given to Dungy.
I think the better question, though, is which team has less of an excuse for going after one of them, the Browns, Lions, or Raiders? The fact that Mangini, Cable, and Schwartz have jobs while Gruden and Shanahan don't is more of a tragedy to me than the actual firings.

theone86

That is the better question, wouldn't it be something to see Chucky or Shanahan back in Oakland? Though there is a lot of buzz (and I realize that's all it is) about him ending up taking Weis' seat if the Irish have another bad year. How cool would that be? I'm gonna step out on a limb and say that with the 10 season being uncapped we're gonna see the return of a few classics, (Shanahan, Gruden, Cowher, Schottenheimer) maybe one in Dallas? The next couple years are shaping up to be as awesome as ever.

I thought Cowher didn't want to coach anymore? But yeah, there are a few positions that could be up for grabs pretty soon. And Charlie Weis getting fired, are you high? That man gets more second chances than, um, I can't think of a good similie right now, but yeah I'm starting to think he's never going to get fired. Shanahan might be pretty good taking that position, though. If he gets signed to the Raiders he's going to be expected to make the playoffs within two years. If he takes a college position it's a little less pressure, a little more control to be able to shape the team.

Avatar image for Second_Rook
Second_Rook

3680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#16 Second_Rook
Member since 2007 • 3680 Posts

I thought Cowher didn't want to coach anymore? But yeah, there are a few positions that could be up for grabs pretty soon. And Charlie Weis getting fired, are you high? That man gets more second chances than, um, I can't think of a good similie right now, but yeah I'm starting to think he's never going to get fired. Shanahan might be pretty good taking that position, though. If he gets signed to the Raiders he's going to be expected to make the playoffs within two years. If he takes a college position it's a little less pressure, a little more control to be able to shape the team.

theone86

Cowher was burnt out. I've heard him say that much. I think he's too young to be real done, he's more like comic book done, just waiting for the perfect time and place to rise again. As far as Weis goes, the ND boosters would be the ones in an altered state if they let him get away with pissing away back to back top 3 recruiting classes. He looks immune to firing at the moment but anything short of a top tier bowl this year should be the last straw (in a sane world.) Gruden makes perfect sense, the boy from South Bend who's daddy was an Irish assistant, lifelong fan of the program, a nice NFL resume, (regardless of what the Gruden detractors say) he would be a top candidate if the school is willing to eat Weis' contract.

Avatar image for Boston_Boyy
Boston_Boyy

4103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Boston_Boyy
Member since 2008 • 4103 Posts

Defiantly Shanhan. There are few coaches i'd rather have than Shanhan in the league right now. There are few coaches i'd take under (if any) i'd take under McDaniels. As I said in previous posts I don't think he's an innocent victim in either the Cutler or Marshall cae (I think both Marshall and Cutler are a huge part of it but there must be something about this guy his players evidently don't respect him enough to want to play for him). Gruden is a decent coach but nothing like Shanahan

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]I thought Cowher didn't want to coach anymore? But yeah, there are a few positions that could be up for grabs pretty soon. And Charlie Weis getting fired, are you high? That man gets more second chances than, um, I can't think of a good similie right now, but yeah I'm starting to think he's never going to get fired. Shanahan might be pretty good taking that position, though. If he gets signed to the Raiders he's going to be expected to make the playoffs within two years. If he takes a college position it's a little less pressure, a little more control to be able to shape the team.

Second_Rook

Cowher was burnt out. I've heard him say that much. I think he's too young to be real done, he's more like comic book done, just waiting for the perfect time and place to rise again. As far as Weis goes, the ND boosters would be the ones in an altered state if they let him get away with pissing away back to back top 3 recruiting classes. He looks immune to firing at the moment but anything short of a top tier bowl this year should be the last straw (in a sane world.) Gruden makes perfect sense, the boy from South Bend who's daddy was an Irish assistant, lifelong fan of the program, a nice NFL resume, (regardless of what the Gruden detractors say) he would be a top candidate if the school is willing to eat Weis' contract.

I agree about Weis, I just don't know if he hasn't been fired yet that there's anything he can do to lose that job. Perhaps he's more valuable for the publicity he brings. he also might get saved this season by having some REALLY good players. His offense killed in their debut.

Avatar image for Mister__Awesome
Mister__Awesome

2439

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 Mister__Awesome
Member since 2009 • 2439 Posts
Firing Shanahan was worse.
Avatar image for deactivated-5c47d700b56ab
deactivated-5c47d700b56ab

8038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-5c47d700b56ab
Member since 2003 • 8038 Posts
shanahan. he was an excellent coach for offense and a great coordinator too. too bad the broncos could lose all games this year. bring back john elway?
Avatar image for thequietguy
thequietguy

2160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 thequietguy
Member since 2008 • 2160 Posts
Gruden, because now the Buccaneers organization will completely collapse. The Broncos can still compete for playoffs, but the Bucs don't even have a chance anymore.
Avatar image for chAzN93
chAzN93

34854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 chAzN93
Member since 2004 • 34854 Posts

firing shanahan

Avatar image for iowastate
iowastate

7922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#23 iowastate
Member since 2004 • 7922 Posts

Both were smart moves...Shanahan could not handle things anymore, he was stale and was making overly conservative calls in recent years.

Reminds me of Tom Cable.

There was a time when he had the gambling spirit and poker face necessary to run a contending team in the NFL.

not any more.

Gruden....always belonged right where he returned, at the college level.

It was just annoying to have to see him blathering on the sidelines of a team and although he did wellll one season

big deal it was the Raiders on the big game.:P

his ability and ability at handling the players soon took care of that.

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

One can make an arguement that firing Shanahan was a bad move, but Gruden is on of the worst coaches to hold the position for as long as he did.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
They were both bad moves. Firing shanahan and getting mcdaniels led to the trading of Cutler (the worst move so far for the broncos). John Gruden did ok, not great, but ok. That was not the worst move for the bucs though, it was releasing Derrick Brooks and getting rid of the Tampa 2, will they ever have that dominating defense again?
Avatar image for Yannakos
Yannakos

585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#26 Yannakos
Member since 2008 • 585 Posts

Firing Shanahan.

Definitly after all the offseason drama the broncos have been through.

Avatar image for ShuichiChamp24
ShuichiChamp24

5014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ShuichiChamp24
Member since 2009 • 5014 Posts

Firing Shanahan is the worst move, not only that but you replace him with a McD? It was a sad day in Denver when that happened.

Avatar image for NaughtyRag
NaughtyRag

2309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 NaughtyRag
Member since 2009 • 2309 Posts

Firing shanahan brought cutler to my bears.. so i am okay with it.. but i think denver made a mistake.. gruden well i think it was fine..