360 graphics better because of the year lead?

Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we  received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?OSCARMIKE

[QUOTE="OSCARMIKE"]Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we  received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?_AsasN_

[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="OSCARMIKE"]Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we  received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?musicalmac

The "hard to develop for" part?

Well, of course there isn't going to be a concensus among developers.  It's all a matter of opinion.

Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?OSCARMIKE

Good points Jayo its just hard for me to stay positive about my ps3 when I compare my 360 to ps3 games and see my ps3 just under performing when i expected my ps3 to wow me right outta the box like my 360 did with COD2. One things for sure i never expected a digital turd like gundam to be pooped outta my 600$ dollar console.

Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we  received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?OSCARMIKE

Kameo puts EVERY launch PS3 game to shame really, i finished it some days back, and had played both  Motorstorm and Resistance in  a kiosk, Resistance was looking mediocre comparing, and motorstorm had nothing on Kameo too, it was so empty, Kameo was full of stuff and life and thousands of troops and effects and bump mapping etc, a work of art

So, comparing launch titles, 360 is far ahead in graphics, but PS3 is hardrer to develop for, so they should be equal in the end

Good points Jayo its just hard for me to stay positive about my ps3 when I compare my 360 to ps3 games and see my ps3 just under performing when i expected my ps3 to wow me right outta the box like my 360 did with COD2. One things for sure i never expected a digital turd like gundam to be pooped outta my 600$ dollar console.

OSCARMIKE

Resistance turned to be a great launch game with Stunnin graphics and havin that much things going on at once in that 1 game should ruleWhiteknight19

You know that Kameo was a year earlier than Resistance and looks 10x better ?

[QUOTE="OSCARMIKE"]Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?LabWarrior1

Kameo puts EVERY launch PS3 game to shame really, i finished it some days back, and had played both Motorstorm and Resistance in a kiosk, Resistance was looking mediocre comparing, and motorstorm had nothing on Kameo too, it was so empty, Kameo was full of stuff and life and thousands of troops and effects and bump mapping etc, a work of art

So, comparing launch titles, 360 is far ahead in graphics, but PS3 is hardrer to develop for, so they should be equal in the end

[QUOTE="LabWarrior1"]

[QUOTE="OSCARMIKE"]Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?Javy03

Kameo puts EVERY launch PS3 game to shame really, i finished it some days back, and had played both Motorstorm and Resistance in a kiosk, Resistance was looking mediocre comparing, and motorstorm had nothing on Kameo too, it was so empty, Kameo was full of stuff and life and thousands of troops and effects and bump mapping etc, a work of art

So, comparing launch titles, 360 is far ahead in graphics, but PS3 is hardrer to develop for, so they should be equal in the end

Genji ? That game looks generations behind Kameo, just uses many effects to impress, nothing like Kameo detail and alive world, you clearly have not played it, i was in that underwater level a few days back, the game is a stunner in every new stage, the best beeing the one with the red trees and yellow grasses, and the interactive water

The day/night cycle is also stunning to look at, i just load the game now to watch the sun go up/down in those beautifull spots, it is THAT great looking, frankly few games counter Kameo even on my 360, those would be Oblivion, GRAW 1, viva Pinata ands of course Gears, but most upcoming titles do surpass Kameo at last clearly

Play the game and you will understand, i was skeptical too at first, now that i have finisehd it, i can confirm it looks nothing short of spectacular, best parts beeing the underwater level, the red trees hub, the bad guy castle entrance, and a hge forest at some point, the desert level has sweet lighting too

[QUOTE="OSCARMIKE"]Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?_AsasN_

[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="OSCARMIKE"]Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?eclipsed4utoo

   Thats not the only thing, efficiency plays a big role in all of this "potential" talk, as far as graphics are concerned, their is major differences between the Xenos and RSX, the main being architecture, not only is the Xenos more powerfull than the RSX, it obliterates it in efficiency.

the year is a big factorSonnyF

Not as big as you think, not only is the 360 a graphical powerhouse, its MUCH easier to harness that power.

[QUOTE="SonnyF"]the year is a big factorNagidar

Not as big as you think, not only is the 360 a graphical powerhouse, its MUCH easier to harness that power.

[QUOTE="Nagidar"]

[QUOTE="SonnyF"]the year is a big factorSonnyF

Not as big as you think, not only is the 360 a graphical powerhouse, its MUCH easier to harness that power.

Its not the RSX devs are having trouble with, its the Cell, like I said, the year lead isn't as big a factor as you think, the 360 has ALOT of graphical power and is easier to harness.

Lets take this into consideration.

If 360 released a year later it would have had an upgrade on the hardware and/or full DX10 api, or maybe both, or maybe none, but I doubt none. It would have also had an amazing launch 20+ games? and it would have also had more developement time as well.

Now I know some of you out there hate me because of the terrible act I commited to get my hands on a PS3 but im posting anyway. If ps3 would of launched in spring like it was suppose to woudnt the games released be twice as horrible as the ones we received at launch? It seems everyone claims 360 games look better because of the 1 year lead but it seems to me devs have had about equall time with both systems dev kits so what gives? Why isnt my ps3 crushing my 360 in graphics?OSCARMIKE