$70 a year for psn?

  • 87 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for partyboy219
partyboy219

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 partyboy219
Member since 2004 • 33 Posts

http://loot-ninja.com/2009/12/18/could-a-70-yearly-psn-subscription-be-around-the-corner/

Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

playing online will still be free

Avatar image for Colin1192
Colin1192

6221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Colin1192
Member since 2008 • 6221 Posts

if they want to charge for PSN and make it a success then they will have to sell for way cheaper than what live is going for

Avatar image for Silent-Hal
Silent-Hal

9795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 Silent-Hal
Member since 2007 • 9795 Posts
As long as we still get what we have now for free I couldn't care less.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

I'd gladly pay 70 just so the service wasn't slow

Give me faster donwloads and lag free matches and you can have 70 dollars easy, throw in the rest to make yourself happy but just make it a competent service and the money is there

Avatar image for Yandere
Yandere

9878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Yandere
Member since 2009 • 9878 Posts

"The suggested prices range from $29.99 a year to $69.99 a year."

Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts

I looked at some of the features included in these premium packages, and imo none of it makes the service worth the $70 per year. Good thing online play will remain free.

Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16740 Posts
The hypothetical premium content sounds great but still, i'd be able play my games online for free :)
Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

I dont mind paying this amount if they make it really worth the money

Avatar image for Yankees718
Yankees718

1033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Yankees718
Member since 2009 • 1033 Posts

Lol, if that is true it would be intresting how the cows would react

Avatar image for nullvision
nullvision

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 nullvision
Member since 2003 • 1988 Posts

Lol, if that is true it would be intresting how the cows would react

Yankees718

To a poll?

Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#12 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

I'd gladly pay 70 just so the service wasn't slow

Give me faster donwloads and lag free matches and you can have 70 dollars easy, throw in the rest to make yourself happy but just make it a competent service and the money is there

Jaysonguy

faster downloads and lag depends on users' internet connection as well. there is not much they can do...you have to talk with your internet provider.

for example, tiger wood PGA tour 10 1700MB demo, i had it downloaded in 15 mins, but it might be half hour or moreinother people'shouse.

Avatar image for tbolt76
tbolt76

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#13 tbolt76
Member since 2008 • 987 Posts

Unlimited access to PSOne classics? That sounds cool, as well as PSN Store discounts. Purely optional? There is nothing wrong with that.

Avatar image for bubbleboyii
bubbleboyii

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#14 bubbleboyii
Member since 2005 • 550 Posts

Lol, if that is true it would be intresting how the cows would react

Yankees718

Believe me, some will probably take the lemming route and claim that it'll improve the PSN experience. It still doesn't make any sense though. Either way, as long as demos and multiplayer are still free, I couldn't care less.

Avatar image for Yankees718
Yankees718

1033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Yankees718
Member since 2009 • 1033 Posts

[QUOTE="Yankees718"]

Lol, if that is true it would be intresting how the cows would react

bubbleboyii

Believe me, some will probably take the lemming route and claim that it'll improve the PSN experience. It still doesn't make any sense though. Either way, as long as demos and multiplayer are still free, I couldn't care less.

Well exactly. I just want the multiplayer to be free. If thats not, im screwed paying potentially paying $120/year for both Live and PSN

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#16 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

As long as what they have now stays free, I'm all for an optional paid subscription.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts

As long as what they have now stays free, I'm all for an optional paid subscription.

Wasdie
This. Though some of the supposed possibilities of a subscribed PSN makes it pretty sweet.
Avatar image for ThePRAssassin
ThePRAssassin

1344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 ThePRAssassin
Member since 2009 • 1344 Posts

Unlimited access to PSOne classics? That sounds cool, as well as PSN Store discounts. Purely optional? There is nothing wrong with that.

tbolt76

This. I want almost every PS one title, as I love to go back and play classics but my brother sold our PSone and games to get more PS2 games.

The only one I have left is FFIX, the one I disliked the most.

Avatar image for 2beers_in_hand
2beers_in_hand

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 2beers_in_hand
Member since 2007 • 2950 Posts

I'm calling BS on this right know... Anyone with some spare time can make a niffty spread sheet...

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#20 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

playing online will still be free

sikanderahmed
which is why I won't be signing up.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#21 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

Unlimited access to PSOne classics? That sounds cool, as well as PSN Store discounts. Purely optional? There is nothing wrong with that.

tbolt76
Agreed. But I remember a while back a thread questioning how important is BC in a console since the PS3 dropped it. So many claimed it wasn't all that, and new games are all they need. I wonder if some are now saying unlimited access to" PS1 games, I'll pay!!!" I love my PS3 being BC, and wouldn't want it any other way.
Avatar image for patriots7672
patriots7672

3249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 patriots7672
Member since 2008 • 3249 Posts

I'll pass and use the free service. I don't need long demos or that other crap. Xlive isn't worth it and neither is that.

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts

I looked at some of the features included in these premium packages, and imo none of it makes the service worth the $70 per year. Good thing online play will remain free.

Doolz2024
The problem with a $70 price tag, with the current listed features, is you're not actually getting anything extra that you can't already get from the free PSN. Ok, so you have extra save storage... everything else is already available to customers who shell out a few bucks. Honestly, you have to do quite a bit of purchasing over the course of the year to make it worth that $70 price tag. If they want to make the premium service worth that cash, they need to not only offer what is available on XBL, but also bump it up with a couple extra services that you can't get elsewhere.
Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#24 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

They should do better than that to get me to pay for Premium.

At least online will still be free.

Avatar image for RogueShodown
RogueShodown

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 RogueShodown
Member since 2009 • 2818 Posts

I'd gladly pay 70 just so the service wasn't slow

Give me faster donwloads and lag free matches and you can have 70 dollars easy, throw in the rest to make yourself happy but just make it a competent service and the money is there

Jaysonguy

It is a competent service, but fanboys don't see it that way. And I think the download speed BS is the worst excuse I've ever seen. I don't get fast download speeds, but I also don't play 24 hours a day, so I can just download games when I'm not playing. In fact, I'm downloading 2 demos as I'm typing this. The only problem is that my ps3 froze once again, so I may need to just get a new one. It wasn't very hot, and I only played it for about 2 hours, so It makes no sense for it to freeze.

Avatar image for RogueShodown
RogueShodown

2818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 RogueShodown
Member since 2009 • 2818 Posts
[QUOTE="tbolt76"]

Unlimited access to PSOne classics? That sounds cool, as well as PSN Store discounts. Purely optional? There is nothing wrong with that.

cainetao11
Agreed. But I remember a while back a thread questioning how important is BC in a console since the PS3 dropped it. So many claimed it wasn't all that, and new games are all they need. I wonder if some are now saying unlimited access to" PS1 games, I'll pay!!!" I love my PS3 being BC, and wouldn't want it any other way.

I'm pretty sure all ps3s play ps1 games. My slim does, but It scratched up one of my black discs.Fortunately, the scratches weren't deep. I'd love to be able to play ps2 games on my ps3, but considering it just had a huge price drop,the fact that the new model came out, and that I already own a fat ps2, it wasn't a huge problem that I got the ps3. .Plus, I got the Black Friday deal, so I got a pretty good deal. Still, being able to play my 80 or so ps2 games on my ps3, of which many are nowhere near completion, would be great, especially adding all the things I could do on my ps3 while playing those games.
Avatar image for Racer850
Racer850

2293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 Racer850
Member since 2009 • 2293 Posts
As long as Online play is still free.
Avatar image for Racer850
Racer850

2293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 Racer850
Member since 2009 • 2293 Posts

I'll pass and use the free service. I don't need long demos or that other crap. Xlive isn't worth it and neither is that.

patriots7672
XBL is a fantastic service, the interface and the online play are so worth the monthly fee. PSN is a solid service, but XBL is imo still superior!
Avatar image for HAZE-Unit
HAZE-Unit

10564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 HAZE-Unit
Member since 2007 • 10564 Posts

Extended console warranty to 3 years, that sounds great.

Full title trial? first hour is free...wow thats amazing.

Cloud storage space for games, thats great too.

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

It will fail if the online is still free. Although has the free online play officially confirmed?

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

Mark my words within the next 2 years you will be paying for online multliplayer on PSN..

No I have no way to know, but let me just say once Pandora's box is opened and Sony sees the profit it can make doing like Live..they will charge.

I still think that Sony is only holding out on the free service to lure in new purchases of the PS3.

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts

As long as the service is worth it, I don't mind paying for it.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#33 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

They should do better than that to get me to pay for Premium.

At least online will still be free.

LegatoSkyheart
That is the problem in a business sense. Online play is the "hook" for the most part, and Sony already gave that card away. Now that may make them a lot of friends, but it may not make them much money. There are some cool features in that premium service, but none I need to have. Maybe you consider it wrong or greedy, but that was the genius in Live, from a business stand point.
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#34 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

Extended console warranty to 3 years, that sounds great.

Full title trial? first hour is free...wow thats amazing.

Cloud storage space for games, thats great too.

HAZE-Unit
I have to subscribe yearly, to get a 3 year warranty? So does my yearly fee go down when the 3 year warranty is up? Sounds stupid, imo. Just cover your product, Sony. I would have paid a one time fee for 3 years like the Xbox service plan.
Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

They should do better than that to get me to pay for Premium.

At least online will still be free.

cainetao11

That is the problem in a business sense. Online play is the "hook" for the most part, and Sony already gave that card away. Now that may make them a lot of friends, but it may not make them much money. There are some cool features in that premium service, but none I need to have. Maybe you consider it wrong or greedy, but that was the genius in Live, from a business stand point.

Thats what I was thinking that for this to sell at all they will need to charge for the online play to. After all no one could argue with it as no one would get "ripped off" by losing something that was free anyhow.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#36 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

They should do better than that to get me to pay for Premium.

At least online will still be free.

vaderhater

That is the problem in a business sense. Online play is the "hook" for the most part, and Sony already gave that card away. Now that may make them a lot of friends, but it may not make them much money. There are some cool features in that premium service, but none I need to have. Maybe you consider it wrong or greedy, but that was the genius in Live, from a business stand point.

Thats what I was thinking that for this to sell at all they will need to charge for the online play to. After all no one could argue with it as no one would get "ripped off" by losing something that was free anyhow.

Well said. If this premium service doesn't take off, the fee will happen for online play. It's just too much revenue that is lost for them not to do it.
Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts
The hypothetical premium content sounds great but still, i'd be able play my games online for free :)AgentA-Mi6
for now.... when those *premium dont sell they will make you pay. trust me. they see ms charging and its system is still selling and their online based games are selling double of ps3s... so enjoy it will its lasts it wont be much longer:wink:
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#38 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts
[QUOTE="AgentA-Mi6"]The hypothetical premium content sounds great but still, i'd be able play my games online for free :)monson21502
for now.... when those *premium dont sell they will make you pay. trust me. they see ms charging and its system is still selling and their online based games are selling double of ps3s... so enjoy it will its lasts it wont be much longer:wink:

Cows so don't want to hear that, dude. But it may happen. Live has proven that for a small fee on a closed service it works. Sony is letting money go, if they don't.
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
I would gladly pay 70 dollars a year for a much improved network with all the added stuff from the article.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8

22399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-5e0e425ee91d8
Member since 2007 • 22399 Posts
if there anywhere near on the ball in that artical, than i'll wait for a drop in price. the all acsess pass to PS1 classics, Minis and cloud based gamesaves sounds good though
Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

Free access to all PSone games is great but not enough to make pay for it as long as playing online will remain free.

Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

I have to be honest if they included the perks listed in that article i might consider it. Access to the ps1 library, dicounts on ps store purchases, those are two big things for me. We will see.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

Exactly who's blog is that?

Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

You'll excuse me if I take a BLOG from a site with the name "loot ninja" with a grain of salt.

Cows am owned 70 dollar subscription am confirmed. :lol:

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#45 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

3 year warrenty, plus everything live offers, and more.... seems worth it. But again NOT like live and force you to pay to play basic ONLINE!!!

Avatar image for scarface_dm
scarface_dm

1652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 scarface_dm
Member since 2009 • 1652 Posts

WTF, that is pure B.S. and Cows say Live is overcharged :roll:

defenitley sticking to Xbox Live if this rediculousness pans out!!!

Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#47 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts
Free PS1 games? For that price they better add some classic PS2 games also..
Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#48 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

typical sony i saw the possible features and the only thing that looked interisting is the free ps1 games , but other then that 70 is pushing it ,

remember launch of ps3 "playstation 3 will launch for five hundred and ninty nine us dollars giant enemy crabs hahaha

i almost had a heart burn because of that hahhaa sony dis-pleases me ill keep paying 50 for my live thank you very much -no credit card or debit card required ps3 is like stuck in the original xbox years- where a debit or major credit card is required lol

Avatar image for tok1879
tok1879

1537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 tok1879
Member since 2005 • 1537 Posts

As long as what they have now stays free, I'm all for an optional paid subscription.

Wasdie
Then say bye-bye to all the upgrades the free PSN gets. From when they start doing that, any new features will only be added to the premium service/s. There are so many hypocrites on these forums, it disgusts me.
Avatar image for slvrraven9
slvrraven9

9278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 slvrraven9
Member since 2004 • 9278 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

I'd gladly pay 70 just so the service wasn't slow

Give me faster donwloads and lag free matches and you can have 70 dollars easy, throw in the rest to make yourself happy but just make it a competent service and the money is there

to hell wit that. as long as can get the exact same thing for 20 bucks less on XBL theres no way id pay that much for PSN and the premium services. i think like someone else said, as long as they price it UNDER the xbl then itll be successful. only people with no choice will pay that rediculous amount.... i do wonder what all it gives you...