Ubisoft and Activision are Geniuses. Seems like the publisher divided the franchise between two different developement teams to increase each teams competive nature so that could squeeze out better Ideas and Fight complacency. Milk or no Milk, Its still a great Idea, because of overlapping development cycles between the two teams the publisher achieves the illusion of releasing a "2-3 year quality" title EVERY YEAR. I hope we drown in this sh!t.
Ubisoft and Activision are Geniuses. Seems like the publisher divided the franchise between two different developement teams to increase each teams competive nature so that could squeeze out better Ideas and Fight complacency. Milk or no Milk, Its still a great Idea, because of overlapping development cycles between the two teams the publisher achieves the illusion of releasing a "2-3 year quality" title EVERY YEAR. I hope we drown in this sh!t.Lulekani
Â
Assasins Creed falls lower in sales every single entry and in quite a few have lost more than made profit, and many times had to cut costs. Also, sales aren't really that goos and as said, falls lower each time and seems to find a hard time finding a dedicated base.
Â
Activsion however, does not have this problem, although the legs of COD games seem to be slowing a bit it's not to the point where they should actually care.
^ Atleast Ubisoft is trying to compete with COD. If we're gona be bombarded by a game annualy, I'd rather it be Assassin's Creed than Call of Duty. But I wana give a big congrats to them both.
Ubisoft and Activision are Geniuses. Seems like the publisher divided the franchise between two different developement teams to increase each teams competive nature so that could squeeze out better Ideas and Fight complacency. Milk or no Milk, Its still a great Idea, because of overlapping development cycles between the two teams the publisher achieves the illusion of releasing a "2-3 year quality" title EVERY YEAR. I hope we drown in this sh!t.Lulekani
We'll be seeing more of this in the future unfortunately.
Congratdulations ! You're the 1st person to reply to my very 1st thread. Next time, however, give it alil more effort. Well, perhaps if you gave more effort to your thread.
Congratdulations ! You're the 1st person to reply to my very 1st thread. Next time, however, give it alil more effort. Well, perhaps if you gave more effort to your thread. Lol, you want me to inspire you ? All right "princess", what do you like most ? Maybe I can make it happen.
[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="Lulekani"] Congratdulations ! You're the 1st person to reply to my very 1st thread. Next time, however, give it alil more effort.Lulekani
Well, perhaps if you gave more effort to your thread. Lol, you want me to inspire you ? All right "princess", what do you like most ? Maybe I can make it happen. Oooooh, princess. Thanks. I doubt you can. You don't seem too bright. Do you have a cell phone?
[QUOTE="Lulekani"]Ubisoft and Activision are Geniuses. Seems like the publisher divided the franchise between two different developement teams to increase each teams competive nature so that could squeeze out better Ideas and Fight complacency. Milk or no Milk, Its still a great Idea, because of overlapping development cycles between the two teams the publisher achieves the illusion of releasing a "2-3 year quality" title EVERY YEAR. I hope we drown in this sh!t.jimmypsn
We'll be seeing more of this in the future unfortunately. some parts of the industry depend on consistency, its either this or MM0's.
It would be great if they change up the gameplay. They kinda don't. Though I guess AC does change it up here and there a lot, but AC3 was disappointing so that doesn't really matter.
Log in to comment