AAAA should not be possible

becouse, nothing is perfect.

the closest we ever got to perfect whas World in Conflict, it didn't even had a bad section

and yes, I know it is called Prime now, but prime is still perfect if it get's 10/10

when I take a school exam, I can only have a 10 if I make NO mistakes

and since WiC had no bad section, and it is still not AAAA, nothing should be able to be AAAA

~W

Agreed, looking at smash bros brawl and most of the top 10 games.

10/10s .... how can gamerankings mix media that sometimes throws them out easily, and others that NEVER give 10s ...

Gamerankings is beyond flawed.

AAAA no longer means Perfect here on GS, it means Prime.Ibacai

damnit man, READ MY THREAD

So what you say is that if a game is really so good that it could not be improved in a meaningfull way it should not get the highest rank?

WiC had flaws, too high requirements, infantry not that useable, several overpowered units. Not gamebraking in any way, but still flaws enough to pull the rating down.

10 SHOULD EXIST, SHOULD BE GIVEN, but not given easily.

So what you say is that if a game is really so good that it could not be improved in a meaningfull way it should not get the highest rank?

WiC had flaws, too high requirements, infantry not that useable, several overpowered units. Not gamebraking in any way, but still flaws enough to pull the rating down.

10 SHOULD EXIST, SHOULD BE GIVEN, but not given easily.

haols

you tell me what game should be AAAA then ?

jezus on a dinosaur ?

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]AAAA no longer means Perfect here on GS, it means Prime.whoody12

damnit man, READ MY THREAD

Don't look too far into things like "It had no bad section, and got 9.5, therefore you can't get 10."

Halo 3 got a 9.5, and COD4 got a 9.0. But COD4 still got 360 game of the year.

Yea a game should be able to get a 10/10. I just like how GS reserves it for A REALLY AMAZING game.

Like when that "next amazing game" gets reveiwed by gamespy, and they want to say it's like the best game they've ever played, how the hell do they show that? Give it 5/5 like they give all the higher grade games? See gamespot always has that 10 to give out to a game that is THAT AMAZING and desevres some extra attention.

If it's not possible to get a perfect score, than why have a perfect score? Ergo, 10/10 does not mean perfect, because a "perfect" designation is pointless.Tylendal

by removing 10, 9,5 will become the highest score, making p,5 the perfect score

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]If it's not possible to get a perfect score, than why have a perfect score? Ergo, 10/10 does not mean perfect, because a "perfect" designation is pointless.whoody12

by removing 10, 9,5 will become the highest score, making p,5 the perfect score

No, you get me wrong. Removing 10 is what people want to do now. I'm saying that we need to keep 10, because a perfect score can't be achieved, making "Perfect" a mystical 11/10 score (didn't SMG get one?).

[QUOTE="whoody12"]

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]If it's not possible to get a perfect score, than why have a perfect score? Ergo, 10/10 does not mean perfect, because a "perfect" designation is pointless.Tylendal

by removing 10, 9,5 will become the highest score, making p,5 the perfect score

No, you get me wrong. Removing 10 is what people want to do now. I'm saying that we need to keep 10, because a perfect score can't be achieved, making "Perfect" a mystical 11/10 score (didn't SMG get one?).

ratchet and clank got a 10.5 on SDF :lol:

[QUOTE="whoody12"]

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]If it's not possible to get a perfect score, than why have a perfect score? Ergo, 10/10 does not mean perfect, because a "perfect" designation is pointless.Tylendal

by removing 10, 9,5 will become the highest score, making p,5 the perfect score

No, you get me wrong. Removing 10 is what people want to do now. I'm saying that we need to keep 10, because a perfect score can't be achieved, making "Perfect" a mystical 11/10 score (didn't SMG get one?).

Read the GS's definition on Prime.

There's no point in having a 10 if nothing can achieve a 10. There's little difference between a game that makes few tiny mistakes, and one that makes no mistakes, and they are both deserving of a 10.

And, come on, it's great seeing a game get AAAA, especially if you agree with the score. Why would you try to take that joy away?

If it werent possible developers would loose motivation to push their game to the limits.

We'l see an AAAA game one day, I hope.

becouse, nothing is perfect.

the closest we ever got to perfect whas World in Conflict, it didn't even had a bad section

and yes, I know it is called Prime now, but prime is still perfect if it get's 10/10

when I take a school exam, I can only have a 10 if I make NO mistakes

and since WiC had no bad section, and it is still not AAAA, nothing should be able to be AAAA

~W

whoody12

prime != perfect. Ontain

I'll see your programming negation and raise a logical theorem negation.

P: Prime and perfect mean the same thing

~P

[QUOTE="whoody12"]

becouse, nothing is perfect.

the closest we ever got to perfect whas World in Conflict, it didn't even had a bad section

and yes, I know it is called Prime now, but prime is still perfect if it get's 10/10

when I take a school exam, I can only have a 10 if I make NO mistakes

and since WiC had no bad section, and it is still not AAAA, nothing should be able to be AAAA

~W

KungfuKitten

Hmmm, the quantum world...uncertainty! I thought this was more akin to relativity! AAAA is an absolute limit. The closer you get to it the more the mass of a game increases, time slows down but most importantly, its length decreases!

errr... no.

here:

10.0: Prime This exceedingly rare score refers to a game that is as perfect as a game can aspire to be at its time of release. Obviously, the constantly changing standards for technology and gameplay will probably make this game obsolete some day, but at its time of release, a game earning this score could not have been improved upon in any meaningful way.

Gamespot explains pretty well why we could indeed see a 10/10

It's not perfect, it means it stands up to be the very best at what it is and in every category for the time of release. Although this is flawed with THPS3...

and WiC wasn't that great...probably one of the worst RTS I've played recently.

EDIT: Oh, perfection doesn't exist, in any way shape or form. It's as incomprehensible as nothingness itself.


Saturos3091

World in conflict is AWESOME! =]

I played at friend's house, my PC has like NO RAM so it kinda got owned by the demo..

I think it deserves the score it got tbf..

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="whoody12"]

becouse, nothing is perfect.

the closest we ever got to perfect whas World in Conflict, it didn't even had a bad section

and yes, I know it is called Prime now, but prime is still perfect if it get's 10/10

when I take a school exam, I can only have a 10 if I make NO mistakes

and since WiC had no bad section, and it is still not AAAA, nothing should be able to be AAAA

~W

DAZZER7

Hmmm, the quantum world...uncertainty! I thought this was more akin to relativity! AAAA is an absolute limit. The closer you get to it the more the mass of a game increases, time slows down but most importantly, its length decreases!

[QUOTE="haols"]

So what you say is that if a game is really so good that it could not be improved in a meaningfull way it should not get the highest rank?

WiC had flaws, too high requirements, infantry not that useable, several overpowered units. Not gamebraking in any way, but still flaws enough to pull the rating down.

10 SHOULD EXIST, SHOULD BE GIVEN, but not given easily.

whoody12

you tell me what game should be AAAA then ?

jezus on a dinosaur ?