About Super Mario Galaxies graphics.

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.sexy_chimp

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

Conker has way better lighting, I'll give it that.

SMG is cleaner I have to say that but other than that they look both the same smg might be a bit better technecally and graphically but it isn't surpassed that much.

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/6560.html?type

SMG doesn't look better than that even though its a port of a N64 game. "100 times better" :lol:

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/25847.html

JiveT

100 times better was obviously an exaggeration but its arguably better.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.amorbis1001

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

XD that's not the best video of SMG.

[QUOTE="PSTriple4life"]

Those are pushing the Wii to its limits.

Don't think that the Wii will be able to do any better than that.

Maybe the next Zelda Wii game will but who knows.

SMG could be done a 6600 gt which is a low end graphics card now.

I do believe Xbox 1 could do SMG like graphics if devs would have put 5 years into it like they did with SMG.

DivergeUnify

Bad damage control. A geforce 6600 GT can run Doom 3 on max settings and it still looks better then most PS3 and 360 games, what's your point? SMG looks really good, the Wii isn't a Gamecube with a remote, get over it.coolviper2003

Those are pushing the Wii to its limits.

Don't think that the Wii will be able to do any better than that.

Maybe the next Zelda Wii game will but who knows.

SMG could be done a 6600 gt which is a low end graphics card now.

I do believe Xbox 1 could do SMG like graphics if devs would have put 5 years into it like they did with SMG.

PSTriple4life

And you know this because...?

Bad damage control. A geforce 6600 GT can run Doom 3 on max settings and it still looks better then most PS3 and 360 games, what's your point? SMG looks really good, the Wii isn't a Gamecube with a remote, get over it.coolviper2003

LOL @ this post.

[QUOTE="PSTriple4life"]

Those are pushing the Wii to its limits.

Don't think that the Wii will be able to do any better than that.

Maybe the next Zelda Wii game will but who knows.

SMG could be done a 6600 gt which is a low end graphics card now.

I do believe Xbox 1 could do SMG like graphics if devs would have put 5 years into it like they did with SMG.

--ProtoMan--

And you know this because...?

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="PSTriple4life"]

Those are pushing the Wii to its limits.

Don't think that the Wii will be able to do any better than that.

Maybe the next Zelda Wii game will but who knows.

SMG could be done a 6600 gt which is a low end graphics card now.

I do believe Xbox 1 could do SMG like graphics if devs would have put 5 years into it like they did with SMG.

coolviper2003

Bad damage control. A geforce 6600 GT can run Doom 3 on max settings and it still looks better then most PS3 and 360 games, what's your point? SMG looks really good, the Wii isn't a Gamecube with a remote, get over it.coolviper2003

[QUOTE="sexy_chimp"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.amorbis1001

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

Conker has way better lighting, I'll give it that.

SMG is cleaner I have to say that but other than that they look both the same smg might be a bit better technecally and graphically but it isn't surpassed that much.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.amorbis1001

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.GundamGuy0

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

XD that's not the best video of SMG.

I was trying to get the best video that wasnt too long, jive posted the review.

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.coolviper2003

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

[QUOTE="MrEpyx"]

[QUOTE="OGTiago"]SMG > conker, pretty obvious now.GundamGuy0

I disagree. Conker looks better. So does Doom 3 and Ninja Gaiden.

Post pictures that look better please!

I'd go on but I've got better things to do than prove that Xbox 1's graphics > Wii's.

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.coolviper2003

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

I kno I want gameplay, ingame cinematics have added effect not present in gamplay.

This is almost as sad as when fanboys were claiming that Gears of War will be the best 360 can do. Blackbond

[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.amorbis1001

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

I kno I want gameplay, ingame cinematics have added effect not present in gamplay.

[QUOTE="coolviper2003"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.DivergeUnify

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

SMG

CONKER

happy now best video I could find that seems to show both games realtime cinematics and gameplay

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="MrEpyx"]

[QUOTE="OGTiago"]SMG > conker, pretty obvious now.MrEpyx

I disagree. Conker looks better. So does Doom 3 and Ninja Gaiden.

Post pictures that look better please!

I'd go on but I've got better things to do than prove that Xbox 1's graphics > Wii's.

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.OregonTrailing

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

1. Personally, I think SMG looks better

2. The SMG video is from 2006, while it was still running on a modified Gamecube

ya. See the new videos from the SMG japan website in the other thread, they are amazing!

Hahaha Smg cant even produce better graphics then Conker on the xbox one, nevertheless it looks fun.TheJuiceyBar

How about you look at Super Mario Galaxy's intro.

[QUOTE="OregonTrailing"][QUOTE="amorbis1001"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"]

[QUOTE="amorbis1001"]conker looks just as good as SMG but thats not a bad thing.renger6002

I have to disagree. Conker looks great, but not as good as SMG.

here are VIDEOS OF BOTH: YOU DECIDE. best videos I coud'have found of both.

conker

SMG

1. Personally, I think SMG looks better

2. The SMG video is from 2006, while it was still running on a modified Gamecube

ya. See the new videos from the SMG japan website in the other thread, they are amazing!

I posted that comparison already look above.

both looks same with SMG just alittle bit better looking.

[QUOTE="Sir_BIGnuts"]

Ya because we can tell what the Wii is capible of after 10 months on shelves...

PSTriple4life

Check the specs, its an Overclocked gamecube

Check the specs... greater than the Xbox.

yet somehow people deny it... hmm....

[QUOTE="PSTriple4life"][QUOTE="Sir_BIGnuts"]

Ya because we can tell what the Wii is capible of after 10 months on shelves...

kansasdude2009

Check the specs, its an Overclocked gamecube

Check the specs... greater than the Xbox.

yet somehow people deny it... hmm....

I did.. dude *slaps forehead* just face it, it does not look better then conker, get over it.TheJuiceyBar

I did.. dude *slaps forehead* just face it, it does not look better then conker, get over it.TheJuiceyBar

How about you put your glasses on, it's clear SMG looks better then Conker...

[QUOTE="kansasdude2009"][QUOTE="PSTriple4life"][QUOTE="Sir_BIGnuts"]

Ya because we can tell what the Wii is capible of after 10 months on shelves...

TheJuiceyBar

Check the specs, its an Overclocked gamecube

Check the specs... greater than the Xbox.

yet somehow people deny it... hmm....

It doesn't...

I did.. dude *slaps forehead* just face it, it does not look better then conker, get over it.TheJuiceyBar

Are you looking at the same game as I am? Because SMG does look better to me, and I not blind.

The OP is correct I think. Metroid Prime 3 is even pushing Wii to an extent. I hear Wii constantly loading data on that game and it gets quite loud sometimes. Not Xbox 360 loud, but loud for Wii. Also, regardless of what Gamespot said about Metroid Prime 3 being smooth framerate wise, it is not in some spots. Skytown, Elysia chugs at times. SMG is going to be the pinnacle of Wii graphics, like it or not. AvIdGaMeR444

Loading has nothing to do with the hardware's graphical limitations.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="MrEpyx"]

[QUOTE="OGTiago"]SMG > conker, pretty obvious now.MrEpyx

I disagree. Conker looks better. So does Doom 3 and Ninja Gaiden.

Post pictures that look better please!

I'd go on but I've got better things to do than prove that Xbox 1's graphics > Wii's.

Jeezus Christ, look at the resolution of those pictures. It's obvious that those are bullshots. Why is that concept so hard to get through the heads of posters on System wars. If a game runs at 640x480 and the screenshots are like 1024x768 then you know you're looking at bullshots, and if the resolution is wrong, then you can bet there are alot of other BS in the pics (i.e. like lighting, aliasing, and texture quality). I mean those pics look better then most 360 and PS3 games, are you telling that the Xbox has more horsepower then the PS3 and 360!?!

[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]The OP is correct I think. Metroid Prime 3 is even pushing Wii to an extent. I hear Wii constantly loading data on that game and it gets quite loud sometimes. Not Xbox 360 loud, but loud for Wii. Also, regardless of what Gamespot said about Metroid Prime 3 being smooth framerate wise, it is not in some spots. Skytown, Elysia chugs at times. SMG is going to be the pinnacle of Wii graphics, like it or not. Ramadear

Loading has nothing to do with the hardware's graphical limitations.

Alot of people said the same thing about the PS2 and FFX.

Then we saw God of War II.

[QUOTE="MrEpyx"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="MrEpyx"]

[QUOTE="OGTiago"]SMG > conker, pretty obvious now.Zerostatic0

I disagree. Conker looks better. So does Doom 3 and Ninja Gaiden.

Post pictures that look better please!

I'd go on but I've got better things to do than prove that Xbox 1's graphics > Wii's.

Jeezus Christ, look at the resolution of those pictures. It's obvious that those are bullshots. Why is that concept so hard to get through the heads of posters on System wars. If a game runs at 640x480 and the screenshots are like 1024x768 then you know you're looking at bullshots, and if the resolution is wrong, then you can bet there are alot of other BS in the pics (i.e. like lighting, aliasing, and texture quality). I mean those pics look better then most 360 and PS3 games, are you telling that the Xbox has more horsepower then the PS3 and 360!?!

those are the only pictures that are in a valid resolution.

One thing to remember is that the Wii is running these games (MP3, SMG) at 60 fps. They can easily make the games look a lot better by cutting the fps down to 40 or even 30.mdisen

Nice job comparing Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3 and what ever other realistic type game to SMG. Great eye you have there. SMG looks like it stole a lot from Ninja Gaiden's art style.

On another note, ya most people don't realize running a game at 60fps with high quality visuals takes a lot. The fps could easily be dropped to 30fps to pump out more detail.

Nice job comparing Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3 and what ever other realistic type game to SMG. Great eye you have there. SMG looks like it stole a lot from Ninja Gaiden's art style.

On another note, ya most people don't realize running a game at 60fps with high quality visuals takes a lot. The fps could easily be dropped to 30fps to pump out more detail.

Ramadear

[QUOTE="Ramadear"]

Nice job comparing Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3 and what ever other realistic type game to SMG. Great eye you have there. SMG looks like it stole a lot from Ninja Gaiden's art style.

On another note, ya most people don't realize running a game at 60fps with high quality visuals takes a lot. The fps could easily be dropped to 30fps to pump out more detail.

DivergeUnify

60 FPS really helped MP3. Also the fact that they can keep it at 60 FPS and still have amazing graphics like SMG says something.

[QUOTE="Ramadear"]

Nice job comparing Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3 and what ever other realistic type game to SMG. Great eye you have there. SMG looks like it stole a lot from Ninja Gaiden's art style.

On another note, ya most people don't realize running a game at 60fps with high quality visuals takes a lot. The fps could easily be dropped to 30fps to pump out more detail.

DivergeUnify

No idea really, I'd say 60fps is a must for fps and racing games. But most developers like to run it at 60fps if possible without sacrificing details of their artistic vision.

[QUOTE="DivergeUnify"][QUOTE="Ramadear"]

Nice job comparing Ninja Gaiden, Doom 3 and what ever other realistic type game to SMG. Great eye you have there. SMG looks like it stole a lot from Ninja Gaiden's art style.

On another note, ya most people don't realize running a game at 60fps with high quality visuals takes a lot. The fps could easily be dropped to 30fps to pump out more detail.

sexy_chimp

60 FPS really helped MP3. Also the fact that they can keep it at 60 FPS and still have amazing graphics like SMG says something.

[QUOTE="JiveT"]

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]looks better than every xbox game. Even Conker.sexy_chimp

Wow. Wrong.

[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]looks better than every xbox game. Even Conker.sexy_chimp

Conker isn't even close. There's a picture of an average mole enemy from SMG. The mole has as much detail in its fur as Conker does.

And your cousin. More wrong.

No, this definately looks 100 times better than Conker. Go watch the videos if you haven't. There is no denying it.

I agree, and SMG runs at a crisp 60fps with so much more detail than conker.