While I disagreed with him, to lose his job over this matter is kind of sad and unfortunate. Especially if he was just sharing his opinion on issue and in no way saying the next xbox was or wasn't going to be always online.
Someone on Kotaku said:
 "Great job angry internet mob.
This is exactly the reason developers are not allowed to talk freely about their projects. Because every shit the say to their friends or as a joke is policed by a few thousand people who spend their life on the internet being angry at evil EA and Microsoft.
You have absolutley no idea how this guy performed in his job, what he did or didn't do. You read two sentences and just decide "Nope, this guy has to burn at the stakes". Between this and "EA is the worst company ev0r" i really beginn to despise this hateful gaming-"community"."
And I kind of agree. Maybe not specifically in this instance, as it can easily be argued that he was being exceptionally rude, but in plenty of other incidents where an overzealous fanbase got in the face of developers/publishers.
AncientDozer
"because every sh!t they say to their friencds or as a joke is policed by a few thousand people"....what?  This guy is (was) the CREATIVE DIRECTOR AT MICROSOFT STUDIOS.  Hey Kotaku, welcome to 2013 and to something known as the Internet.  Everything posted on it is open to critique.
Perhaps that person at Kotaku has been living under a rock for the past year, but rumors have been floating around about the new Xbox being always-online from numerous sources for a long time now. Â This is a major point of contention for most all gamers, for if it comes to pass it will entail a drastic change in how this industry is run and the rights that we as consumers hold. Â We are in the midst of a massive shift in the gaming world. Â Yet Kotaku has the gall to come out and claim "I really begin despise this hateful gaming-"community"". Â People being unable to express their concerns in a meaningful and constructive manner does not equate to hate. Â
Orth and Orth alone is to be held accountable for his actions. Â He is damn well aware of the furor that always-onlne instills in gamers, yet he goes on to make rude and ridiculous statements when not viewed in context. What did he expect? Â Or Kotaku? Â They need to pull their collective heads out of their asses and get in touch with the current sentiment that's been permeating throughout the industry about these rumors. Â Now, I believe this was a light-hearted exchange between friends. Â Orth may not even feel this way towards always-online and was simply playing Devil's Advocate. Â But considering his position at a company that has been drawing this much negative heat from numerous reliable sources, not to mention the social outlet he was posting this on he should've damn well known better, and MS apparently thinks so as well.
And how does "having no idea how this guy performed at his job" hold any point relevant to the topic at hand? Â
This post isn't directed at you Dozer, but more at Kotaku for saying such a thing. Â People overreacted, sure, but it's not like they don't have reasonable justification for doing so, justification that's been steadily building up for a long time now. Â It was throwing a match on a smoking pile of hay. Â What the hell was Orth thinking? Â Do I think he deserved to be fired? Â No. Â But when anyone is in such a position of authority in any company, they need to view every word they speak with great scrutiny before they speak it. Â And they can't cry unjustified pursecution when they reap the ramifications when they don't.
Log in to comment