Am I the only one who thought gta 4 looks horrible graphically?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for numba1234
numba1234

3561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 numba1234
Member since 2007 • 3561 Posts

Still? I actually think that spiderman 3 the game looks then it




Avatar image for ginglejangle
ginglejangle

3171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 ginglejangle
Member since 2007 • 3171 Posts

you got the worst looking screens

and you know how hard it will be to make a game as big as this fantastic?

Avatar image for springz300
springz300

2050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 springz300
Member since 2004 • 2050 Posts
will this be your first time playing GTA?

they never were about the graphics
Avatar image for numba1234
numba1234

3561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#4 numba1234
Member since 2007 • 3561 Posts

you got the worst looking screens

and you know how hard it will be to make a game as big as this fantastic?

ginglejangle
Worst screens? I got the one without the main character taking up 2/3 of the screen.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#5 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
It looks terrible... but then again GTA has never been about visuals...

Although, I wish it could at least look a bit better than it does... the overuse of HDR on some things makes it look like vomit.
Avatar image for emawk
emawk

1820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 emawk
Member since 2004 • 1820 Posts

Are you kidding me? Those pictures look stunning for a Grand Theft Auto game.

In fact, I think they look too good to be true.

Avatar image for Lazy_Boy88
Lazy_Boy88

7418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Lazy_Boy88
Member since 2003 • 7418 Posts

You probably aren't the only one but I think it looks great. You've got to realize here the scale, level of detail, and amount of stuff going on all at once. It's either big scale like GTA and Lair. Or small scale with super detail like Mass Effect cut-scenes.

Personally I really prefer the huge open game with tons of stuff going over a couple pretty character models.

Avatar image for numba1234
numba1234

3561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 numba1234
Member since 2007 • 3561 Posts

Are you kidding me? Those pictures look stunning for a Grand Theft Auto game.

In fact, I think they look too good to be true.

emawk
It goes the same for any next generation game. Halo 3looks stunning for a halo game. But this is by no means amazing. I would say in the 5 range graphically.
Avatar image for lagreendown
lagreendown

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 lagreendown
Member since 2006 • 1612 Posts

Are you kidding me? Those pictures look stunning for a Grand Theft Auto game.

In fact, I think they look too good to be true.

emawk
YOU?RE A WINNER!! but I AGREE WITH U THE GAME IS GREAT FOR A GTA GAME
Avatar image for 1carus
1carus

1454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 1carus
Member since 2004 • 1454 Posts

You probably aren't the only one but I think it looks great. You've got to realize here the scale, level of detail, and amount of stuff going on all at once. It's either big scale like GTA and Lair. Or small scale with super detail like Mass Effect cut-scenes.

Personally I really prefer the huge open game with tons of stuff going over a couple pretty character models.

Lazy_Boy88

Uuuh, Mass Effect is on the big scale.

And I know games were never about the graphics, and I really couldn't care if GTA has good or bad graphics, but saying it's on the big scale isn't really an excuse (well it is, I guess), because other games like Oblivion, Morrowind, Gothic 3 all capture big worlds with great graphics.

But I'm not complaining, they really don't look that bad, and hell, when you're crusing through the city it'll look awesome anyway.

Avatar image for LinKuei_warrior
LinKuei_warrior

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#12 LinKuei_warrior
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts

One Big Step for GTA fans..one little step for ppl new 2 the series...

Avatar image for campbell1874
campbell1874

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 campbell1874
Member since 2006 • 1920 Posts

The new GTA4 looks great.

GTA has alway been massive games with loads of things to do and this limits the graphics. One of the great thing about this game is that it focus more on gameplay than it does the graphic. That is why i think GTA games are always fun to playand haveinteresting story lines.

Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4
Avatar image for Live_to_kill
Live_to_kill

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Live_to_kill
Member since 2007 • 138 Posts

GTA IV isn't about graphics, GTA graphics have always been on the low side. What matters the most in GTA is gameplay. So long as the GTA IV graphics are next gen, it doesn't matter, really.

Avatar image for Zeliard9
Zeliard9

6030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Zeliard9
Member since 2007 • 6030 Posts
Um, those pics look great. Not the most impressive character models or textures ever, but I'm digging the realistic environments. Just walking around the city will end up being awesome, just because of how real it is.
Avatar image for Zerostatic0
Zerostatic0

4263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#17 Zerostatic0
Member since 2005 • 4263 Posts
They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4-MoOkS-
Let me guess, you're about 14 years old?
Avatar image for aDDiKt24
aDDiKt24

1265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 aDDiKt24
Member since 2006 • 1265 Posts

They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4-MoOkS-

Another system wars fanboy who knows nothing.

Avatar image for norfair_dweller
norfair_dweller

1639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 norfair_dweller
Member since 2007 • 1639 Posts
Grand Theft Auto was never big on graphics.
Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts

I think it's the art style that is bothering some people, the graphics are actually good IMO.

If people can say they don't like the way Lair or Halo3 or the cartoon Zelda looks.....I guess some will say they don't like the art sytle of GTA4. It's looks good enough although I never really cared for GTA games. Just something disturbing about them. I can play a FPS game like Halo and get into it but I tried the old GTA2 and it was...bleh.

Avatar image for bc226
bc226

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 bc226
Member since 2004 • 93 Posts
to be honest i really do not see anything that could not be done on the PS2.
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4aDDiKt24

Another system wars fanboy who knows nothing.

Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.-MoOkS-


Weird... because the PS3 is not the best system graphically or technically... the PC is.
Avatar image for Live_to_kill
Live_to_kill

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Live_to_kill
Member since 2007 • 138 Posts
[QUOTE="aDDiKt24"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4-MoOkS-

Another system wars fanboy who knows nothing.

Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.

Exactly. But the X360, the lead console?

Avatar image for archpro
archpro

981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 archpro
Member since 2007 • 981 Posts
Since when has GTA been about graphics, you must be a lemming. I've played san andreas for hours a day even though I had a better looking PS2 and PC game o_o.
Avatar image for Dr_Neptune
Dr_Neptune

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 Dr_Neptune
Member since 2007 • 510 Posts

One Big Step for GTA fans..one little step for ppl new 2 the series...

LinKuei_warrior

yeah... gta was never about the graphics for me. im buying it for the story.

Avatar image for IceCold54
IceCold54

265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#27 IceCold54
Member since 2005 • 265 Posts
They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4-MoOkS-

Wow, i've never experienced a true fanboy and this is my first time. I try to avoid these forums cause of ppl like this. This guy is ridiculous.

Avatar image for Live_to_kill
Live_to_kill

138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Live_to_kill
Member since 2007 • 138 Posts

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.foxhound_fox


Weird... because the PS3 is not the best system graphically or technically... the PC is.

The PC not only takes time to upgrade, but playing too long means more screen glare and sore eyesthan you would get from a typical widescreen TV. Plus, there's lots of fun games which are console exclusive.

Avatar image for wiirdawgs
wiirdawgs

556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 wiirdawgs
Member since 2007 • 556 Posts
NO ur the onl7y one who feels that way.
Avatar image for Wartzay
Wartzay

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Wartzay
Member since 2006 • 2036 Posts
looks about on the level of half life 2. Thats perfectly fine for me.
Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.foxhound_fox


Weird... because the PS3 is not the best system graphically or technically... the PC is.

riiiight so every pc is more powerful and better than a ps3? wrong. Although you can get parts that make a pc more powerful. And dont even bother bringing pc into gaming discussions the only ones that mater are ps3, 360 and the wii because pc gaming is practically extinct.
Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

20088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 20088 Posts

What did you expect - Gears of War graphics on a GTA-sized map? Ha! Not this gen! (For consoles, anyway.)

Anyway, GTA is the sort of game that benefits from having huge areas to play around in - Rockstar would be stupid to sacrifice huge city maps in favour of great graphics.

Avatar image for sadikovic
sadikovic

3868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 sadikovic
Member since 2004 • 3868 Posts
[QUOTE="Lazy_Boy88"]

You probably aren't the only one but I think it looks great. You've got to realize here the scale, level of detail, and amount of stuff going on all at once. It's either big scale like GTA and Lair. Or small scale with super detail like Mass Effect cut-scenes.

Personally I really prefer the huge open game with tons of stuff going over a couple pretty character models.

1carus

Uuuh, Mass Effect is on the big scale.

And I know games were never about the graphics, and I really couldn't care if GTA has good or bad graphics, but saying it's on the big scale isn't really an excuse (well it is, I guess), because other games like Oblivion, Morrowind, Gothic 3 all capture big worlds with great graphics.

But I'm not complaining, they really don't look that bad, and hell, when you're crusing through the city it'll look awesome anyway.

True but GTA needs to runny steady because there just more action in the game than "oblivion" or "mass effect", those games have like 10 people maximum fighting at once and GTA will have helicopters/police/cars guns fights explosions running all at the same time.

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts
GTA has never had pretty visuals, it's always about scale.
Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.-MoOkS-


Weird... because the PS3 is not the best system graphically or technically... the PC is.

riiiight so every pc is more powerful and better than a ps3? wrong. Although you can get parts that make a pc more powerful. And dont even bother bringing pc into gaming discussions the only ones that mater are ps3, 360 and the wii because pc gaming is practically extinct.

8 million plus WoW addicts would have to disagree with that statement.

Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts

so every person who has ever logged on to WoW is an addict? WRONG 8million people dont play daily

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

so every person who has ever logged on to WoW is an addict? WRONG 8million people dont play daily

-MoOkS-

According to Blizzard it's 8 million active accounts, meaning 8 million accounts that play regularly.

Avatar image for -MoOkS-
-MoOkS-

528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 -MoOkS-
Member since 2006 • 528 Posts
no im sure they said subscribers meaning signed up, and 8mill addicts to me means theyd be on daily and im sure theres not that many on
Avatar image for Zerostatic0
Zerostatic0

4263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#39 Zerostatic0
Member since 2005 • 4263 Posts
[QUOTE="aDDiKt24"]

[QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4-MoOkS-

Another system wars fanboy who knows nothing.

Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.

ahh, so last generation you had an Xbox (because that was the most powerful), and the generation before that you had a Nintendo 64 (again, that was the most powerful from that gen), and before that you had an Atari Jaguar or a 3D0 instead of the weaker SNES or Genesis. Is that correct?
Avatar image for Nin360
Nin360

707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Nin360
Member since 2007 • 707 Posts

Still? I actually think that spiderman 3 the game looks then it




numba1234

You need glasses. Those pictures are stunning. Do you see the amount of stuff going on and the level of detail. I would go as far as say the best looking game I have seen this generation so far. Atleast a 9 on the graphics scale.

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

no im sure they said subscribers meaning signed up, and 8mill addicts to me means theyd be on daily and im sure theres not that many on-MoOkS-

No, 8 million active accounts. And it's not just WoW that destroys your arguement, look at all the people that still play Counter Strike, StarCraft, Command and Conquer, Enemy Territory, etc. PC gaming is far from dead.

Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8287 Posts

The game is lagging like hell :?

Avatar image for Danthegamingman
Danthegamingman

19978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#43 Danthegamingman
Member since 2003 • 19978 Posts

I think it's the art style that is bothering some people, the graphics are actually good IMO.

If people can say they don't like the way Lair or Halo3 or the cartoon Zelda looks.....I guess some will say they don't like the art sytle of GTA4. It's looks good enough although I never really cared for GTA games. Just something disturbing about them. I can play a FPS game like Halo and get into it but I tried the old GTA2 and it was...bleh.

darthogre
Gamers complained about Crackdowns art style as well but I thought it looked cool with itscell shaded likestyle (it wasn't true cell shading). Same here with GTA4, I see nothing wrong here, It's not going to have realistic like graphics, GTA has always had a touch of cartoony style graphics to it like on its box covers.
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
It looks really good, seriously a lot of people here have really really high standards. Do some of you guys even realize the scale of this game? I mean things have to be scaled back slightly for everything to run well. The PS3 and Xbox 360have limits, flaws, and aren't the super computers some of you think they are.
Avatar image for coolviper2003
coolviper2003

1915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 coolviper2003
Member since 2003 • 1915 Posts
to be honest i really do not see anything that could not be done on the PS2.bc226
You're joking right? Then why do the GTA games on the PS2 look nothing like GTA4?
Avatar image for Pariah_001
Pariah_001

4850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Pariah_001
Member since 2003 • 4850 Posts

The graphics may not be as extensive as other games, but it certainly delivers as far as upgrade goes.

Plus, Rockstar has a particular style that really transcends graphics. Saint's Row was superior in the graphics department, but the GTA brand remains the preferred franchise among consumers. 2 Days 2 Vegas is looking better than both of those games so far, but whether or not they'll exceed Rockstar's ingenuity has yet to be seen.

Avatar image for buuzer0
buuzer0

3792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 buuzer0
Member since 2005 • 3792 Posts

They had to downgrade it so the 360 can run it. If they made the ps3 the main priority we'd see graphics on par with HAZE and MGS4-MoOkS-

:|
* Points and Laughs * :lol:

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="-MoOkS-"]Im not a fanboy, i just like the system thats the best and i know that GTA would look better if ps3 was the main priority.-MoOkS-


Weird... because the PS3 is not the best system graphically or technically... the PC is.

riiiight so every pc is more powerful and better than a ps3? wrong. Although you can get parts that make a pc more powerful. And dont even bother bringing pc into gaming discussions the only ones that mater are ps3, 360 and the wii because pc gaming is practically extinct.



:|

* Points and laughs * :lol:

Whew... I thought that blatant ignorance like this died off months ago around here. Guess I was wrong!

Keep it up, you are a riot.

Avatar image for wiirdawgs
wiirdawgs

556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 wiirdawgs
Member since 2007 • 556 Posts


riiiight so every pc is more powerful and better than a ps3? wrong. Although you can get parts that make a pc more powerful. And dont even bother bringing pc into gaming discussions the only ones that mater are ps3, 360 and the wii because pc gaming is practically extinct.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:. That is he dumbest thing i have ever heard on sytem wars ever :lol:

Avatar image for commando611
commando611

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 commando611
Member since 2007 • 1728 Posts
its the gameplay that counts...in a gta game.
Avatar image for rocket9434
rocket9434

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 rocket9434
Member since 2006 • 2665 Posts
What do you except its a GTA game! There not going to blow you away with graphics, they blow you away with gameplay! Anyway those pictures look very nice for a GTA game. Also Rockstar does not focus a whole lot on graphics.