And gamers consider this the best FPS!? ....

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Medal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

Half Life 2is the best FPS out there in my opinion. If we're talking competetive though, then nothing comes close to touching Halo 2 in my opinion.

Looks great to me :D reminds me of COD4. Dont think camping will be an issue, 1. they wont get many kills( your not being rewarded like in MW2) 2. Campers are easy to kill once you know the camping spots. And the knifing looked fine to me nothing like in MW2 where you could get knifed from a mile away.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

soapandbubbles

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

Thing is on the video you posted the guy is playing on Trianing mode with bots, no wonder he's getting too many kills o and im getting more excited now. MoH still not sure, beta wasnt that great

the shotgun sounds beastly in this game :P

I still consider Doom II the best FPS, especially considering that over 15 years later the mod community is STILL going and the game never gets old. In that time no one will remember a specific Call of Duty or Halo because the newest one will be getting the limelight.

Damn TC you just raised my hype :D

Anyway the game look fine. I didn't see anything wrong with it.

That was just stupid. I felt like I was watching a ninja battle with all the use of the knives.

Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.soapandbubbles

MEDAL OF HONOR FTW PC Beta is 2 days, I got hopes.

BTW: I love how I had to watch a MoH as before seeing the footage. =D

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

soapandbubbles

wow...you gave a 360 game credit for being good, YOU??? i am in shockism:shock:

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

xYamatox

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

TC, the game looks fine. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Your ranting about a game you don't even care about WILL NOT make a difference to one, let alone the millions of players who will be ENJOYING the game, as opposed to spending their free time hating on it...

Noone said BO would be the best FPS apart from the guy that started that other topic.

I personally consider Shadow of Chernobyl to be the best FPS, closely followed by Crysis, Oddworld: Stranger's Wrath, and Half-Life 2.

meh never really liked Cod or medal of honor outside of WaW, Ive always been more of a sci fi shooter kinda guy.

TC, the game looks fine. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Your ranting about a game you don't even care about WILL NOT make a difference to one, let alone the millions of players who will be ENJOYING the game, as opposed to spending their free time hating on it...

xYamatox

That was just stupid. I felt like I was watching a ninja battle with all the use of the knives.

Casboof

Its smart using your knife, its faster than using your gun,rather use knife than waste ammo. Plus charging at someone with your knife will usually distract the average player, and will likely spray bullets and miss... and that point you just knife him.

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

soapandbubbles

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

I don't understand the mind set behind dying faster = less skill. If anything I would assume someone who can dominate in a game where life total is so small would be MORE skill based than anything. Sure, people will spout out the "camping" excuse, but let's be honest here: Most players who go 40 - 10 are usually in a TACTICAL position, defending objective points. If this is considered camping, then by all mean, camp away.

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

xYamatox

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

halo definitely caters to noobs too.

but imo there is a little more depth beneath the surface than in COD.

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"][QUOTE="xYamatox"]

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

xYamatox

I don't understand the mind set behind dying faster = less skill. If anything I would assume someone who can dominate in a game where life total is so small would be MORE skill based than anything. Sure, people will spout out the "camping" excuse, but let's be honest here: Most players who go 40 - 10 are usually in a TACTICAL position, defending objective points. If this is considered camping, then by all mean, camp away.

i dont know how dying faster mean less skill. COD rewards shooting first, halo rewards shooting consistently.... when it comes to aiming i dont think there is much of a case for COD requiring more skill.

i personally tend to hate camping so im very bias, but i could see there is a good argument that camping well and strategically placing yourself is a skill in itself.

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

xYamatox

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

Halo actually takes skill to play, its easy to get into and its hard to master. Granted teh skill gap is not as High as say Starcraft, Counterstrike or Quake, but in terms of consoles its one of the most balanced games on console shooter market, both Halo 3 and Halo reach. In Halo reach their is agun used for every situation, every weapon can be a tool of destruction in the right hands, their is reticle bloom, you have to concentrate and keep steady rate of fire as the more you spam the lss accrate the weapon becomes. Its very balanced and fun. Call of duty has become broken since they added perks like "steadyaim, which is an extra aimbot, or stopping power or Extra damage" Halo has non of this nonsense, and rarely anyone camps in Halo unless you playing swat or snipers on a big open map. In halo there is Far less camping, its more of a toned down tactialArena shooter, so basically slower version of unreal/quake with Tf2 elements into it and it manages to have it sown flavor.

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Medal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

soapandbubbles

I love how he just knifes everyone cause no one can aim with those controllers.

EDIT: Oh they are bots. Makes sense. :P

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Metal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

AiurProtoss

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

Halo actually takes skill to play, its easy to get into and its hard to master. Granted teh skill gap is not as High as say Starcraft, Counterstrike or Quake, but in terms of consoles its one of the most balanced games on console shooter market, both Halo 3 and Halo reach. In Halo reach their is agun used for every situation, every weapon can be a tool of destruction in the right hands, their is reticle bloom, you have to concentrate and keep steady rate of fire as the more you spam the lss accrate the weapon becomes. Its very balanced and fun. Call of duty has become broken since they added perks like "steadyaim, which is an extra aimbot, or stopping power or Extra damage" Halo has non of this nonsense, and rarely anyone camps in Halo unless you playing swat or snipers on a big open map. In halo there is Far less camping, its more of a toned down tactialArena shooter, so basically slower version of unreal/quake with Tf2 elements into it and it manages to have it sown flavor.

[QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Medal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

DragonfireXZ95

I have no problem shooting people in FPS with a controller the guy just sucks. its eally not hard to use one, I can switch back and forth from Gampad to mouse and keyboard, its a matter of not being a noob and knowing how to use both.

[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="soapandbubbles"]

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/wager-match-call-of/703938

Lol, and COD fans wonder why it gets so much hate.

The handguns shoot like machine guns, knifing is so damn overpowered and stupid, die and kill way to easily...it's like playing in fast foward, one of the most unbalanced games, No satisfaction/skill in killing someone, it just who shoots who first..that's it. These type of games result in constant camping because of it. It's so popular because it's made for noobs, anyone can pick up and get loads of kills thanks to the insane autoaim system. Majority of the praise seems to be coming from customizations...whoopty doo.

IMO, Medal of Honor not only looks better, realistically and graphically..but plays better too.

Halo Reach kills them all. IMO.

AiurProtoss

I have no problem shooting people in FPS with a controller the guy just sucks. its eally not hard to use one, I can switch back and forth from Gampad to mouse and keyboard, its a matter of not being a noob and knowing how to use both.

[QUOTE="AiurProtoss"]

[QUOTE="xYamatox"]

So if catering to noobs is the way to make an FPS popular, what's your excuse for Halo...?

DragonfireXZ95

Halo actually takes skill to play, its easy to get into and its hard to master. Granted teh skill gap is not as High as say Starcraft, Counterstrike or Quake, but in terms of consoles its one of the most balanced games on console shooter market, both Halo 3 and Halo reach. In Halo reach their is agun used for every situation, every weapon can be a tool of destruction in the right hands, their is reticle bloom, you have to concentrate and keep steady rate of fire as the more you spam the lss accrate the weapon becomes. Its very balanced and fun. Call of duty has become broken since they added perks like "steadyaim, which is an extra aimbot, or stopping power or Extra damage" Halo has non of this nonsense, and rarely anyone camps in Halo unless you playing swat or snipers on a big open map. In halo there is Far less camping, its more of a toned down tactialArena shooter, so basically slower version of unreal/quake with Tf2 elements into it and it manages to have it sown flavor.

If you played Rumble pit or social slayer than yes but if you actually played the competetive gametypes aka the MLG playlist, the Objective playlist than it was very deep, custom timings, weapon spawn timings, knowing how to spawn lock, baiting and switching, success is earned by teamwork in that game not anyone can jsut completely dominate unless the other team has noobs. and yes Halo reach Is by far better than Halo 3, it has more depth now due to armor abilities but even without AA, the return of Health packs adds more intense shoot outs, the reticle bloom. Competitive Halo is acutally really deep and fun, its just that noobs cant handle it or understand it and would rather just sit in a corner and get easy kills.

Damn TC you just raised my hype :D

Anyway the game look fine. I didn't see anything wrong with it.

timmy00

He's facing bots.:|

obviously every one is forgetting the greatness that is goldeneye007 , and that is coming back on the wii this time