I don't know about anyone else but i'm getting fed up with all these '360 vs ps3 graphics' threads that never get resolved.
On one hand lemmings say that the 360 has better looking multiplats and on the other hand cows say the ps3 has better looking exclusives. It could be argued that the ps3 needs more development time which is the reason for the mediocre looking multiplats. However, i think the answer is simple:
Most 360 games graphics > Most ps3 games graphics
We can argue all day over which is the current graphics king - gears 2, mgs4, uncharted etc. But at the end of the day if graphics were the only variable taken into account; if you want a system with all round better graphics in most games get a 360. If you want a system with inferior graphics in most titles but with an exclusive or two that is said to look a little better than what the 360 offers, get a ps3. Personally I don't understand how can poeple say the ps3 is the graphics king when most other games look inferior. It shouldn't matter which system is the hardest to develop for or what pushes the most numbers on paper all we have to look at is the games. In my oppinion there is no evidence that ps3 exlusives such as killzone 2 and uncharted can't be done on the 360 so my vote goes to the 360.
Log in to comment