Another WOW OMG KZ2 Destructibility Thread (cool pics inside) (56k go away )

Here are some cool kz2 destructibility pics :

I'm tired of thse kind of threads but you guys seem to like them :D 

+I was bored.

Enjoy :) 

Honestly not really impressive.

the destruction really isnt in area's that really change the pace of the game.

These threads suck, no offence OP, bc this was done last gen, why are we hyping this? I don't remember lemmings doing this with GEOW2 and we should not be doing it now.

it's a shame the damage is incredibly superficial. 

you'd think with the power of the cell and a crazy budget they could beat destruction from games that came our for PS2 (red faction anybody?).

for kz2 its just facades on walls and pillars that can be destroyed - and funny enough there is no bullet penetration, which also really sucks for a next gen shooter. 

Honestly not really impressive.

the destruction really isnt in area's that really change the pace of the game.

impattack420

Should it be in ares that change the pace of the game? i think it's just for show :P 

it's a shame the damage is incredibly superficial. 

you'd think with the power of the cell and a crazy budget they could beat destruction from games that came our for PS2 (red faction anybody?).

for kz2 its just facades on walls and pillars that can be destroyed - and funny enough there is no bullet penetration, which also really sucks for a next gen shooter. 

3picuri3

Oh no the game is doomed :P. No bullet penetration. Not having it is totally acceptable considering how amazing the game looks. The lighting, processing effects, animations, hit response system excel compared to other console shooters to make up for no bullet penetration IMO.

Also, when you say bullet penetration do you mean shooting through walls? If so, that's a game design that has that the "power of the cell" can handle since COD4 has it ;). 

there are now three killzone 2 threads on the front page of system wars, a videogame forum

a **** sequel to a **** flop from **** developers

there are now three killzone 2 threads on the front page of system wars, a videogame forum

a **** sequel to a **** flop from **** developers

MarloStanfield

That's acceptable I guess given their pedigree. But if KZ score AA-AAA will you take that back? 

there are now three killzone 2 threads on the front page of system wars, a videogame forum

a **** sequel to a **** flop from **** developers

MarloStanfield

Anyway Kz2 looks pretty cool, i think it'll score AA-AAA :P 

[QUOTE="MarloStanfield"]

there are now three killzone 2 threads on the front page of system wars, a videogame forum

a **** sequel to a **** flop from **** developers

Al3x_n90

Anyway Kz2 looks pretty cool, i think it'll score AA-AAA :P 

3 more months and everyone will see why KZ2 will be a great shooter. Can't do much but debate as of now...

[QUOTE="3picuri3"]

it's a shame the damage is incredibly superficial. 

you'd think with the power of the cell and a crazy budget they could beat destruction from games that came our for PS2 (red faction anybody?).

for kz2 its just facades on walls and pillars that can be destroyed - and funny enough there is no bullet penetration, which also really sucks for a next gen shooter. 

TREAL_Since

Oh no the game is doomed :P. No bullet penetration. Not having it is totally acceptable considering how amazing the game looks. The lighting, processing effects, animations, hit response system excel compared to other console shooters to make up for no bullet penetration IMO.

Also, when you say bullet penetration do you mean shooting through walls? If so, that's a game design that has that the "power of the cell" can handle since COD4 has it ;). 

guess we all know what makes a game good for you - guess it's graphics :) pretty obvious.

i care about other things though Treal, sorry mate. and if COD4 can do bullet pen, why the hell can't KZ2 - lazy devs I guess that are too concerned getting their knock-offs of other games perfect instead of spending the time to make sure this is a fully realized next gen shooter. 

there are now three killzone 2 threads on the front page of system wars, a videogame forum

a **** sequel to a **** flop from **** developers

MarloStanfield

When Crysis does destructibile environments everyone says: "cool"
When Killzone 2 does them its: "OMG TEH GR8TAST THING EVAR! CONSOLE INNOVATION AT ITS FINEST!"

Edit: Though I have to admit it's about damn time there is a PS3 game with good looking textures.foxhound_fox

Lemmings and Cows don't care about PC games I guess. It's a war between PS3 and 360 for many. Plus I don't think anyone ever said destructability in KZ2 was innovation at it's finest :?. It looking really good/amazing is what I've been reading from cows and multiplat gamers.

Why are the cows so impressed by destructibility? I didn't see the lemmings going crazy over the same type of destructibility that is in Gears of War 2.AAllxxjjnn

guess we all know what makes a game good for you - guess it's graphics :) pretty obvious.

i care about other things though Treal, sorry mate. and if COD4 can do bullet pen, why the hell can't KZ2 - lazy devs I guess that are too concerned getting their knock-offs of other games perfect instead of spending the time to make sure this is a fully realized next gen shooter.

3picuri3

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]

it's a shame the damage is incredibly superficial. 

you'd think with the power of the cell and a crazy budget they could beat destruction from games that came our for PS2 (red faction anybody?).

for kz2 its just facades on walls and pillars that can be destroyed - and funny enough there is no bullet penetration, which also really sucks for a next gen shooter. 

3picuri3

Oh no the game is doomed :P. No bullet penetration. Not having it is totally acceptable considering how amazing the game looks. The lighting, processing effects, animations, hit response system excel compared to other console shooters to make up for no bullet penetration IMO.

Also, when you say bullet penetration do you mean shooting through walls? If so, that's a game design that has that the "power of the cell" can handle since COD4 has it ;). 

guess we all know what makes a game good for you - guess it's graphics :) pretty obvious.

i care about other things though Treal, sorry mate. and if COD4 can do bullet pen, why the hell can't KZ2 - lazy devs I guess that are too concerned getting their knock-offs of other games perfect instead of spending the time to make sure this is a fully realized next gen shooter. 

- Then Gears and Halo 3 weren't impressive for not doing bullet penetration (graphics wise)? 

- Hey don't tell me I think graphics make a game :evil:. They can defintely make one better! Atmosphere is very important for a shooter :).

- Bullet penetration isn't a testament of a game being great graphically. It's mostly a gameplay design this gen (since both the 360 and PS3 can handle it with ease... it could have been done last gen actually!)

- Games like Gears, Halo 3, Far Cry 2, Resistance 2, and KZ2 don't go that route. They focus on other things as far as game design is concerened. It's extremely picky to dog KZ2 out for having no bullet penetration when it does many other things so well :). Now if you dogged it our for not having online co-op for SP then that would absolutely legitimate.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]When Crysis does destructibile environments everyone says: "cool"
When Killzone 2 does them its: "OMG TEH GR8TAST THING EVAR! CONSOLE INNOVATION AT ITS FINEST!"

Edit: Though I have to admit it's about damn time there is a PS3 game with good looking textures.TREAL_Since

Lemmings and Cows don't care about PC games I guess. It's a war between PS3 and 360 for many. Plus I don't think anyone ever said destructability in KZ2 was innovation at it's finest :?. It looking really good/amazing is what I've been reading from cows and multiplat gamers.

 I actually was bored, found these pics, posted them.

The pc is at a whole other level :P no need to mention that... :) PC destroys consoles 

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Why are the cows so impressed by destructibility? I didn't see the lemmings going crazy over the same type of destructibility that is in Gears of War 2.foxhound_fox

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="3picuri3"]

it's a shame the damage is incredibly superficial. 

you'd think with the power of the cell and a crazy budget they could beat destruction from games that came our for PS2 (red faction anybody?).

for kz2 its just facades on walls and pillars that can be destroyed - and funny enough there is no bullet penetration, which also really sucks for a next gen shooter. 

3picuri3

Oh no the game is doomed :P. No bullet penetration. Not having it is totally acceptable considering how amazing the game looks. The lighting, processing effects, animations, hit response system excel compared to other console shooters to make up for no bullet penetration IMO.

Also, when you say bullet penetration do you mean shooting through walls? If so, that's a game design that has that the "power of the cell" can handle since COD4 has it ;). 

guess we all know what makes a game good for you - guess it's graphics :) pretty obvious.

i care about other things though Treal, sorry mate. and if COD4 can do bullet pen, why the hell can't KZ2 - lazy devs I guess that are too concerned getting their knock-offs of other games perfect instead of spending the time to make sure this is a fully realized next gen shooter. 

Graphics certainly don't make a game, but they are important.

You enjoy a game more when it has eye candy and big booms and stuff...

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]When Crysis does destructibile environments everyone says: "cool"
When Killzone 2 does them its: "OMG TEH GR8TAST THING EVAR! CONSOLE INNOVATION AT ITS FINEST!"

Edit: Though I have to admit it's about damn time there is a PS3 game with good looking textures.Al3x_n90

Lemmings and Cows don't care about PC games I guess. It's a war between PS3 and 360 for many. Plus I don't think anyone ever said destructability in KZ2 was innovation at it's finest :?. It looking really good/amazing is what I've been reading from cows and multiplat gamers.

 I actually was bored, found these pics, posted them.

The pc is at a whole other level :P no need to mention that... :) PC destroys consoles 

Of course! PC owns (still saving up to build my uber PC and get back into my Hermit mode :))

Since the PC and Wii are in leagues of their own, most people in SW care about debating 360 and PS3. 

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Why are the cows so impressed by destructibility? I didn't see the lemmings going crazy over the same type of destructibility that is in Gears of War 2.foxhound_fox

Last bastion of hope? the ps3 is just starting to show what it's capable of, idk what you mean by that really, the ps3 had a great year in terms of games and sales :| 

[QUOTE="3picuri3"]

guess we all know what makes a game good for you - guess it's graphics :) pretty obvious.

i care about other things though Treal, sorry mate. and if COD4 can do bullet pen, why the hell can't KZ2 - lazy devs I guess that are too concerned getting their knock-offs of other games perfect instead of spending the time to make sure this is a fully realized next gen shooter.

JLF1

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
You wouldn't have liked it here earlier this year then.

Half of the first page could be filled with Fable 2 thread with just pictures of trees (With 10k leaves on each one of them).MarloStanfield

What is the point?

With my post or filling up the first page with stupid threads? JLF1

the latter. 

Molyneux is known for outlandish claims, and while he was good with bullfrog since then all he had was fable

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Why are the cows so impressed by destructibility? I didn't see the lemmings going crazy over the same type of destructibility that is in Gears of War 2.foxhound_fox

That's the problem. We haven't seen all of KZ2, we've only read about it. These vids are from regular gamers in the MP beta and don't show off cool features like the clan system, c1asses, squad system. Dynamic matches are shown though which is a really cool new idea for online gaming.

[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Why are the cows so impressed by destructibility? I didn't see the lemmings going crazy over the same type of destructibility that is in Gears of War 2.foxhound_fox

it's a shame the damage is incredibly superficial. 

you'd think with the power of the cell and a crazy budget they could beat destruction from games that came our for PS2 (red faction anybody?).

uh, the system is also rendering awesome graphics at the same time. :? What do expect? Bad Company-esque destructability with those graphics?

for kz2 its just facades on walls and pillars that can be destroyed - and funny enough there is no bullet penetration, which also really sucks for a next gen shooter. 

the point is that the cosmetic destructability is still immersive and goes a long way to making the enviorment feel real. oh yes, and not every other shooter coming out has caught on to COD's bullet penetration either.

3picuri3

I would also like to add that KZ2 and COD4 have different native resolutions. That also makes a difference for what is possible to include in a game.

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]

 

Lemmings and Cows don't care about PC games I guess. It's a war between PS3 and 360 for many. Plus I don't think anyone ever said destructability in KZ2 was innovation at it's finest :?. It looking really good/amazing is what I've been reading from cows and multiplat gamers.

TREAL_Since

 I actually was bored, found these pics, posted them.

The pc is at a whole other level :P no need to mention that... :) PC destroys consoles 

Of course! PC owns (still saving up to build my uber PC and get back into my Hermit mode :))

Since the PC and Wii are in leagues of their own, most people in SW care about debating 360 and PS3. 

Yeah i'm still saving money as well, my 2 year old pc with a 7600gt and a 3200+ amd athlon maxed most games at it's time of glory(including bioshock).Now i can only play games like far cry 2 on medium :( Jeez these devs are graphic monster :P 

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Why are the cows so impressed by destructibility? I didn't see the lemmings going crazy over the same type of destructibility that is in Gears of War 2.Al3x_n90

Last bastion of hope? the ps3 is just starting to show what it's capable of, idk what you mean by that really, the ps3 had a great year in terms of games and sales :| 

True. I guess everyone is ignoring 2 AAAE and 1 AAAAE just for 2008 alone :(.

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
With my post or filling up the first page with stupid threads? MarloStanfield

the latter.

Molyneux is known for outlandish claims, and while he was good with bullfrog since then all he had was fable

ehhhh

really that new battlefield game was supposed to be about destructability and it's really kinda MEH.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]When Crysis does destructibile environments everyone says: "cool"
When Killzone 2 does them its: "OMG TEH GR8TAST THING EVAR! CONSOLE INNOVATION AT ITS FINEST!"

Edit: Though I have to admit it's about damn time there is a PS3 game with good looking textures.TREAL_Since

Lemmings and Cows don't care about PC games I guess. It's a war between PS3 and 360 for many. Plus I don't think anyone ever said destructability in KZ2 was innovation at it's finest :?. It looking really good/amazing is what I've been reading from cows and multiplat gamers.

Exactly, not to mention that such is to be expected on the PC. However, when a technically impressive game appears on a console, are we not supposed to remark on how impressive it is for a console game? Is that not allowed for some strange reason?

A pity that some folks are obviouisly offended by people making remarks on how good this game is looking, lol. Yes, we all know Crysis is "Teh SUpeRiorz", but for a current generation console game, KZ2 is looking mighty impressive indeed. It would seem the vast majority of the gaming media tends to agree as well. Too bad some folks are just too 'elite' to admit it though.

I don't really know.

JLF1

It pisses me off

PS3 is having a pretty great year and there's some great exclusives on it at last. MGS4 is awesome and LBP /R2 look really cool as well

Why the hell are people hyping crap like Killzone 2? Why not hype Fear 2? Why not hype MAG? Zipper and Monolith are ten times better than Guerilla. killzone 1 sucked

You too?! :( Last bastion of hope? This entire generation was bad for the PlayStation for it did have some good games. The shooter looks like COD4's to be honest but is there really a problem with that? I don't think you all realized but you have either catch on the bandwagon or Sony has made you angry with something and you have become ant-Sony. They could give you the world right now and you will find a reason to hate it. I honestly expected much better from you, Foxhound.Nerkcon

Lemming stop bashing great games, i could call Geow 2 "bland and run of the mill" too. WalterPaladines

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
I don't really know.

MarloStanfield

It pisses me off

PS3 is having a pretty great year and there's some great exclusives on it at last. MGS4 is awesome and LBP /R2 look really cool as well

Why the hell are people hyping crap like Killzone 2? Why not hype Fear 2? Why not hype MAG? Zipper and Monolith are ten times better than Guerilla. killzone 1 sucked

Yeah kz1 sucked, that's what will make KZ2 better:P 

+ nobody really has enough detail on MAG and fear2 to start the hype :P 

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]You too?! :( Last bastion of hope? This entire generation was bad for the PlayStation for it did have some good games. The shooter looks like COD4's to be honest but is there really a problem with that? I don't think you all realized but you have either catch on the bandwagon or Sony has made you angry with something and you have become ant-Sony. They could give you the world right now and you will find a reason to hate it. I honestly expected much better from you, Foxhound.foxhound_fox

Sorry, but that just came off, to me, as a string of generalizations. :?

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]Why are the cows so impressed by destructibility? I didn't see the lemmings going crazy over the same type of destructibility that is in Gears of War 2.TREAL_Since

That's the problem. We haven't seen all of KZ2, we've only read about it. These vids are from regular gamers in the MP beta and don't show off cool features like the clan system, c1asses, squad system. Dynamic matches are shown though which is a really cool new idea for online gaming.

Agreed,

All we know is that it looks great. The gameplay hasn't really been showned yet.

I don't think people hating on KZ2 in these threads really knows why they are created. No one is claiming KZ2 will be the best shooter ever because it looks great (at least no sane person). Coming in saying it's shallow only hyping a game for it's graphics comes of almost as damage control when only the graphics is known about the game.

This thread wasnt' created to bash Gears, Halo, Farcry Etc etc, it was created so that people looking forward to the game could at least see if the graphics (which is the only thing known about the game) is good.

We will judge the real game when it's released later next year.

[QUOTE="JLF1"]
I don't really know.

MarloStanfield

It pisses me off

PS3 is having a pretty great year and there's some great exclusives on it at last. MGS4 is awesome and LBP /R2 look really cool as well

Why the hell are people hyping crap like Killzone 2? Why not hype Fear 2? Why not hype MAG? Zipper and Monolith are ten times better than Guerilla. killzone 1 sucked

Um, who cares. It'll just be for looks, no important gameplay changes unlike in Battlefield Bad CompanyToriko42

Well it adds to the atmosphere. 

[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
Killzone 2 is the last bastion of hope to redeem Sony and the PS3. Anything that is shown about the game is hyped out the ass and around the corner. All these claims I've seen about Killzone 2 being "great" are just videos showing the environment destructibility and really bland, run-of-the-mill gameplay. Like the first Killzone, I'm guessing it's going to be all show and no go.JLF1

That's the problem. We haven't seen all of KZ2, we've only read about it. These vids are from regular gamers in the MP beta and don't show off cool features like the clan system, c1asses, squad system. Dynamic matches are shown though which is a really cool new idea for online gaming.

Agreed,

All we know is that it looks great. The gameplay hasn't really been showned yet.

I don't think people hating on KZ2 in these threads really knows why they are created. No one is claiming KZ2 will be the best shooter ever because it looks great (at least no sane person). Coming in saying it's shallow only hyping a game for it's graphics comes of almost as damage control when only the graphics is known about the game.

This thread wasnt' created to bash Gears, Halo, Farcry Etc etc, it was created so that people looking forward to the game could at least see if the graphics (which is the only thing known about the game) is good.

We will judge the real game when it's released later next year.

There you have it guys :P 

Anyways if some of you want i can post some beta gameplay vids :D