Any cows still calling Xbox 360 graphical capabilities teh Xflop 1.5?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

Avatar image for useLOGIC
useLOGIC

2802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 useLOGIC
Member since 2006 • 2802 Posts

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

AvIdGaMeR444

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
Left field.....
Avatar image for viper7721
viper7721

329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 viper7721
Member since 2006 • 329 Posts
It's well known that the 360's graphics are better than the PS3's graphics.  And this is not likely to change.
Avatar image for Vyse_The_Daring
Vyse_The_Daring

5318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Vyse_The_Daring
Member since 2003 • 5318 Posts
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

useLOGIC

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

Which is ignorant, just like he said.
Avatar image for useLOGIC
useLOGIC

2802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 useLOGIC
Member since 2006 • 2802 Posts
[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

Vyse_The_Daring

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

Which is ignorant, just like he said.

he said that gears "proved" something to cows... the only way it can "prove" something in their eyes is for their eyes to actually appreciate it. and theyre convinced its trash.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#7 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts
[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

useLOGIC

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

Which is ignorant, just like he said.

he said that gears "proved" something to cows... the only way it can "prove" something in their eyes is for their eyes to actually appreciate it. and theyre convinced its trash.

Well...they're Cows...

Avatar image for bluebrad1974
bluebrad1974

5162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 bluebrad1974
Member since 2005 • 5162 Posts
I think that Gears just hammered it home. I see 360 launch games that are currently better looking than anything for PS3.
Avatar image for vidiofreak
vidiofreak

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 vidiofreak
Member since 2003 • 427 Posts

99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.

Avatar image for Gayspotsucks
Gayspotsucks

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Gayspotsucks
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Gears of War owns the PS3 and the cows.

Ownage approved.

Avatar image for BK-Sleeper
BK-Sleeper

2686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#11 BK-Sleeper
Member since 2006 • 2686 Posts
[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

The_Game21x

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

Which is ignorant, just like he said.

he said that gears "proved" something to cows... the only way it can "prove" something in their eyes is for their eyes to actually appreciate it. and theyre convinced its trash.

Well...they're Cows...

Cows don't like anything that doesn't have the words "Playstaion 3" on the top of the box.
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts
Oblivion also can't run AA and HDR on PS3, verything looks washed out, no glows from the sun, flat colors and shadows, and jaggies everywhere
Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts

99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.

vidiofreak
MGS the original was one of the most amazing games I've ever played. The 2nd, was a massive disappointment and ruined the series for me. And I'm not alone of this matter. Let's remember the Halo series has all scored AAA, while MGS's big installment was AA.
Avatar image for chrismunx
chrismunx

3964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 chrismunx
Member since 2003 • 3964 Posts

It's well known that the 360's graphics are better than the PS3's graphics.  And this is not likely to change.viper7721

Hrm. I'll go on to say that Gears does look great, but it's also fact that the systems life is more older than the PS3. Then of course, it gets all turned around with "Launch vs Launch", then after that, a graphic pic whore piss fest. So on and so on. Why can't people just accept that by the end of this year, PS3 games potentially will look up to par with 360 games? This isn't up to Sony. It's up to the developer.

Avatar image for DrinkDuff
DrinkDuff

6762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 DrinkDuff
Member since 2004 • 6762 Posts
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

useLOGIC

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

That doesn't take away from the fact that Gears is a technical achievement and has raised the bar for ingame graphics for all systems. It proves that the 360 is graphically competitive with the PS3. Now that's pretty significant no matter what the cows say.
Avatar image for OXIIIIXO
OXIIIIXO

2337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 OXIIIIXO
Member since 2006 • 2337 Posts
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

useLOGIC

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.

Avatar image for Snowmanlovesyou
Snowmanlovesyou

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Snowmanlovesyou
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
Gears owns the cows. They are sad because of this.
Avatar image for chrismunx
chrismunx

3964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 chrismunx
Member since 2003 • 3964 Posts
[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

OXIIIIXO

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.

You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?

Avatar image for OXIIIIXO
OXIIIIXO

2337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 OXIIIIXO
Member since 2006 • 2337 Posts
[QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

chrismunx

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.

You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?

What were those guys smoking?

Avatar image for chrismunx
chrismunx

3964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 chrismunx
Member since 2003 • 3964 Posts
[QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

OXIIIIXO

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.

You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?

What were those guys smoking?

The good stuff no doubt :D

Avatar image for OXIIIIXO
OXIIIIXO

2337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 OXIIIIXO
Member since 2006 • 2337 Posts
[QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities. 

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

chrismunx

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.

You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?

What were those guys smoking?

The good stuff no doubt :D

Yeah, how else would they come up with something as ridiculous as that?

Avatar image for FearlessSpirit
FearlessSpirit

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#22 FearlessSpirit
Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts
[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

OXIIIIXO

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.



It's around 7 hours first playthrough on Casual. Which is for a special mode for newbies to gaming. Try Insane.

And there is nothing wrong with the way the story is told. There just isn't enough story there.
Avatar image for console_fanboy
console_fanboy

595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 console_fanboy
Member since 2006 • 595 Posts
Over a couple of years developers will find the hidden power of the PS3. If thats enough to beat the 360 in the graphix department? Dunno.... just wait.
Avatar image for Davis092
Davis092

1449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Davis092
Member since 2006 • 1449 Posts
[QUOTE="console_fanboy"]Over a couple of years developers will find the hidden power of the PS3. If thats enough to beat the 360 in the graphix department? Dunno.... just wait.

Teh 4-D!
Avatar image for OXIIIIXO
OXIIIIXO

2337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 OXIIIIXO
Member since 2006 • 2337 Posts
[QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

FearlessSpirit

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.



It's around 7 hours first playthrough on Casual. Which is for a special mode for newbies to gaming. Try Insane.

And there is nothing wrong with the way the story is told. There just isn't enough story there.

For a complete newb it's 7 hours on casual and that's understandable, but for a fan or experienced player it's only worth an afternoons play on hardcore.

Ok, it's not that bad, but just like you said, there isn't enough. Again, short game.

Avatar image for AzelKosMos
AzelKosMos

34194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 89

User Lists: 0

#26 AzelKosMos
Member since 2005 • 34194 Posts

It's well known that the 360's graphics are better than the PS3's graphics.  And this is not likely to change.viper7721

:| :lol: I laughed.

Yeah Gears looks amazing, it's dam short though, and the story and character development was a bit lacking. However...Cole Train is the man :wink:

Avatar image for thedarkomen
thedarkomen

859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 thedarkomen
Member since 2007 • 859 Posts
Looks are only skin deep. Real beauty grows from the inside out. Gameplay to graphics. I'm sorry that the best that could come out was a 7 hour adventure that was shorter than God of War. No doubt it's a great game, but if that's all you got man... then maybe you should consider a new system yeah?
Avatar image for PelekotansDream
PelekotansDream

7602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#28 PelekotansDream
Member since 2005 • 7602 Posts

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

Avatar image for chrismunx
chrismunx

3964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 chrismunx
Member since 2003 • 3964 Posts

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

PelekotansDream

I believe Mass Effect looks a whole lot better than Gears. Hell, even Bioshock looks better. What more could we possibly see in the next year? HD gaming gets brighter and brighter.

Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

PelekotansDream

There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end

Avatar image for PelekotansDream
PelekotansDream

7602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#31 PelekotansDream
Member since 2005 • 7602 Posts
[QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

tricyclon123

There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end

Hey, im just saying what cliffy said and I think he knows what he is talking about. If you wanna see for yourself its either on the GEARS bonus disc or on one of the vids you can download from the market place.
Avatar image for thedarkomen
thedarkomen

859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 thedarkomen
Member since 2007 • 859 Posts
[QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

tricyclon123

There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end

I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer.
Avatar image for Oemenia
Oemenia

10416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -2

User Lists: 0

#33 Oemenia
Member since 2003 • 10416 Posts
Because when PS4 roles around it will pwnt j00!
Avatar image for TripleXAlexXx
TripleXAlexXx

867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 TripleXAlexXx
Member since 2006 • 867 Posts
[QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]

GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.

Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.

OXIIIIXO

some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.

It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.

If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.



It's around 7 hours first playthrough on Casual. Which is for a special mode for newbies to gaming. Try Insane.

And there is nothing wrong with the way the story is told. There just isn't enough story there.

For a complete newb it's 7 hours on casual and that's understandable, but for a fan or experienced player it's only worth an afternoons play on hardcore.

Ok, it's not that bad, but just like you said, there isn't enough. Again, short game.

For a hardcore or experienced played it would take longer than an afternoon if you blindly ran through the whole game as fast as you could without slowing to explore, finding ANY cog tags, and ignoring all the beautiful, artistically driven scenery. Honestly. Quit being a fanboy, and quit acting like everyone can get through Gears in 4 hours. Or even 7 hours. (For their first time through, on hardcore.)
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts
[QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

thedarkomen

There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end

I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer.

So, in your opinion, how many textures does a game have, and how much space do they take on a disk ?

I would say 1.000 textures, by 1MB each = 1GB space !!!  I doubt compressed textures take up 1MB each though, maybe 0.5GB for 1000 textures or less

Avatar image for TripleXAlexXx
TripleXAlexXx

867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 TripleXAlexXx
Member since 2006 • 867 Posts
[QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

thedarkomen

There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end

I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer.

Space on whatever media format has nothing to do with it. Nothing. Hell, less than a year ago there were pc games that spanned across 5 or more cd's that have better graphics than any ps3 game. I guess we'll have to deal with 2 dvd9s someday. Oh well. Big deal. Seriously, are you that lazy that it matter so much? And game length has nothing to do with space either. They could have made Gears 14 hours if they put it on 2 dvd9s, right? But they didn't. Do you know why? Making a game is VERY expensive. Especially when your game is state of the art and surpasses all other games like it. It's going to be very difficult to create. And very expensive. And very time consuming. Get it, now? THAT's why we have short games these days.
Avatar image for Mass_Effect
Mass_Effect

1993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Mass_Effect
Member since 2006 • 1993 Posts
[QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]

Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.

Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.

thedarkomen

There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end

I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer.

The game isn't shortened because of limited disk space. Do you honestly think Epic would have spent extra money developing GeOW to be 40 hours long if it were made for Blu-ray? They would have given the same game but with better textures, they wouldn't have increased the length. Most games this gen are going to be short

Avatar image for gtx-1
gtx-1

901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 gtx-1
Member since 2007 • 901 Posts

99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.

vidiofreak

Halo would have been on the PS2. But..

  • Made by Rockstar
  • Canned
Avatar image for mathew952
mathew952

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#39 mathew952
Member since 2003 • 976 Posts
Have you noticed that cows will dis the crap out of a 360 game, say everything about it is horrible, and that gamespot is biased when it reviewed it. But as soon as the game is going to be brought to the PS3, " That gamez Roxorz, Look how good GS reviewed it. Now the PS# has even more great games"
Conflict of intrest, no?
Avatar image for Sgt_So_and_So
Sgt_So_and_So

1724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 Sgt_So_and_So
Member since 2005 • 1724 Posts
[QUOTE="vidiofreak"]

99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.

gtx-1

Halo would have been on the PS2. But..

  • Made by Rockstar
  • Canned

Halo would've been on Mac and then PC, if not for Microsoft.