GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
useLOGIC
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
Which is ignorant, just like he said.[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
Vyse_The_Daring
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
Which is ignorant, just like he said.he said that gears "proved" something to cows... the only way it can "prove" something in their eyes is for their eyes to actually appreciate it. and theyre convinced its trash.
[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
useLOGIC
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
Which is ignorant, just like he said.he said that gears "proved" something to cows... the only way it can "prove" something in their eyes is for their eyes to actually appreciate it. and theyre convinced its trash.
Well...they're Cows...
99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.
[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
The_Game21x
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
Which is ignorant, just like he said.he said that gears "proved" something to cows... the only way it can "prove" something in their eyes is for their eyes to actually appreciate it. and theyre convinced its trash.
Well...they're Cows...
Cows don't like anything that doesn't have the words "Playstaion 3" on the top of the box.MGS the original was one of the most amazing games I've ever played. The 2nd, was a massive disappointment and ruined the series for me. And I'm not alone of this matter. Let's remember the Halo series has all scored AAA, while MGS's big installment was AA.99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.
vidiofreak
It's well known that the 360's graphics are better than the PS3's graphics. And this is not likely to change.viper7721
Hrm. I'll go on to say that Gears does look great, but it's also fact that the systems life is more older than the PS3. Then of course, it gets all turned around with "Launch vs Launch", then after that, a graphic pic whore piss fest. So on and so on. Why can't people just accept that by the end of this year, PS3 games potentially will look up to par with 360 games? This isn't up to Sony. It's up to the developer.
[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
useLOGIC
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
That doesn't take away from the fact that Gears is a technical achievement and has raised the bar for ingame graphics for all systems. It proves that the 360 is graphically competitive with the PS3. Now that's pretty significant no matter what the cows say.[QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
useLOGIC
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
OXIIIIXO
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?
[QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
chrismunx
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?
What were those guys smoking?
[QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
OXIIIIXO
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?
What were those guys smoking?
The good stuff no doubt :D
[QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="chrismunx"][QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
chrismunx
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
You do know that Gears won the best dialog or whatever as an award at DICE, right?
What were those guys smoking?
The good stuff no doubt :D
Yeah, how else would they come up with something as ridiculous as that?
[QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
OXIIIIXO
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
[QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
FearlessSpirit
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
For a complete newb it's 7 hours on casual and that's understandable, but for a fan or experienced player it's only worth an afternoons play on hardcore.
Ok, it's not that bad, but just like you said, there isn't enough. Again, short game.
It's well known that the 360's graphics are better than the PS3's graphics. And this is not likely to change.viper7721
:| :lol: I laughed.
Yeah Gears looks amazing, it's dam short though, and the story and character development was a bit lacking. However...Cole Train is the man :wink:
Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
PelekotansDream
I believe Mass Effect looks a whole lot better than Gears. Hell, even Bioshock looks better. What more could we possibly see in the next year? HD gaming gets brighter and brighter.
Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
PelekotansDream
There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end
[QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
tricyclon123
There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end
Hey, im just saying what cliffy said and I think he knows what he is talking about. If you wanna see for yourself its either on the GEARS bonus disc or on one of the vids you can download from the market place.[QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
tricyclon123
There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end
I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer.[QUOTE="FearlessSpirit"][QUOTE="OXIIIIXO"][QUOTE="useLOGIC"][QUOTE="AvIdGaMeR444"]GeOW proved all the cows wrong about the Xbox 360 graphical capabilities.
Any cow who still is laughing at the 360's graphical capabilities is ignorant.
OXIIIIXO
some cows still dont believe gears is anything special, dont kid yourself.
It is special for the 4 hours(you dont have to be a pro) of gamplay, the really bad story telling, and the worst dialogue in shooter history.
If you can ignore all that, it has some really nice graphics, although everything is grey, and the gunplay is fun.
For a complete newb it's 7 hours on casual and that's understandable, but for a fan or experienced player it's only worth an afternoons play on hardcore.
Ok, it's not that bad, but just like you said, there isn't enough. Again, short game.
For a hardcore or experienced played it would take longer than an afternoon if you blindly ran through the whole game as fast as you could without slowing to explore, finding ANY cog tags, and ignoring all the beautiful, artistically driven scenery. Honestly. Quit being a fanboy, and quit acting like everyone can get through Gears in 4 hours. Or even 7 hours. (For their first time through, on hardcore.)[QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
thedarkomen
There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end
I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer.So, in your opinion, how many textures does a game have, and how much space do they take on a disk ?
I would say 1.000 textures, by 1MB each = 1GB space !!! I doubt compressed textures take up 1MB each though, maybe 0.5GB for 1000 textures or less
[QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
thedarkomen
There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end
I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer. Space on whatever media format has nothing to do with it. Nothing. Hell, less than a year ago there were pc games that spanned across 5 or more cd's that have better graphics than any ps3 game. I guess we'll have to deal with 2 dvd9s someday. Oh well. Big deal. Seriously, are you that lazy that it matter so much? And game length has nothing to do with space either. They could have made Gears 14 hours if they put it on 2 dvd9s, right? But they didn't. Do you know why? Making a game is VERY expensive. Especially when your game is state of the art and surpasses all other games like it. It's going to be very difficult to create. And very expensive. And very time consuming. Get it, now? THAT's why we have short games these days.[QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="PelekotansDream"]Cliffy did say on I think it was the bonus disc that they were pushing the limits of what the 360 can do. Just wanted to say.
Looks like we nearly seen the 360 at maximum power.
thedarkomen
There was NEVER a console that its first gameswere as good as the last ones, so Gears is about 30-50% of what 360 will get in the end
I don't know... I mean... there isn't THAT much space they can put on DVD9. It's essential that a console update its storage capability for more textures, etc. These 7 hour games just aren't cutting. The multi-player is what saves them...... I think you'll see one more game really take advantage of it, it won't be Halo 3 though. Halo 3 will look nothing like the CG trailer.The game isn't shortened because of limited disk space. Do you honestly think Epic would have spent extra money developing GeOW to be 40 hours long if it were made for Blu-ray? They would have given the same game but with better textures, they wouldn't have increased the length. Most games this gen are going to be short
99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.
vidiofreak
[QUOTE="vidiofreak"]99% of the PS3 fanboys have never played GoW. They just say it sucks because it's never going to the PS3. Which is why PS3 fanboys also say Halo sucks. And why Xbox 360 fanboys say MGS sucks. But in reality, they are all incredible.
gtx-1
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment