anyone seen hd killzone 2 gameplay?

Doesnt look nearly as impressive as the standard definition everyone what so hyped about , because you can see the ugly textures better, character models and stuff are alright, but world textures suck far from impressive.

even quakewars looks better.

http://gametrailers.com/player/21637.html

I saw the trailer on my PS3 with my HD tv. And I have to say it looked much better. The game is in pre-alpha, at that stage the focus is mostly on character models. Thats why the MGS trailer had bad textures when the game was in pre-alpha. Killzone looks AMAZING so far IGN said they have got 90% of the 2005 trailer down. The game will just keep getting better as it comes closer to the release date.MGS9150

l,ook at the steel grate wall so low res and crappy.

i can tell you that texture will still be in final game.

This game looks cool, but there's no jumping that sucks, automatically kinda suck.

plus the running speed is really slow.

the graphix are bad ass but the gameplay=yuck

the graphix are bad ass but the gameplay=yuck

OldParr

lol, the levels look cool, would be better you could explore nooks and cranniies and upper levels with jumping damn it, suckers just like killzone 1 no jumping :(

Yeah the textures suck in this game, didnt meet the CGI expections as far as im concerned, but its still in pre - alpha so things could change till releasedesktopdefender

best...sig...ever!

I'm not concerned about the graphics, but the gameplay is kinda dull...76ers

You've played it?

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

[QUOTE="76ers"]I'm not concerned about the graphics, but the gameplay is kinda dull...Soulja_West

You've played it?

LMAO i guess he did.

[QUOTE="76ers"]I'm not concerned about the graphics, but the gameplay is kinda dull...Soulja_West

You've played it?

You didnt hear they released the game in pre alpha stage at retail stores:o

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

desktopdefender

what exactly is there to deny?

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

desktopdefender

Why would we deny that.I can find pics of good textures too.The fact is the gm is in pre alpha and 6-9 months away.

[QUOTE="Soulja_West"]

[QUOTE="76ers"]I'm not concerned about the graphics, but the gameplay is kinda dull...wingman3030

You've played it?

You didnt hear they released the game in pre alpha stage at retail stores:o

Wow :shock: Where can I get the pre alpah stage retail at?

[QUOTE="desktopdefender"]

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

jujutheking

Why would we deny that.I can find pics of good textures too.The fact is the gm is in pre alpha and 6-9 months away.

But my point is that no mattar how hard the cows try, the game didnt match the trailer

Though it looks great!! 8/10

[QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"]

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

desktopdefender

Why would we deny that.I can find pics of good textures too.The fact is the gm is in pre alpha and 6-9 months away.

But my point is that no mattar how hard the cows try, the game didnt match the trailer

Though it looks great!! 8/10

It came close to the trailer and thats all that matters. WE never said that it would look EXACLTY like the trailer.

anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.ps3rulezzggdff

All devs approach the "Alpha, beta, gold" levels of development differently. Some work on textures and stuff later in development, other do it early. There is no set order of what to do first in development. :|

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.Not-A-Stalker

All devs approach the "Alpha, beta, gold" levels of development differently. Some work on textures and stuff later in development, other do it early. There is no set order of what to do first in development. :|

texture's are usually the first thing created.

funny how doom3's leaked alpha which wasnt even a alpha still had textures of the final game.

[QUOTE="desktopdefender"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"]

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

Soulja_West

Why would we deny that.I can find pics of good textures too.The fact is the gm is in pre alpha and 6-9 months away.

But my point is that no mattar how hard the cows try, the game didnt match the trailer

Though it looks great!! 8/10

It came close to the trailer and thats all that matters. WE never said that it would look EXACLTY like the trailer.

But plenty of them said it suppressed the trailer in graphics and was better than crysis:shock:

Now i think it looks great, but it didnt match the trailer i think, about 20% off i think

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.ps3rulezzggdff

All devs approach the "Alpha, beta, gold" levels of development differently. Some work on textures and stuff later in development, other do it early. There is no set order of what to do first in development. :|

texture's are usually the first thing created.

funny how doom3's leaked alpha which wasnt even a alpha still had textures of the final game.

Keyword is usually. Take Lair for example. They polished the graphics and textures after everything else. I even remember an article when a dev said that graphics were the last thing they were going work on.

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"][QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.Not-A-Stalker

All devs approach the "Alpha, beta, gold" levels of development differently. Some work on textures and stuff later in development, other do it early. There is no set order of what to do first in development. :|

texture's are usually the first thing created.

funny how doom3's leaked alpha which wasnt even a alpha still had textures of the final game.

Keyword is usually. Take Lair for example. They polished the graphics and textures after everything else. I even remember an article when a dev said that graphics were the last thing they were going work on.

still looks same.

anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.ps3rulezzggdff

Really? Is that why Halo 3 looked like crap when we saw the first alpha images of it? Look how much it's improved, in everything, including textures. Shows how much you know:roll:

How about we just wait until it comes out.

[QUOTE="Soulja_West"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"]

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

desktopdefender

Why would we deny that.I can find pics of good textures too.The fact is the gm is in pre alpha and 6-9 months away.

But my point is that no mattar how hard the cows try, the game didnt match the trailer

Though it looks great!! 8/10

It came close to the trailer and thats all that matters. WE never said that it would look EXACLTY like the trailer.

But plenty of them said it suppressed the trailer in graphics and was better than crysis:shock:

Now i think it looks great, but it didnt match the trailer i think, about 20% off i think

It came pretty close and all they need to do is fix the some of the textures.It's still in pre alpha stages and it looks pretty close.

while i agree the textures aren't the best (although they aren't bad either),

it's still the best looking and most technically advanced console game to date.

animations are leaguesbetter then any other FPS, plus there are a ton more things happening at once on screen. the lighting is insane, and as IGN stated, the polygon count is unbelievable.

it's not all about textures guys. even if the final build ends up looking like this, it would still be the best looking game. no one is saying killzone looks bad but you guys, seriously :|

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"][QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"][QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.ps3rulezzggdff

All devs approach the "Alpha, beta, gold" levels of development differently. Some work on textures and stuff later in development, other do it early. There is no set order of what to do first in development. :|

texture's are usually the first thing created.

funny how doom3's leaked alpha which wasnt even a alpha still had textures of the final game.

Keyword is usually. Take Lair for example. They polished the graphics and textures after everything else. I even remember an article when a dev said that graphics were the last thing they were going work on.

still looks same.

Lair? No. Lair looks much better. :lol: Go away fanboy.

[QUOTE="desktopdefender"][QUOTE="Soulja_West"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"]

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

jujutheking

Why would we deny that.I can find pics of good textures too.The fact is the gm is in pre alpha and 6-9 months away.

But my point is that no mattar how hard the cows try, the game didnt match the trailer

Though it looks great!! 8/10

It came close to the trailer and thats all that matters. WE never said that it would look EXACLTY like the trailer.

But plenty of them said it suppressed the trailer in graphics and was better than crysis:shock:

Now i think it looks great, but it didnt match the trailer i think, about 20% off i think

It came pretty close and all they need to do is fix the some of the textures.It's still in pre alpha stages and it looks pretty close.

hell i downloaded the trailer on psn to my PS3 and watched it on my 1080p sony bravia and i could still notice the terible textures

I think the games graphics wowed alot of people, and didnt seem to bother to look around them and see that GG were trying to hide alot of things

BTW ill post pictures for proof if you want

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.BrownWalrus

Really? Is that why Halo 3 looked like crap when we saw the first alpha images of it? Look how much it's improved, in everything, including textures. Shows how much you know:roll:

How about we just wait until it comes out.

Umm, did you even read previews? halo 3 alpha pictures were from multiplayer, and all previews said the single player looks much much better and they just now released single player shots.

the texture work is the same.

animations are leagues better then any other FPSleadernator

Bioshock?

[QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"][QUOTE="Soulja_West"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"][QUOTE="jujutheking"][QUOTE="desktopdefender"]

I like KZ2 graphicly i think it looks great

But you cows cant deny this

desktopdefender

Why would we deny that.I can find pics of good textures too.The fact is the gm is in pre alpha and 6-9 months away.

But my point is that no mattar how hard the cows try, the game didnt match the trailer

Though it looks great!! 8/10

It came close to the trailer and thats all that matters. WE never said that it would look EXACLTY like the trailer.

But plenty of them said it suppressed the trailer in graphics and was better than crysis:shock:

Now i think it looks great, but it didnt match the trailer i think, about 20% off i think

It came pretty close and all they need to do is fix the some of the textures.It's still in pre alpha stages and it looks pretty close.

hell i downloaded the trailer on psn to my PS3 and watched it on my 1080p sony bravia and i could still notice the terible textures

I think the games graphics wowed alot of people, and didnt seem to bother to look around them and see that GG were trying to hide alot of things

BTW ill post pictures for proof if you want

I already said that this is pre pre alpha

[QUOTE="leadernator"]

animations are leagues better then any other FPSZeliard9

Bioshock?

yes. and that's even considering that there's not nearly as much mayhem on screen in that game.

you can't downplay killzone2's graphics... don't waste your time folks.

anything alpha=game textures already complete just needing playtesting/optimizing/bug checks.ps3rulezzggdff

No, alpha is more optimization, and setting in the final gameplay stuff. Beta is testing, beta is when the graphics barley improve. Also if your trying to claim ownage with that you arent because A. your wrong about alpha, and B, its not even in alpha yet.

KZ2 looks amazing. I liked COD4 and Halo 3 better though. None the less, all the hype it is getting is just what sony wants.Sony hyped Killzone 1 as being the halo killer and is now hyping KZ2 as another halo killer. Aside from that, the graphics are amazing, and really saved sony's conference from the corny snore fest it was.elite_ferns1

even without KZ2, sony's conference was still the best overall.

KZ2 was at the very end of the conference, and to add to that we've pretty much seen everything during the KZ event.

sony's conference was good overall, because they were the only ones that focused on GAMES. exclusive ones at that too. MGS4, little big planet, GT5... calling it a 'snore fest' is a real big understatement.

microsoft gloated through half of the conference (with sales figures that aren't even that impressive), and emphasized on multiplatform games like GTAIV, COD4and Assassin's Creed.

nintendo... well, they were nintendo i guess.

Like everyone else has been saying. Yeah, it's pre-pre-alpha. The devs probably went into overdrive trying to finish it up and polish their demo for E3. They still have like a year to improve the textures...munu9

agreed just like AC.

Stop being a fanboy tomarlyn. SiegeTanksFTW

I'm not a fanboy, I've been a multi-plat gamer for for the last 12 years of the industry. I didn't even care for the PS3 until recently, the only new system I own so far is a Wii. I'm even a big Halo fan, so there.

GAMER