Anyone truly surprised at the way the PS3 is going right now?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ASK_Story
ASK_Story

11455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ASK_Story
Member since 2006 • 11455 Posts

I kind of am. I expected Sony to struggle because of the price but not like this.

What does everyone else think?

Avatar image for TheSpidren
TheSpidren

2565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 TheSpidren
Member since 2005 • 2565 Posts
Yeah I wasn't really expecting all this either. OH WELLZ
Avatar image for gsx1100
gsx1100

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 gsx1100
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts
Yeah I wasn't really expecting all this either. OH WELLZTheSpidren
Yeah the price is really hurting them at the mo.They should focus on the 20gb model a bit more.
Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts
I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction.
Avatar image for MikeB_74
MikeB_74

829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 MikeB_74
Member since 2007 • 829 Posts
i expected this the consoles last generation were $300 and to suddenly make it $930 canadian ( ps3 and warranty ) was just a dumb move and sony needs to lower the price.
Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts
I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction.
Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts
I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction.
Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts
I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction.
Avatar image for lucas_kelly
lucas_kelly

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 lucas_kelly
Member since 2005 • 5783 Posts
I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction.
Avatar image for VideoGameGuy
VideoGameGuy

7695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 VideoGameGuy
Member since 2002 • 7695 Posts
Well considering everything, i was kinda thinking it was going to go this way...i mean $600 is just TO MUCH!!
Avatar image for TheSpidren
TheSpidren

2565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 TheSpidren
Member since 2005 • 2565 Posts
I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction. lucas_kelly
Ohsnap at your (accidental) spammage! :| But yeah um, one could say they DID take the same route like they did with the PS2. But that's not a good thing. Times change, the world changes, the same strategy that worked 10 years ago might not work again now. They went with BluRay because it is a new format, and that's how they won before, mainly because of the new DVD format. But it's just not time for that yet. Oh sony.
Avatar image for LongshotX2
LongshotX2

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 LongshotX2
Member since 2006 • 842 Posts

I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction. lucas_kelly

There are many strategy similiarities between PS2 and PS3.

Dumdumdumdum.

 

(triple post ftw) 

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
You can't win with a $600 price tag. Period.
Avatar image for FatalDomain
FatalDomain

1783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 FatalDomain
Member since 2005 • 1783 Posts

As a gamer who has witnessed the rise and fall of several console leaders, I must say the fall of Sony this gen is truely surprising. As gamers we all have console preferences based on the genre of games we enjoy playing. I have been on both sides of the fence where i supported consoles that were dominate in the market and others that failed miserably.

With the extreme price of the PS3 I figured it would just be a close 2nd place system making the systems wars this gen similar the to Sega Genesis/SNES era where being a manticore meant you had the best of both worlds. Both systems were equal and played off each other strengths....one port of a blockbuster game would be better on SNES while another hit would be better on the Genesis. Each system being equally great with its exclusives and never really gaining the 1up on each other. Unfortunately this wont happen between the PS3and the 360 this gen because of the constant missteps of Sony.

I didnt think Sony would implode the way it has with the PS3 project. The numerous errors Sony made this gen you would think this was their first attempt in the console race.

-They priced themselves out of competition

-Hyped the performance of their system beyond realm of simply promoting and selling a product...they flat out lied!!! (ex. hyped late Dreamcast performance, launched with late PS1 performance...big difference!!!)

-Launched with no software...you would think they would have learned by now to launch with games!!!

The list goes on and on, but overall I would have never guessed the biggest enemy to the Playstation franchise would be Sony...

Game On....

Avatar image for Boba_Fett_3710
Boba_Fett_3710

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Boba_Fett_3710
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts

[QUOTE="lucas_kelly"]I am surprised because they dominated the market so much last gen. You would think they would put the strategies they used with the PS2 into place with the PS3 but insted they went in the opposite direction. LongshotX2


There are many strategy similiarities between PS2 and PS3.

Dumdumdumdum.

(triple post ftw)

Yeah, but the PS2 was never a hulking beast of a system priced at double the price of the original Playstation.
Avatar image for Gimp_Shard
Gimp_Shard

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Gimp_Shard
Member since 2006 • 104 Posts

As a gamer who has witnessed the rise and fall of several console leaders, I must say the fall of Sony this gen is truely surprising. As gamers we all have console preferences based on the genre of games we enjoy playing. I have been on both sides of the fence where i supported consoles that were dominate in the market and others that failed miserably.

With the extreme price of the PS3 I figured it would just be a close 2nd place system making the systems wars this gen similar the to Sega Genesis/SNES era where being a manticore meant you had the best of both worlds. Both systems were equal and played off each other strengths....one port of a blockbuster game would be better on SNES while another hit would be better on the Genesis. Each system being equally great with its exclusives and never really gaining the 1up on each other. Unfortunately this wont happen between the PS3and the 360 this gen because of the constant missteps of Sony.

I didnt think Sony would implode the way it has with the PS3 project. The numerous errors Sony made this gen you would think this was their first attempt in the console race.

-They priced themselves out of competition

-Hyped the performance of their system beyond realm of simply promoting and selling a product...they flat out lied!!! (ex. hyped late Dreamcast performance, launched with late PS1 performance...big difference!!!)

-Launched with no software...you would think they would have learned by now to launch with games!!!

The list goes on and on, but overall I would have never guessed the biggest enemy to the Playstation franchise would be Sony...

Game On....

FatalDomain
I have to agree... the only thing killing PS3 is Sony (not MS!)
Avatar image for Danthegamingman
Danthegamingman

19978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#17 Danthegamingman
Member since 2003 • 19978 Posts

I kind of am. I expected Sony to struggle because of the price but not like this.

What does everyone else think?

ASK_Story
I was, $500 to 600 consoles do not have MAss appeal, it doesn't matter how much value you think is there all people know is that its the price of a generic PC and thats not a good thing.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
599 USD with an unproven format as the headliner?

Hell no.
Avatar image for zaibutzu
zaibutzu

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

#19 zaibutzu
Member since 2004 • 1277 Posts

WOW $599 is too much for a piece of technology that is gonna stay in your home entertaining you every day without constant hardware issues for the next 4-6 years!!!. Everyone here is a gamer and if you enjoy doing it, isn't it justifiable spending that money a console that provides to your gaming needs? Sure, you might say that 360 is cheaper. But there's a reason for that. It's processor isn't as good, so is it's cooling.

Furthermore, Blue ray has more than double the storage capacity of hd dvd. Right now that's insignificant. But in maybe 2-3 years, games like gta could take advantage of this, and then 360 wouldn't be able to port the game due to it's inferior hd dvd's space.

Overall, it seems that the capabilities of the systems are the same. However, it is when the developers get more comfortable with the system that they unleash it's potential. This happens from maybe 1-2 years onwards and this is the case with ps3. John carmack himself, (he created doom 3 engine that won best technical achievement on gamespot) said that ps3 has a lot more power inside it. As for 360, do you seriously think that there is gonna be as much of a grapical improvement over the next years?  Answer is no. So look at the long run. Not at how it is going right now.

Avatar image for vashxsk8erx12
vashxsk8erx12

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 vashxsk8erx12
Member since 2004 • 264 Posts
Hahahaha, as i predicted, ps3 cost too much and will be the downfall to the system, now they are losing exclusives...its over, PS3 is losing big time