This topic is locked from further discussion.
Same reason why Bioshock gets its hype.
Lair = Factor 5. They are awsome with flight sims
Uncharted : Naughty Dog. Nuff said
asdasd
does that answer ur question?
Same reason why Bioshock gets its hype.
Lair = Factor 5. They are awsome with flight sims
Uncharted : Naughty Dog. Nuff said
asdasd
I guess we'll see how it shakes out... Personally, Uncharted and Lair look meh...
Lair=factor 5. Rouge Squadren
Uncharted=Naughty Dog. Crash Bandicoot (the PS1 games) and Jak and Daxter.
Bioware is bioware.
Splinter cell? You have to be kidding, those really aren't amazing-AAA games.
System shock 1 wasn't made by irration games, and neither was system shock 2.
Over rated FPS is over rated FPS?
You apparently have brain damage then if you think they look meh. You can say that SOME (not all) are overhyping them, but they definatly look good.
MGS4 will get 8.5 at the most, it's rehased to death.
Final Fantasy XIII will be ported over, more than likely.
IGN and 1up said that DMC4 is better on 360.
Killzone 2 will flop like the first two.
Lair sucks...period. Everyone is saying so.
The PS3 has no AAA games this year and their best bet is a rehased game that won't win GOTY because it's coming out early 2008.
I don't get why cows are hyping the hell out of these games. The 360 has had games like this for 2 years now.
Uhhh no, MGS4, LBP, R&C, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, ect. all have talented developers behind them or have had great previews so far. Why wouldn't you hype these games?Finale-
Warhawk is another one that looks like a borefest... More motorstorm fodder... pretty games with no substance....
[QUOTE="apolloluke"]Naughty Dog is good!?!?!? Uh, Crash Bandicoot sucks...Smakkjoo
Jak didn't
yeah i love ND for jak and PS1 crash[QUOTE="Finale-"]Uhhh no, MGS4, LBP, R&C, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, ect. all have talented developers behind them or have had great previews so far. Why wouldn't you hype these games?colmusterd28
Warhawk is another one that looks like a borefest... More motorstorm fodder... pretty games with no substance....
Is that why everyone who played the beta loved it and the previews have been positive so far? Please stop posting.
MGS4 will get 8.5 at the most, it's rehased to death. more so than halo? mgs is 10 years old and has four games halo is like 6 and has 3.
Final Fantasy XIII will be ported over, more than likely. nope
IGN and 1up said that DMC4 is better on 360. i cant say about this but im pretty sure the 360 version has yet to be playedKillzone 2 will flop like the first two. the 2nd wasnt a flop and well we'll see
Lair sucks...period. Everyone is saying so. o really gamespot and ign both have glowing previews for the game
The PS3 has no AAA games this year and their best bet is a rehased game that won't win GOTY because it's coming out early 2008.
threegodhalo
I don't get why cows are hyping the hell out of these games. The 360 has had games like this for 2 years now.
MGS4 will get 8.5 at the most, it's rehased to death.
Final Fantasy XIII will be ported over, more than likely.
IGN and 1up said that DMC4 is better on 360.Killzone 2 will flop like the first two.
Lair sucks...period. Everyone is saying so.
The PS3 has no AAA games this year and their best bet is a rehased game that won't win GOTY because it's coming out early 2008.
I don't get why cows are hyping the hell out of these games. The 360 has had games like this for 2 years now.threegodhalo
Go back to Team Training, you mediocre Halo player.
Lair=factor 5. Rouge Squadren
Uncharted=Naughty Dog. Crash Bandicoot (the PS1 games) and Jak and Daxter.
Bioware is bioware.
Splinter cell? You have to be kidding, those really aren't amazing-AAA games.
System shock 1 wasn't made by irration games, and neither was system shock 2.
Over rated FPS is over rated FPS?
LastSamurai14
Splinter Cell's gameplay and atmosphere is better than MGS in everyway imaginable... It is true stealth... MGS succeeds with its story telling, something SC struggles with a bit, but that said, SC is absolutly AAA anyone who says it isn't must've played the crapfests released on the inferior PS2 and Gamecube...
[QUOTE="asdasd"]Same reason why Bioshock gets its hype.
Lair = Factor 5. They are awsome with flight sims
Uncharted : Naughty Dog. Nuff said
colmusterd28
I guess we'll see how it shakes out... Personally, Uncharted and Lair look meh...
and that's why you don't have a PS3.....different strokes for different folks.
MGS4 will get 8.5 at the most, it's rehased to death.
Final Fantasy XIII will be ported over, more than likely.
IGN and 1up said that DMC4 is better on 360.Killzone 2 will flop like the first two.
Lair sucks...period. Everyone is saying so.
The PS3 has no AAA games this year and their best bet is a rehased game that won't win GOTY because it's coming out early 2008.
I don't get why cows are hyping the hell out of these games. The 360 has had games like this for 2 years now.threegodhalo
Almost 2 years. Hell, not even almost. :lol: And everything else you said makes it appear as if you're in possession of a crystal ball.
Are you? :lol:
cause of the videos look great.
I have seen many videos and this game looks tons of fun has has great graphics.This game deserves all the hype.
and i also thought uncharted was overrated untill i saw the live demo.Everything looks great about the game.defintaly AAA worthy.
[QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="Finale-"]Uhhh no, MGS4, LBP, R&C, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, ect. all have talented developers behind them or have had great previews so far. Why wouldn't you hype these games?Finale-
Warhawk is another one that looks like a borefest... More motorstorm fodder... pretty games with no substance....
Is that why everyone who played the beta loved it and the previews have been positive so far? Please stop posting.
I'd ask the cows to do the same with Warhawk... please stop posting... 7.0 thats about it... it's multiplayer on an inferior online service...
MGS4 will get 8.5 at the most, it's rehased to death.
Final Fantasy XIII will be ported over, more than likely.
IGN and 1up said that DMC4 is better on 360.Killzone 2 will flop like the first two.
Lair sucks...period. Everyone is saying so.
The PS3 has no AAA games this year and their best bet is a rehased game that won't win GOTY because it's coming out early 2008.
I don't get why cows are hyping the hell out of these games. The 360 has had games like this for 2 years now.threegodhalo
no one has said lari sucked.:|
Why again am I supposed to believe that Lair and Drake are anything more than standard...? I'm not seeing anything great... I guess when you got nothin anything looks good...colmusterd28
Because they're developed by companies with flawless track records, and the gameplay footag elooks spectacular. /thread
[QUOTE="apolloluke"]Naughty Dog is good!?!?!? Uh, Crash Bandicoot sucks...asdasd
Did you play the PS1 games? ND sold the crash liscense after PS1
Crash Bandicoot died with the original playstation
I know... I loved these games! Such a shame, they were some of my first games for my ps and i played the hell out of em.
[QUOTE="Finale-"][QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="Finale-"]Uhhh no, MGS4, LBP, R&C, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, ect. all have talented developers behind them or have had great previews so far. Why wouldn't you hype these games?colmusterd28
Warhawk is another one that looks like a borefest... More motorstorm fodder... pretty games with no substance....
Is that why everyone who played the beta loved it and the previews have been positive so far? Please stop posting.
I'd ask the cows to do the same with Warhawk... please stop posting... 7.0 thats about it... it's multiplayer on an inferior online service...
Dedicated servers. You can talk to people. You can play online. In terms of actually playing the damn games online, it is no way inferior, in fact, it might actually be superior. I would take your thread more seriously but i know you're a 100% Microsoft fanboy, so there's no point. The simple fact that you don't think any of these games look impressive shows the type of person you really are.
Someone please clarify for me why PSN Is inferior?
I mean, it doesn't have universal friends list... but at least we have dedicated servers to play on right?
When your joining a game, its not very inferior because its a basic lobby system =/
Gears was the same, and Resistance, and pretty much all online games have a lobby based system.
Correct me if I'm wrong
[QUOTE="LastSamurai14"]Lair=factor 5. Rouge Squadren
Uncharted=Naughty Dog. Crash Bandicoot (the PS1 games) and Jak and Daxter.
Bioware is bioware.
Splinter cell? You have to be kidding, those really aren't amazing-AAA games.
System shock 1 wasn't made by irration games, and neither was system shock 2.
Over rated FPS is over rated FPS?
colmusterd28
Splinter Cell's gameplay and atmosphere is better than MGS in everyway imaginable... It is true stealth... MGS succeeds with its story telling, something SC struggles with a bit, but that said, SC is absolutly AAA anyone who says it isn't must've played the crapfests released on the inferior PS2 and Gamecube...
for that you fail, splinter cell is alright and even good at some points, but it doesn hold a candle to any metal game story, gameplay or atmosphere wise
Someone please clarify for me why PSN Is inferior?
I mean, it doesn't have universal friends list... but at least we have dedicated servers to play on right?
When your joining a game, its not very inferior because its a basic lobby system =/
Gears was the same, and Resistance, and pretty much all online games have a lobby based system.
Correct me if I'm wrong
Smakkjoo
You're not wrong, Live has it's touches, but as i already mentioned, in terms of actually playing games online, PSN offers the exact same things Live offers, plus dedicated servers.
Mass Effect gets its hype because of Bioware... Bioshock gets its hype because Systemshock was amazing... Halo is Halo... Splinter Cell is Splinter Cell... Why again am I supposed to believe that Lair and Drake are anything more than standard...? I'm not seeing anything great... I guess when you got nothin anything looks good...colmusterd28
lair and drake look like quailty titles, but i cant help but notice that actual gameplay /=/ cutscenes in lair, the cutscenes look alot better.
I didn't know PSN was so 'inferior' that it would cause online multiplayer games to actually be crappy. Because it lacks some features that another service may have the core online gameplay will suffer? :lol: Yeah, in game messaging and achievements are going to detract from the actual versus gameplay. Oh yeah, trophies. "But the Second Life ripoff!" That is a whole other can of worms, want to open it?
This whole thread is like some huge genital measuring contest seeing who can bash an entire 2007 lineup at once. Nice try but gameplay videos and previews by actual gaming journalists are a little more credible than people throwing sand in the playground.
[QUOTE="asdasd"]Same reason why Bioshock gets its hype.
Lair = Factor 5. They are awsome with flight sims
Uncharted : Naughty Dog. Nuff said
colmusterd28
I guess we'll see how it shakes out... Personally, Uncharted and Lair look meh...
Halo 3 and mass effect look alright at best, other than that, meh.
[QUOTE="colmusterd28"]Mass Effect gets its hype because of Bioware... Bioshock gets its hype because Systemshock was amazing... Halo is Halo... Splinter Cell is Splinter Cell... Why again am I supposed to believe that Lair and Drake are anything more than standard...? I'm not seeing anything great... I guess when you got nothin anything looks good...Goldensun48
lair and drake look like quailty titles, but i cant help but notice that actual gameplay /=/ cutscenes in lair, the cutscenes look alot better.
We will find out soon enough. Besides, the same exact thing can be said for Mass Effect.
[QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="Finale-"][QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="Finale-"]Uhhh no, MGS4, LBP, R&C, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, ect. all have talented developers behind them or have had great previews so far. Why wouldn't you hype these games?BrownWalrus
Warhawk is another one that looks like a borefest... More motorstorm fodder... pretty games with no substance....
Is that why everyone who played the beta loved it and the previews have been positive so far? Please stop posting.
I'd ask the cows to do the same with Warhawk... please stop posting... 7.0 thats about it... it's multiplayer on an inferior online service...
Dedicated servers. You can talk to people. You can play online. In terms of actually playing the damn games online, it is no way inferior, in fact, it might actually be superior. I would take your thread more seriously but i know you're a 100% Microsoft fanboy, so there's no point. The simple fact that you don't think any of these games look impressive shows the type of person you really are.
I am a fanboy for excellent online service, amazing game line-ups and the ability to hype a game thats worth hyping... I never said that these games don't look good, just go easy, they don't look like Mass Effect...
I didn't know PSN was so 'inferior' that it would cause online multiplayer games to actually be crappy. Because it lacks some features that another service may have the core online gameplay will suffer? :lol: Yeah, in game messaging and achievements are going to detract from the actual versus gameplay. Oh yeah, trophies. "But the Second Life ripoff!" That is a whole other can of worms, want to open it?
This whole thread is like some huge genital measuring contest seeing who can bash an entire 2007 lineup at once. Nice try but gameplay videos and previews by actual gaming journalists are a little more credible than people throwing sand in the playground.
TekkenMaster606
When it comes to the core multiplayer experience PSN is on par (if not better>>>Dedicated Servers) Perihperal amenities is where XBL shines.
[QUOTE="BrownWalrus"][QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="Finale-"][QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="Finale-"]Uhhh no, MGS4, LBP, R&C, Uncharted, Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, ect. all have talented developers behind them or have had great previews so far. Why wouldn't you hype these games?colmusterd28
Warhawk is another one that looks like a borefest... More motorstorm fodder... pretty games with no substance....
Is that why everyone who played the beta loved it and the previews have been positive so far? Please stop posting.
I'd ask the cows to do the same with Warhawk... please stop posting... 7.0 thats about it... it's multiplayer on an inferior online service...
Dedicated servers. You can talk to people. You can play online. In terms of actually playing the damn games online, it is no way inferior, in fact, it might actually be superior. I would take your thread more seriously but i know you're a 100% Microsoft fanboy, so there's no point. The simple fact that you don't think any of these games look impressive shows the type of person you really are.
I am a fanboy for excellent online service, amazing game line-ups and the ability to hype a game thats worth hyping... I never said that these games don't look good, just go easy, they don't look like Mass Effect...
They look better. You're right, you are a fanboy, for all the wrong reasons. Mass Effect looking better? Not really, the most impressive thing about it is the character models and faces. Other than that, the backrounds suffer severely in comparison, plus they look better in custscenes. Way to completely ignore my statement by the way. If i want to play a game online on the PS3, i can play it in the exact same way i can with the 360.
the intellingent cow writed2 paragraphz- lets applaud him for waste 15 minutes of SONY TYPE marketingzI didn't know PSN was so 'inferior' that it would cause online multiplayer games to actually be crappy. Because it lacks some features that another service may have the core online gameplay will suffer? :lol: Yeah, in game messaging and achievements are going to detract from the actual versus gameplay. Oh yeah, trophies. "But the Second Life ripoff!" That is a whole other can of worms, want to open it?
This whole thread is like some huge genital measuring contest seeing who can bash an entire 2007 lineup at once. Nice try but gameplay videos and previews by actual gaming journalists are a little more credible than people throwing sand in the playground.
TekkenMaster606
SOny employees must be proud of YA
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]the intellingent cow writed2 paragraphz- lets applaud him for waste 15 minutes of SONY TYPE marketingzI didn't know PSN was so 'inferior' that it would cause online multiplayer games to actually be crappy. Because it lacks some features that another service may have the core online gameplay will suffer? :lol: Yeah, in game messaging and achievements are going to detract from the actual versus gameplay. Oh yeah, trophies. "But the Second Life ripoff!" That is a whole other can of worms, want to open it?
This whole thread is like some huge genital measuring contest seeing who can bash an entire 2007 lineup at once. Nice try but gameplay videos and previews by actual gaming journalists are a little more credible than people throwing sand in the playground.
Capal_vicious
SOny employees must be proud of YA
At least his post is actually legible.
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]the intellingent cow writed2 paragraphz- lets applaud him for waste 15 minutes of SONY TYPE marketingzI didn't know PSN was so 'inferior' that it would cause online multiplayer games to actually be crappy. Because it lacks some features that another service may have the core online gameplay will suffer? :lol: Yeah, in game messaging and achievements are going to detract from the actual versus gameplay. Oh yeah, trophies. "But the Second Life ripoff!" That is a whole other can of worms, want to open it?
This whole thread is like some huge genital measuring contest seeing who can bash an entire 2007 lineup at once. Nice try but gameplay videos and previews by actual gaming journalists are a little more credible than people throwing sand in the playground.
Capal_vicious
SOny employees must be proud of YA
Ok, thenwho is proud of you? :|
[QUOTE="Capal_vicious"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]the intellingent cow writed2 paragraphz- lets applaud him for waste 15 minutes of SONY TYPE marketingzI didn't know PSN was so 'inferior' that it would cause online multiplayer games to actually be crappy. Because it lacks some features that another service may have the core online gameplay will suffer? :lol: Yeah, in game messaging and achievements are going to detract from the actual versus gameplay. Oh yeah, trophies. "But the Second Life ripoff!" That is a whole other can of worms, want to open it?
This whole thread is like some huge genital measuring contest seeing who can bash an entire 2007 lineup at once. Nice try but gameplay videos and previews by actual gaming journalists are a little more credible than people throwing sand in the playground.
Finale-
SOny employees must be proud of YA
At least his post is actually legible.
a PS3 fan-boy 100% forlife, defendingthe PS3 fan-boy #1,565interesting
[QUOTE="Capal_vicious"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]the intellingent cow writed2 paragraphz- lets applaud him for waste 15 minutes of SONY TYPE marketingzI didn't know PSN was so 'inferior' that it would cause online multiplayer games to actually be crappy. Because it lacks some features that another service may have the core online gameplay will suffer? :lol: Yeah, in game messaging and achievements are going to detract from the actual versus gameplay. Oh yeah, trophies. "But the Second Life ripoff!" That is a whole other can of worms, want to open it?
This whole thread is like some huge genital measuring contest seeing who can bash an entire 2007 lineup at once. Nice try but gameplay videos and previews by actual gaming journalists are a little more credible than people throwing sand in the playground.
Watch_Me_Xplode
SOny employees must be proud of YA
Ok, thenwho is proud of you? :|
not sony, ms, or nintendo
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment