Aren't 343i better than most Sony studios according to SW rules?

Minus Halo: Master Chief Collection which wasn't an original creation and developed by other studios anyways, however Halo 4 was their own creation and it received a 9 from Gamespot.

Doesn't make that 343i better than most Sony studios given 343's first game was better than Sony's studio first games?

SCE Japan Studio's Ape Escape scored a 8.8

Polyphony's Omega Boost scored a 6.5

Sony Bend Studio's Bubsy 3D scored a 5.5

San Deigo Studio's The Mark of Kri scored a 7.5

Santa Monica's Kinectia scored a 7

Sucker Punch's Sly Cooper scored a 7.8

Naughty Dud's Crash Bandicoot scored a 6.8

Gureilla Games' ShellShock Nam '67 scored a 5.4

whilst 343i's Halo 4 scored 9, the only studio that matches them with their first game is Media Molecule with the LittleBigPlanet 1 which also scored a 9.

By System War rules, 343i is better than every Sony studio outside of Media Molecule who's no more better than them, merely equal. lol

I guess you're right as far as first games go. The Sony studios have come a long way though.

Maybe you shouldn't focus so much on non-valuable numbers.

But Gamespot scores only matter, not Metacritic, not general consensus and by that logic, 343i is better.

FWI, 343i scoring 9 on their first game whilst Sony studio's scoring 5, 6 and 7s basically means 343i will be God-tier in couple years. Be afraid, cows, be very afraid.

This thread makes no sense

this is beyond grasping for straws... for real son

Couldn't agree more.