army of two is ps3 port to xbox360

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was ps3.

hmmm

ps3 30 fps

xbox360 60 fps

owned? cry?

Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

bobogoeroeofog

Corrected.

/thread

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

NobuoMusicMaker

Corrected.

/thread

nope

PS3 STRUGGLES 30 FPS

LOL XBOX360 60 FPS SOLID

owned plus 200$ more  out of your wallet haha PIMPSLAPPED.

Who is lying here? can we get a link?agentfred

Unless the particular dev comes out and says it, I dont believe "a phone call from an anonymous EA dev working on Army of Two" 

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

bobogoeroeofog

Corrected.

/thread

nope

PS3 STRUGGLES 30 FPS

LOL XBOX360 60 FPS SOLID

owned plus 200$ more out of your wallet haha PIMPSLAPPED.

http://www.xbox360struggles30fpslolps360fpssolid.com

/thread again 

Hot news!

An anonymous dev who works on a game that hasn't even been announced yet said that the Wii will produce graphics that will make Industrial Light & Magic cry in shame! Some random dude said it so it must be true!!!

link? no link, no proofRacoonusDoodus

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

NobuoMusicMaker

Corrected.

/thread

nope

PS3 STRUGGLES 30 FPS

LOL XBOX360 60 FPS SOLID

owned plus 200$ more out of your wallet haha PIMPSLAPPED.

http://www.xbox360struggles30fpslolps360fpssolid.com

/thread again 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

pwned

So I take it tc was lying then? agentfred

No, the article is true, but I think that the website was lying about the dev calling them and telling them that. 

So I take it tc was lying then? agentfred

Yes.  I hope I made the little kid so mad that he start carving art into his body. 

[QUOTE="agentfred"]So I take it tc was lying then? asdasd

No, the article is true, but I think that the website was lying about the dev calling them and telling them that. 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

NOPE, why would a non biased site make up bullcrap?

[QUOTE="RacoonusDoodus"]link? no link, no proofbobogoeroeofog

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

I'm really interested to see whether or not the excuse for this one is going to be lazy devs.Mystery_Writer

When you say excuse, do you mean actual reason, as considering the PS3's power and untapped potential, what else could it be? Devs admit that the PS3 is harder to develop for, so it's quite obvious that that is the reason. If they properly taxed the system and put some effort in, it could easily have a 60 framerate. 

I'm really interested to see whether or not the excuse for this one is going to be lazy devs.Mystery_Writer

It is ALWASY lazy developers, PS3 is a supercomputer fromthe future, the only thing it can't run is some new games that arrived from outside the galaxy

[QUOTE="RacoonusDoodus"]link? no link, no proofbobogoeroeofog

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

And yet that's just a random website that could easily lie, and why would an EA dev call in just to say that? I don't believe it. 

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"]

[QUOTE="RacoonusDoodus"]link? no link, no proofShmenonPie

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

And yet that's just a random website that could easily lie, and why would an EA dev call in just to say that? I don't believe it.

[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]I'm really interested to see whether or not the excuse for this one is going to be lazy devs.ShmenonPie

When you say excuse, do you mean actual reason, as considering the PS3's power and untapped potential, what else could it be? Devs admit that the PS3 is harder to develop for, so it's quite obvious that that is the reason. If they properly taxed the system and put some effort in, it could easily have a 60 framerate.

why spin it? let's just safely say the PS3 is less powerful than X360 and be done with it instead of going through this gen trying to label all developers lazy.

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

NobuoMusicMaker

Corrected.

/thread

nope

PS3 STRUGGLES 30 FPS

LOL XBOX360 60 FPS SOLID

owned plus 200$ more out of your wallet haha PIMPSLAPPED.

http://www.xbox360struggles30fpslolps360fpssolid.com

/thread again 

Why would you post a link to a site that doesn't exist just to try and deny what someone is saying?

Are you really that desperate for attention? 

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

MCGSMB

Corrected.

/thread

nope

PS3 STRUGGLES 30 FPS

LOL XBOX360 60 FPS SOLID

owned plus 200$ more out of your wallet haha PIMPSLAPPED.

http://www.xbox360struggles30fpslolps360fpssolid.com

/thread again

Why would you post a link to a site that doesn't exist just to try and deny what someone is saying?

Are you really that desperate for attention?

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

NobuoMusicMaker

Corrected.

/thread

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

danneswegman

Corrected.

/thread

[QUOTE="ShmenonPie"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"]

[QUOTE="RacoonusDoodus"]link? no link, no proofRacoonusDoodus

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

And yet that's just a random website that could easily lie, and why would an EA dev call in just to say that? I don't believe it.

thats because the dev doesnt want his name to be released

i cant believe that the ps3 cant even handle 30fps and the 360 does a solid 60fps

I didnt think that the ps3 was so weak

Why is it that most people in this thread find this report "unbelievable". It sounds like the person was having a casual conversation with the dev.

Now i think you can agree that it is more than possible that something like that was said, why try to deny it like it is complete BS?

Cmon we all know its not like the dev called up and just stated that and left. Another thing its perfectly reasonable that the dev name was not released, matter of fact there is many reasons why. Figure it out and think a little.

[QUOTE="RacoonusDoodus"]link? no link, no proofbobogoeroeofog

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

So you expect us to believe that just plain out of the blue, an EA developer decided to call the people of this web site, of their own free will, not for an interview or anything, and said all this as if it were a casual conversation or as if maxconsole was some sort of super important outlet, customers, business partner, etc. and then proceeded to hang up the phone and get back to work?

I'm sorry but the chances of this being true is slim to none. Any article that begins with a random developer calling up a gaming site out of the blue just to say something like this usually is fake to begin with. It doesn't help the credibility of the story much either the fact that the name of the article poster forgot to capitalize the first letter in his name, which probably isn't his name but an Internet alias and if he's posting "professional" articles with an Internet alias instead of his formal name, that kind of just cements the fact that he probably isn't any different than you and I.

Why is it that most people in this thread find this report "unbelievable". It sounds like the person was having a casual conversation with the dev.

Now i think you can agree that it is more than possible that something like that was said, why try to deny it like it is complete BS?

Cmon we all know its not like the dev called up and just stated that and left. Another thing its perfectly reasonable that the dev name was not released, matter of fact there is many reasons why. Figure it out and think a little.

cohmiracleman

Answer my previous post.

[QUOTE="cohmiracleman"]

Why is it that most people in this thread find this report "unbelievable". It sounds like the person was having a casual conversation with the dev.

Now i think you can agree that it is more than possible that something like that was said, why try to deny it like it is complete BS?

Cmon we all know its not like the dev called up and just stated that and left. Another thing its perfectly reasonable that the dev name was not released, matter of fact there is many reasons why. Figure it out and think a little.

fresherfish

Answer my previous post.

What is there not to believe?

[QUOTE="fresherfish"][QUOTE="cohmiracleman"]

Why is it that most people in this thread find this report "unbelievable". It sounds like the person was having a casual conversation with the dev.

Now i think you can agree that it is more than possible that something like that was said, why try to deny it like it is complete BS?

Cmon we all know its not like the dev called up and just stated that and left. Another thing its perfectly reasonable that the dev name was not released, matter of fact there is many reasons why. Figure it out and think a little.

cohmiracleman

Answer my previous post.

What is there not to believe?

It wouldn't be hard to believe if it came from a reliable source, is all.

[QUOTE="cohmiracleman"][QUOTE="fresherfish"][QUOTE="cohmiracleman"]

Why is it that most people in this thread find this report "unbelievable". It sounds like the person was having a casual conversation with the dev.

Now i think you can agree that it is more than possible that something like that was said, why try to deny it like it is complete BS?

Cmon we all know its not like the dev called up and just stated that and left. Another thing its perfectly reasonable that the dev name was not released, matter of fact there is many reasons why. Figure it out and think a little.

fresherfish

Answer my previous post.

What is there not to believe?

It wouldn't be hard to believe if it came from a reliable source, is all.

Ok i will give you that.

It is still very much a possibility it is the truth.

[QUOTE="fresherfish"][QUOTE="cohmiracleman"][QUOTE="fresherfish"][QUOTE="cohmiracleman"]

Why is it that most people in this thread find this report "unbelievable". It sounds like the person was having a casual conversation with the dev.

Now i think you can agree that it is more than possible that something like that was said, why try to deny it like it is complete BS?

Cmon we all know its not like the dev called up and just stated that and left. Another thing its perfectly reasonable that the dev name was not released, matter of fact there is many reasons why. Figure it out and think a little.

cohmiracleman

Answer my previous post.

What is there not to believe?

It wouldn't be hard to believe if it came from a reliable source, is all.

Ok i will give you that.

It is still very much a possibility it is the truth.

I know you want to believe it, but how would you feel about it if it was the opposite? Be  honest now.

Yet Team Ninja can get Ninja Gaiden Sigma to run at 60FPS in 1080p on the PS3.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/775/775292p1.html

It's not that the PS3 can't, but it seems it's harder for developers to get the most out of the PS3 than it is for the 360.

Yet Team Ninja can get Ninja Gaiden Sigma to run at 60FPS in 1080p on the PS3.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/775/775292p1.html

It's not that the PS3 can't, but it seems it's harder for developers to get the most out of the PS3 than it is for the 360.

 

berga52

Adding a textures and HD coating to an old game, is not making a next gen game, just a port to next gen, there is nothin fully next gen about NG:Sigma, in fact in some 720p on 360 looked better !!! See now, NGSigma could be done with 1/10 the 360 power in 60fps and 1080p and then some

It is NEXT GEN titles, that use lighting/shadows/HDR to the max, and shaders everywhere that tax the new systems, like Gears, understand now NG:Sigma shown nothing, the fact that ALL multi games run like crap on PS3, and as time passes and games get more impressive PS3 struggles even more, mean ONE THING, PS3 hardware is shown its age, since the GPU is ancient compring to 360 one, and the less ram does not help either

http://www.xbox360struggles30fpslolps360fpssolid.com

/thread again

NobuoMusicMaker

[QUOTE="agentfred"]So I take it tc was lying then? NobuoMusicMaker

Yes. I hope I made the little kid so mad that he start carving art into his body.

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

WHO THE HELL IS MAX CONSOLE, AND WHERE DID YOU READ THAT IT WAS A PORT FROM THE PS3?

 LINK=

/THREAD - WHATEVA THAT MEANS

[QUOTE="berga52"]

Yet Team Ninja can get Ninja Gaiden Sigma to run at 60FPS in 1080p on the PS3.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/775/775292p1.html

It's not that the PS3 can't, but it seems it's harder for developers to get the most out of the PS3 than it is for the 360.

 

greg_splicer

Adding a textures and HD coating to an old game, is not making a next gen game, just a port to next gen, there is nothin fully next gen about NG:Sigma, in fact in some 720p on 360 looked better !!! See now, NGSigma could be done with 1/10 the 360 power in 60fps and 1080p and then some

It is NEXT GEN titles, that use lighting/shadows/HDR to the max, and shaders everywhere that tax the new systems, like Gears, understand now NG:Sigma shown nothing, the fact that ALL multi games run like crap on PS3, and as time passes and games get more impressive PS3 struggles even more, mean ONE THING, PS3 hardware is shown its age, since the GPU is ancient compring to 360 one, and the less ram does not help either

God I just love SW.  

[QUOTE="RacoonusDoodus"]link? no link, no proofbobogoeroeofog

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

lmao you honestly believe that EA went out of their way to call them and tell them that 360 has better framerate? That's just too funny. People are really gullible.

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"]

[QUOTE="RacoonusDoodus"]link? no link, no proofE_x_i_l_e

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

OWNED

lmao you honestly believe that EA went out of their way to call them and tell them that 360 has better framerate? That's just too funny. People are really gullible.

Not EA, a developer for EA. It's entirely possible that this could have happened, and as far as I'm concerned it's legitimate until it's proven wrong. Then again, a developer for EA told me that they were breeding gorillas and chickens to make a super army of Chickillas.  

This "news" is obviously taken from n4g.com

Dont get your hopes up lems, its probably the other way around since EA themselves said months ago that they where changing

to the ps3 as their main platform. 

"Updates:

Note from admin: There is a big chance of this story being false, as the origin of the information is questionable. We have filed it under rumors for now."

 

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

NobuoMusicMaker

Corrected.

/thread

ohh yea, you sure owned him :roll:

Link?tree-branch

umm lazy look through thread  its in there

ps3 is less powerful than xbox360.

[QUOTE="tree-branch"]Link?bobogoeroeofog

umm lazy look through thread  its in there

ps3 is less powerful than xbox360.

Then  how come ps3 launch games destroyed anything the 360 launched with? 

[QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"]

[QUOTE="tree-branch"]Link?-Reggaeton-

umm lazy look through thread  its in there

ps3 is less powerful than xbox360.

Then  how come ps3 launch games destroyed anything the 360 launched with? 

umm, perfect dark zeros graphics look 2 generations ahead of resistance fall of man texture/shader wise, only thing better on resistance was model detail.

[QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"][QUOTE="NobuoMusicMaker"][QUOTE="bobogoeroeofog"] Quote:

An EA developer has called in to let Maxconsole know that he believes the PS3 will triumph over the Xbox 360 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the PS3 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the Xbox 360 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

i seen someone say a few months ago, army of two's main platform was Xbox360.

hmmm

ps3 60 fps

xbox360 30 fps

 

owned? cry?

MCGSMB

Corrected.

/thread

nope

PS3 STRUGGLES 30 FPS

LOL XBOX360 60 FPS SOLID

owned plus 200$ more out of your wallet haha PIMPSLAPPED.

http://www.xbox360struggles30fpslolps360fpssolid.com

/thread again 

Why would you post a link to a site that doesn't exist just to try and deny what someone is saying?

Are you really that desperate for attention?